Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited logo

CRP PROVIDES UPDATE, COMMENTS ON WORLD FOOD SAFETY ISSUE

Operational Update7 July 2022CRPIndustrials

NEWS RELEASE 22- 12 July 7, 2022



CHATHAM PROVIDES QUARTERLY UPDATE AND COMMENTS

ON WORLD FOOD SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES


WELLINGTON, New Zealand – Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited (TSXV: “NZP” and NZX:

“CRP” or the “Company") is pleased to provide a quarterly update.


World Food Safety & Security


We also wish to discuss the rapidly developing World food security and food safety

concerns and Chatham’s strong strategic position in respect of both.


In a recent International Fertilizer Association announcement (attached) the importance of

recognizing the fundamental importance of fertilizers in securing World food security was

clearly spelt out.


With Russia and Belarus supplying 41% of the world supply of fertilizers and no end in sight

of the conflict in Ukraine, the world is reassessing potential sources of secure and safe

fertilizers.


As mined, rock phosphate is the only source of phosphorus, and access to low cadmium

phosphate rock is an essential part of the realignment of the supply chain to provide safe

fertilizers to feed the world.


Russia was the major supplier of low cadmium phosphate to Europe.


CRP’s focus on low cadmium phosphate in Australia, French Polynesia and New Zealand

projects places it in a unique position to be part of this restructured world supply chain.


While farmers and agronomists talk about the 4R’s for fertilizer addition i.e. right nutrient,

right rate, right time and right place; at CRP we can confirm:


• CRP has the right nutrient – low cadmium phosphate


• CRP has the right rate of supply – developing 2 Mtpa export mine in Queensland,

250,000 tpa mine on Makatea, French Polynesia and 1.5Mtpa phosphate recovery

project Chatham Rise


• CRP is developing its project at the right time – With project development

underway we are matching the current realignment in the world supply chain


• CRP has projects in the right place – Well located projects capable of meeting the

needs of the Indo-Pacific region as well as exporting to Europe

2

In summary... CRP is the right company to become an integral part of the new secure supply

chain to provide safe fertilizers to feed the growing world.


Quarterly Update


Most recently we reported on our successful participation in the Investors Exchange in the

Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) annual conference staged in

Toronto on June 13-15. Chatham was represented by CEO Chris Castle and executive

director Colin Randall. As reported, it was an incredibly busy three days as we met with

dozens of parties interested in either working with Chatham group companies, investing for

the first time, or increasing their existing investment.


The strong forward momentum established at PDAC has continued following the

conference with numerous follow up remote meetings with various parties around the

globe.


Other recent announcements include:


1. The confirmation in April of a significantly oversubscribed private placement which

raised CAD$2,197,753 (NZ$2,520,952). Due to this success Chatham now enjoys its

strongest financial position since the company was established in 2006.


2. Subsequently we announced that we had engaged CSIRO (the Australian

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) to evaluate the

potential to extract Rare Earths from our Korella mine and Korella South phosphate

ore using biomining technology. Samples of phosphate and overlying sediments

have been supplied to CSIRO for initial testing. Korella phosphate is enriched with

Rare Earth Elements (REE) and CSIRO will use biomining technology, utilizing

microbes, to study the potential to extract REE. In past exploration of the Korella

deposit the presence of yttrium (Y) mainly in the form of xenotime (YPO

4

) was

identified. The previous explorer Krucible reported an inferred JORC resource of 4.2

million tonnes at 746 g Y/tonne (i.e., 0.96 kg Y

2

O

3

/t). Also, in past exploration other

more valuable heavy REE such as neodymium (Nd) and dysprosium (Dy) were

identified as being associated with the yttrium but no systematic testing for these

additional REE was conducted.


3. In May we announced that CRP subsidiary Avenir Makatea Pty, trading as Korella

Terminals, had commenced a scoping study into a stand-alone 5Mtpa

phosphate/fertilizer export facility in the Port of Townsville (Korella Terminal). This

study is being undertaken by an assembled team of industry specialists who bring

together years of experience in logistics, major capital works construction, port

operations/construction, and financing of new major port/rail facilities for bulk

commodities.


4. At the same time a scoping study for a 2 Mtpa phosphate export mine based on the

Korella South is underway and will underpin the economic basis for the 5Mtpa

export facility in the Port of Townsville.


5. Later that month we provided a further update on the activities now taking place

under the umbrella of our 100% owned subsidiary Pacific Rare Earths Limited (PRE).

3

PRE was originally formed in 2018 to project-manage a Rare Earths Elements (REE)

study on rock phosphate nodules and seafloor muds on the Chatham Rise. PRE is

now coordinating the scoping study for concentration of Total Rare Earth Oxides

(TREO) from our Korella Mine and Korella South Exploration Area. Three Rare Earth

Oxides, Yttrium, neodymium, and dysprosium, described as critical minerals and

Heavy Rare Earth Elements, are found in abundance at Korella and Korella South as

well as Chatham Rise.


6. In June we provided a further update on the Dicalcium Phosphate (DCP)

manufacturing project we announced on 14 January 2022. DCP and derivative

Monocalcium Phosphate (MCP) are essential additives to improve bone growth and

structure in all farmed animals. DCP and MCP are added to the feed ration and are

an important ingredient in supplemental feeding. Samples had been sent in

February to phosphate technology specialists Prayon SA for testing to establish the

parameters for production of DCP through their “GetMoreP” technology. Prayon

undertook tests in accordance with the standard appraisal protocols for the

GetMoreP™ process. Initial test work suggests, with slight modifications using their

process technology suite, low-grade Korella phosphate is a suitable feedstock for

MCP production with European Union acceptable fluorine levels.


7. Most recently we reported further on the acquisition of the fully permitted Korella

phosphate mine in Queensland, Australia with its ability to generate positive cash

flows starting in 2022. We still expect acquisition documentation will be completed

and executed in the near future.



For more information contact Chris Castle on 021 558 185 or chris@widespread.co.nz or

check out www.rockphosphate.co.nz


Neither the Exchange, its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined under the policies of the

Exchange), or NZX Limited has in any way passed upon the merits of the Transaction and associated

transactions, and has neither approved nor disapproved of the contents of this press release.

An unfolding food crisis: a perspective
from the fertiliser industry

Fertilisers are a vital ingredient for feeding

the world sustainably

To understand the importance of fertilisers in this scenario, think of fertilisers

as food for plants. Just like people, plants need nutrients to grow and thrive.

Nitrogen-based ammonia fertilisers and the mineral fertilisers, phosphate

and potash (potassium), which are processed from mineral deposits taken

from the ground, are often referred to as N, P and K. It is a widespread

practice of farmers and agronomists to apply the right nutrient source, at

the right rate, at the right time and in the right place (the ‘4R’ approach).

Combinations of fertiliser applications vary, depending on the type of crop,

the soil at the farm, local climate conditions, geography and so on. Organic

fertiliser (manure, for example) has a role too; although, not at a scale to

provide the high yields necessary to feed billions and not within planetary

boundaries for methane. If farmers do not apply fertilisers, their crop yields

go down - and with the main exception of legumes, which can get one

of the nutrients, nitrogen, from the air by themselves, all crops need plant

nutrients. The efficient production, distribution and use of plant nutrients

including mineral fertilisers are essential to the global food system.

The war in Ukraine is the biggest geopolitical

disruption to hit the global fertiliser market

in decades

Global fertiliser market facts

Fertilisers are consumed in almost every country. The largest suppliers

are countries which have the relevant raw materials needed for fertiliser

production, as follows:

• For nitrogen, the raw material is hydrogen, typically from natural gas

or coal (the trend in fertiliser production is to move toward low-carbon

and ultimately net-zero emissions, using renewable energy and

innovative recycling techniques). In 2020, global nitrogen production

totalled 85 million tonnes (Mt) of ammonia. The top four producing

countries were China, Russia, USA and India.

• Gross phosphoric acid production can be used as a proxy for total

processed phosphate production. Global processed phosphate

production totaled 87Mt of phosphoric acid. In 2020 China, Morocco,

USA and Russia led production.

• Global potash production was 71Mt in 2020 and the top producers were

Canada, Russia, Belarus and China.

• The top five ammonia fertiliser producing countries accounted for 61%

of the world total in 2020. For phosphoric acid and potash, the top five

countries accounted for 79% and 85% respectively. See figure 1.

Global fertiliser prices are market-driven and determined by the balance

between supply and demand among other factors such as export restrictions,

logistics constraints and the time of year in the agricultural cycle of planting

and harvesting (‘seasonality’). The war in Ukraine is the biggest geopolitical

disruption to hit the global fertiliser market in decades.

The role of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in fertilisers

The war in Ukraine is having several repercussions on the fertiliser supply

chain. Russia is a major player in global fertiliser trade, and international

sanctions on Russian individuals, entities and financial transactions have

disrupted the flow of many commodities, including nitrogen, phosphate and

potash fertilisers. This trade disruption from Russia alone has halted 14% of

the urea volumes traded globally, 11% of ammoniated phosphates trade and

21% of global potash trade. Russia also supplies 23% of the world’s traded

volume of ammonia and 46% of the ammonium nitrate trade.

Add to the picture Belarus, sanctions on which have restricted a further 20%

of global potash trade, resulting in a disruption of 41% of world supply. To

replace this volume is not easy, despite other producing countries ramping

up supply as quickly as they can. Potash comes from deep mines and

bringing capacity online takes years; in fact, across the inorganic fertilisers it

can take from three to up to 10 years to reach that point. See figure 2.

Some of the largest fertiliser consuming regions import significant volumes

from Russia and Belarus. While some regions may be able to turn to

alternative suppliers, global supply outside of Russia and Belarus is

definitively not enough to satisfy global demand. Europe, Latin America and

South Asia are most exposed in volume terms. See figure 3.

Sanctions on Russia have also led to record high gas prices in Europe,

which has been passed through to fertiliser production costs. Natural gas

accounts for 70-80% of nitrogen fertiliser production costs, and spiraling gas

prices have led to unsustainably high costs for European nitrogen fertiliser

producers - reinforcing the case for decarbonising the fertiliser and other

sectors, already a driver in response to climate change.

The war in Ukraine has placed a cloud of uncertainty over the Black Sea

ports and shipping, coupled with sky-high insurance premiums and barriers

to financing and payments due to sanctions on financial transactions.

Precise information is difficult to obtain, but it is safe to say that this year

will not be the usual planting season in Ukraine and farmers elsewhere in the

northern hemisphere are concerned about implications for the 2023 season.

A precarious balance

In 2021, Russia or Ukraine (or both) were in the top three global exporters of

wheat, maize, rapeseed, sunflower seeds and sunflower oil, according to the

FAO, which also states that most of the countries that are highly dependent

GLOBAL FERTILISER MARKET

8

One hundred years ago, the world was in a global food shortage. The discovery in the

early 1900s of an efficient process for making ammonia out of hydrogen and the nitrogen

that is in the air led to the production of nitrogen-based fertilisers. This innovation vastly

expanded the availability of food such that today mineral fertilisers are responsible for

half of the food we eat. But now conflict in Europe is interrupting the availability of

agricultural commodities including fertilisers, weakening a global food system already

stressed by the effects of climate change and the Covid-19 pandemic, and prompting

calls for action to mitigate a growing food crisis, especially in emerging markets.

By Alzbeta Klein, CEO/Director General, International Fertilizer Association

GLOBAL FERTILISER MARKET
9

on imported foodstuffs rely on Ukrainian and Russian food supplies. Russia

is the world’s largest exporter of wheat. In addition, the World Food

Programme says that over the past 10 years Ukraine has become its biggest

supplier of foods such as sunflower oil.

These and other statistics point to serious shortfalls in food supplies. At

times like this, it is common for governments to restrict exports of strategic

commodities and products. It was already the case during the Covid-19

pandemic and was a feature of previous food crises. The International

Fertilizer Association (IFA) is apolitical; we describe what we see and reflect

on experiences from the past. While solutions to replacing production

capacity are long-term, steps can be taken now to mitigate the situation.

These include eliminating export restrictions, as the FAO has called for, and

governments with surplus stocks in vegetable oils and grains, among others,

to release some of their surplus on world markets, as the WTO advocates.

IFA members are bringing on supply and tackling distribution challenges

where they can.

And last but not least, it is time to make fertilisers essential goods. Mineral

fertilisers are precursors to wheat, soy, corn and many other everyday

staples. Without fertilisers, there will be limited production of staple

commodities and food. Fertilisers were declared essential during the

pandemic by many countries, and now it is time to do so for all.

Brazil launched a national fertiliser plan in March aiming to reduce

the country’s dependence on imports from just under 85% to around

45% by 2050. With concerns about fertiliser supplies for the 2022/23

crops, short term actions include the launch of the “Caravana Embrapa

FertBrasil” which aims to increase efficiency in fertiliser application and

reduce usage by around 20% for the next crop. For the longer term the

government aims to encourage investment in the production of natural

gas, the raw material for nitrogenous fertilisers, as well as increasing

domestic production of potash and phosphates.

The EU has a medium-term objective of reducing fertiliser usage by 20%

by 2030 under its Farm to Fork Strategy. The EU Commission issued a

Communication in March on “Safeguarding food security and reinforcing

the resilience of food systems”. Short-term plans include the provision of

direct aid to farmers to cover increased input costs and to EU ammonia

manufacturers to subsidise raw material costs. It states that free trade

agreements already in place should facilitate the replacement of Russia

and Belarus for potash and phosphate imports. Those two countries

currently account for 60% and 35% respectively of EU imports of potash

and phosphates. In the longer term, the Commission is encouraging farmers

to prioritise the efficient use of fertilisers and decrease their usage through

practices such as precision and organic farming and agro-ecology,

and also to encourage research and innovation into the substitution of

synthetic fertilisers and development of greener production methods.

The US government in March announced it would support additional

fertiliser production for US farmers to address rising costs. The USDA will

provide $250M through a new grant programme to support domestic,

independent, innovative and sustainable fertiliser production to supply

US farmers. “Recent supply chain disruptions...have shown just how

important it is to invest in this crucial link in the agricultural supply chain

here at home,” said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. A public inquiry

has also been launched on the competitive nature of the markets in

fertiliser, seeds, other agricultural inputs and retail.

The International Fertilizer Association (IFA) is the only global fertiliser association, with some 400 members in approximately 70 countries and a mission to

promote the efficient and responsible production, distribution and use of plant nutrients. The mission plays a critical role in helping to feed the world sustainably.

Figure 1: The countries with the largest production of fertilisers are dictated by the presence and economics of the relevant raw materials

(Production by country, million tonnes product, 2020)

Figure 2: Russia, Belarus and Ukraine are major suppliers

to global nitrogen and potash trade

(% share of global trade, 2020)

Figure 3: Europe, Latin America and South Asia are highly exposed to

imports from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine

(Imports by source, million tonnes product, 2020)

Countries addressing the fertiliser situation

Most nations that produce food have had to reassess their domestic fertiliser markets, to ensure the soaring

input costs do not limit production at a time when food supply is also compromised. Some examples are:

60

40

20

0

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

20

15

10

5

0

AmmoniaUreaANPhosphate

Rock

MAPDAPPotash

Russia Ukraine Belarus Rest of World

Rus+Bel+Ukr Rest of World

West

Europe

AfricaNorth

America

South

Asia

Central

Europe

West

Asia

Latin

America

East

Asia

Oceania

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

Urea

MAP+DAP

MOP

40

30

20

10

0

30

20

10

0

AmmoniaPhoshoric AcidPotash

China

Russia

U.S.A.

India

Indonesia

Saudi Arabia

Egypt

Trinidad

Canada

Iran

Rest of World

China

Morocco

U.S.A.

Russia

Saudi Arabia

India

Brazil

Jordan

Mexico

Israel

Rest of World

Canada

Russia

Belarus

China

Germany

Israel

Jordan

Chile

Laos

Brazil

Rest of World

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.