Argosy Property Limited logo

Argosy FY25 Annual Result

Full Year Results20 May 2025ARGReal Estate

1
21.05.2025


FY25 Year end result – Quality attracts quality

Argosy will present the FY25 year end result via a teleconference and webcast at 10am today. Please

visit https://s1.c-conf.com/diamondpass/10045461-jh7y6t.html dial 0800 453 055 and quote the

conference ID#10045461. It is recommended that you dial in or log in a few minutes before the start

time. A copy of the webcast will be available on Argosy’s website later in the day.

Argosy Property Limited (‘Argosy’ or the ‘Company’) has reported its results for the year ended 31

March 2025.

KEY RESULTS FOR THE PERIOD INCLUDE:

• Net property income for the period of $116.9 million, up 0.4% on the prior comparable period;

• $72.7 million revaluation gain for the 12 months to 31 March ($111.7 million revaluation loss in the

prior comparable period), up 3.6% on book value, contributing to a full year net profit after tax of

$125.9 million (loss of $54.5 million in the prior comparable period);

• Net distributable income of $55.8 million, the same as the prior comparable period (note this year

Argosy incurred incremental tax expense of $2.8 million, following the Government’s removal of tax

deductions for depreciation on buildings);

• Sound portfolio metrics, with occupancy at 96.5% and WALT of 5.1 years;

• NTA per share of $1.53 up from $1.45 at 31 March 2024;

• Portfolio gearing steady at 35.7%, in the middle of the target band of 30-40%;

• Divested and settled the non Core asset at 8 Forge Way for $35.2 million, achieving above book

value;

• Successful portfolio leasing and rent review outcomes, including 3.5% annualised rental growth on

rents reviewed and 86% tenant retention rate;

• Progress on green developments, continuing our portfolio transformation and progress to a 50%

green portfolio by 2031 (37.2% at 31 March 2025);

• Argosy achieved notable success at the annual Property Council of New Zealand (PCNZ) Awards.

The company won the Supreme Award for its 6 Green Star Built property located at 8 Willis

Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner. This property was also Highly Commended at the World Green

Building Council’s Asia Pacific Leadership in Green Buildings Awards.


2

• Additionally, the 6 Star Green Built property at 105 Carlton Gore Road received an Excellence

Award at the PCNZ Awards. These accolades further underscore the quality of our portfolio and our

commitment to sustainable practices;

• Appointment of Alex Cutler to the Board, as part of the Board succession process; and

• FY26 dividend guidance of 6.65 cents per share, consistent with the prior year.


CHAIRMAN REVIEW

Chairman Jeff Morrison said, “The business has performed well in the second half of the year, despite

difficult market conditions. The Board is pleased by the progress made towards our sustainability goals

evidenced by the green buildings completed, certifications achieved and the commencement of new

developments. We believe greening our portfolio towards more sustainable buildings, with appropriate

certifications validating their quality, will drive long term shareholder value.”

The Company won the Supreme Award at the Property Council of New Zealand Awards for the 6

Green Star Built property at 8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner. The Property Council Awards is a

prestigious awards program that recognises excellence in design and innovation in the built

environment. The Board congratulates staff and all the Company’s partners who worked on the project.

Additionally, the same building was Highly Commended at the World Green Building Council’s Asia

Pacific Leadership in Green Buildings Awards (one of only three buildings to be recognised in this

category).

8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner continues the Company’s growing expertise in retrofitting

existing buildings to create modern, attractive working environments for our tenants and their people.

We will continue to target strategic growth opportunities with green potential – with Auckland Industrial

being the current focus.

The Board is comfortable with the company's capital position and balance sheet strength. The sale of 8

Forge Way, Auckland, was settled for $35.2 million in March and proceeds will be applied to our green

developments at 224 Neilson Street and Mt Richmond. The business has sufficient funding capacity to

accommodate medium term development requirements.

Inflation is now within the Reserve Bank’s target band, and interest rates have fallen to more

reasonable levels, albeit the cash rate is still higher than the Reserve Bank’s estimate of the neutral

rate. The Company has reported a revaluation gain of $72.7 million this year, primarily driven by

market rental growth. This compares to a revaluation loss of $111.7 million in the last financial year.

Argosy continues to follow an investment policy focused on a diversified high quality portfolio

underpinned by our sustainability strategy. Key policy targets include a weighting to Industrial of 60-

70% and a weighting to Auckland of 70-80%.

At the last Annual Shareholders Meeting, the Board noted it is focused on ensuring there is appropriate

succession planning in place at Board level. The first step in that process saw Alex Cutler join the

Board in October 2024. Alex has global experience working with multinational organisations to assist


3

their understanding of the strategic importance of sustainability. Alex will stand for election at the 2025

Annual Shareholders Meeting.

A fourth quarter dividend of 1.6625 cents per share has been declared for the March quarter with

imputation credits of 0.217951 cents per share attached. This will bring the full year dividend to 6.65

cents per share in line with previous guidance. Overseas investors will receive an additional

supplementary dividend of 0.098902 cents per share to offset non-resident withholding tax. Please see

the dividend announcement today for more details.

Dividend guidance for FY26 is 6.65 cents per share, consistent with the FY25 year. Our dividend policy

is to pay between 85-100% of AFFO earnings (note the Board is comfortable being outside policy for

limited periods to reduce dividend volatility). Based on current projections, we expect the dividend

payout for FY26 to be within, but at the top end, of the policy range.

Whilst the removal of tax depreciation on buildings from 1 April 2024 imposed a significant additional

tax impost on Argosy, previous highly restrictive interest rates appear to be behind us. This, along with

the prospect of slowly improving economic conditions, provides us with some optimism for the year

ahead.

MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Argosy’s Chief Executive Officer, Peter Mence said “Difficult economic conditions and restrictive

interest rate settings persisted for most of this financial year (although some welcome relief is in sight).

The extended time to close leasing opportunities was evident in the first half of the year, but we have

been buoyed by a recent improvement in leasing enquiry.

Our portfolio occupancy at 96.5% is solid, however our core focus over the next twelve months will be

to address residual vacancy and near term expiries. We continue to receive good enquiry for green

properties with their vibrant and engaging environments, which reinforces our overall strategic

direction. Our green industrial development projects at 224 Neilson Street and Mt Richmond in

Auckland (along with future developments including the industrial property at 291 East Tamaki Road,

Auckland) underpin our strategic goal of increasing our Industrial weighting and greening half our

portfolio by 2031.

There is growing evidence around rental premiums between green and non-green buildings. A recent

CBRE sustainability report found that more than 50% of Prime and B-Grade office occupiers are willing

to pay a premium to be in space with high environmental performance (≥ 5 Green Star or NABERSNZ

ratings). Green ratings also have a high correlation with building quality and occupancy.”

Financial Results

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Argosy reported net property income of $116.9 million for the period, which was consistent with the

prior comparable period. Interest expense of $41.6 million was lower than the prior comparable period

($44.0 million). This was due to a combination of lower overall debt levels, lower rates and higher

capitalised interest.


4

Annual valuations for the year to 31 March 2025 were performed by CBRE Limited, Colliers

International New Zealand Limited and Jones Lang LaSalle Limited. The total unrealised revaluation

gain was $72.7 million, or 3.6% on book value, which compares to an unrealised revaluation loss for

the year to 31 March 2024 of $111.7 million. An increase in market rents was the key driver of the

revaluation increase. Of the annual increase, $8.7 million was recognised in the interim result at 30

September 2024.

By sector, Industrial increased by $60.6 million or 5.7%. The Office portfolio increased by $4.1 million

or 0.5%, and Large Format Retail increased by $8.0 million or 4.0%. The portfolio is 11.0% under-

rented, excluding market rent on developments.

As a result of the FY25 revaluations, Argosy’s NTA increased to $1.53 per share from $1.45 at 31

March 2024. Following the revaluation, Argosy’s portfolio shows a contract yield on values of 6.00%

and a yield on fully let market rentals of 6.85%.

The revaluation gain contributed to the net profit after tax of $125.9 million, compared to a net loss of

$54.5 million in the prior year.

Distributable Income

Net distributable income (NDI) for the year was $55.8 million, the same as the prior comparable period.

NDI has been negatively impacted in this period by incremental tax expense of $2.8 million, following

the Government’s removal of tax deductions for depreciation on buildings.

Portfolio Activity - Portfolio Metrics, Rent Reviews and Leasing

Peter Mence said “The financial year was influenced by tight economic conditions, high interest rates

and geopolitical uncertainty. The team has worked hard to deliver solid core operating metrics

including occupancy, rental growth and leasing outcomes.”

As at 31 March, Argosy’s WALT was 5.1 years and portfolio occupancy was 96.5%.

Over the financial year, Argosy completed 105 rent reviews, achieving annualised rental growth of

3.5%. These reviews were achieved on rents totalling $76.5 million.

On rents subject to review by sector, Argosy achieved annualised rental growth of 4.2% for Industrial

rent reviews, 2.5% for Office rent reviews and 3.3% for Large Format Retail rent reviews. Over the

financial year, 81% of rents reviewed were subject to fixed reviews, 10% were market reviews and 9%

were CPI based.

Argosy completed 54 leasing transactions across 57,100m² of NLA during the year. Lease transactions

were made up of new leases (22), renewals (24) and extensions (8).

Key leasing highlights over the year include;

• Cotton On Clothing Limited, Albany Mega Centre - 1,718m² on a 10 year renewal;

• Mitchell Vranjes Consulting Engineers Limited, 8 Nugent Street - 810m² on a 6 year renewal;

• Trust Investments Management Limited, 105 Carlton Gore Road - 529m² on a new 8 year lease;

• New Zealand Educational Institute, 101 Carlton Gore Road - 984m² on a new 7 year lease;


5

• Booths Logistics Limited, 32 Bell Avenue - 8,790m² on a new 3 year lease;

• Henkel New Zealand Limited, 12 Allens Road - 2,344m² on a new 10 year lease;

• Steel E.D. & Patton Limited, 39 Randwick Road - 2,304m² on a new 12 year lease;

• Lighthouse Financial Services, 23 Customs Street - 656m² on a new 5 year lease;

• Farmers, Albany Mega Centre - 3,336m² on a 6 year renewal;

• The Warehouse, Cavendish Drive - 9,427m² on a 6 year renewal; and

• Belton IT Nexus, 101 Carlton Gore Road - 500m² on a new 4 year lease.

Peter Mence said “We are pleased with the efforts of the team this year. We have managed to retain

many valued tenants and also attract new tenants to the portfolio.

The softer leasing environment was offset to some degree by the ongoing strong metrics for the

Industrial sector. This sector continues to show low forecast vacancy and positive rental growth and is

forecast to deliver solid returns over the next four years. Our portfolio was 53% weighted to Industrial

at 31 March 2025 and, following the completion of our pipeline of green Value Add development

Industrial sites, will continue to increase toward our target weighting of 60-70% over the medium term.”

Divestment of non Core Assets

The non Core property at 8 Forge Way, Auckland, was unconditionally sold in FY24 for $35.2 million

and settled in March 2025.

A further seven properties have been identified as non Core, with a combined current book value of

$147 million, and these properties are expected to be divested over the medium term.

Developments

224 Neilson Street

This project is the first of Argosy’s Value Add green industrial estates and the development is

progressing well. The 3.5ha site is strategically located, 8km from the Auckland CBD with excellent

access to State Highway 1, State Highway 20 and the wider transport network.

Argosy has successfully secured a 12-year lease agreement with national business, Bascik Transport,

for the first warehouse and this lease commenced in April 2025.

Additionally, the second warehouse at Neilson Street, comprising 15,300 sqm of NLA, is on track for

completion in September this year, with solid current leasing enquiry.

Both warehouses are targeting 6 Green Star Design and As Built ratings. The design team have

incorporated a wide range of green initiatives to help achieve the 6 Star rating, including low carbon

concrete, rainwater harvesting, solar electricity generation and intelligent lighting and air conditioning.

With approximately 1,880 solar panels, generating over 1.2GWh of energy annually, on completion the

facility will have one of the largest rooftop photovoltaic installations in the country.

Following completion, 224 Neilson Street is expected to have an end value of $110 million, with a yield

on development cost of 5.7%, and a development margin of 11.2%.


6

Mt Richmond

Mt Richmond is a 10.6 hectare Value Add green development site in the central industrial precinct of

Mt Wellington, only 15km from the Auckland CBD. The Mt Richmond development is an important part

of our long term strategy given our positive view of the Industrial sector over the long term.

The first building at Mt Richmond has been committed with a new 10-year lease agreement with the

global healthcare company Viatris Ltd (with lease commencement in the first quarter of 2026). This

building includes 6,633 sqm of NLA and is targeting a 6 Green Star Built rating.

The business park has very solid metrics, including an IRR of 9.4%, a yield on cost of 6.2% and a

development margin of 18.7%.

Peter Mence said, “The addition of Bascik Transport and Viatris underscores Argosy's strong market

position and the growing demand for high-quality, sustainable warehouse/office space.”

Acquisitions

There were no acquisitions during this financial year. However, in November 2024, Argosy

unconditionally contracted to purchase 291 East Tamaki Road (and adjacent titles). This is a 4.6

hectare, level site in a well-established industrial precinct, just 2km’s from State Highway 1.

The initial purchase price and attendant capital works is $60 million, and the fully-let holding return is

5.0%. The site is currently 58% leased, with the balance expected to be leased up soon after

settlement, in August 2025. This strategic acquisition, when developed to a high 6 Green Star Built

standard, will position the portfolio closer to the target Industrial weighting of 60-70%.

“This location is excellent and is already generating very strong leasing interest. We will be well-placed

to capitalise on strong prospective net absorption for Auckland Industrial in the coming years” said

Peter Mence.

Capital Management

As at 31 March, Argosy’s debt to total assets ratio, excluding capitalised borrowing costs, was 35.7%

1


compared to 36.5% at 31 March 2024, and 37.2% at the half-year.

The ratio reflects the net impact of revaluation gains, divestments and development activity during the

period. Argosy’s year end gearing sits comfortably in the middle of its target gearing band of 30-40%,

and well below its bank covenant of 50%.

Banking Facilities

In July, Argosy extended its syndicated bank facilities with ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited, Bank of

New Zealand Limited, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac New Zealand Limited and Industrial

and Commercial Bank of China Limited. The new Tranches and expiries are:

Tranche A: $210 million, expiry 1 October 2027.


1

The ratio excludes the right of use asset at 39 Market Place of $39.8 million, recorded in the period under NZ IFRS 16.


7

Tranche B: $215 million, expiry 1 October 2028.

Tranche D: $100 million, expiry 1 October 2029.

Argosy’s weighted average debt tenor, including bonds, was 2.7 years at 31 March 2025 (2.3 years at

31 March 2024). The weighted average interest rate was 5.1% (5.6% at 31 March 2024).

Argosy has $100 million of green bonds (ARG010) maturing in March 2026. These bonds will be

refinanced during this financial year.

Trends/Outlook

The strong outlook for the Industrial sector will continue to underpin growth. As economic conditions

improve, it’s expected the imbalance between new supply and net absorption (demand) will abate,

reducing vacancy and improving rents.

In the Office sector flexible working environments continue, but full-time remote work is declining and

the building environment is increasingly in focus by employers as a means to get staff back to the

office. The Government’s desire to get more employees back to the office will be positive for Argosy.

Although there are some cutbacks in Wellington, past trends indicate that core civil service numbers

are resilient. Many firms are looking to increase unassigned seating (hot desking), but are also looking

for more collaborative spaces, and Argosy is looking to position the portfolio accordingly.

Although national retail sales decreased over the year to September 2024, confidence is improving.

Argosy’s retail exposure is limited to Large Format Retail which is expected by CBRE to provide

relatively high returns over the next 4 years.

Argosy is very well placed. It has a strong balance sheet and a growing, high quality portfolio of

diversified properties with a clear focus on sustainability and green assets. Gradually increasing our

weighting to Industrial through our pipeline of green developments will deliver certainty and stability to

our cashflows and earnings.

The Management team, as always, will remain focused on addressing near term lease expiries within

the portfolio and ensuring that our tenant retention rate remains high.



END.

Peter Mence

Chief Executive Officer

09 304 3411

pmence@argosy.co.nz

Dave Fraser

Chief Financial Officer

09 304 3400

dfraser@argosy.co.nz

---

FY25 Annual Results
21 May 2025

Argosy Property Limited
Agenda

Vision & Strategy4

Development Update6

Results Summary9

Portfolio10

Financials13

Leasing & Sector Commentary24

Focus and Outlook28

Appendices30

Peter Mence, CEODave Fraser, CFO

Note: This results presentation should be read in conjunction with the NZX

release dated 21 May 2025. Due to rounding, numbers presented in this

presentation may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages

may not reflect exactly absolute figures.

2

Argosy Property Limited
“We continue to receive good enquiry for

green properties, with their vibrant and

engaging environments, which reinforces

our overall strategic direction.”

Peter Mence, CEO

3

Argosy Property Limited

Argosy Property Limited
4

A diversified portfolio by sector and region

A diversified asset allocation across sectors to

reduce volatility and widen growth opportunities

Targeting strategic growth opportunities with green

potential and a focus on Auckland Industrial

Maintaining a portfolio of high quality, well located

Core assets with growth potential

Proactive delivery of sustainable growth

A business culture that is environmentally focused

Executing green Value Add portfolio opportunities

to drive earnings and capital growth

A commitment to funding for green assets

A business that is adaptable and responsive

to change

Maintaining strong and valued relationships across

all stakeholders

A commitment to management excellence delivering

earnings and dividend growth

Ensuring safe working environments for Argosy and

its partners

Building a better future

Argosy Property Limited
Award winning green developments

5

8 Willis Street & Steward Dawsons Corner, Wellington

Owner/developer: Argosy Property

8 Willis Street & Steward Dawsons Corner, Wellington

Owner/developer: Argosy Property

8 Willis Street & Steward Dawsons Corner, Wellington

Owner/developer: Argosy Property

Argosy Property Limited
224 Neilson Street Development

6

NABERSNZ energy rating

being targeted

5 Star

of warehouse/office/canopy

leased to Bascik Transport

6,557m

2

value on completion

$110m

Green Built Design rating

achieved on completed space

(Warehouse B)

6 Star

Argosy Property Limited

15,300m

2

on track for completion in

September 2025

$11.1m

development margin

Argosy Property Limited
8-14 Mt Richmond Drive Development (3 stages)

will be added across two buildings

in Stage 2

will be added across two buildings

in Stage 3

Stage 1 leased to Viatris Limited on

a 10-year lease

forecast IRR on completion

Stage two planned completion

9,500m

2

39,000m2

6,633m

2

9.4%

2027/28

7

Argosy Property Limited

2029

Stage three planned completion

Argosy Property Limited
Value Add & Green Developments

GREEN ASSETS FILL DEVELOPMENT

PIPELINE

•Value Add properties are a key strategic pillar and will

transform the portfolio over the next decade.

•224 Neilson Street development underway with first

stage completed and leased. The second stage is

underway with projected delivery of September 2025.

•Mt Richmond green industrial estate will be completed

in three stages. Stage one has commenced with a

target completion date of April 2026, while stage two

is planned for completion in 2027/28.

•291 East Tamaki Road, which will be acquired in

August 2025, will be developed to the same high 6

Green Star Built standard.

~$272m

Value Add properties with potential to

deliver earnings and capital growth

PropertySectorLocation

Valuation @

31 Mar 25

32 Bell Avenue, Mt WellingtonFutureIndustrialAuckland18.7

90-104 Springs Road, East TamakiFutureIndustrialAuckland10.2

224 Neilson Street, OnehungaUnderwayIndustrialAuckland89.2

8-14 Mt Richmond Drive, Mt WellingtonUnderwayIndustrialAuckland103.0

133 Roscommon Road, WiriFutureIndustrialAuckland14.0

15 Unity Drive, AlbanyFutureIndustrialAuckland8.1

101 Carlton Gore Road, NewmarketFutureOfficeAuckland29.0

TOTAL $m 272.2

% of portfolio

12.9%

8

Argosy Property Limited
Results Summary

Net property income up 0.4%Revaluation gain to 31 March

NTA per share, up 5.6%Net Distributable Income

Dividend for FY25

$116.9m$72.7m

$1.53

$55.8m

6.65cps

9

Argosy Property Limited

Gearing within the target 30-40% band

35.7%

Argosy Property Limited
Portfolio Highlights

OccupancyWeighted Average Lease Term

Tenant retention rateGovernment sector rental incomeWeighting to Auckland Industrial

96.5%5.1yrs

86%33.2%46.7%

10

Argosy Property Limited

Annualised growth on rent reviews

3.5%

Argosy Property Limited
Portfolio at a glance

11

1.Large format retail.

2.Regional North Island and South Island. This weighting also includes up to 5%

allocation to the golden triangle area between Auckland, Tauranga and Hamilton.

Sector by value %Region by value %Asset mix by value %

53

37

10

Industrial (60-70%)Office (20-30%)LFR (5-15%)

71

26

3

Auckland (70-80%)Wellington (15-25%)Regional (0-10%)

80

13

7

Core (75-90%)Value AddDivest

12

Targets:

Argosy Property Limited
Revaluations

MARKET RENTALS UP

•Independent valuations as at 31 March

were completed on all properties.

•$72.7m gain reported, or 3.6% revaluation

gain to book value.

•Growth in market rentals. Any impact of

firming cap rates yet to come.

•The portfolio is under rented by 11%

(Auckland Industrial under rented by 18%).

6.35%

Weighted average portfolio cap rate

12

1.Book Value excludes September 2024 revaluation gain/loss.

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages

may not reflect exactly absolute figures.

31 Mar 25

Book Value

($m)

31 Mar 25

Valuation


($m)



$m



%

Mar 25

Cap rate

%

Mar 24

Cap rate

%

Auckland1,429.31,494.164.84.5%6.27%6.31%

Wellington550.7557.87.11.3%6.55%6.49%

North Island Regional & South Island56.457.20.81.4%6.86%6.86%

Total2,036.4 2,109.1 72.73.6%6.35%6.37%

31 Mar 25

Book Value

($m)

31 Mar 25

Valuation


($m)



$m



%

Mar 25

Cap rate

%

Mar 24

Cap rate

%

Industrial1,068.31,128.960.65.7%6.21%6.26%

Office771.4775.54.10.5%6.50%6.45%

Large Format Retail196.7204.78.04.0%6.59%6.67%

Total2,036.4 2,109.1 72.73.6%6.35%6.37%

Argosy Property Limited
Financials

13

Argosy Property Limited
Gross Property Income Waterfall

RENT REVIEWS UP ANNUALISED 3.5%

14

131.0

3.4

(1.1)

2.3

(2.9)

132.7

-

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

Gross Property Income

31 March 2024

Rent ReviewsVacancy/

Leasing Up/

Others

DevelopmentsDisposalsGross Property Income

31 March 2025

Rental income $m

Like for like rental growth of 1.8%

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly

to the totals provided and percentages may not reflect exactly absolute figures

Argosy Property Limited
Financial Performance

PERFORMANCE SLIGHTY UP ON PRIOR

COMPARABLE PERIOD

•Net property income and EBIT were slightly

up on the prior comparable period.

•Interest expense was lower, mainly due to

lower rates and higher capitalised interest.

$116.9m

NPI up 0.4% on the prior

comparable period

15

FY25

$m

FY24

(Restated)

$m

Net property income116.9116.5

Administration expenses(11.4)(11.6)

Profit before financial income/(expenses), other gains/(losses) and tax105.5104.9

Net interest expense(41.3)(43.7)

Gain/(loss) on derivatives1.4 0.6

Other gains/(losses)

Revaluation gains/(losses) on investment property72.7 (111.7)

Realised gains/(losses) on disposal of investment property(0.0)(1.0)

Profit/(loss) before income tax attributable to shareholders138.1 (50.8)

Taxation expense(12.3)(3.7)

Profit/(loss) and total comprehensive income/(loss) after tax125.9 (54.5)

Earnings per share (cents)14.83 (6.43)

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages

may not reflect exactly absolute figures.

Argosy Property Limited
Distributable Income

SOUND RESULT

•Gross distributable income for the year was

$64.1m, up 4.7% on the prior comparable

period.

•Net distributable income was flat on the

prior comparable period.

•Taxation expense was higher than the prior

comparable period, primarily due to

incremental tax expense of $2.8m following

the Government’s removal of the tax

deduction for depreciation on buildings.

$55.8m

Net distributable income

16

FY25FY24

$m$m

Profit before income tax138.1 (50.8)

Adjustments:

Revaluation (gains)/losses on investment property(72.7)111.7

Realised losses/(gains) on disposal0.0 1.0

Derivative fair value (gain)/loss(1.4)(0.6)

Gross distributable income64.161.2

Depreciation recovered on disposals- 1.0

Current tax expense(8.3)(6.3)

Net distributable income55.855.8

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (m)848.5847.1

Gross distributable income per share (cents)7.567.23

Net distributable income per share (cents)6.586.58

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages

may not reflect exactly absolute figures.

Argosy Property Limited
Adjusted Funds From Operations (AFFO)

HIGHER TAXATION AND MAINTENANCE

CAPEX IMPACTS AFFO

•AFFO 6.43cps, compared to 6.90cps in

prior comparable period.

•Mainly due to higher taxation, lower

amortisation and higher net maintenance

capex.

103%

AFFO dividend payout ratio

17

FY25FY24

$m$m

Net distributable income55.855.8

Amortisation of tenant incentives and leasing costs2.1 3.5

Share based payment expense0.1 0.3

Funds from operations (FFO)57.959.6

Capitalisation of tenant incentives and leasing costs(1.4)(1.3)

Maintenance capital expenditure(2.1)(2.1)

Maintenance capital expenditure recovered through sale0.2 2.3

Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)54.658.4

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (m)848.5847.1

FFO cents per share 6.837.04

AFFO cents per share 6.436.90

Dividends paid/payable in relation to period6.656.65

Dividend payout ratio to FFO97%94%

Dividend payout ratio to AFFO103%96%

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages

may not reflect exactly absolute figures.

Argosy Property Limited
Investment Property Waterfall

POSITIVE REVALUATION GAIN

18

(1)

2,014

63

73 2,149

(40)

2,109

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

2,400

Balance at

1 April 2024

Capitalised costsChange in fair valueChange in capitalised

leasing costs &

incentives

Balance 31 March

2025

Right of use assetBalance 31 March

2025 (excluding right

of use asset)

Investment Properties ($m)

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly

to the totals provided and percentages may not reflect exactly absolute figures

Argosy Property Limited
Net Tangible Assets

19

1.45

0.06

0.08

(0.06)

1.53

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.60

1.70

NTA at

31 March 2024

Profit for the yearRevaluations/

Others

Dividends paidNTA at

31 March 2025

NTA per share ($)

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly

to the totals provided and percentages may not reflect exactly absolute figures

Argosy Property Limited
Balance Sheet Management

GEARING AT THE MID-RANGE OF

TARGET BAND

•The balance sheet is in good shape.

•8 Forge Way settled in March 2025

for $35m.

•At 31 March a further $147m (across

7 properties) regarded as non Core.

35.7%

Debt-to-total-assets ratio comfortably

within the target band of 30-40%

20

1.Excludes capitalised borrowing costs.

2.Excludes Right of Use Asset at 39 Market Place of $39.8 million.

FY25FY24

$m$m

Investment properties2,148.9 2,013.8

Asset held for sale- 35.2

Other assets13.3 20.0

Total assets2,162.2 2,069.0

Right of Use Asset(39.8)(40.0)

Total assets (net of Right of Use Asset)2,122.4 2,029.0

Fixed Rate Green Bonds325.0 325.0

Bank debt

1

433.3 415.6

Total Bank Debt & Bond Funding758.3 740.6

Debt-to-total-assets ratio

2

35.7%36.5%

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages may

not reflect exactly absolute figures.

Argosy Property Limited
Interest Rate Management

FIXED RATE COVER OF 63%

•Weighted average interest rate reduced

to 5.1% from 5.6% at 31 March 2024.

•Fixed rate cover at 63% of debt.

•$170m in forward swaps, effective from

varying dates post 31 March 2025.

2.5x

Interest cover ratio. Banking covenant

set at a minimum of 2.0x

FY25

$m

FY24

$m

Weighted average interest rate

1

5.1%5.6%

Interest Cover Ratio2.5x2.4x

% of fixed rate borrowings63%71%

Weighted average duration of active payer swaps2.4 years1.1 years

Average rate of active payer swaps3.47%3.43%

21

1.Including margin and line fees.

Argosy Property Limited
Debt Profile

GREEN BOND DIVERSIFICATION 38%

•The total amount of the bank facility is

$525m with the nearest tranche expiring in

October 2027 (FY28).

•Argosy’s $325m of green bonds continue to

provide important diversification.

•The first bond matures in March 2026, and

we will refinance at some point this year.

2.7 years

Weighted average duration of Argosy’s debt

22

210

215

100100100

125

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

FY26FY27FY28FY29FY30

Facilities ($m)

Bank facilitiesExisting green bonds

Argosy Property Limited
Dividends

STEADY DIVIDEND

•A 4

th

quarter dividend of 1.6625 cents per

share has been declared with 0.2180 cents

per share imputation credits attached.

•Overseas investors will receive an additional

supplementary dividend of 0.0989 cents per

share to offset non-resident withholding tax.

•Dividend Reinvestment Plan is still open.

6.65c

FY26 dividend guidance in

line with prior year

23

6.03

6.10

6.20

6.28

6.35

6.45

6.55

6.656.656.656.65

5.00

5.20

5.40

5.60

5.80

6.00

6.20

6.40

6.60

6.80

FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

guidance

Dividend cps

Argosy Property Limited
Leasing & sector

commentary

24

Argosy Property Limited
Leasing Outcomes

of NLA leased to 31 MarchNew lease to Steel E.D. & Patton Limited

at 39 Randwick Road, Wellington

New lease to Booths Logistics for

3 years at 32 Bell Avenue

New lease to JD Sports Fashions NZ

Pty Limited at Albany Mega Centre

Rent reviews over the period,

annualised rental growth of 3.5%

57,100m

2

12yr

8,790m

2

7yr105

25

Argosy Property Limited

Leases executed, 22 new leases,

24 renewals and 8 extensions

54

Argosy Property Limited
Lease Expiry & Rent Review Profile

LEASE EXPIRY PROFILE IS WELL

MANAGED

•Largest single expiry remains MBIE in 2027.

•Average annual expiry over the next two

years (FY26 and FY27) is ~10.1%.

5.3%

Percentage of leases in FY26 expiring

26

5.3%

14.9%

18.0%

8.1%

11.2%

6.0%

10.5%

4.7%

0.6%

7.3%

9.9%

3.5%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

VacantMar-26Mar-27Mar-28Mar-29Mar-30Mar-31Mar-32Mar-33Mar-34Mar-35Mar-36 +

Percentage of portfolio (by income)

Year ending

Largest single expiry

Argosy Property Limited
Market Insights

•As economic conditions improve, the imbalance between supply

and net absorption (demand) will correct.

•Limited land supply in Auckland and Wellington continues

pressure on land values, with prime sites holding their value.

•Prime rent reviews continue to show growth in well specified

and well located assets.

•Vacancy remains low, and focused in secondary and sublease

space.

INDUSTRIAL

•Flexible working environments continue but working from home

and full-time remote work continue to decline.

•Central Government goal of returning staff to the office is a

positive development.

•Many firms are looking to increase unassigned seating (hot

desking) while also seeking more collaborative spaces.

•The building environment is increasingly in focus, as employers

try to get more staff back to the office.

•Projected demand for green buildings will exceed supply.

•End of trip facilities now a must have.

•Serviced office/meeting room facilities in increasing demand.

OFFICE

•National retail sales have decreased over the past year.

•Discretionary lines showing a significant drop in sales.

•Retail surveys indicate confidence is improving.

•Large Format Retail continues to receive solid demand in prime

locations.

•Retailers consolidating to a fewer number of locations.

•Growth in demand from offshore retailers continues.

LARGE FORMAT RETAIL

27

Argosy Property Limited
Focus and outlook

28

Argosy Property Limited
Outlook

STAYING FOCUSED ON ACHIEVING STRONG OPERATIONAL RESULTS AND EXECUTING

ON STRATEGIC GOALS

•The domestic economy is expected to gradually improve, although there is some volatility at present.

•Highly restrictive interest rates are easing.

•Lower supply and improving demand across the market, with tenants focused on prime locations and

sustainable initiatives, is positive for Argosy.

•The strong bottoms up fundamentals of the Industrial sector will continue to underpin growth.

•Argosy is well placed, with a sound capital position to continue transforming towards a green &

environmentally sustainable business.

•The key focus areas for 2025/26 are to:

1.Address existing vacancy and key expiries;

2.Progress existing green developments at Neilson Street and Mt Richmond;

3.Achieve Green Star & NABERSNZ certifications;

4.Divest non Core assets and reinvest proceeds;

5.Position the business for the future; and

6.Complete acquisition of 291 East Tamaki Road and commence master planning for future development.

29

Argosy Property Limited
Appendices

30

Argosy Property Limited
Balance Sheet Management

GEARING REMAINS COMFORTABLY WITHIN THE MID-RANGE OF THE BAND

31

35.9

31.1

35.1

36.5

35.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Debt to total assets (%)

Target Range 30-40%

Argosy Property Limited
Hedges, Interest Rates & Debt Maturity

HEDGES & WEIGHTED AVERAGE

INTEREST RATES (MARCH Y/E)

32

DEBT MATURITY PROFILE (FACILITY) &

WEIGHTED AVERAGE MARGIN AND LINE FEE

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

0

100

200

300

400

500

202520262027202820292030

Weighted Average Interest Rate (%)

Face Value of Hedges ($m)

Payer amountRate

210

215

100100100

125

1.79%

1.77%

1.47%

1.25%

1.30%

1.00%

1.20%

1.40%

1.60%

1.80%

2.00%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

FY26FY27FY28FY29FY30

Weighted Average Margin & Line Fee (%)

Debt profile ($m)

DebtBondMargin + Line Fee

Argosy Property Limited
Rent review summary – by type, sector and location

33

Type#

Previous Rent

($000's)

% of rent

reviewed

New Rent

($000's)

$ Increase

(000's)% Increase

Annualised $

Increase

(000's)

% of Total

Annualised

Increase

Annualised %

Increase

Total10576,452100%79,1672,7153.6%2,655100%3.5%

By review type

Fixed8362,12481%63,9141,7902.9%1,80168%2.9%

Market107,17110%7,8346639.2%59222%8.3%

CPI127,1589%7,4192623.7%26210%3.7%

By sector

Industrial3441,46554%43,2041,7394.2%1,73965%4.2%

Office5429,48339%30,2567722.6%73828%2.5%

LFR175,5047%5,7082043.7%1797%3.3%

By location

Auckland8151,91668%54,0212,1054.1%2,09079%4.0%

Wellington2120,89627%21,4175212.5%47518%2.3%

Other33,6405%3,729892.5%893%2.5%

Argosy Property Limited
Portfolio metrics

34

RENT ROLL BY INDUSTRYTOP 10 CUSTOMERS BY RENT

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in this presentation

may not add up exactly to the totals provided and percentages

may not reflect exactly absolute figures.

33%

16%

15%

14%

9%

8%

3%

Government administration

Transport and storage

Manufacturing

Retail trade

Property and business services

Wholesale trade

Finance and insurance

Health and community services

All other

54%

9%

6%

6%

6%

5%

5%

3%

All other

MBIE

General Distributors Limited

Cardinal Logistics Limited

Statistics New Zealand

Kainga Ora

The Warehouse Limited

Carr & Haslam Limited

Ministry of Housing and Urban

Development

PBT Transport Limited

New Zealand Post Limited

Argosy Property Limited
Industrial

Office

Large format retail

Sector Summary

Number of buildings

33

Market value of assets ($m)

$1,128.9

Occupancy (by income)

100%

Weighted average lease term (WALT)

5.6 years

Number of buildings

13

Market value of assets ($m)

$775.5

Occupancy (by income)

88%

Weighted average lease term (WALT)

4.5 years

Number of buildings

4

Market value of assets ($m)

$204.7

Occupancy (by income)

100%

Weighted average lease term (WALT)

5.0 years

35

Argosy Property Limited
Portfolio snapshot

36

Note: Due to rounding, numbers presented in

this presentation may not add up exactly to

the totals provided and percentages may not

reflect exactly absolute figures.

35.9

31.1

35.1

36.5

35.7

0

10

20

30

40

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Debt-to-total-assets (%)

99.0

98.7

99.3

96.7

96.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Occupancy (%)

1.53

1.74

1.58

1.45

1.53

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Net Tangible Assets ($ per share)

5.5

5.7

5.4

5.2

5.1

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

WALT (years)

Argosy Property Limited
Thank you

DISCLAIMER

This presentation has been prepared by Argosy

Property Limited. The details in this presentation provide

general information only. It is not intended as investment

or financial advice and must not be relied upon as such.

You should obtain independent professional advice prior

to making any decision relating to your investment or

financial needs. Thispresentation is not an offer or

invitation for subscription or purchase of securities or

other financial products. Past performance is no

indication of future performance.

All values are expressed in New Zealand currency

unless otherwise stated.

21 May 2025

37

---

1
21.05.2025

Results Announcement

Results for announcement to the market

Name of issuer Argosy Property Limited

Reporting Period 12 months to 31 March 2025

Previous Reporting Period 12 months to 31 March 2024

Currency NZD

Amount (000s) Percentage change

Revenue from continuing operations $116,882 0.4%

Total Revenue $116,882 0.4%

Net profit/(loss) from continuing operations $125,856 331.0%

Total net profit/(loss) $125,856 331.0%

Final Dividend

Amount per Quoted Equity Security $0.01662500

Imputed amount per Quoted Equity Security $0.00217951

Record Date 11 June 2025

Dividend Payment Date 25 June 2025

Current period Prior comparable period

Net tangible assets per Quoted Equity Security $1.53 per share $1.45 per share

A brief explanation of any of the figures above necessary to enable

the figures to be understood

The financial information for this announcement has been

extracted from the audited financial statements of Argosy

Property Limited which have been released to NZX in

conjunction with this announcement.

Authority for this Announcement

Name of person authorised to make this announcement Dave Fraser

Contact person for this announcement Dave Fraser

Contact phone number (09) 304 3400

Contact email address dfraser@argosy.co.nz

Date of release through MAP 21/05/2025


Audited financial statements accompany this announcement.

---

attracts
QUALITY

Annual Report

2025

QUALITY

When your goal is to build
a better future for all your

stakeholders,

QUALITY in

everything you do is essential.

By investing in achieving


the highest standards of property

development and management

we attract and retain top

QUALITY

tenants to our portfolio.

And that leads to the highest

QUALITY outcomes for investors.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202502

Contents
Building a better future04

2025 highlights10

Chairman's review14

Management report16

Numbers at a glance22

Our Leadership & Governance24

Consolidated Financial Statements30

Independent Auditor's Report58

Corporate Governance61

Investor Statistics77

Directory81

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202503

We look to drive quality and value
in every property in our portfolio.

We actively seek opportunities to

maintain and advance a property’s

features in order to enhance our

tenants’ efficiency, productivity

and wellbeing and to add value to

a property’s fundamentals.

Developing and managing

QUALITY properties

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202504

Mt Richmond Drive, Mt Wellington
The Mt Richmond development will happen

in three stages. The first, due for completion

in April 2026, includes a 10-year lease to

Viatris Limited (6,633 sqm). Additional

warehouse platforms are available for lease

or development. The second stage will add

9,500 sqm across two buildings.

The buildings will feature state-of-the-

art sustainability innovations including

low-carbon design, advanced stormwater

management, flood protection, EV truck

charging, energy-efficient lighting, solar

panels and rainwater harvesting to reduce

environmental impact.

Marilyn Storey, Argosy's Head of

Development, said, “Mt Richmond Drive is

an excellent example of a well considered

development designed to drive productivity

and employee wellbeing while making a

significant and positive impact on the planet.

It represents the standard of quality that

high-calibre tenants now require.”

This development is targeting a

6 Green Star As Built rating.

CASE STUDY

TARGETING A

6 GREEN STAR

AS BUILT RATING

STRATEGIC

MT WELLINGTON

LOCATION


Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202505

We believe in doing things right and
doing them well. This comes through in

our thinking, in our people, and in our

balanced approach. We always take a

long-term view to benefit communities

and the environment.

QUALITY in

everything we do

HIGHLY

COMMENDED

8 Willis Street/Stewart

Dawsons Corner

At the World’s Green Building

Council’s Asia Pacific Leadership

Awards in sustainable design

and performance.

The development at 8 Willis

Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner,

Wellington has been awarded a

Highly Commended at the World

Green Building Council’s Asia Pacific

Leadership Awards. This international

recognition places it among the best

Asia Pacific sustainable buildings,

making it a benchmark for green

building excellence.

Already the recipient of New Zealand’s

2024 Supreme Property Award and

numerous international structural

engineering accolades, this office

development stands as a world-class

example of healthy work environments,

sustainable design and high

performance workspaces.

Along with showcasing our ability to

retain the heritage aspects of an iconic

Wellington building, this development

showcases our unique retrofit

approach to sustainable development.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202506

+
Saatyesh Bhana

Argosy’s Head of Sustainability

Our Head of Sustainability, Saatyesh

Bhana, has been recognised with

the C3 Construction Excellence in

Sustainability Award at the 2024

Auckland Property People Awards.

Judges praised his passion and

leadership, highlighting his nearly

20-year impact on New Zealand’s

sustainability journey. Saatyesh

has led numerous major green

retrofit projects that have set new

benchmarks in energy efficiency and

environmental innovation. He has

also led the Green Bonds and Green

Reporting initiatives that have

shaped our sustainability strategy.

Community support programme

We are committed to driving better

long-term outcomes for the many

communities we are part of. Our

community support programmes

help our partners thrive.

Over the last year we have fostered

long-term community partnerships

with quality organisations such as

Variety, The Spirit of Adventure

Trust, numerous Surf Lifesaving

clubs, Keystone Trust and

many more.

These are all organisations whose

values align with ours and who, like

us, work hard to ensure a better

future for more New Zealanders.

EXCELLENCE IN

SUSTAINABILITY

GOOD CORPORATE

CITIZENS

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202507

The recent CBRE Sustainability report
highlights that tenants value quality

developments that enhance their

operations, make them more resilient

and support them in advancing their

sustainability commitments.

And that’s been our experience, with our

quality spaces attracting the highest

quality tenants.

Attracting the highest

QUALITY tenants

224B Neilson Street, Onehunga

Argosy has successfully secured a 12-

year lease with national business Bascik

Transport for 6,500 sqm, starting mid-

April 2025. The building is a premium-

grade industrial facility certified by the

New Zealand Green Building Council

with a 6 Green Star – NZ Design &

As Built NZv1.0 rating, representing

“World Leadership”.

Bascik Transport is a transportation,

logistics, supply chain and storage

provider that has been operating for

over 50 years, emphasising operational

efficiency, people and sustainability.

Tony Bascik, Managing Director, stated:

“Both parties have worked efficiently

together to establish a premium

distribution site within a short timeline.

Racking, warehouse setup and moving

in 9,000 pallets were all completed

within 12 weeks. It’s clear that Argosy

shares similar values and vision, enabling

timely execution.”

Additionally, the large warehouse at

224A Neilson Street, comprising 15,300

sqm is on track for completion in August

2025, with strong current leasing

enquiry coming from potential tenants

with a desire for a more sustainable

work environment.

Saatyesh Bhana, Argosy’s Head of

Sustainability said, “With over two

decades of management experience and

a decade of implementing sustainability

practices, we have honed our strategies to

offer cost-effective, sustainable solutions

to our tenants.”

The Neilson Street development focuses

on delivering a building adaptable to the

occupant’s current and future needs. The

occupied areas are column-free, allowing

flexible space usage configurations.

The project specification benefits the

occupant with energy efficiency and

comfort. It features a hydronic air-

conditioning system using air-to-air heat

recovery, smart LED lighting, PV solar

arrays to run the whole site and additional

electricity and water meters to target

BASCIK

TRANSPORT

224B NEILSON STREET

ONEHUNGA

CASE STUDY

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202508

2. Future proofed
– EV charging and

truck charging capacity.

3. Energy efficient lighting,

solar panels and

rainwater harvesting

ensures the development

makes the most of the

site and reduces the

environmental impact.

4. Certified 6 Green Star

Built rating, joining our

growing portfolio of

quality green buildings.

1. A number of features of the property

are well suited to the logistics, supply

chain, transport operations of Basick.

further reductions. Rainwater harvesting

is used for flushing toilets, irrigation and

cleaning the building and solar panels.

The Building Management System

provides a graphical illustration of the

building functions, allowing tenants to

view real-time data.

In addition, low carbon concrete is used,

with cement substitutes of up to 20%,

significantly reducing carbon emissions.

Stormwater management is addressed

through advanced overland flowpaths

designed to handle high rainfall events,

ensuring effective water management.

The buildings are designed with a high

freeboard that is double the building

code requirement, to provide additional

protection against flooding.

With the completion of 224 Neilson

Street, Argosy’s industrial portfolio

weighting will increase to 54%, moving

closer to our target band of 60-70%. We

look forward to sharing more updates on

this development.

6

Desig

n

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202509

$116.9m
Net

Property

Income

0.4%

2025 highlights

6.65cps

FY26

dividend

guidance

$72.7m

Revaluation

gain for the

ye a r, 3.6%

on book value

96.5%

Occupancy

5.1yrs

$1.53

Weighted

average

lease term

(WALT)

Net Tangible

Assets

(per share)

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202510

53%
3 5.7 %

71%

33%

Industrial weighting

Gearing

Auckland weighting

Government sector

rental income

$70,800

of community sponsorship in 2025

Social

Sustainability

6 Green

Star

6 Green Star Design and Build

certification in progress for the industrial

property located at 224B Neilson Street

33%

Completed green assets

percentage of portfolio

To i t ū

Maintained a Toitū Certified Net

Carbon Zero certification since 2020

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202511

Building a
better future

G

r

e

e

n

R

e

s

i

l

i

e

n

t

D

i

v

e

r

s

i

f

i

e

d

Proactive delivery of

sustainable growth

A business culture that is

environmentally focused

Executing green Value Add

portfolio opportunities to drive

earnings and capital growth

A commitment to funding for

green assets

A business that is adaptable

and responsive to change

Maintaining strong and

valued relationships across

all stakeholders

A commitment to management

excellence delivering earnings

and dividend growth

Ensuring safe working

environments for Argosy

and its partners

A diversified portfolio by sector

and region

A diversified asset allocation

across sectors to reduce volatility

and widen growth opportunities

Targeting strategic growth

opportunities with green potential

and a focus on the Auckland

Industrial market

Maintaining a portfolio of

high quality, well located

Core assets with growth potential

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202512

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202513

Sustainable
dividend growth

over the long term

“Greening our portfolio towards more sustainable

buildings, with appropriate certifications validating

their quality, will drive long term shareholder value.”

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202514

Chairman's review

On behalf of the Board of Directors, it's my pleasure
to present Argosy’s 2025 Annual Report.

The business has performed well in the second half of the year,

despite difficult market conditions. The Board is pleased by

the progress made towards our sustainability goals evidenced

by the green buildings completed, certifications achieved

and the commencement of new developments. We believe

greening our portfolio towards more sustainable buildings, with

appropriate certifications validating their quality, will drive long

term shareholder value.

The Company won the Supreme Award at the Property Council

of New Zealand Awards for the 6 Green Star Built property

at 8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner. The Property

Council Awards is a prestigious awards program that recognises

excellence in design and innovation in the built environment.

The Board congratulates staff and all the Company’s partners

who worked on the project. Additionally, the same building was

Highly Commended at the World Green Building Council’s Asia

Pacific Leadership in Green Buildings Awards (one of only three

buildings to be recognised in this category).

8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner continues the

Company’s growing expertise in retrofitting existing buildings to

create modern, attractive working environments for our tenants

and their people. We will continue to target strategic growth

opportunities with green potential – with Auckland Industrial

being the current focus.

The Board is comfortable with the company's capital position

and balance sheet strength. The sale of 8 Forge Way, Auckland,

was settled for $35.2 million in March and proceeds will be

applied to our green developments at 224 Neilson Street and

Mt Richmond. The business has sufficient funding capacity to

accommodate medium term development requirements.

Inflation is now within the Reserve Bank’s target band, and

interest rates have fallen to more reasonable levels, albeit the

cash rate is still higher than the Reserve Bank’s estimate of the

neutral rate. The Company has reported a revaluation gain of

$72.7 million this year, primarily driven by market rental growth.

This compares to a revaluation loss of $111.7 million in the last

financial year.

Argosy continues to follow an investment policy focused

on a diversified high quality portfolio underpinned by our

sustainability strategy. Key policy targets include a weighting

to Industrial of 60-70% and a weighting to Auckland of 70-80%.

Governance and succession planning

Argosy’s Annual Shareholders Meeting (ASM) will be held

as a hybrid meeting on 22 July at 2pm at the Royal New

Zealand Yacht Squadron in Auckland. Argosy continues to

support hybrid functionality, which allows shareholders to

attend virtually and participate in all elements of the meeting,

including questions and answers and completing all voting.

At the last ASM, the Board noted it is focused on ensuring

there is appropriate succession planning in place at Board

level. The first step in that process saw Alex Cutler join the

Board in October 2024. Alex has global experience working

with multinational organisations to assist their understanding

of the strategic importance of sustainability. Alex will stand for

election at the 2025 Annual Shareholders Meeting.

Dividends

A fourth quarter dividend of 1.6625 cents per share has been

declared for the March quarter with imputation credits of

0.217951 cents per share attached. This will bring the full year

dividend to 6.65 cents per share in line with previous guidance.

Overseas investors will receive an additional supplementary

dividend of 0.098902 cents per share to offset non-resident

withholding tax.

Dividend guidance for FY26 is 6.65 cents per share, consistent

with the FY25 year. Our dividend policy is to pay between

85-100% of AFFO earnings (note the Board is comfortable being

outside policy for limited periods to reduce dividend volatility).

Based on current projections, we expect the dividend payout for

FY26 to be within, but at the top end, of the policy range.

Outlook

Whilst the removal of tax depreciation on buildings from 1 April

2024 imposed a significant additional tax impost on Argosy,

previous highly restrictive interest rates appear to be behind

us. This, along with the prospect of slowly improving economic

conditions, provides us with some optimism for the year ahead.

The key strategic goal around greening the portfolio, in

particular making progress with our green industrial projects

at Neilson Street and Mt Richmond, will support resilient and

sustainable dividend growth to shareholders over the long term.

The Management team will also remain focused on addressing

near term lease expiries within the portfolio and ensuring that

our tenant retention rate remains high.

Jeff Morrison

Chairman

FY25 FULL YEAR DIVIDEND

6.65cps

Consistent with the prior year

FY26 DIVIDEND GUIDANCE

6.65cps

Consistent with the FY25 dividend

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202515

A clear focus
on sustainability

“Our green developments will deliver certainty and

stability to our cashflows and earnings.”

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202516

Management report

Key results for the period include:

Net property income for the period of $116.9 million, up 0.4%

on the prior comparable period;

•$72.7 million revaluation gain for the 12 months to 31 March

($111.7 million revaluation loss in the prior comparable

period), up 3.6% on book value, contributing to a full year

net profit after tax of $125.9 million (loss of $54.5 million in

the prior comparable period);

•Net distributable income of $55.8 million, the same as the

prior comparable period (note this year Argosy incurred

incremental tax expense of $2.8 million, following the

Government’s removal of tax deductions for depreciation

on buildings);

•Sound portfolio metrics, with occupancy at 96.5% and WALT

of 5.1 years;

•NTA per share of $1.53 up from $1.45 at 31 March 2024;

•Portfolio gearing steady at 35.7%, in the middle of the target

band of 30-40%;

•Divested and settled the non Core asset at 8 Forge Way for

$35.2 million, achieving above book value;

•Successful portfolio leasing and rent review outcomes,

including 3.5% annualised rental growth on rents reviewed

and 86% tenant retention rate;

•Progress on green developments, continuing our portfolio

transformation and progress to a 50% green portfolio by

2031 (37.2% at 31 March 2025);

•Argosy achieved notable success at the annual Property

Council of New Zealand (PCNZ) Awards. The company

won the Supreme Award for its 6 Green Star Built

property located at 8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner.

This property was also Highly Commended at the World

Green Building Council’s Asia Pacific Leadership in Green

Buildings Awards.

•Additionally, the 6 Star Green Built property at 105 Carlton

Gore Road received an Excellence Award at the PCNZ

Awards. These accolades further underscore the quality of

our portfolio and our commitment to sustainable practices;

•Appointment of Alex Cutler to the Board, as part of the Board

succession process; and

•FY26 dividend guidance of 6.65 cents per share, consistent

with the prior year.

Difficult economic conditions and restrictive interest rate

settings persisted for most of this financial year (although some

welcome relief is in sight). The extended time to close leasing

opportunities was evident in the first half of the year, but we

have been buoyed by a recent improvement in leasing enquiry.

Our portfolio occupancy at 96.5% is solid, however our core

focus over the next twelve months will be to address residual

vacancy and near term expiries. We continue to receive good

enquiry for green properties with their vibrant and engaging

environments, which reinforces our overall strategic direction.

Our green industrial development projects at 224 Neilson Street

and Mt Richmond in Auckland (along with future developments

including the industrial property at 291 East Tamaki Road,

Auckland) underpin our strategic goal of increasing our

Industrial weighting and greening half our portfolio by 2031.

There is growing evidence around rental premiums between

green and non-green buildings. A recent CBRE sustainability

report found that more than 50% of Prime and B-Grade office

occupiers are willing to pay a premium to be in space with

high environmental performance (≥ 5 Green Star or NABERSNZ

ratings). Green ratings also have a high correlation with building

quality and occupancy.

Financial Results

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Argosy reported net property income of $116.9 million for

the period, which was consistent with the prior comparable

period. Interest expense of $41.6 million was lower than the

prior comparable period ($44.0 million). This was due to a

combination of lower overall debt levels, lower rates and higher

capitalised interest.

Annual valuations for the year to 31 March 2025 were

performed by CBRE Limited, Colliers International New Zealand

Limited and Jones Lang LaSalle Limited. The total unrealised

revaluation gain was $72.7 million, or 3.6% on book value,

which compares to an unrealised revaluation loss for the year

to 31 March 2024 of $111.7 million. An increase in net market

rentals was the key driver of the revaluation increase. Of the

annual increase, $8.7 million was recognised in the interim

result at 30 September 2024.

By sector, Industrial increased by $60.6 million or 5.7%. The

Office portfolio increased by $4.1 million or 0.5%, and Large

Format Retail increased by $8.0 million or 4.0%. The portfolio is

11.0% under-rented, excluding market rent on developments.

As a result of the FY25 revaluations, Argosy’s NTA increased

to $1.53 per share from $1.45 at 31 March 2024. Following the

revaluation, Argosy’s portfolio shows a contract yield on values

of 6.00% and a yield on fully let market rentals of 6.85%.

The revaluation gain contributed to the net profit after tax of

$125.9 million, compared to a net loss of $54.5 million in the

prior year.

NET PROPERTY INCOME

$116.9m

Up 0.4% on prior period

ANNUALISED RENTAL GROWTH OF

3.5%

On rents reviewed

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202517

DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME
Net distributable income (NDI) for the year was $55.8 million,

the same as the prior comparable period. NDI has been

negatively impacted in this period by incremental tax expense

of $2.8 million, following the Government’s removal of tax

deductions for depreciation on buildings.

Portfolio Metrics, Rent Reviews and Leasing

The financial year was influenced by tight economic conditions,

high interest rates and geopolitical uncertainty. The team has

worked hard to deliver solid core operating metrics including

occupancy, rental growth and leasing outcomes.

As at 31 March, Argosy’s WALT was 5.1 years and portfolio

occupancy was 96.5%.

Over the financial year, Argosy completed 105 rent reviews,

achieving annualised rental growth of 3.5%. These reviews were

achieved on rents totalling $76.5 million.

On rents subject to review by sector, Argosy achieved

annualised rental growth of 4.2% for Industrial rent reviews,

2.5% for Office rent reviews and 3.3% for Large Format Retail

rent reviews. Over the financial year, 81% of rents reviewed were

subject to fixed reviews, 10% were market reviews and 9% were

CPI based.

Argosy completed 54 leasing transactions across 57,100m

2

of

NLA during the year. Lease transactions were made up of new

leases (22), renewals (24) and extensions (8).

Key leasing highlights over the year include:

•Cotton On Clothing Limited, Albany Mega Centre - 1,718m

2

on a 10 year renewal;

•Mitchell Vranjes Consulting Engineers Limited, 8 Nugent

Street - 810m

2

on a 6 year renewal;

•Trust Investments Management Limited, 105 Carlton Gore

Road - 529m

2

on a new 8 year lease;

•New Zealand Educational Institute, 101 Carlton Gore Road -

984m

2

on a new 7 year lease;

•Booths Logistics Limited, 32 Bell Avenue - 8,790m

2

on a new

3 year lease;

•Henkel New Zealand Limited, 12 Allens Road - 2,344m

2

on a

new 10 year lease;

•Steel E.D. & Patton Limited, 39 Randwick Road - 2,304m

2

on

a new 12 year lease;

•Lighthouse Financial Services, 23 Customs Street - 656m

2

on a new 5 year lease;

•Farmers, Albany Mega Centre - 3,336m

2

  on a 6

year renewal;

•The Warehouse, Cavendish Drive - 9,427m

2

  on a 6 year

renewal; and

•Belton IT Nexus, 101 Carlton Gore Road - 500m

2

on a new 4

year lease.

We are pleased with the efforts of the team this year. We have

managed to retain many valued tenants and also attract new

tenants to the portfolio.

The softer leasing environment was offset to some degree by

the ongoing strong bottom-up fundamentals for the Industrial

sector. This sector continues to show low forecast vacancy and

positive rental growth and is forecast to deliver solid returns

over the next four years. Our portfolio was 53% weighted to

Industrial at 31 March 2025 and, following the completion of

our pipeline of green Value Add development Industrial sites,

will continue to increase toward our target weighting of 60-70%

over the medium term.

Divestment of non Core Assets

The non Core property at 8 Forge Way, Auckland, was

unconditionally sold in FY24 for $35.2 million and settled in

March 2025.

A further seven properties have been identified as non Core,

with a combined current book value of $147 million, and these

properties are expected to be divested over the medium term.

Developments

224 NEILSON STREET

This project is the first of Argosy’s Value Add green industrial

estates and the development is progressing well. The 3.5ha

site is strategically located, 8km from the Auckland CBD with

excellent access to State Highway 1, State Highway 20 and the

wider transport network.

Argosy has successfully secured a 12-year lease agreement with

national business, Bascik Transport, for the first warehouse and

this lease commenced in April 2025.

Additionally, the second warehouse at  Neilson Street,

comprising 15,300 sqm of NLA, is on track for completion in

September this year, with solid current leasing enquiry.

Both warehouses are targeting 6 Green Star Design and As

Built ratings. The design team have incorporated a wide range

of green initiatives to help achieve the 6 Star rating, including

low carbon concrete, rainwater harvesting, solar electricity

generation and intelligent lighting and air conditioning. With

approximately 1,880 solar panels, generating over 1.2GWh of

energy annually, on completion the facility will have one of the

largest rooftop photovoltaic installations in the country.

Following completion, 224 Neilson Street is expected to have an

end value of $110 million, with a yield on development cost of

5.7%, and a development margin of 11.2%.

MT RICHMOND

Mt Richmond is a 10.6 hectare Value Add green development

site in the central industrial precinct of Mt Wellington, only 15km

from the Auckland CBD. The Mt Richmond development is an

important part of our long term strategy given our positive view

of the Industrial sector over the long term.

The first building at Mt Richmond has been committed with

a new 10-year lease agreement with the global healthcare

company Viatris Ltd (with lease commencement in the first

quarter of 2026). This building includes 6,633 sqm of NLA and

is targeting a 6 Green Star Built rating.

The business park has very solid metrics, including an IRR

of 9.4%, a yield on cost of 6.2% and a development margin

of 18.7%.

The addition of Bascik Transport and Viatris underscores

Argosy's strong market position and the growing demand for

high-quality, sustainable warehouse/office space.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202518

Management report

Acquisitions
There were no acquisitions during this financial year. However,

in November 2024, Argosy unconditionally contracted to

purchase 291 East Tamaki Road (and adjacent titles). This is

a 4.6 hectare, level site in a well-established industrial precinct,

just 2km’s from State Highway 1.

The initial purchase price and attendant capital works is

$60 million, and the fully-let holding return is 5.0%. The site

is currently 58% leased, with the balance expected to be

leased up soon after settlement, in August 2025. This strategic

acquisition, when developed to a high 6 Green Star Built

standard, will position the portfolio closer to the target Industrial

weighting of 60-70%.

This location is excellent and is already generating strong

leasing interest. We will be well-placed to capitalise on strong

prospective net absorption for Auckland Industrial in the

coming years.

Capital Management

As at 31 March, Argosy’s debt to total assets ratio, excluding

capitalised borrowing costs, was 35.7% compared to 36.5% at

31 March 2024, and 37.2% at the half-year.

The ratio reflects the net impact of revaluation gains,

divestments and development activity during the period.

Argosy’s year end gearing sits comfortably in the middle of

its target gearing band of 30-40%, and well below its bank

covenant of 50%.

Banking Facilities

In July, Argosy extended its syndicated bank facilities with

ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited, Bank of New Zealand Limited,

Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac New Zealand

Limited and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited.

The new Tranches and expiries are:

Tranche A: $210 million, expiry 1 October 2027.

Tranche B: $215 million, expiry 1 October 2028.

Tranche D: $100 million, expiry 1 October 2029.

Argosy’s weighted average debt tenor, including bonds,

was 2.7 years at 31 March 2025 (2.3 years at 31 March

2024). The weighted average interest rate was 5.1% (5.6% at

31 March 2024).

Argosy has $100 million of green bonds (ARG010) maturing

in March 2026. These bonds will be refinanced during this

financial year.

Trends/Outlook

The strong bottom up fundamentals of the Industrial sector

will continue to underpin growth. As economic conditions

improve, it’s expected the imbalance between new supply and

net absorption (demand) will abate, reducing vacancy and

improving rents.

In the Office sector flexible working environments continue,

but full-time remote work is declining and the building

environment is increasingly in focus by employers as a means

to get staff back to the office. The Government’s desire to

get more employees back to the office will be positive for

Argosy. Although there are some cutbacks in Wellington, past

trends indicate that core civil service numbers are resilient.

Many firms are looking to increase unassigned seating (hot

desking), but are also looking for more collaborative spaces

(two discrepant trends) and Argosy is looking to position the

portfolio accordingly.

Although national retail sales decreased over the year to

September 2024, confidence is improving. Argosy’s retail

exposure is limited to Large Format Retail which is expected

by CBRE to provide relatively high returns over the next 4 years.

Argosy is very well placed. It has a strong balance sheet and

a growing, high quality portfolio of diversified properties with

a clear focus on sustainability and green assets. Gradually

increasing our weighting to Industrial through our pipeline of

green developments will deliver certainty and stability to our

cashflows and earnings.

The Management team, as always, will remain focused on

addressing near term lease expiries within the portfolio and

ensuring that our tenant retention rate remains high.

Peter Mence

Chief Executive Officer

Management Report

Diversification pays

dividends

“After another challenging year affected by lockdowns

and traffic light settings, its pleasing to have delivered

what we consider to be a very solid full year result to

shareholders.”

Peter Mence

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Dave Fraser

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

8

Annual Report 2022Argosy Property Limited

We delivered on all of our operational focus areas around

vacancies, key expiries and completing developments. We also

divested non-core buildings during the year at healthy premiums

to book value. Our core portfolio metrics have remained sound

despite the operational environment being so difficult for

everyone.

8-14 Willis Street has now been handed over to Statistics New

Zealand. At a total cost o

f $xm, the handover sees Argosy complete

its largest green development project in its history. If we achieve

our target 6 Green Stars the building will certainly be the jewel in

our crown. The Wellington office market continues to exhibit

strong fundamentals which we don’t see waning for some time.

Our ongoing exposure to Government rental streams provides a

high degree of certainty and stability during uncertain times.

Master planning at Argosy’s two key Auckland industrial estates

at Mt Richmond Road and Neilson Street are progressing and we

are fielding a lot of market inquiry for these sites which will be

repurposed into green industrial estates. We’re excited about the

potential these sustainably focused properties bring to the

portfolio and the cross section of new industrial tenants showing

interest. We think strong industrial fundamentals and the fact the

sector is forecast to be the best performer over the next five years

is underpinning occupier interest.

The balance of the portfolio is in excellent shape. Argosy’s capital

structure is sound and we have capacity to execute on

opportunities as they arise. However, with interest rates rising it

we are focusing more on our organic value add development

pipeline. Given the pipeline of work we see ahead, we’ve

resourced the business and development team up accordingly.

Highlights

Key highlights for the period include:


Continued focus on sustainability and green developments;


Record interim net profit after tax of $xx.0 million;


Net property income for the period up xx%;


High occupancy (~9x%) and WALT (5.x years);


Strong portfolio leasing and rent review outcomes, including

xx% annualised rental growth on rents reviewed;


7WQ in Wellington is now 100% leased;


$xx million annual revaluation gain, an increase of x% on book

value;


Increase in NTA per share to $1.xx from $1.53 at 31 March 2021,

a xx% increase; and


FY23 dividend guidance of 6.65 cents per share under the new

dividend policy which commenced from 1 April 2022.

Financial Results

Statement of Comprehensive Income

For the 12 months to 31 March, Argosy reported net property

income of $xx million for the period, up x% compared with the

prior comparable period.

Solid like for like rental growth was bolstered by a full year

contribution from Mt Richmond and lower Covid-19 rent rebates

over the period, partially offset by disposals.

For the year to 31 March, Argosy provided for $x million in rental

abatements to tenants and no deferrals.

Net interest expense of $xx million was up/down by $xx million

on the prior comparable period, primarily due to xxx [lower

overall debt levels and higher capitalised interest].

Annual valuations for the year to 31 March were performed by

CBRE, Colliers International New Zealand Limited, Bayleys and

Jones Lang Lasalle. The total unrealised revaluation gain for the

year to 31 March was $xx million or a xx% increase above book

value. The portfolio is x% under-rented, excluding market rent

on vacant space.

Current tax expense was higher / lower due to large deductions

recorded in the prior comparable period and the non-assessable

deposit for the Albany Lifestyle Centre.

Distributable Income

Net distributable income for the year was $xx million compared

to $.0 million in the prior comparable period.

Valuations

The work performed by the valuers resulted in an annual

revaluation uplift of $x million, or a x% increase above book value.

By location, Auckland was the largest contributor to the total year

end valuation results with an unrealised revaluation increase of

$x million or 84% of the total portfolio uplift. By sector, and at

~50% of Argosy’s portfolio by value Industrial was the key driver

of the overall gain at $x million, up x% on book value. The Office

portfolio increased $x million, and Large Format Retail increased

by $x million.

As a result of the FY22 revaluation gain, Argosy’s NTA increased

to $1.xx, or xx% from $1.64 at 31 March 2021. Following the

revaluation, Argosy’s portfolio shows a contract yield on values of

5.xx% and a yield on fully let market rentals of 5.xx%.

Outlook

With the economy facing a range of headwinds, the next 6-12

months will be challenging for the domestic economy, but we’re

ready for it. We’ll continue to work hard on the things we can

control. On the operational side this is leasing up vacancies and

renewing expiring leases. On the strategic side, we’ll keep

working closely with our tenants and supporting their growth

aspirations, completing our existing green projects and master

planning and development of our value add opportunities. All of

these support the delivery of our ten year strategic plan and

sustainable distributions to shareholders.

I look forward to updating all our stakeholders at our Annual

Meeting in June.

PETER MENCE

Chief Executive Officer

NEED TO UPDATE

SIGNATURE

DAVE FRASER

Chief Financial Officer

9

Annual Report 2022Argosy Property Limited

Dave Fraser

Chief Financial Officer

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202519

Investment Framework
Argosy has a Clearly Defined Investment Strategy

Argosy is, and will remain, invested in a portfolio that is

diversified by sector, location and tenant mix. The Investment

Strategy is unchanged and Argosy’s portfolio will continue to

consist primarily of Core and Value Add properties.

Core

Core properties are well constructed, well-located assets which

are intended to be long-term investments of more than 10

years. The Core properties target is between 75% to 90% of the

portfolio by value. Core properties are well located with strong

long-term generic demand, a leasing profile that provides for

rental growth of at least CPI and good structural integrity with

minimal maintenance capital expenditure required.

Value Add

Value Add properties are assets which, through skilled asset

management, can increase future earnings and provide capital

growth. Value Add properties will already be well located

with the potential for strong long-term tenant demand. These

properties are available for near to medium-term repositioning

or development with the view to moving into the Core category.

Investment Policy

The Investment Policy clearly defines what properties Argosy

will seek to own by setting the boundaries within which it

will operate and invest. It delivers a clear acquisition checklist

and every potential acquisition (and portfolio asset) can be

measured against that checklist. In some cases, a portfolio

of assets may be considered for acquisition. The strategy for

a potential portfolio acquisition must be consistent with the

overall Argosy Portfolio Investment Strategy (i.e. the majority

by value of the properties are either Core or offer potential

to move to Core in the medium-term). Investment Policy

target bands also reflect development opportunities over the

medium-term and the effect on overall portfolio composition.

The Industrial target is 60-70%, Office is 20-30% and the Large

Format Retail target is 5-15%. Argosy’s diversified portfolio of

quality properties has an average value of $42.2 million. Liquid

properties, which are properties that could potentially be under

contract within a short period, currently represent 18% of the

portfolio or $380.4 million.

Capital Management

The optimal capital structure for Argosy is one that enables it

to maximise its earnings yield through the property cycle within

the following parameters:

•properties can be acquired when they meet the approved

Investment Policy criteria, or sold when they are non Core;

•there are no forced sales of properties or a requirement to

issue equity at a price that is dilutive to shareholders;

•measured dividend growth is maintained.

Argosy’s debt-to-total assets ratio target band remains at

30-40%. This band allows Argosy flexibility to react to changing

financial and property market conditions. Any movement

beyond pre-set parameters requires an action plan and

timeframe to move debt levels to within the prescribed range.

Risk Management

Argosy has a robust risk assessment process. Risk assessment

reviews are carried out by a representative cross-section

of Argosy’s management team at least twice a year in

accordance with Argosy’s Risk Management Framework. A

risk assessment review has three phases: identification of

material risks arising from Argosy’s operation; assessment of

the probability and consequences of the risk; and development

of controls to achieve a level of residual risk that is within

Argosy’s risk appetite.

Argosy generally operates within a medium, low to very low

overall risk range. Argosy has a low risk appetite for risks

associated with managing developments, Value Add projects

and compliance matters. Please also refer pages 75-76 of this

report for more detail on key risks and mitigations.

PORTFOLIO MIX BY SECTOR

53%Industrial

37%Office

10%Large Format Retail

“Our Investment Policy is a key pillar of

our strategy of creating a green, resilient and

diversified portfolio.”

Peter Mence

CEO

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202520

Management report

Investment Policy
Argosy has a Clearly Defined Investment Policy

Argosy is, and will remain, invested in a portfolio that is

diversified by sector, location and tenant mix. The Investment

Strategy is unchanged and Argosy’s portfolio will continue to

consist primarily of Core and Value Add properties.

Core

Core properties are well constructed, well located assets which

are intended to be long-term investments of more than 10

years. The Core properties target is between 75% to 90% of the

portfolio by value. Core properties are well located with strong

long-term generic demand, a leasing profile that provides for

rental growth of at least CPI and good structural integrity with

minimal maintenance capital expenditure required.

Value Add

Value Add properties are assets which, through skilled asset

management, can increase future earnings and provide capital

growth. Value Add properties will already be well located

with the potential for strong long-term tenant demand. These

properties are available for near to medium-term repositioning

or development with the view to moving into the Core category.

Investment Policy

The Investment Policy clearly defines what properties Argosy

will seek to own by setting the boundaries within which it

will operate and invest. It delivers a clear acquisition checklist

and every potential acquisition (and portfolio asset) can be

measured against that checklist.

In some cases, a portfolio of assets may be considered for

acquisition. The strategy for a potential portfolio acquisition

must be consistent with the overall Argosy Portfolio Investment

Strategy (i.e. the majority by value of the properties are either

Core or offer potential to move to Core in the medium-term).

In certain circumstances, exceptions to the Investment Policy

may be considered where an acquisition is made to meet the

requirements of a valued tenant.

Investment Policy target bands also reflect development

opportunities over the medium-term and the effect on overall

portfolio composition. The Industrial target is 60-70%, Office is

20-30% and the Large Format Retail target is 5-15%. Argosy’s

diversified portfolio of quality properties has an average value of

$39.5 million. Liquid properties, which are properties that could

potentially be under contract within a short period, currently

represent 18% of the portfolio or $362 million.

Capital Management

The optimal capital structure for Argosy is one that enables it

to maximise its earnings yield through the property cycle within

the following parameters:

•properties can be acquired when they meet the approved

Investment Policy criteria, or sold when they are non Core;

•there are no forced sales of properties or a requirement to

issue equity at a price that is dilutive to shareholders;

•measured dividend growth is maintained.

Argosy’s debt-to-total assets ratio target band remains at

30-40%. This band allows Argosy flexibility to react to changing

financial and property market conditions. Any movement

beyond pre-set parameters requires an action plan and

timeframe to move debt levels to within the prescribed range.

Risk Management

Argosy strives to deliver reliable and attractive returns to

shareholders. It takes a considered approach to development,

acquisition, divestment, leasing and capital management

decisions, reflecting its proposition to shareholders as a yield-

based investment.

Argosy has a robust risk assessment process. Risk assessment

reviews are carried out by a representative cross-section

of Argosy’s management team at least twice a year in

accordance with Argosy’s Risk Management Framework. A

risk assessment review has three phases: identification of

material risks arising from Argosy’s operation; assessment of

the probability and consequences of the risk; and development

of controls to achieve a level of residual risk that is within

Argosy’s risk appetite.

Argosy generally operates within a medium/low overall risk

range. Argosy has a low risk appetite for risks associated with

managing developments, Value Add projects and compliance

matters. Please also refer pages [xx-xx] of this report.

PORTFOLIO MIX BY SECTOR

51%Industrial

39%Office

10%Large Format Retail

“Our Investment Policy is a key pillar of

our strategy of creating a green, resilient and

diversified portfolio.”

Peter Mence

CEO

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202422

Management report

IMAGE PLACEHOLDER TO HELP WITH PAGINATION

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202423

24–28 Highgate Parkway Auckland

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202521

INDUSTRIAL SECTOR WEIGHTING
53%

AUCKLAND PORTFOLIO VALUE

71%

Numbers at a glance

107 Carlton Gore Road Auckland

Unit of

measureIndustrialOffice

Large Format

RetailTotal

Number of buildingsno. 33 13 4 50

Market value of assets$m 1,129 776 205 2,109

Net lettable aream² 371,172 127,859 50,204 549,235

Occupancy factor by rent%100.0%92.8%100.0%96.5%

Weighted average lease termyears 5.6 4.5 5.0 5.1

Average value$m 34.2 59.7 51.2 42.2

Passing yield

1

%5.54%6.32%6.89%6.00%

1. Passing yield excludes 224 Neilson Street & 8-14 Mt Richmond Drive.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202522

0
5

10

15

20

Mar-36+Mar-35Mar-34Mar-33Mar-32Mar-31Mar-30Mar-29Mar-28Mar-27Mar-26Vacant

10.5

7.3

0.6

4.7

10.5

5.5

11.2

8.1

17.9

14.9

5.3

3.5

Per

centage of portfolio by income

NEW LEASES COMPLETED IN FY25 by sector

Floor Area

(sqm)

Average

Lease Term

(years)

No. of

Leases

Industrial24,7767.012

Office9,8374.731

Large Format Retail22,4926.611

Total57,1056.254

RENT REVIEWS IN FY25 by sector

No. of

Reviews

Annualised

Rent

Increase

Increase

over

Contract ($)

Industrial344.2%1,738,531

Office542.5%772,324

Large Format Retail173.3%204,281

Total1053.5%2,715,136

TOTAL PORTFOLIO VALUE

by sector

LEASE EXPIRY PROFILE

by rent

TOTAL PORTFOLIO VALUE

by region

PORTFOLIO MIX

by type

71% Auckland

26% Wellington

3% North Island regional or

South Island

80% Core properties

13% Value Add properties

7% Properties & land to divest

ANNUALISED RENT GROWTH

3.5%

On rents reviewed

CORE PROPERTIES

80%

Of total portfolio

53% Industrial

37% Office

10% Large Format Retail

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202523

Our Leadership
& Governance

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202524

Our Leadership & Governance

Ethics & Values

ARGOSY'S APPROACH

Our values guide our internal conduct as well as our

relationships with external parties. In striving for outstanding

performance, we do not compromise our ethics or principles. We

place great importance on honesty, integrity, quality and trust.

Our values

•Ethics – Inspiring trust in our actions by doing the right thing.

•Culture – Creating a fun environment that encourages

inclusiveness and teamwork.

•Respect – Treating all stakeholders with courtesy

and understanding.

•Accountability – Taking ownership and responsibility.

•Communication – Promoting effective communication to

all stakeholders.

Governance

Argosy will maintain the highest standards of corporate

behaviour and accountability.

Argosy's approach

The Company is committed to fostering open and transparent

communications with investors, ensuring it delivers to the

highest standards and complies with the NZX listing rules.

Argosy is proactive in meeting all its continuous disclosure

obligations to ensure that all investors are fully informed

of all material information necessary to assess the

Company’s performance.

Argosy upholds the highest ethical standards, acting in good

faith and in the best interests of shareholders at all times.

The ethical and behavioural standards we expect of Directors,

officers and employees are set out in our Code of Conduct

and Ethics. Argosy’s website contains key governance policies

which support the delivery of the highest standards of corporate

behaviour. Policies include but are not limited to:

•Code of conduct and ethics;

•Conflicts of interests;

•Reporting against the NZX code;

•Diversity;

•Sustainability;

•Insider trading; and

•Shareholder communications.

Performance

Argosy regularly reviews the performance, skills and structure

of its Board and Committees to ensure independent and

effective governance.

More information about Argosy's governance practices is set out

at pages 61-68 of this report.

Annual Meeting
Argosy’s Annual Shareholders Meeting (ASM) will be held as

a hybrid meeting on 22 July at 2pm at the Royal New Zealand

Yacht Squadron in Auckland. Argosy continues to utilise the

hybrid functionality of the ASM. It allows shareholders to attend

virtually and participate in all elements of the meeting including

questions and answers and completing all voting.

As usual, all shareholders are encouraged to attend the meeting

where you will have the opportunity to listen to and meet the

Board of Directors in person.

Retail Roadshow

The 2025 Retail Roadshow schedule has been finalised. Chief

Executive Officer Peter Mence, is planning a 12 city visit

of New Zealand from May to June. The Retail Roadshow

remains an important engagement tool for Management to meet

directly with shareholders and update them on the company's

performance, sustainability goals and strategy.

We encourage our shareholders to attend the roadshow as we

believe this will contribute to their understanding of Argosy's

business and the listed property market in general.

Key Dates

(indicative only and subject to change)

23 MAY 2025

Annual Retail Roadshow commences and ends Monday

16 June.

25 JUNE 2025

Final quarter FY25 dividend payment.

22 JULY 2025

Annual Shareholders Meeting.

SEPTEMBER 2025

1

st

Quarter FY26 dividend payment.

NOVEMBER 2025

FY26 Interim results release.

DECEMBER 2025

2

nd

Quarter FY26 dividend payment.

ANNUAL MEETING

22 July

Hybrid meeting to be held in Auckland

ANNUAL RETAIL ROADSHOW STARTS

23 May

12 city retail roadshow commences

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202525

Director since July 2013
Mr Morrison has 40 years of experience as a property lawyer, 29

of them as a commercial property partner at Russell McVeagh,

and now practises on his own account. Mr Morrison is a trustee

of the Spirit of Adventure and other charitable trusts and holds

a number of private company directorships. Mr Morrison is

a qualified lawyer with a Bachelor of Laws degree from The

University of Auckland. He is also a member of the Institute of

Directors in New Zealand.

Jeff Morrison

Chair

Director since October 2024

Ms Cutler, until recently the CEO and Chief Sustainability

Officer at RDT Pacific, is a prominent figure in the property

industry and a dedicated sustainability expert. Prior to her

current role, Alex served as CEO of the New Zealand Green

Building Council for six years. She brings extensive global

experience, assisting multinational organisations in recognising

the strategic importance of sustainability. Alex holds a MSc in

Environmental Management from the University of Surrey, a BSc

in Environmental Sciences from the University of Southampton,

and is a Member of the New Zealand Institute of Directors.

Alex Cutler

Director

Director since November 2018

Mr Gudgeon has been involved in property investment,

development and construction in New Zealand for more than 25

years. He was previously Chief Executive of Kiwi Property Group

and Capital Properties NZ Ltd. He is currently a director of National

Infrastructure Funding and Financing Limited  and Ngāti Whātua

Ōrākei Whai Rawa Limited. Mr Gudgeon holds an MBA from the

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and a Bachelor of

Engineering degree from The University of Canterbury. He is a

Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors and is a past

President of Property Council New Zealand.

Chris Gudgeon

Director

Meet our

Board of Directors

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202526

Our Leadership & Governance

Director since March 2020
Mr Stearne has over 25 years commercial and capital markets

experience, primarily in investment banking. He is a Senior

Advisor at Montarne Limited and currently holds appointments

to the NZ RegCo Advisory Panel, the Takeovers Panel and the

Investment Committee of the Impact Enterprise Fund. He is a

member of INFINZ and IceAngels. Mr Stearne holds a BSc (Hons)

in maths and a BCom in finance from the University of Otago.

He is also a member of the New Zealand Institute of Directors.

Martin Stearne

Director

Director since August 2018

Mr McLauchlan is a Senior Partner of GS McLauchlan & Co

Business Advisors and Accountants, a prominent businessman

and company director. He is a Director of Scenic Hotels Group

Limited, Dunedin Casinos Limited, EBOS Group Limited and

several other companies. Mr McLauchlan is also Chairman of

the NZ Sports Hall of Fame and Scott Technology Limited. He is

also a past President of the New Zealand Institute of Directors.

Mr McLauchlan is a qualified accountant with a Bachelor of

Commerce degree from the University of Otago, an FCA from

Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and is a

Chartered Fellow of the New Zealand Institute of Directors.

Stuart McLauchlan

Director

Director since February 2019

Mr Pohio has 25 years of senior executive and governance

experience across a range of industries including property,

investment, port/logistics and dairy. He is Chairman of several Iwi

investment companies and a director on the board of Kiwi Group

Capital. Mr Pohio holds an MBA from IMD, Lausanne, an FCA

from Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand and is a

Chartered Fellow of the New Zealand Institute of Directors.

Mike Pohio

Director

Director since August 2019

Ms Winder has over 20 years commercial property experience

including development, strategy, portfolio management, financial

management and leading teams. Her experience spans both

private, corporate and government, particularly construction,

telecommunications and financial services. Ms Winder has a

particular interest in how property strategy can be an enabler

for business performance. Currently consulting and on multiple

boards, Rachel holds an MBA from the University of Otago and

a Bachelor of Property from Auckland University. She is also a

member of Property Council New Zealand and the New Zealand

Institute of Directors.

Rachel Winder

Director

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202527

Meet our Senior
Management Team

Peter Mence

Chief Executive

Officer

Peter is the Chief Executive of Argosy Property Limited. An

engineer by background, Peter has 40 years of experience

in the property industry working with Progressive Enterprises,

Challenge Properties, Richard Ellis and Green and McCahill.

Peter joined Armstrong Jones (NZ) in 1994 and was appointed

General Manager of Argosy (then known as ING Property Trust)

in 2007. Instrumental in the rebranding and internalisation

of the company’s management, Peter was appointed Chief

Executive of the business in 2009.

Peter is a past lecturer in Advanced Property Management

at The University of Auckland and is a past President of the

Property Council New Zealand. He is a current Trustee of Saint

Andrews Village and the New Zealand Sailing Trust.

In 2013, Peter was honoured with the Stuart McIntosh award in

recognition of his contribution to the University of Auckland.

In 2021, Peter was honoured as the Property Council New

Zealand Members’ Laureate, a lifetime membership awarded

once a year to the industry’s most respected leaders.

In 2023, Peter received the Supreme Award from the

Property Institute.

Dave Fraser

Chief Financial

Officer

Dave joined the team in 2011 and was originally responsible for

the planning and execution of the management internalisation

and Argosy’s corporatisation. He now oversees the financial

and corporate activities of the Company.

Dave has spent over 30 years in senior financial and general

management roles both in New Zealand and overseas,

including six years in Japan as a senior vice president with the

Jupiter Group.

He has broad experience in strategic and operational planning,

business development, debt restructures, equity raisings and

merger and acquisitions. In addition to being a qualified

Chartered Accountant, Dave has Bachelor of Commerce and

Master of Business Administration degrees from The University

of Auckland.

To read bios of all our people please visit our website:

argosy.co.nz/about-us/our-people

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202528

Our Leadership & Governance

Financial Summmary
NET PROPERTY INCOME

$m

106.5106.5

105.1105.1

112.8112.8

116.5

116.5

116.9116.9

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

0

40

80

120

160

NET DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME

cents per share

8.148.14

7.687.68

7.58

7.58

6.58

6.586.586.58

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

DEBT-TO-TOTAL-ASSETS

percentage

35.935.9

31.131.1

35.135.1

36.5

36.5

35.7

35.7

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

0

10

20

30

40

50

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Unit of

measure

FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Net property income$m106.5105.1112.8116.5116.9

Profit before financial income/(expenses) and other

gains/(losses) and tax$m95.693.3102.0104.9105.5

Revaluation gains on investment property$m157.7163.7(146.6)(111.7)72.7

Profit for the year (before taxation)$m248.4241.2(70.9)(50.8)138.1

Profit for the year (after taxation)$m241.7236.2(80.8)(54.5)125.9

Earnings per sharecents29.0428.01(9.55)(6.43)14.83

Gross distributable income per sharecents8.618.038.117.237.56

Net distributable income per sharecents8.147.687.586.586.58

Total assets$m2,156.82,291.52,212.62,069.02,162.2

Debt-to-total-assets%35.931.135.136.535.7

Net assets backing per sharecents153174158145153

Cash dividend per sharecents6.456.556.656.656.65

Shares on issue at year endm839.5846.6846.7847.2856.5

Total equity$m1,280.61,472.11,335.71,228.91,307.8

PROPERTY METRICS

Unit of

measure

FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Number of tenantsno.157157158155164

Number of properties

1

no.5553545050

Average property value$m36.641.739.739.542.2

Net lettable areasqm632,872629,449643,693624,814549,235

Total book value$m2,010.82,207.52,144.81,973.82,109.1

Weighted average lease termyears5.515.675.395.175.07

Occupancy factor by rental%99.098.799.396.796.5

Occupancy factor by area%99.399.499.597.997.3

1.Certain titles have been consolidated and treated as one. The total number of buildings excludes properties held for sale.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202529

Our Leadership & Governance

105 Carlton Gore Road, Auckland
Consolidated

Financial Statements

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202530

Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position32

Consolidated Statement of

Comprehensive Income

33

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity34

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows35

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements36

Independent Auditor's Report58

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202531

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Restated

1

Note

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Non-current assets

Investment properties

5

2,148,8962,013,753

Derivative financial instruments

6

584,784

Other non-current assets

7

3,173283

Total non-current assets2,152,1272,018,820

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

6

1,4381,829

Trade and other receivables

6,8

2,1162,070

Derivative financial instruments

6

8165,072

Other current assets

9

5,7275,996

10,09714,967

Investment property classified as held for sale

5, 10

–35,200

Total current assets10,09750,167

Total assets

4

2,162,2242,068,987

Shareholders' funds

Share capital

11

829,900820,557

Share based payments reserve

12

532475

Retained earnings

13

477,343407,896

Total shareholders' funds1,307,7751,228,928

Non-current liabilities

Interest bearing liabilities

14

655,982738,057

Derivative financial instruments

6

19,59130,532

Non-current lease liabilities

25

39,69239,826

Deferred tax

20

15,60811,638

Total non-current liabilities730,873820,053

Current liabilities

Interest bearing liabilities

14

100,000–

Trade and other payables

15

18,20714,447

Taxation payable1,7881,377

Current lease liabilities

25

134127

Derivative financial instruments

6

571–

Other current liabilities

16

2,8764,055

Total current liabilities123,57620,006

Total liabilities854,449840,059

Total shareholders' funds and liabilities2,162,2242,068,987

For and on behalf of the Board

Jeff Morrison

Director

Stuart McLauchlan

Director

Date: 20 May 2025

1. Refer to note 3.

The notes to the accounts form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202532

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2025

Restated

1

Note

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Gross property income from rentals132,732131,015

Gross property income from expense recoveries22,99522,136

Property expenses(38,845)(36,690)

Net property income

4

116,882116,461

Administration expenses

17

11,41211,571

Profit before financial income/(expenses), other gains/(losses) and tax105,470104,890

Financial income/(expenses)

Interest expense

18

(41,599)(43,966)

Gain/(loss) on derivative financial instruments held for trading1,387637

Interest income257315

(39,955)(43,014)

Other gains/(losses)

Revaluation gains/(losses) on investment property

5

72,666(111,691)

Realised gains/(losses) on disposal of investment property

5

(41)(988)

72,625(112,679)

Profit/(loss) before income tax attributable to shareholders138,140(50,803)

Taxation expense

19

12,2843,691

Profit/(loss) and total comprehensive income/(loss) after tax125,856(54,494)

All amounts are from continuing operations.

Earnings/(loss) per share

Basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share (cents)

22

14.83(6.43)

1. Refer to note 3.

The notes to the accounts form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202533

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2025

Restated

1

Note

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Shareholders' funds at the beginning of the year1,228,9281,335,695

Restatement

3

–3,773

Restated shareholders' funds at the beginning of the year1,228,9281,339,468

Profit/(loss) and total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year125,856(54,494)

Contributions by shareholders

Issue of shares from Dividend Reinvestment Plan

11

9,371–

Issue costs of shares

11

(28)–

Dividends to shareholders

13

(56,409)(56,336)

Equity settled share based payments

12

57290

Shareholders' funds at the end of the year1,307,7751,228,928

1. Refer to note 3.

The notes to the accounts form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202534

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2025

Note

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash was provided from:

Property income155,687155,527

Interest received257315

Cash was applied to:

Property expenses(37,402)(36,809)

Interest paid(38,749)(41,104)

Interest paid for ground lease(1,998)(2,004)

Employee benefits(7,272)(6,485)

Taxation paid(7,383)(4,427)

Other expenses(4,177)(4,828)

Net cash from/(used in) operating activities

21

58,96360,185

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash was provided from:

Sale of properties, deposits and deferrals35,06957,167

Cash was applied to:

Capital additions on investment properties(57,418)(35,843)

Capitalised interest on investment properties(3,234)(1,985)

Purchase of properties, deposits and deferrals(2,928)(12)

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities(28,511)19,327

Cash flows from financing activities

Cash was provided from:

Debt drawdown

14

71,96949,384

Cash was applied to:

Repayment of debt

14

(54,300)(71,949)

Dividends paid to shareholders net of reinvestments(47,558)(56,670)

Issue costs of shares(14)–

Repayment of lease liabilities(127)(121)

Bond costs(70)(70)

Facility refinancing fee(743)(314)

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities(30,843)(79,740)

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(391)(228)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period1,8292,057

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period1,4381,829

The notes to the accounts form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202535

1. Reporting entity
Argosy Property Limited (APL or the Company) is an FMC

Reporting Entity under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013

and the Financial Reporting Act 2013. APL is incorporated under

the Companies Act 1993 and domiciled in New Zealand.

The Company's principal activity is investment in properties

which include Industrial, Office and Large Format Retail

properties, predominantly in Auckland and Wellington.

These financial statements are the consolidation of APL and its

subsidiaries (the Group).

2. Basis of preparation

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance

with Generally Accepted Accounting Practice in New Zealand

(NZ GAAP). The accounting policies applied in these financial

statements comply with New Zealand equivalents to IFRS

Accounting Standards (NZ IFRS) and other applicable Financial

Reporting Standards issued and effective at the time of

preparing these statements as applicable to the Company as

a profit-oriented entity. These Group financial statements also

comply with IFRS Accounting Standards.

These financial statements were approved by the Board of

Directors on 20 May 2025.

BASIS OF MEASUREMENT

The financial statements have been prepared on the historical

cost basis except for derivative financial instruments and

investment properties which are measured at fair value.

USE OF ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with NZ

IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates

that affect the application of policies and reported amount of

assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The area involving

a higher degree of complexity and where assumptions and

estimates are significant to the financial statements is note 5

- valuation of investment property.

FUNCTIONAL AND PRESENTATION CURRENCY

These financial statements are presented in New Zealand

dollars which is the Company’s functional currency and have

been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($000).

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

The Group’s financial statements incorporate the financial

statements of APL and its controlled subsidiaries as set out

in note 24. Control is achieved when the Company has power

over the investee; is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns

from its involvement with the investee, and has the ability

to use its power to affect its returns. The results of the

subsidiaries are included in the consolidated statement of

comprehensive income from the date of acquisition which is

the date the Company became entitled to income from the

subsidiaries acquired. All significant intercompany transactions

are eliminated on consolidation.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

The statement of cash flows is prepared on a GST exclusive

basis, which is consistent with the statement of comprehensive

income. The following terms are used in the statement of

cash flows:

Operating activities are the principal revenue producing

activities of the Group and other activities that are not investing

or financing activities.

Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of

long term assets and other investments not included in

cash equivalents.

Financing activities are activities that result in changes

in the size and composition of the contributed equity and

borrowings of the entity. Termination payments for swap

contracts, establishment fees, extension fees and arranger fees

are considered financing activities as they effect a change in the

company’s borrowing arrangements.

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and

demand deposits. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on

demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash

management are included as a component of cash and cash

equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows.

3.

 Material accounting policies

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting policies and methods of computation have been

applied consistently to all periods and by all Group entities.

RESTATEMENT

Historically, Argosy has recognised a deferred tax liability for

certain costs capitalised to investment property that were

under development. Whilst a temporary difference does arise

in relation to these costs the deferred tax consequences were

calculated on the basis that the economic benefits embodied

in these costs would be consumed over time. Paragraph

51(C) of NZ IAS 12 includes a rebuttable presumption that

the carrying amount of investment property, measured using

the fair value model in NZ IAS 40, will be recovered through

sale. Accordingly, unless the presumption is rebutted, the

measurement of the deferred tax liability or deferred tax asset

should reflect the tax consequences of recovering the carrying

amount of the investment property entirely through sale. The

Group has not rebutted this presumption, and because there

are no tax consequences on disposal of the property related to

these costs, no deferred tax liability is recognised.

The effect of this matter has been recognised retrospectively

in the comparative figures with a reduction in the deferred tax

liability of $4.6 million, a decrease in tax expense of $0.8 million

and an increase in retained earnings as at 1 April 2024 of

$4.6 million. As a result, comparative loss per share and diluted

loss per share decreased by 0.10 cents for the financial year

ending 31 March 2024. There is no effect on the statement of

cash flow, investment property assets or the non-GAAP AFFO /

distributable income disclosures.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202536

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. Material accounting policies (continued)
STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE

At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the Group has not applied any new and revised NZ IFRS standards and

amendments that have been issued but are not yet effective.

NZ IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements (NZ IFRS 18) will replace NZ IAS 1 Presentation of Financial

Statements. NZ IFRS 18 has been issued and will be effective from the period commencing 1 April 2027. The Group has not yet

assessed the impact of NZ IFRS 18.

4. Segment information

The principal business activity of the Group is to invest in, and actively manage, properties in New Zealand. NZ IFRS 8 Operating

Segments requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the Group that

are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker, being the Chief Executive Officer, in order to allocate resources to

segments and assess their performance.

The information reported to the Group’s Chief Executive Officer includes investment property information aggregated into three

business sectors, Industrial, Office and Large Format Retail, based on what the occupants actual or intended use is. Segment profit

represents profit earned by each segment including allocation of identifiable revaluation gains/(losses) on investment properties

and gains/(losses) on disposal of investment properties.

The following is an analysis of the Group’s results by reportable segments.

IndustrialOfficeLarge Format RetailTotal

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

Restated

2024

$000s

Segment profit/(loss)

Net property income

1

54,97754,85348,95548,79712,95012,811116,882116,461

Realised gains/(losses) on disposal

of investment properties

(39)(818)(2)(297)


127(41)(988)

54,93854,03548,95348,50012,95012,938116,841115,473

Interest on ground lease––(1,998)(2,004)––(1,998)(2,004)

Revaluation gains/(losses) on

investment properties

60,566(51,235)4,109(49,899)

7,991

(10,557)72,666(111,691)

Total segment profit/(loss)

2

115,5042,80051,064(3,403)20,9412,381187,5091,778

Unallocated:

Administration expenses(11,412)(11,571)

Net interest expense(39,344)(41,647)

Gain/(loss) on derivative financial instruments held for trading1,387637

Profit/(loss) before income tax138,140(50,803)

Taxation expense(12,284)(3,691)

Profit/(loss) for the year125,856(54,494)

1.Net property income consists of revenue generated from external tenants less property operating expenditure.

2.There were no inter-segment sales during the year (31 March 2024: Nil).

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202537

4. Segment information (continued)
IndustrialOfficeLarge Format RetailTotal

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

Segment assets

Current assets6,4943,1133,0853,4562504169,8296,985

Investment properties1,128,8701,014,900815,326803,403204,700195,4502,148,8962,013,753

Non-current assets

classified as held for sale–35,200–––––35,200

Total segment assets1,135,3641,053,213818,411806,859204,950195,8662,158,7252,055,938

Unallocated assets3,49913,049

Total assets2,162,2242,068,987

IndustrialOfficeLarge Format RetailRestated Total

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

2025

$000s

2024

$000s

Segment liabilities

Current liabilities9,3594,0792,7574,6591,05073213,1669,470

Non-current liabilities––39,69239,826––39,69239,826

Total segment liabilities9,3594,07942,44944,4851,05073252,85849,296

Unallocated liabilities801,591790,763

Total liabilities854,449840,059

For the purposes of monitoring segment performance and allocating resources between segments, all assets are allocated

to reportable segments other than cash and cash equivalents, derivatives, other non-current assets and other minor current

assets that cannot be allocated to particular segments. All liabilities are allocated to reportable segments other than borrowings,

derivatives, tax liabilities and other minor current liabilities that cannot be allocated to particular segments.

5.

 Investment properties

ACCOUNTING POLICY – INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

Investment property is property held to earn rental income.

Investment property is initially measured at cost and subsequently measured at fair value with any change therein recognised

in profit or loss.

Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging operating leases and lease incentives granted are added to the

carrying amount of the leased asset.

In accordance with the valuation policy of the Group, complete property valuations are carried out at least annually by

independent registered valuers. The fair values are based on market values being the estimated amount for which a property

could be exchanged on the date of the valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction

after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.

The valuations are prepared using a combination of the Capitalisation of Contract Income, Capitalisation of Market Income

and Discounted Cash Flow methodologies. Discounted Cash Flow methodology is based on the estimated rental cash flows

expected to be received from the property adjusted by a discount rate that appropriately reflects the risks inherent in the

expected cash flows.

Following the adoption of NZ IFRS 16 on 1 April 2019, a right-of-use asset and investment were recognised on the ground

lease that exists over 39 Market Place, Viaduct Harbour, Auckland.

Investment properties are derecognised when they have been disposed of and any gains or losses incurred on disposal are

recognised in profit or loss in the year of derecognition.

Borrowing costs directly attributable to property under development are capitalised as part of the cost of those assets.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202538

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

5. Investment properties (continued)
Industrial

2025

$000s

Office

2025

$000s

Large

Format Retail

2025

$000s

Group

2025

$000s

Movement in investment properties

Balance at 1 April1,014,900803,403195,4502,013,753

Capitalised costs53,7038,2171,23563,155

Change in fair value60,5664,1097,99172,666

Change in capitalised leasing costs278(356)(18)(96)

Change in lease incentives(577)(47)42(582)

Investment properties at 31 March1,128,870815,326204,7002,148,896

Less lease liability (39 Market Place)–(39,826)–(39,826)

Investment properties at 31 March excluding NZ IFRS 16

lease adjustments

1,128,870775,500204,7002,109,070

Industrial

2024

$000s

Office

2024

$000s

Large

Format Retail

2024

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Movement in investment properties

Balance at 1 April1,127,775851,174205,9502,184,899

Capitalised costs12,16323,05120435,418

Transfer to property held for sale(35,200)––(35,200)

Disposals(37,850)(19,857)–(57,707)

Change in fair value(51,235)(49,899)(10,557)(111,691)

Change in capitalised leasing costs(206)(106)(40)(352)

Change in lease incentives(547)(960)(107)(1,614)

Investment properties at 31 March1,014,900803,403195,4502,013,753

Less lease liability (39 Market Place)–(39,953)–(39,953)

Investment properties at 31 March excluding NZ IFRS 16

lease adjustments

1,014,900763,450195,4501,973,800

Investment properties are classified as Level 3 (inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability) under the fair value hierarchy on the

basis that adjustments must be made to observable data of similar properties to determine the fair value of an individual property.

The Group holds the freehold to all investment properties other than 39 Market Place, Viaduct Harbour, Auckland.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Disposal of properties

8 Forge Way, Mount Wellington, Auckland35,200–

10 Transport Place, East Tamaki, Auckland–37,850

302 Great South Road, Greenlane, Auckland–10,978

308 Great South Road, Greenlane, Auckland–8,879

35,20057,707

Sale proceeds of properties disposed of35,20057,900

Net gain/(loss) on disposal–193

Selling costs(41)(1,181)

Total gain/(loss) on disposal(41)(988)

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202539

5. Investment properties (continued)
All investment properties were independently valued as at 31 March 2025 in accordance with the Group's valuation policy. The

valuations were prepared by independent registered valuers Colliers International New Zealand Limited, CBRE Limited and Jones

Lang LaSalle. The total value per valuer was as follows:

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Colliers International New Zealand Limited1,699,300708,750

CBRE Limited226,5701,265,050

Jones Lang LaSalle183,200–

2,109,0701,973,800

Investment properties are stated at fair value by independent valuers supported by market evidence of property sale transactions

and leasing activity. These valuations are reviewed by the Asset Management team within Argosy. The major inputs and

assumptions that are used in the valuation that require judgement include forecasts of the current and expected future market

rentals and growth, maintenance and capital expenditure requirements, an assessment of yields, discount rates, occupancy, leasing

costs and weighted average lease terms.

In deriving a market value under each approach, all assumptions are based, where possible, on market based evidence and

transactions for properties with similar locations, conditions and quality of construction and fitout.

Generally as occupancy and weighted average lease terms increase, yields firm, resulting in increased fair values for investment

properties. A movement in any of these assumptions could result in a significant change in fair value.

Investment property metrics for the year ended 31 March 2025 are as follows:

IndustrialOfficeLarge Format RetailTotal

Contract yield

1

- Average5.54%6.32%6.89%6.00%

Market yield

1

- Average6.41%7.44%6.64%6.85%

Occupancy (rent)100.0%92.8%100.0%96.5%

Occupancy (net lettable area)100.0%88.3%100.0%97.3%

Weighted average lease term (years)5.64.55.05.1

No. of buildings

2

3313450

Fair value total ($000s)1,128,870775,500204,7002,109,070

1.224 Neilson Street and 8-14 Mt Richmond Drive have been excluded from the yield metrics as these have been valued on the basis of completion of the

developments currently underway.

2.Certain titles have been consolidated and treated as one.

Investment property metrics for the year ended 31 March 2024 are as follows:

IndustrialOfficeLarge Format RetailTotal

Contract yield

1

- Average5.54%6.51%6.86%6.05%

Market yield

1

- Average6.43%7.13%6.66%6.73%

Occupancy (rent)99.1%94.0%100.0%96.7%

Occupancy (net lettable area)99.1%92.8%100.0%97.9%

Weighted average lease term (years)5.95.12.55.2

No. of buildings

2

3313450

Fair value total ($000s)1,014,900763,450195,4501,973,800

1.224 Neilson Street has been excluded from the yield metrics as it has been valued on the basis of completion of the development currently underway.

2.Certain titles have been consolidated and treated as one.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202540

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6. Financial instruments
ACCOUNTING POLICY - NON-DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Non-derivative financial instruments comprise trade and other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings

(comprising of interest bearing liabilities and lease liabilities) and trade and other payables.

Non-derivative financial instruments are initially measured at fair value plus directly attributable costs. Subsequently these

instruments are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The carrying values of these financial

instruments are a reasonable approximation of their fair values.

The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or financial liability and of

allocating interest income over the relevant period (including all fees and points paid or received between the parties to

the contract that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts)

through the expected life of the financial instrument, or, where appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying amount of the

financial instrument.

ACCOUNTING POLICY - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate exposure. For interest rate swaps, the net differential paid or

received is recognised as a component of interest expense in the profit or loss.

Interest rate swaps are initially recognised at zero at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are remeasured to their

fair value at subsequent reporting dates. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately.

Interest rate swaps are presented as a non-current asset or a non-current liability if the remaining maturity of the instrument

is more than 12 months and it is not expected to be realised or settled within 12 months. Other interest rate swaps are

presented as current assets or current liabilities.

The Group has the following financial instruments:

Group 2025

Derivatives at

fair value

through profit/

(loss)

$000s

Financial assets

measured

at amortised cost

$000s

Financial

liabilities measured

at amortised cost

$000s

Total

$000s

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents–1,438–1,438

Derivative financial instruments (current and term)874––874

Trade and other receivables–2,116–2,116

8743,554–4,428

Financial liabilities

Interest bearing liabilities (current and term)––(755,982)(755,982)

Trade and other payables––(18,207)(18,207)

Derivative financial instruments (current and term)(20,162)––(20,162)

Lease liabilities (current and term)––(39,826)(39,826)

Other current liabilities––(2,876)(2,876)

(20,162)–(816,891)(837,053)

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202541

6. Financial instruments (continued)
Group 2024

Derivatives at

fair value

through profit/

(loss)

$000s

Financial assets

measured

at amortised cost

$000s

Financial

liabilities measured

at amortised cost

$000s

Total

$000s

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents–1,829–1,829

Derivative financial instruments (current and term)9,856––9,856

Trade and other receivables–2,070–2,070

9,8563,899–13,755

Financial liabilities

Interest bearing liabilities––(738,057)(738,057)

Trade and other payables––(14,447)(14,447)

Derivative financial instruments (current and term)(30,532)––(30,532)

Lease liabilities (current and term)––(39,953)(39,953)

Other current liabilities––(4,055)(4,055)

(30,532)–(796,512)(827,044)

RISK MANAGEMENT

The use of financial instruments exposes the Group to credit, interest rate and liquidity risks. The Group’s overall risk management

programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group’s

financial performance.

Credit risk

Credit risk relates to the risk that the counterparty to a financial instrument may default on its obligations to the Group, resulting in

financial loss.

The Group's main exposure to credit risk arises from trade receivables and transactions with financial institutions, and is

summarised in the preceding table. There are no significant concentrations of credit risk in specific receivables due to receivables

mainly comprising a large number of tenants in the Group’s property portfolio and the Group policy to limit the amount of credit

exposure to any financial institution.

The Group manages its exposure to credit risk from trade receivables through its credit policy which includes performing credit

evaluations on customers requiring credit. The Group does not hold any collateral in respect of balances past due. Details of

impairment losses relating to trade receivables together with the ageing of receivables is provided in note 8.

The risk from financial institutions is managed by placing cash and deposits with high credit quality financial institutions only. Cash

deposits are placed with ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202542

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

6. Financial instruments (continued)
Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk arises from long term borrowings (refer note 14). Variable rate borrowings expose the Group to cash flow interest

rate risk while fixed rate borrowings expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk.

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate risk through derivatives in the form of both floating-to-fixed and fixed-to-floating

interest rate swaps. These derivatives provide an economic hedge against variability in cash flows as a result of changes in variable

interest rates on borrowings.

The Group’s policy is to maintain a range of approximately 40-100% of its borrowings in fixed interest rate instruments unless

otherwise instructed by the Board of Directors. At year end, 62.6% of borrowings, after the effect of associated swaps, were at fixed

rates (2024: 70.9%).

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group may encounter difficulty in meeting its obligations associated with its financial liabilities that

are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. Liquidity risk mainly arises from the Group’s obligations in respect of long

term borrowings, derivatives and trade and other payables. The Group aims to maintain flexibility in funding by keeping committed

credit lines available (refer note 14).

The expected undiscounted cash flows of the Group’s financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturity at the balance date is

as follows:

Group 2025

Carrying

Amount

$000s

Less than

1 year

$000s

1-2 years

$000s

2-3 years

$000s

3-4 years

$000s

4-5 years

$000s

5+ years

$000s

Financial liabilities

Interest bearing liabilities

1

(755,982)(135,239)(130,031)(357,033)(224,883)(102,249)–

Trade and other payables(18,207)(18,207)–––––

Derivative financial instruments(20,162)(3,145)(4,077)(2,582)(1,135)(91)17

Lease liabilities(39,826)(2,125)(2,125)(2,125)(2,125)(2,125)(109,889)

Other current liabilities(2,876)(2,876)–––––

(837,053)(161,592)(136,233)(361,740)(228,143)(104,465)(109,872)

1.The undiscounted cash flows on interest bearing liabilities includes interest, margin and line fees.

Group 2024

Carrying

Amount

$000s

Less than

1 year

$000s

1-2 years

$000s

2-3 years

$000s

3-4 years

$000s

4-5 years

$000s

5+ years

$000s

Financial liabilities

Interest bearing liabilities

1

(738,057)(38,997)(345,926)(195,988)(245,596)––

Trade and other payables(14,447)(14,447)–––––

Derivative financial instruments(30,532)(6,964)(6,040)(4,491)(2,177)(514)–

Lease liabilities(39,953)(2,125)(2,125)(2,125)(2,125)(2,125)(112,014)

Other current liabilities(4,055)(4,055)–––––

(827,044)(66,588)(354,091)(202,604)(249,898)(2,639)(112,014)

1.The undiscounted cash flows on interest bearing liabilities includes interest, margin and line fees.

To manage the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk on variable rate instruments, the Group has implemented a hedging strategy

that uses interest rate swaps that have a range of maturities. At 31 March 2025, the Group had active interest rate derivatives (both

payer and receiver swaps) with a notional contract amount of $700 million (2024: $750 million). The active derivatives mature over

the next 6 years (2024: 4 years). Payer swaps have fixed interest rates ranging from 1.37% to 5.04% (2024: 1.37% to 4.90%). Swaps

with a notional amount of $170 million have been entered into but are not yet effective at 31 March 2025 (2024: $255 million).

Interest rate swaps are measured at the present value of future cash flows estimated and discounted based on applicable yield

curves derived from observable market interest rates. Accepted market best practice valuation methodology using mid-market

interest rates at the balance date is used, provided from sources perceived to be reliable and accurate. Interest rate swaps have been

classified into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy on the basis that the valuation techniques used to determine the values at balance

date use observable inputs.

The net liability for derivative financial instruments as at 31 March 2025 is $19.3 million (2024: $20.7 million). The mark-to-market

decrease in the liability for derivative financial instruments is a result of the movement in the interest rate curve during the

financial year.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202543

6. Financial instruments (continued)
Sensitivity analysis

The sensitivity analysis below details the potential future impact of reasonably possible changes in the observable inputs over the

next financial period. It has been determined based on the exposure to interest rates for both derivative and non-derivative financial

instruments at the reporting date.

Group

2025

Impact on

Profit & Loss

$000s

Group

2024

Impact on

Profit & Loss

$000s

Increase of 100 basis points4,522359

Decrease of 100 basis points(4,961)(498)

7. Other non-current assets

ACCOUNTING POLICY - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

All property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment

losses. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.

At the end of each reporting period, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its assets to determine whether there is

any indication that those assets have suffered impairment. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the

asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the

recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which

the asset belongs.

An impairment is recognised immediately in profit or loss.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Property, plant and equipment and software232283

Deposit paid on acquisition of investment property

1

2,941–

Total other non-current assets3,173283

1.This relates to the deposit paid and other costs associated with the acquisition of 291 East Tamaki Road, East Tamaki, Auckland. This property is subject to an

unconditional sale and purchase agreement for $56.0 million. Settlement is expected to take place in August 2025.

There was no impairment in the current year (2024: Nil).

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202544

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

8. Trade and other receivables
ACCOUNTING POLICY - TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Trade and other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the

effective interest method, less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established

to reflect an estimate of amounts that the Group will not be able to collect in accordance with the original terms of the

receivables. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of

estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Trade receivables2,1301,717

Loss allowance(135)(14)

1,9951,703

Amount receivable from insurance proceeds–31

Other receivables121336

Total trade and other receivables2,1162,070

The average credit period on receivables is 3.3 days (2024: 3.1 days). The Group is entitled to charge interest on trade receivables

as determined in each individual lease agreement. Interest is charged on receivables over 90 days on a case by case basis. The

Group has provided for 50% of all receivables over 90 days unless there is information suggesting that particular amounts are

recoverable. This amount increases to 100% of any receivable that is determined as not being recoverable. Trade receivables

less than 90 days are provided for based on estimated non-recoverable amounts, determined by reference to relevant factors,

conditions, and information at reporting date including past default experience.

Aged past due but not impaired trade receivables

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

0-30 days past due18664

31-60 days past due4411

Beyond 60 days past due1755

40580

Included in the Group's trade receivable balance are debtors with a carrying amount of $405,737 (2024: $79,629), which are past

due at the reporting date, for which the Group has not provided as there has not been a significant change in credit quality and the

amounts are still considered recoverable.

Movement in the loss allowance

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Balance at the beginning of the year1450

(Decrease)/increase in allowance recognised in profit or loss121(36)

Balance at the end of the year13514

9. Other current assets

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Prepayments4,3275,348

Other1,400648

Total other current assets5,7275,996

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202545

10. Property held for sale
No property was subject to an unconditional sale and purchase agreement at balance date (31 March 2024: 8 Forge Way, Panmure,

Auckland ($35.2 million)).

11. Share capital

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Balance at the beginning of the period820,557820,069

Issue of shares from Dividend Reinvestment Plan9,371–

Issue costs of shares(28)–

Issue of shares from equity settled share based payments–488

Total share capital829,900820,557

The number of shares on issue at 31 March 2025 was 856,546,809 (2024: 847,168,744).

All shares are fully paid and rank equally with one vote attached and carry the right to dividends.

Reconciliation of number of shares

(in 000s of shares)

Group

2025

Group

2024

Balance at the beginning of the period847,169846,724

Issue of shares from Dividend Reinvestment Plan9,378–

Issue of shares from share based payments–445

Total number of shares on issue856,547847,169

Capital risk management

The Group's capital includes shares, reserves and retained earnings with total shareholders' funds equal to $1,307.8 million (2024:

$1,228.9 million restated).

The Group maintains a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain the Group's

future on-going activities and development of the business. The impact of the level of capital on equity holder returns is also

recognised along with the need to maintain a balance between the higher returns that might be possible with greater gearing and the

advantages and security afforded by a sound capital position.

The Board's intention is to maintain the debt-to-total-assets ratio between 30-40% in the medium term. The Group's banking

covenants require that the aggregate principal amount of the loan outstanding does not exceed 50% of the fair value of property at

all times. All banking covenants have been met during the year.

The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising

the return to stakeholders through optimisation of debt and equity. The Group's policies in respect of capital management and

allocation are reviewed regularly by the Board of Directors. There have been no material changes in the Group's overall strategy

during the year.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202546

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

12. Share based payments reserve
ACCOUNTING POLICY - SHARE BASED PAYMENTS

The fair value of performance share rights (PSRs) are recognised as an expense in the statement of financial performance

over the vesting period of the rights with a corresponding entry to the share based payments reserve.

PSRs were offered to senior executives, commencing 1 April 2015. Under the scheme, PSRs are issued to participants which give

them the right to receive ordinary shares in the Company after a three year period, subject to certain vesting and other conditions

being met. The vesting of the PSRs is subject to the Company achieving a positive total shareholder return (measured against the

Company's share price on the date of the issue of the PSRs, and including dividends) over a three year measurement period. The

total number which actually vest will be dependent on the relative ranking of the Company's total shareholder returns against a

comparator group of listed entities determined by the Board from the S&P/NZX All Real Estate Gross Index.

The total expense recognised in the year to 31 March 2025, in relation to equity settled share based payments was $57,300 (2024:

$290,405). No PSRs (2024: 444,849) vested during the year.

Grant dateVesting date

Granted

during the

year

1

Weighted

average

issue price

Balance at

the beginning

of the period

1

Vested

during the

period

1

Forfeited

during the

period

1

Balance at

the end of

the period

1

2025

1 April 20241 April 2027501,149$1.131,076,938–(281,621)

2

1,296,466

2024

1 April 20231 April 2026495,473$1.101,026,314(444,849)–

3

1,076,938

2023

1 April 20221 April 2025299,844$1.381,026,806(173,293)(127,043)

4

1,026,314

2022

1 April 20211 April 2024281,621$1.441,117,874(318,573)(54,116)

5

1,026,806

1.This is the number of PSRs.

2.The rights forfeited relate to those issued on 1 April 2021.

3.The rights forfeited relate to those issued on 1 April 2020.

4.The rights forfeited relate to those issued on 1 April 2019.

5.The rights forfeited relate to those issued on 1 April 2018.

13. Retained earnings

Group

2025

$000s

Restated

Group

2024

$000s

Balance at the beginning of the year407,896518,726

Profit/(loss) for the year125,856(54,494)

Dividends to shareholders(56,409)(56,336)

Total retained earnings477,343407,896

The annual dividend paid to shareholders was 6.6500 cents per share, paid in four quarterly payments of 1.6625 cents per share

(2024: annual dividend paid was 6.6500 cents per share).

After 31 March 2025, the final dividend was declared. The dividend has not been provided for. Refer to note 27.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202547

14. Interest bearing liabilities
ACCOUNTING POLICY - INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

All interest bearing liabilities are initially measured at fair value net of transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition,

using the effective interest method.

Borrowing costs are the costs incurred in establishing the bank facility and fixed rate bonds. These costs are amortised over

the life of the instrument at the effective interest rate.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Non-current liabilities

Syndicated bank loans433,271415,601

Fixed rate green bonds225,000325,000

Borrowing costs(2,289)(2,544)

655,982738,057

Current liabilities

Fixed rate green bonds

1

100,000–

100,000–

Total interest bearing liabilities755,982738,057

Weighted average interest rate on interest bearing liabilities

(inclusive of bonds, interest rate swaps, margins and line fees)

5.11%5.59%

1.ARG010 fixed rate green bonds are due to mature on 27 March 2026. Given the maturity date is within 12 months the ARG010 bonds have been classified as a

current liability.These interest bearing liabilities will be refinanced later in the financial year ending 31 March 2026.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Total interest bearing liabilities at the beginning of the year738,057759,991

Drawdowns from syndicated bank loans71,96949,384

Repayments to syndicated bank loans(54,300)(71,949)

Additional refinancing fee on interest bearing liabilities(813)(383)

Refinancing fee on interest bearing liabilities amortised during the year1,0691,014

Total interest bearing liabilities at the end of the year755,982738,057

Syndicated bank loans

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited58,27165,982

Bank of New Zealand60,000–

Commonwealth Bank of Australia75,00034,400

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China90,00090,000

The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited–54,400

Westpac New Zealand Limited150,000170,819

Total syndicated bank loans433,271415,601

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202548

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

14. Interest bearing liabilities (continued)
As at 31 March 2025, the Group had a syndicated revolving facility with ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited, Bank of New Zealand,

Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Westpac New Zealand Limited for $525.0 million

(31 March 2024: $525.0 million) secured by way of mortgage over the investment properties of the Group.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

LimitMaturity DateLimitMaturity Date

Tranche A210,0001 October 2027160,0001 April 2025

Tranche B215,0001 October 202860,0001 October 2025

Tranche C--115,0001 October 2027

Tranche D100,0001 October 2029110,0001 October 2026

Tranche I--80,00019 May 2026

525,000525,000

Fixed rate green bonds

NZX code

Value of Issue

$000sIssue DateMaturity DateInterest Rate

Fair Value

$000s

ARG010100,00027 March 201927 March 20264.00%99,179

ARG020100,00029 October 201929 October 20262.90%97,214

ARG030125,00027 October 202027 October 20272.20%115,924

The fair value of the fixed rate green bonds is based on the listed market price at balance date and is therefore classified as Level 1

in the fair value hierarchy. Interest on ARG010 bonds is payable in equal instalments on a quarterly basis in March, June, September

and December. Interest on ARG020 and ARG030 bonds is payable in equal instalments on a quarterly basis in April, July, October

and January.

The green bonds are secured by way of mortgage over the investment properties of the Group.

15.

 Trade and other payables

ACCOUNTING POLICY - TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the

effective interest method.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

GST payable6821,354

Other creditors and accruals17,52513,093

Total trade and other payables18,20714,447

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202549

16. Other current liabilities
ACCOUNTING POLICY - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

A provision is recognised for benefits accruing to employees in respect of annual leave and long service leave when it is

probable that settlement will be required and they are capable of being measured reliably.

Provisions made in respect of employee benefits expected to be settled within 12 months are measured at their nominal

values using the remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement. Provisions made in respect of employee

benefits which are not expected to be settled within 12 months are measured as the present value of the estimated future

outflows to be made by the Group in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Employee entitlements397557

Other liabilities2,4793,498

Total other current liabilities2,8764,055

17. Administration expenses

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Auditor's remuneration:

Audit and review of financial statements269260

Vote scrutineering at annual shareholders' meeting56

Greenhouse Gas briefing3–

Total other services86

Total fees paid to auditor277266

Employee benefits7,0196,800

Other expenses3,9864,528

Doubtful debts expense/(recovery)121(36)

Bad debts913

Total administration expenses11,41211,571

18. Interest expense

ACCOUNTING POLICY - INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense on borrowings is recognised using the effective interest method.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Interest expense(42,835)(43,947)

Interest on ground lease (39 Market Place)(1,998)(2,004)

Less amount capitalised to investment properties3,2341,985

Total interest expense(41,599)(43,966)

Capitalised interest relates to the developments at 101 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland, 224 Neilson Street, Onehunga,

Auckland, and 8-14 Mt Richmond Drive, Mt Wellington, Auckland (2024: Capitalised interest relates to the developments

at 101 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland, 105 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland and 224 Neilson Street,

Onehunga, Auckland).

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202550

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

19. Taxation
ACCOUNTING POLICY - TAXATION

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognised in profit or loss except to the

extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted

at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

Group

2025

$000s

Restated

Group

2024

$000s

The taxation charge is made up as follows:

Current tax expense8,5526,444

Deferred tax expense3,970(2,648)

Adjustment recognised in the current year in relation to the current tax of prior years(238)(105)

Total taxation expense recognised in profit or loss12,2843,691

Reconciliation of accounting profit/(loss) tax expense

Profit/(loss) before tax138,140(50,803)

Current tax expense/(credit) at 28%38,679(14,225)

Adjusted for:

Capitalised interest(906)(556)

Fair value movement in investment properties(20,346)31,274

Fair value movement in derivative financial instruments(388)(178)

Depreciation(6,435)(9,358)

Deductible repairs and maintenance expenditure capitalised for accounting purposes(903)(1,368)

Depreciation recovered on disposal of investment properties–876

Tax on accounting gain on disposal of investment properties11277

Other(1,160)(298)

Current taxation expense8,5526,444

Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to:

Investment properties3,465(2,303)

Fair value movement in derivative financial instruments64(79)

Other441(266)

Deferred tax expense3,970(2,648)

Prior year adjustment(238)(105)

Total tax expense recognised in profit or loss12,2843,691

There were no imputation credits at 31 March 2025 (2024: Nil).

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202551

20. Deferred tax
ACCOUNTING POLICY - DEFERRED TAX

Deferred tax is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the financial

statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance

sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax

assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary

differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or

from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affect

neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the

asset realised.

Under NZ IAS 12, the measurement of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets depends on whether an entity expects

to recover an asset by using it or by selling it and includes a presumption that an investment property is recovered entirely

through sale unless it will be consumed over its useful life.

The following are the major deferred tax liabilities and (assets) recognised by the Group, and the movements thereon during the

current and prior reporting years:

Interest rate

swaps

$000s

Investment

property

$000s

Other

$000s

Total

$000s

At 1 April 2024 (Restated)(4,906)15,1031,44111,638

Charge/(credit) to deferred taxation expense for the year643,4654413,970

At 31 March 2025(4,842)18,5681,88215,608

At 1 April 2023 (Restated)(4,827)17,4061,70714,286

Charge/(credit) to deferred taxation expense for the year(79)(2,303)(266)(2,648)

At 31 March 2024 (Restated)(4,906)15,1031,44111,638

Deferred tax is provided in respect of depreciation expected to be recovered on the sale of property at fair value. Depreciation is

claimed at Inland Revenue Department approved rates.

Investment properties are valued each year by independent valuers (as outlined in note 5). These values include an allocation of the

valuation between the land and building components. The calculation of deferred tax on depreciation recovered and changes in fair

value relies on the split provided by the valuers.

It is assumed that all fixtures and fittings will be sold at their tax book value.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202552

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

21. Reconciliation of profit/(loss) after taxation with cash flows from operating activities
Group

2025

$000s

Restated

Group

2024

$000s

Profit/(loss) after tax125,856(54,494)

Movements in working capital items relating to investing and financing activities(25)6,468

Non cash items

Movement in deferred tax liability3,970(2,648)

Movement in interest rate swaps(1,387)(637)

Fair value change in investment properties(72,666)111,691

Movements in working capital items

Trade and other receivables(46)3,096

Taxation payable4111,579

Trade and other payables3,760(4,349)

Other current assets269(806)

Other current liabilities(1,179)285

Net cash from operating activities58,96360,185

22. Earnings/(loss) per share

Basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to shareholders of the Company by the

weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue during the year.

Group

2025

Restated

Group

2024

Profit/(loss) attributable to shareholders of the Company ($000s)125,856(54,494)

Weighted average number of shares on issue (000s)848,491847,110

Basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share (cents)14.83(6.43)

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

Issued shares at beginning of period (000s)847,169846,724

Issued shares at end of period (000s)856,547847,169

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (000s)848,491847,110

On 20 May 2025, a final dividend of 1.6625 cents per share was approved by the Board. Continuation of the Dividend Reinvestment

Plan programme will increase the number of shares on issue.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202553

23. Distributable income and adjusted funds from operations
Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Profit/(loss) before income tax138,140(50,803)

Adjustments:

Revaluation (gains)/losses on investment property(72,666)111,691

Realised (gains)/losses on disposal of investment properties41988

(Gain)/loss on derivative financial instruments held for trading(1,387)(637)

Gross distributable income64,12861,239

Tax impact of depreciation recovered on disposal of investment properties–876

Current tax expense(8,314)(6,339)

Net distributable income55,81455,776

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (000s)848,491847,110

Gross distributable income cents per share7.567.23

Net distributable income cents per share6.586.58

Net distributable income55,81455,776

Amortisation of tenant incentives and leasing costs2,0683,548

Share based payment expense57290

Funds from operations (FFO)57,93959,614

Capitalisation of tenant incentives and leasing costs(1,390)(1,304)

Maintenance capital expenditure(2,116)(2,135)

Maintenance capital expenditure recovered through sale1572,251

Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)54,59058,426

FFO cents per share6.837.04

AFFO cents per share6.436.90

Dividends paid/payable in relation to period6.656.65

Dividend payout ratio to FFO97%94%

Dividend payout ratio to AFFO103%96%

The Company's dividend policy is based on AFFO from the Property Council of Australia Voluntary Best Guidelines for disclosing

FFO and AFFO as interpreted by the Company and amended to include maintenance capital expenditure recovered through sale.

FFO and AFFO are non-GAAP measures and may not be directly comparable with other entities.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202554

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

24. Investment in subsidiaries
The Company has control over the following subsidiaries:

Name of subsidiaryPrincipal activity

Place of

incorporation

Place of

operationHolding 2025Holding 2024

Argosy Property No.1 LimitedProperty investmentNZNZ100%100%

Argosy Property Management LimitedManagement companyNZNZ100%100%

Argosy Cover LimitedCaptive insurerCook IslandsNZ100%100%

The subsidiaries have the same reporting date as the Company.

25. Leases

ACCOUNTING POLICY - LEASES

The Group as a lessee

Argosy do not recognise right of use assets or lease liabilities for short term leases or low value leases. Lease payments for

these leases are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term.

Where Argosy identifies a lease, the following treatment is applied: 

Right of use assets are measured at cost comprising the amount of the initial lease liability, any payments made before the

commencement of the lease, direct costs and any restoration costs. Right of use assets are disclosed within the same line

item as that within which the corresponding underlying assets would be presented if they were owned. Some right of use

assets meet the definition of investment properties. Refer note 5 for policies and disclosure on investment properties.

Lease liabilities are measured at the net present value of the lease payments. These payments include fixed lease payments,

amount expected to be payable under residual value guarantees, variable lease payments that are based on an index or rate,

the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option, and payments of penalties

for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising that option.

These lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease. If that rate cannot be determined, the

lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used, being the rate that the lessee would have to pay to borrow the funds necessary to

obtain an asset of similar value in a similar economic environment with similar terms and conditions.

Subsequent to initial measurement, each lease payment is allocated between the principal and finance cost. The finance cost

is charged to the statement of comprehensive income over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of

interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period.

The maturity analysis of lease liabilities is presented in note 6.

The Group as a lessor

Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of

ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

The Group has entered into commercial property leases on its investment properties. The Group has determined that

it retains all significant risks and rewards of ownership of these properties and has thus classified these leases as

operating leases.

Rental income from operating leases is recognised in the period to which it relates. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating

and arranging an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the leased asset and amortised to property expenses

on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

In the event that lease incentives are paid to enter into the operating leases, such incentives are recognised as an asset. The

aggregate cost of incentives is recognised as a reduction of rental revenue on a straight-line basis.

When a contract includes both lease and non-lease components, consideration is allocated to each component under

the contract.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202555

25. Leases (continued)
Lease liabilities

Lease liabilities relate to the ground lease at 39 Market Place, Viaduct Harbour, Auckland.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Opening balance39,95340,074

Lease liability interest expense1,9982,004

Ground rent paid(2,125)(2,125)

Total lease liabilities39,82639,953

Non-cancellable operating lease receivable

Operating leases relate to the investment properties owned by the Group with the leases expiring between 2026 and 2038. The

lessee does not have an option to purchase the property at the expiry of the lease.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Within one year129,570123,717

One year or later and not later than five years355,084351,049

Later than five years191,770202,356

Total operating lease receivable676,424677,122

There were no contingent rents recognised as income during the year.

26.

 Commitments

Building upgrades and developments

Estimated capital commitments contracted for building projects not yet completed at 31 March 2025 and not provided for were

$48.8 million (2024: $24.0 million).

An unconditional sale and purchase agreement has been entered into to acquire 291 East Tamaki Road, Auckland for $56.0 million.

A deposit of $2.8 million has been paid with the balance due on settlement, which is expected to take place in August 2025.

There were no other commitments as at 31 March 2025 (2024: Nil).

The Company has the following guarantees, which are not expected to be called upon:

As a condition of listing on the New Zealand Stock Exchange (NZX), NZX requires all issuers to provide a bank bond to NZX under

NZX Main Board/Debt Market Listing Rule 2.6.2. The bank bond required from APL for listing on the NZX Main Board is $75,000.

A bank guarantee of $30,000 was provided by Argosy Property No.1 Limited to Auckland Council to allow building consents and LIM

reports to be obtained on account.

27.

 Subsequent events

On 20 May 2025, a final dividend of 1.6625 cents per share was approved by the Board. The record date for the final dividend

is 11 June 2025 and a payment is scheduled to shareholders on 25 June 2025. Imputation credits of 0.2180 cents per share are

attached to the dividend.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202556

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

28. Related party transactions
Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been

eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Details of transactions between the Group and other related parties

are disclosed below.

Group

2025

$000s

Group

2024

$000s

Key management and directors compensation

Salaries and other short term employee benefits1,9752,010

Share based payments–488

Directors' fees796728

Total2,7713,226

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202557

Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Shareholders of Argosy Property Limited

Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Argosy Property Limited and its

subsidiaries (the ‘Group’), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position

as at 31 March 2025, and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income,

statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and

notes to the consolidated financial statements, including material accounting policy

information.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements, on pages 32 to 57,

present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Group as

at 31 March 2025, and its consolidated financial performance and cash flows for the year

then ended in accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to IFRS Accounting Standards

(‘NZ IFRS’) as issued by the External Reporting Board and IFRS Accounting Standards

(‘IFRS’) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (‘ISAs’)

and International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (‘ISAs (NZ)’). Our responsibilities

under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit

of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to

provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of the Group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1

International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International

Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the New Zealand Auditing and

Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’

International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International

Independence Standards), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in

accordance with these requirements.

Other than in our capacity as auditor, vote scrutineering at the annual shareholders’

meeting, and the provision of a greenhouse gas briefing, we have no relationship with or

interests in the Group. These services have not impaired our independence as auditor of

the Group.

Audit materiality We consider materiality primarily in terms of the magnitude of misstatement in the

financial statements of the Group that in our judgement would make it probable that the

economic decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be changed or

influenced (the ‘quantitative’ materiality). In addition, we also assess whether other

matters that come to our attention during the audit would in our judgement change or

influence the decisions of such a person (the ‘qualitative’ materiality). We use materiality

both in planning the scope of our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work.

We determined materiality for the Group financial statements as a whole to be $3.12

million.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most

significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period.

These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial

statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a

separate opinion on these matters.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202558

Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Investment property valuations

As disclosed in note 5 of the consolidated financial

statements, investment properties were valued at $2,149

million as at 31 March 2025. The investment properties are

classified into three segments being, Industrial,

Office and

Large Format Retail.

The methods used for assessing fair values include the

capitalisation of contract income, capitalisation of market

income and discounted cash flow methodologies. Fair values

are calculated using actual and forecasted inputs and

assumptions including market rentals and growth,

maintenance and capital expenditure requirements, an

assessment of yields, discount rates, occupancy, leasing

costs and weighted average lease terms. Adjustments are

made to observable market data of similar properties to

reflect the specific nature and location of the individual

properties.

The Group’s policy is to

engage independent registered

valuers to perform valuations for each of the properties on

at least an annual basis. The valuation of investment

properties is a key audit matter due to the subjective

judgements and

assumptions in the valuation process.

We read the valuation reports for all properties that

were subject to revaluation at year end. We checked for

any limitations of scope in the valuation reports that

would impact the reliability of the valuations. Whe

n

c

onsidered appropriate, discussions were held with the

valuers to confirm the valuation approach used. These

discussions related to the general market, as well as

specific properties identified by us.

We assessed the valuers’ experience and professional

accreditations. This included having each of the valuers

confirm their independence, qualifications and that the

scope of work undertaken was in line with professional

valuation standards and financial reporting standards. I

n

a

ddition, we considered the Group’s process for

reviewing and challenging the valuation reports to

ensure that they accurately reflected the individual

characteristics of each property.

The major inputs to the valuation process were tested

across a sample of properties, with a focus on the

capitalisation of market rent methodology. For the

sample selected, key changes in rental assumptions,

capitalisation rates and other adjustments and terms

were agreed to underlying supporting information.

For a sample of properties, ownership was confirmed

through property title searches.

Our internal valuation specialists assisted in assessing the

appropriateness of the valuation methodology.

Other in formation

The directors are responsible o n behalf of the Group for the other information. The other

information comprises the information in the Climate Related Financial Disclosures and i

n

the A

nnual Report that accompanies the consolidated financial statements and the audit

report.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other

information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether it is materiall

y

inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the

audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If so, we are required to report that

fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Directors’ re

sponsibilities for

the consolidated fin

ancial

statements

The directors are responsible on behalf of the Gr

oup for the preparation and fair

presentation of the consolidated f

inancial statements in accordance with NZ IFRS and

IFRS, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the

preparation of consolidated fi

nancial statements that are free from material

misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202559

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the directors are responsible on behalf
of the Group for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as

applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of

accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease

operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the

audit of the consolidated

financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated

financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to

fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable

assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in

accordance with ISAs and ISAs (NZ) will always detect a material misstatement when it

exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,

individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the

economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial

statements is located on the External Reporting Board’s website at:

https://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-responsibilities/audit-

report-1-1/

This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Restriction on use

This report is made solely to the Company’s shareholders, as a body. Our audit has been

undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s shareholders those matters we are

required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest

extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than

the Company’s shareholders as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the

opinions we have formed.

Peter Gulliver

Partner

for Deloitte Limited

Auckland, New Zealand

20 May 2025

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202560

The Company
Argosy is a limited liability company incorporated under the

Companies Act 1993. Argosy shares are listed on the NZX Main

Board (NZX code: ARG). Argosy’s constitution is available on its

website (www.argosy.co.nz) and the New Zealand Companies

Office website (www.companiesoffice.govt.nz).

Corporate Governance Philosophy

Ultimate responsibility for corporate governance of the

Company resides with the Board of Directors. The Board sees

strong corporate governance and stewardship as fundamental

to the strong performance of the Company and, accordingly,

the Board’s commitment is to the highest standards of

business behaviour and accountability. Outlined below are

the main corporate governance practices in place throughout

the year. In the Board’s opinion, as at 31 March 2025,

the Company complied with the recommendations set by

the NZX Corporate Governance Code (31 January 2025),

except as set out in the Company’s Statement on Reporting

Against the NZX Code, which is available on the Company’s

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Ethical Standards

Argosy’s Code of Conduct and Ethics sets out the ethical and

behavioural standards expected of Argosy’s Directors, Officers

and employees. The purpose of the Code of Conduct and Ethics

is to uphold the highest ethical standards and ensure Argosy’s

Directors, Officers and employees are acting in good faith and

in the best interests of shareholders at all times. The Code of

Conduct and Ethics outlines the Company’s policies in respect

of conflicts of interest, fair dealing, compliance with applicable

laws and regulations, maintaining confidentiality of information,

dealing with company assets and use of company information.

Argosy’s Code of Conduct and Ethics forms part of each

employee’s conditions of employment. Failure to comply with

the principles or the spirit of the Code of Conduct and Ethics

will be considered a serious breach of Argosy policy and will

be investigated. Disciplinary action for breaches of the Code of

Conduct and Ethics may range from a verbal warning through

to termination of employment. Argosy’s Code of Conduct and

Ethics is available on its website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Climate-Related Financial Disclosures

The group climate statements for Argosy and its subsidiaries

are available on the Company's website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Composition of the Board

Argosy is committed to having a Board whose members have

the capacity to act independently and have the composite

skills to optimise the financial performance of the Company and

returns to shareholders. The Constitution provides for there to

be not fewer than three Directors. All the members of the Board

are independent non-executive Directors. The Board does not

impose a restriction on the tenure of any Director as it considers

that such a restriction may lead to the loss of experience and

expertise from the Board.

Attendance of Directors

BOARD MEETINGS ATTENDED

DirectorAttendance

Jeff Morrison (Chair)7 of 7

Stuart McLauchlan6 of 7

Chris Gudgeon7 of 7

Mike Pohio6 of 7

Rachel Winder7 of 7

Martin Stearne7 of 7

Alex Cutler3 of 3

Jeff Morrison, Stuart McLauchlan, Chris Gudgeon, Mike Pohio,

Rachel Winder, Martin Stearne and Alex Cutler were Directors

as at 31 March 2025. Brief resumés of Argosy's current

Directors are included in the section headed “Our Leadership

& Governance” on pages 26 and 27 of this report.

Independent Directors

The Company recognises that independent directors are

important in assuring shareholders that the Board is properly

fulfilling its role and is diligent in holding management

accountable for its performance.

In determining whether a Director is independent, the Board

considers whether the Director is independent of management

and free of any business or other relationship that could

materially interfere with, or could reasonably be perceived to

materially interfere with, the exercise of his or her unfettered

and independent judgement. In accordance with Rule 2.6.1 of

the NZX Listing Rules, the Board has determined that all of

the Directors were, in its view, independent directors as at the

balance date as none of them had a disqualifying relationship

with the Company. In making this determination the Board has

determined that none of the factors referred to in table 2.4 of the

NZX Corporate Governance Code apply to Argosy’s Directors.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202561

Corporate Governance

Board Skills
The skills matrix below presents the Board’s assessments of

its skills and experience against criteria identified as necessary

in the context of Argosy’s business and the wider commercial

environment in which it operates. It helps guide the assessment

of the skills and diversity that the Board has or is looking for,

provides an opportunity to identify gaps in skills that the Board

seeks of current Directors and is part of the Board’s planning

for development, renewal and succession. The matrix will be

reviewed regularly, to ensure the Board’s collective skills and

experience are aligned with the needs of Argosy’s business

and developments in the commercial environment. Beyond

the variety of technical skills and experience listed below, the

Board seeks to work as a team with different personalities and

viewpoints, who will respectfully challenge Management and

each other to support the long term success of the Company.

Property Industry ExperienceExperience in property including but not limited to investment and

divestment, leasing, development and management.

6/7

Commercial ExperienceBroad range of commercial/entrepreneurial/business experience.7/7

FinancialQualifications and experience in accounting and/or finance and the

ability to:

•analyse key financial statements

•critically assess financial feasibility and performance, IRR and cost

of capital

•contribute to strategic financial planning

•oversee budgets and the efficient use of resources

•oversee funding arrangements.

5/7

LegalGeneral experience with legal principles around property, capital raising

and funds management. Experience in corporate and commercial law,

including major contracts.

3/7

Capital MarketsKnowledge of capital markets and experience with raising funds via

the capital markets. Knowledge and awareness of the objectives and

preferences of institutional and retail investors.

3/7

ESGKnowledge and experience of responsible investment.

Environmental: Green Buildings and design, climate change, energy,

water and stranded assets.

Social: Ethical procurement, labour standards and community relations.

Governance: Use of best practice policies, procedures, risk and reporting.

3/7

StrategyBusiness strategy skills, including oversight, development and execution,

business growth, sustainability, capital allocation and planning.

5/7

Risk and ComplianceAbility to identify, mitigate and manage key risks to the organisation in a

wide range of areas including legal, regulatory and operational (including

health and safety).

4/7

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202562

Corporate Governance

Board and Director Performance
The Board will, regularly, critically evaluate its own

performance, and its own processes and procedures to ensure

that they are not unduly complex and are designed to assist

the Board in effectively fulfilling its role. The Board also

regularly reviews and evaluates the performance of each

standing Committee to ensure it is operating consistently with

its constitution and delegations.

Insider Trading and Restricted Persons Trading

Argosy’s Directors, Officers and employees, their families

and related parties must comply with the Insider Trading

and Restricted Persons Trading policy. Amongst other

requirements, the policy identifies three ‘black-out periods’

where trading in the Company’s shares is prohibited (with

limited exceptions, such as a ‘special circumstances’ trading

application). The black-out periods are from the close of trading

on 28 February (or 29 February in a leap year) until the day

following the full year announcement date each year; from the

close of trading on 31 August until the day following the half year

announcement date each year; and 30 days prior to release of a

product disclosure statement for a general public offer of Argosy

securities. The black-out periods do not affect ongoing fixed

participation in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (DRP).

Trading by Directors, Officers, employees and their associates,

requires pre trade approval (with limited exceptions, such

as shares acquired under the DRP). Officers and employees

must obtain approval from any two Directors or a Director

and the Chief Financial Officer and Directors must obtain

pre-trade approval from the Chairman (or in the case of the

Chairman, the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee). The

holdings of Directors of securities in Argosy are disclosed in the

section headed 'Directors' Shareholdings and Bondholdings'

on pages 69 and 70 of this report. Argosy’s Insider Trading

and Restricted Persons Trading Policy is available on its

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Directors and Officers' Indemnification

and Insurance

In accordance with section 162 of the Companies Act 1993

and the Constitution of the Company, Argosy has indemnified

and insured its Directors and employees, including Directors

and employees of subsidiaries, in respect of liability (including

defence costs) incurred for any act or omission in their capacity

as a Director or employee. The insurer reimburses the Company

where it has indemnified the Directors or employees.

Board Committees

Board Committees assist with the execution of the Board’s

responsibilities to shareholders. Each Committee operates

under a Constitution approved by the Board, setting out

its role, responsibilities, authority, relationship with the

Board, reporting requirements, composition, structure and

membership. Argosy’s Board Committee constitutions are

available on its website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Remuneration and Nominations Committee

The Remuneration and Nominations Committee is a standing

Committee of the Board responsible for considering the

remuneration of Directors and senior executives, administering

the Company’s bonus and incentive schemes, succession

planning, reviewing Board composition and skills and making

recommendations in respect of Director appointments. As at

31 March 2025 Jeff Morrison (Chairman), Stuart McLauchlan

and Martin Stearne were members of the Committee.

The Committee’s charter, which sets out its

responsibilities in more detail, is available on Argosy’s

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Attendance at Remuneration and

Nominations Committee

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE MEETINGS ATTENDED

DirectorAttendance

Jeff Morrison (Chair)4 of 4

Stuart McLauchlan4 of 4

Martin Stearne4 of 4

Environmental, Social & Governance

(ESG) Committee

The ESG Committee is a standing Committee of the Board

responsible for identifying and considering ESG matters in

relation to the Company and its operations, including climate

change impacts. As at 31 March 2025 Mike Pohio (Chairman),

Rachel Winder and Alex Culter were members of the Committee.

The Committee’s charter, which sets out its

responsibilities in more detail, is available on Argosy’s

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Attendance at ESG Committee Meetings

ESG COMMITTEE MEETINGS ATTENDED

DirectorAttendance

Mike Pohio (Chair)4 of 4

Rachel Winder4 of 4

Alex Cutler1 of 1

Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee is a standing Committee of

the Board responsible for overseeing the financial, accounting

and risk management responsibilities of the Company. The

minimum number of members on the Audit and Risk Committee

is three. All members must be Directors, the majority must

be Independent Directors and at least one member who is an

Independent Director must have an adequate accounting or

financial background. As at 31 March 2025 Stuart McLauchlan

(Chairman), Jeff Morrison, Chris Gudgeon and Martin Stearne

were members of the Committee.

The Audit and Risk Committee assists the Board in fulfilling

its corporate governance and disclosure responsibilities with

particular reference to financial matters, external audit and

risk management. The Committee’s charter, which sets out

its responsibilities in more detail, is available on Argosy’s

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202563

Attendance at Audit and Risk Committee
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE MEETINGS ATTENDED

DirectorAttendance

Stuart McLauchlan (Chair)3 of 4

Jeff Morrison4 of 4

Chris Gudgeon4 of 4

Martin Stearne4 of 4

Directors' Remuneration

Director remuneration policy

The Remuneration and Nominations Committee reviews

Director remuneration annually and makes recommendations

to the Board. The Board takes advice from independent

remuneration specialists when considering any proposal to

increase the Directors’ fees.

DIRECTORS' FEES

The Company considers it desirable to attract and retain high

performing Directors whose skills and experience are well suited

to the Company’s requirements. To this end, it is important

that the Directors are remunerated appropriately. The current

total Directors’ fee pool approved by ordinary resolution at

the Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting is $853,000 per annum.

Pursuant to Rule 2.11.3 of the NZX Listing Rules, this fee pool

may be increased if a new Director is appointed by an amount

not exceeding the average amount then being paid to each non-

executive director other than the chairperson.

Director remuneration arrangements and outcomes

The Directors’ fees are presently set as follows:

OfficeRemunerationNo. of

people

holding

office

Chair$160,0001

Non-Executive Director$97,5006

Chair of Audit and Risk Committee$20,0001

Audit and Risk Committee Member$12,0003

Chair of Remuneration and

Nominations Committee

$12,5001

Remuneration and Nominations

Committee Member

$6,0002

Chair of ESG Committee$15,0001

ESG Committee Member$10,0002

The approved fee pool includes an unallocated amount of

$100,000 that provides flexibility to remunerate Directors who

assume additional responsibilities (including any one-off project

work and committee memberships) from time to time beyond

the scope of their usual responsibilities. No such remuneration

was provided in the year to 31 March 2025 (2024: Nil).

DIRECTORS' REMUNERATION

Remuneration paid to Directors by the Company during the year is as follows:

DirectorFee

Fee for Audit &

Risk Committee

Fee for Remuneration &

Nomination Committee

Fee for

ESG CommitteeRemuneration

Jeff Morrison (Chair)$160,000$12,000$12,500-$184,500

Stuart McLauchlan$96,420$20,000$6,000-$122,420

Chris Gudgeon$96,420$12,000$108,420

Mike Pohio$96,420--$15,000$111,420

Rachel Winder$96,420--$10,000$106,420

Martin Stearne$96,420$12,000$6,000-$114,420

Alex Cutler$44,610--$3,645$48,255

Total$686,710$56,000$24,500$28,645$795,855

No current or former Director received any other benefits from Argosy during the year to 31 March 2025 (2024: Nil).

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202564

Corporate Governance

Gender Balance
As at 31 March 2025, the gender balance statistics for

the Company's Directors, Officers and all employees were

as follows:

GENDER DIVERSITY

DirectorsOfficersAll employees

Female2 (2024: 1)3 (2024: 3)17 (2024: 15)

Male5 (2024: 5)8 (2024: 10)18 (2024: 21)

Total7 (2024: 6)11 (2024: 13)35 (2024: 36)

As at 31 March 2025, the age statistics for the Company's

Directors, Officers and all employees were as follows.

DirectorsOfficersAll employees

Under 30Nil (2024: Nil)Nil (2024: Nil)4 (2024: 3)

30-50 yrsNil (2024: 2)4 (2024: 5)16 (2024: 16)

Over 507 (2024: 4)7 (2024: 8)15 (2024: 17)

Argosy’s Diversity Policy is available on its website

(www.argosy.co.nz). The Board considers that the diversity

objectives and targets in the Policy are appropriate and that

Argosy is making good progress toward meeting them. You

can find further information on diversity on page 11 of the 2025

Sustainability Report.

Remuneration Report

CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTION:

The Board has established remuneration policies and practices

to attract and retain a high performing management team

to carry on the Company’s property investment business in

the interests of shareholders. All permanent staff are paid

a mixture of fixed and variable remuneration. The variable

component is designed to link pay of employees to both

individual performance and the success of the Company.

During the year the Remuneration and Nominations Committee

considered independent external advice and recommended to

the Board that the long-term incentive  scheme (LTI) for senior

executives should be updated. This has resulted in a new

performance measure which is intended to better incentivise

senior executives and reflect developments in market practice,

since the Company’s LTI scheme was established in 2015. The

new performance measure, which applies for the three year

period commencing on 1 April 2024 is outlined on page 66.

The Remuneration and Nominations Committee has reviewed

the Company’s remuneration policies and practices as outlined

below and discussed them with Management. The Board

considers that they create the foundation for a high performing

Management team whose interests are aligned with the

interests of the Company’s shareholders.

Jeff Morrison, Chairman


REMUNERATION GOVERNANCE

The Board’s Remuneration and Nominations Committee

oversees the Company’s remuneration policy and framework.

These are designed to attract, retain and reward individual

employees who deliver high performance aligned to

business objectives, strategy, shareholder interests and

investment performance.

During the year the Board updated the Company’s LTI

performance measure for performance share rights (PSRs)

awarded during the current year (with a performance period

from 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2027). The LTI performance

measure has been updated to better incentivise senior

executives and to reflect developments in market practice

based on other similar schemes. The new performance measure

is based on a broader range of performance hurdles as

summarised in the table on page 66.

Each member of the Remuneration and Nominations Committee

is independent and Management only attend Committee

meetings by invitation. Further information concerning the

composition of the Remuneration and Nominations Committee

(and other Board Committees) is set out on pages 63 to 64.

The Remuneration and Nominations Committee operates under

a written Constitution and in accordance with the Company’s

Remuneration Policy, both of which are available on the

Company’s website (www.argosy.co.nz). The main features of

the Company’s Remuneration Policy are summarised as follows.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202565

Remuneration Report (continued)
EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION

An employee’s remuneration is comprised of the

following components:

•fixed remuneration;

•variable or ‘at risk’ components.

The fixed remuneration component (including salary, KiwiSaver

contributions, health and disability benefits and private use of

Company vehicles) is designed to reward employees for their

skills and experience and the accountability of their role. The

variable component is comprised of a short term incentive

scheme (STI) for all permanent employees and the LTI scheme

for eligible senior executives. Each component of remuneration

is outlined below.

FIXED REMUNERATION

Fixed remuneration is the primary basis for remunerating the

Company’s employees. Each employee’s fixed remuneration

is determined based on their responsibilities, capability,

performance and market benchmarks. Fixed remuneration for

permanent employees is comprised of their base salary and

benefits. Benefits may include:

•KiwiSaver employer superannuation contributions;

•life and disability insurance;

•health insurance; and

•private use of a company vehicle.

SHORT TERM INCENTIVE SCHEME (STI)

The STI is a discretionary variable pay scheme for

permanent employees, designed to reward participants for

high performance and the Company’s success over the

financial year.

•The STI for all employees other than the CEO is based on

Company and individual performance measures with stretch

performance goals.

•The Company performance measure is based on specific

annual Company targets in relation to net property income,

AFFO and key performance metrics, which are linked to the

Company’s strategy and approved by the Board.

•Individual goals and performance measures are agreed

between each manager and their direct reports, to

encourage outstanding performance.

•Measures and stretch performance goals are reviewed each

financial year.

•The STI for the CEO is based solely on

Company performance.

LONG TERM INCENTIVE SCHEME (LTI)

The Company has established an LTI scheme to remunerate

senior executives for sustained performance over a three-year

period. Under the LTI scheme (which is subject to Board

discretion), the Company may issue PSRs to eligible employees

each year (during the year to 31 March 2025 these were the CEO

and CFO). Each PSR entitles its holder to one share in Argosy on

its vesting date, subject to meeting LTI performance thresholds.

Each PSR has a vesting date three years after commencement

of the financial year in which it is issued.

The LTI performance measure for PSRs with a vesting date

during the current year is a relative Total Shareholder Return

(TSR) performance hurdle based on a comparison of the

Company’s TSR against the TSR of a comparator group of listed

entities determined by the Board, and requiring non-negative

TSR performance over the vesting period.

•Comparator entities are chosen from the S&P/NZX All Real

Estate Gross Index.

•TSRs of the entities in the comparison group over the

performance period (which is three years) will be ranked from

highest to lowest.

•If Argosy’s TSR over the performance period is non-negative

and exceeds the TSR of the company ranked at the 50th

percentile in the comparison group, 50% of the PSRs

will vest.

•If Argosy’s TSR over the performance period is non-negative

and exceeds the TSR of the company ranked at the 75th

percentile in the comparison group, 100% of the PSRs

will vest.

•There is a straight-line progression and apportionment

between these two points.

PSRs with a vesting date during the current year had a vesting

period from 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2024. Although the

Company’s TSR performance over the performance period

exceeded the company ranked at the 75

th

percentile, the TSR

performance was negative and no PSRs vested.

The LTI performance measure for PSRs awarded during the

current year (with a performance period from 1 April 2024 to

31 March 2027) has been updated to better incentivise senior

executives and to reflect developments in market practice

based on other similar schemes. The new performance measure

is based on a broader range of performance hurdles as

summarised in the table below:

Performance hurdleLTI weighting

Relative TSR40%

Absolute TSR40%

FFO growth20%

External independent advice and references to employee

remuneration benchmarks

In the current year, the Company has received independent

and external remuneration advice and considered external

employee remuneration benchmarks. The advice related to

employee salary levels, the level and formulation of the

employee STI scheme, and hurdles for the senior executive

LTI scheme.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202566

Corporate Governance

Remuneration Report (continued)
CHIEF EXECUTIVE'S REMUNERATION

The Chief Executive's remuneration for the year ended 31 March

2025 is outlined below:

Base Salary$677,000

Other benefits$73,500

Short term incentive (STI)$364,000

Long term incentive (LTI)-

Total remuneration$1,114,500

Base salary and other benefits reflect the CEO’s fixed

remuneration during the year. The base salary remained

unchanged from the prior year. The CEO’s maximum STI for

the year is equal to 70% of base salary ($473,900). The

proportion of this amount awarded reflects the Remuneration

and Nominations Committee’s assessment of the CEO’s

performance during the year measured against agreed

performance hurdles in the following areas:

•Financial Performance: Targets based on net property

income and AFFO.

•Health and Safety: Targets based on zero serious

harm injuries.

•Operations & strategic initiatives: Targets based on leasing,

portfolio positioning and strategy.

•Sustainability: Targets based on near term actions in the

Company’s Sustainability Framework.

The STI weightings attributed to each area are shown in the

table below:

Performance hurdleSTI weightingOutcome

Financial performance36%36%

Health and Safety11%11%

Operations & strategic initiatives42%20%

Sustainability11%11%

The CEO did not receive any remuneration under the

Company’s LTI scheme as no PSRs vested during the year to

31 March 2025.

In addition to the total remuneration disclosed above, the CEO

was granted 359,310 PSRs during the year to 31 March 2025

(which have a three-year vesting period commencing 1 April

2024). The grant of PSRs was calculated based on 60% of

base salary and using the volume weighted average price of

the shares sold through the NZX over the period of 10 trading

days ending on 31 March 2024. The LTI is included in the CEO’s

remuneration in the year that the shares vest.

GrantedCommencement datePSR periodVesting date

2021 PSRs180,0051 April 2021Three yearsExpired

2022 PSRs188,9261 April 2022Three yearsExpected FY26

2023 PSRs353,1331 April 2023Three yearsExpected FY27

2024 PSRs359,3101 April 2024Three yearsExpected FY28

The CEO’s shareholdings in the Company are disclosed on page

71 of this report.


ESG disclosures

As at 31 March 2025, the CEO’s base salary of $677,000 was

4.7 times (2024: 4.4 times) that of the base salary of the

median employee at $142,600 per annum. The CEO’s total

remuneration, including STI Earned, of $1,114,500 was 5.5

times (2024: 7.4 times) the total remuneration of the median

employee at $203,300.

The Company does not report gender pay gap information as

it has less than 50 employees. The MindTheGap campaign

considers that it is not appropriate for issuers with less than

50 employees to make a gender pay gap disclosure.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202567

Remuneration Report (continued)
EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION

All employees of the Group are employed by Argosy Property

Management Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the

Company. The number of employees or former employees who

received remuneration and any other benefits in their capacity

as employees of $100,000 per annum or more, are set out in the

following table:

Amount of Remuneration

No. of

Employees

$100,001 - $110,0004

$130,001 - $140,0002

$140,001 - $150,0002

$150,001 - $160,0001

$170,001 - $180,0003

$180,001 - $190,0001

$190,001 - $200,0002

$200,001 - $210,0002

$240,001 - $250,0002

$250,001 - $260,0001

$280,001 - $290,0001

$290,001 - $300,0002

$300,001 - $310,0001

$310,001 - $320,0002

$320,001 - $330,0001

$330,001 - $340,0001

$360,001 - $370,0001

$420,001 - $430,0001

$430,001 - $440,0001

$490,001 - $500,0001

$860,001 - $870,0001

$1,110,001 - $1,120,0001

The CEO salary included in the table above includes the STI

earned in this financial year, and described further on page 67,

which will be paid in the financial year ending 31 March 2026.

No PSRs vested in the year to 31 March 2025.  Employee

remuneration does not include PSRs issued under the

Company’s LTI scheme that have been granted but which have

not vested.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202568

Corporate Governance

Interests Registers
DIRECTORS’ SHAREHOLDINGS AND BONDHOLDINGS

Equity and debt securities in which each Director and associated person of each Director held a relevant interest as at 31 March 2025

are listed below:

DirectorHolderTrusteesInterestShares

Chris GudgeonTrustees of the Twinrock TrustCW Gudgeon, JC

Gudgeon and PB Guise

Beneficial

(family trust)

18,100

Mike PohioTrustees of the Pohio Family TrustMichael Eric Pohio,

Karen Elizabeth

Pohio and Ruby

Trustees Limited

Beneficial

(family trust)

50,000

Rachel WinderRachel WinderBeneficial14,000

Martin StearneFNZ Custodians Limited for the trustees of

the MW and LJ Stearne Family Trust

Martin William

Stearne and Tobias

Edward Groser

Beneficial

(family trust)

200,000

Stuart McLauchlanJBWere (NZ) Nominees LimitedBeneficial78,504

Stuart McLauchlan1804 LimitedBeneficial25,000

Jeff MorrisonInvestment Custodial Services for the

trustees of the Suzanne Fisher Trust

Jeff Morrison and

Barry Fisher

Non beneficial

(professional

trustee)

243,790

Jeff MorrisonInvestment Custodial Services for the

trustees of the LJ Fisher Trust

Jeff Morrison and

Andrew Spencer

Non beneficial

(professional

trustee)

21,636

Jeff MorrisonTrustees of the JM Thompson TrustJeff Morrison,

Robyn Shearer

Non beneficial

(professional

trustee)

357,730

Jeff MorrisonTrustees of the Dalbeth Family Trust No.3William Dalbeth,

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional

trustee)

246,640

Jeff MorrisonTrustees of the Dalbeth Family Trust No.4William Dalbeth and

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional

trustee)

334,300

Jeff MorrisonFNZ Custodians Limited for Stephen

Fisher, Virginia Fisher and Jeff Morrison

as trustees of the Stephen and Virginia

Fisher Trust

Stephen Fisher, Virginia

Fisher and Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional

trustee)

66,000

Jeff MorrisonInvestment Custodial Services Limited for

the Spirit of Adventure Trust Board

Charitable Trust BoardNon beneficial

(professional

trustee)

191,924

Jeff MorrisonInvestment Custodial Services Limited for

Jeff Morrison and Noeline Morrison as

trustees of the J&N Morrison Family Trust

Jeff Morrison and

Noeline Morrison

Beneficial

(family trust)

302,332

Jeff MorrisonInvestment Custodial Services Limited for

the The Lou and Iris Fisher Charitable

Trust Board

Charitable Trust BoardNon beneficial

(director of

trust manager)

155,531

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202569

Interests Registers (continued)
DirectorHolderTrusteesInterest

Number of

ARG010

Bonds

Jeff MorrisonJM Thompson Charitable TrustRobyn Maree Shearer and

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

300,000

Jeff MorrisonWT Dalbeth Family Trust No.3William Thomas Dalbeth &

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

200,000

Jeff MorrisonWT Dalbeth Family Trust No.2William Thomas Dalbeth &

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

200,000

Jeff MorrisonLJ Fisher TrustAndrew Spencer and

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

45,000

Jeff MorrisonSusanne Fisher TrustStephen Fisher and

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

200,000

Jeff MorrisonWT Dalbeth Family Trust No.4William Thomas Dalbeth &

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

300,000

Jeff MorrisonThe Lou and Iris Fisher Charitable

Trust Board

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

100,000

DirectorHolderTrusteesInterest

Number of

ARG020

Bonds

Jeff MorrisonStephen and Virginia Fisher TrustStephen Fisher, Virginia

Fisher and Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

125,000

Jeff MorrisonSusanne Fisher TrustStephen Fisher and

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

200,000

Jeff MorrisonThe Lou and Iris Fisher Charitable

Trust Board

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

200,000

DirectorHolderTrusteesInterest

Number of

ARG030

Bonds

Jeff MorrisonFNZ Custodians Limited for Stephen

Barry Fisher, Virginia Jane Fisher

and Jeff Morrison as trustees of the

Stephen and Virginia Fisher Trust

Stephen Fisher, Virginia

Jane Fisher and

Jeff Morrison

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

150,000

Jeff MorrisonJeff Morrison, John Sieprath, Jon

Dotchin and Dulcie Dotchin as

trustees of the Margaret Claire

Dotchin-Knight Trust

Jeff Morrison, John

Sieprath, Jon Dotchin and

Dulcie Dotchin

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

60,000

Jeff MorrisonJeff Morrison, John Sieprath, Jon

Dotchin and Dulcie Dotchin as

trustees of the Joanne Elizabeth

Dotchin Trust

Jeff Morrison, John

Sieprath, Jon Dotchin and

Dulcie Dotchin

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

60,000

Jeff MorrisonJeff Morrison, John Sieprath, Jon

Dotchin and Dulcie Dotchin as

trustees of the Jonathan Napier &

Dulcie Elizabeth Dotchin Trust

Jeff Morrison, John

Sieprath, Jon Dotchin and

Dulcie Dotchin

Non beneficial

(professional trustee)

60,000

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202570

Corporate Governance

Senior Managers' Shareholdings
Equity securities in which each Senior Manager and associated persons of each Senior Manager held a relevant interest as at

31 March 2025 are listed below:

OfficerHolderTrusteesInterestNo. of shares

Peter MencePeter Mence2022 PSRs

1

188,926

2023 PSRs

1

353,113

2024 PSRs

1

359,310

Peter MenceBeneficial744,099

Trustees of the

Papageno

Trust

Peter Mence,

Stella

McDonald

Non beneficial416,077

Sharesies

Nominee

Limited as

nominee for

Peter Donald

Mence

Sharesies

Nominee

Limited

Beneficial254,437

Dave FraserDave Fraser2022 PSRs

1

110,918

2023 PSRs

1

142,340

2024 PSRs

1

141,839

Dave FraserBeneficial630,616

1.Performance Share Rights issued under the Company's Long Term Incentive Scheme.

Directors and Senior Managers' Share and Bond dealings

The Directors and Senior Managers disclosed the following

dealings which relate to the acquisition of shares and bonds in

the Company during the year:

•Dave Fraser acquired a beneficial interest in 27,000 shares

in the Company on 16 December 2024 for consideration of

$27,813 through an on-market acquisition.

•Dave Fraser disposed of a beneficial interest in 101,616

performance share rights in the Company on 16 July 2024 for

nil consideration which expired under the Company’s Long

Term Incentive Scheme. Dave Fraser acquired a beneficial

interest in 141,839 performance share rights in the Company

on 16 July 2024 for nil consideration which were granted

under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Scheme.

•Peter Mence acquired a beneficial interest in 111,374 shares in

the Company on 11 June 2024 for consideration of $119,975

through an on-market acquisition.

•Peter Mence acquired a beneficial interest in 11,631 shares

in the Company on 18 December 2024 for consideration of

$11,970 under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

•Peter Mence acquired a beneficial interest in 12,497 shares in

the Company on 26 March 2025 for consideration of $12,163

under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

•Peter Mence disposed of a beneficial interest in 180,005

performance share rights in the Company on 16 July 2024 for

nil consideration which expired under the Company’s Long

Term Incentive Scheme. Peter Mence acquired a beneficial

interest in 359,310 performance share rights in the Company

on 16 July 2024 for nil consideration which were granted

under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Scheme.

•Peter Mence acquired a beneficial interest in 56,051 shares in

the Company on 24 May 2024 for consideration of $59,975

through an on-market acquisition.


Peter Mence acquired a beneficial interest in 20,576 shares

in the Company on 27 May 2024 for consideration of $22,016

through an on-market acquisition.

•Peter Mence acquired a beneficial interest in 25,697 shares

in the Company on 28 May 2024 for consideration of $27,975

through an on-market acquisition.

•Stuart McLauchlan acquired a beneficial interest in 25,000

shares in the Company on 24 June 2024 for consideration of

$25,750 through an on-market acquisition.

•Stuart McLauchlan acquired a beneficial interest in 830

shares in the Company on 18 December 2024 for

consideration of $854 under the Company’s dividend

reinvestment plan.

•Stuart McLauchlan acquired a beneficial interest in

25,000 shares in the Company on 24 February 2025 for

consideration of $24,625 through an on-market acquisition.

•Stuart McLauchlan acquired a beneficial interest in 1,318

shares in the Company on 26 March 2025 for consideration

of $1,283 under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 100,000 shares in the Company on

28 May 2024 for consideration of $92,139 through an on-

market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a beneficial interest in 50,000 shares

in the Company on 25 June 2024 for consideration of

$51,097 through an on-market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a beneficial interest in 50,000 shares

in the Company on 26 July 2024 for consideration of

$54,856 through an on-market acquisition.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202571

Directors and Senior Managers' Share and Bond
dealings (continued)

•Jeff Morrison disposed of a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 91,324 shares in the Company on

22 November 2024 for consideration of $99,500 through an

on-market disposal.

•Jeff Morrison disposed of a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 9,132 shares in the Company on

22 November 2024 for consideration of $9,950 through an

on-market disposal.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a beneficial interest in 30,000 shares

in the Company on 28 November 2024 for consideration of

$32,089 through an on-market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 28,570 shares in the Company on

10 December 2024 for consideration of $29,999 through an

on-market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 45,751 shares in the Company on

11 November 2021 for consideration of $69,228 through an

on-market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 76,923 shares in the Company on

28 April 2022 for consideration of $102,820 through an on-

market acquisition.


Jeff Morrison disposed of two non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interests of 5,000 shares each in the Company on

2 April 2024 for consideration of $5,600 each through an

on-market disposal.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 43,668 shares in the Company on

4 June 2020 for consideration of $53,729 through an on-

market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 100,000 ARG010 Bonds on 12 December

2022 for consideration of $94,929 through an on-

market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 100,000 ARG020 bonds on 17 May

2024 for consideration of $92,369 through an on-

market acquisition.

•Jeff Morrison acquired a non-beneficial (professional

trustee) interest in 100,000 ARG020 bonds on 31 July

2024 for consideration of $93,882 through an on-

market acquisition.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202572

Corporate Governance

Directors' Interests
The Directors have declared interests in the entities listed below. Where (R) is included next to the interest, the Director has ceased

to have that interest during the year.

DirectorPositionCompany/Organisation

Stuart McLauchlanDirectorGS McLauchlan & Co

DirectorScenic Hotel Group Limited

ChairmanDunedin Casinos Limited

ChairmanAnalog Digital Instruments Limited

ChairmanScott Technology Limited

DirectorEbos Group Limited

ChairmanSkyline Aviation Limited

Member (R)Marsh Limited Advisory Board

TrusteeSouth Link Education Trust

Mike PohioChairmanRotoiti 15 Investment Limited Partnership

ChairmanMana Ahuriri Holdings Limited Partnership

DirectorWhakapoungakau 24 Limited

Director (R)Te Atiawa (Taranaki) Holdings Limited

DirectorKiwi Group Capital Limited

ChairmanTe Pou Tahua

Jeff Morrison (Chair)TrusteeSpirit of Adventure Trust

Chris GudgeonDirectorNational Infrastructure Funding and Financing Limited

ChairmanNgati Whatua Orakei Whai Rawa Limited

ChairmanNgati Whatua Orakei Housing Trustee Limited

ChairmanWhai Rawa GP Limited

ChairmanWhai Rawa Kainga Development Limited

MemberKiwiRail Holdings Limited Property Committee

Member (R)Niwa Future Property Programme Committee

Board advisorDialog Property (NZ) Limited

Rachel WinderDirectorCurrent Trading Company Limited

DirectorAuckland Thoroughbred Racing Inc.

DirectorTe Atiawa Iwi Holdings Management Limited

DirectorTe Atiawa (Taranaki) Holdings Limited

DirectorWaikato Regional Airport Limited

DirectorTitanium Park Limited

Martin StearneDirector & Shareholder (100%)Encore Advisory Limited

DirectorImpact Ventures CI Limited

MemberImpact Enterprise Fund Investment Committee

MemberNZX RegCo Advisory Panel

MemberTakeovers Panel

Senior AdvisorMontarne Limited

Alex CutlerDirector & ShareholderUrban Constructs (NZ) Limited

Peter MenceDirectorArgosy Property No. 1 Limited

DirectorArgosy Cover Limited

DirectorArgosy Property Management Limited

Dave FraserDirectorArgosy Property No. 1 Limited

DirectorArgosy Cover Limited

DirectorArgosy Property Management Limited

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202573

Information used by Directors
No Director requested to use information received in his or her

capacity as a Director that would not otherwise be available to

the Director.

Indemnities and insurance

The Company effected insurance for Directors, Officers and

employees for liability (including defence costs) arising in

respect of acts or omissions while acting in the capacity of a

director, officer or employee, and a policy for defence costs.

External audit firm guidelines

In addition to the formal constitution under which the Audit

and Risk Committee operates, the Audit and Risk Committee

also has an External Auditor Independence Policy containing

procedures to ensure the independence of the Company’s

external auditor. Argosy’s External Auditor Independence Policy

is available on its website (www.argosy.co.nz).

The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for recommending

the appointment of the external auditor and maintaining

procedures for the rotation of the external audit lead partner.

Under the External Auditor Independence Policy, the external

audit lead partner must be rotated every 5 years.

The Policy covers provision of non-audit services with the

general principle being that the external auditor should not

have any involvement in the production of financial information

or preparation of financial statements such that they might be

perceived as auditing their own work.

Deloitte is the Company’s current external auditor.

NZX rulings and waivers

The Company did not apply to NZX for, nor rely on, any rulings

or waivers during the year to 31 March 2025.

Donations

The Company paid $70,800 across the following sponsorship

payments during the year to 31 March 2025:

Keystone New Zealand Property

Education Trust

$23,500

Lyall Bay Surf Life Savings Club Inc$7,500

New Zealand Green Building Council$5,000

Property Council of New Zealand$1,500

Special Children's Events New Zealand Ltd$2,200

Spirit of Adventure Trust$6,100

St Clair Surf Lifesaving Club Inc$7,500

Taylors Mistake Surf Life Saving Club Inc$7,500

Variety – the Children’s Charity Incorporated$10,000

No other member of the Group made donations in the year to

31 March 2025.

Argosy subsidiaries – Directors

As at 31 March 2025:

•Jeff Morrison, Peter Mence and Dave Fraser were the

Directors of Argosy Property No. 1 Limited;

•Jeff Morrison, Peter Mence and Dave Fraser were the

Directors of Argosy Property Management Limited; and

•Peter Mence, Dave Fraser and Antony WIll were the Directors

of Argosy Cover Limited

No director of any Argosy subsidiary received additional

remuneration or benefits in respect of their directorships other

than Antony Will who is an independent director of Argosy

Cover Limited. Other than the entries set out under the heading

“Directors' Interests”, there were no entries made in the

Interests Registers of Argosy’s subsidiaries during the year to

31 March 2025. The directors of Argosy’s subsidiaries who are

not also directors of the Company have no interests recorded in

the interest registers of those companies.

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202574

Corporate Governance

Risk management
Argosy has a robust risk assessment process. Risk assessment

reviews are carried out by a representative cross-section

of Argosy’s management team at least twice a year in

accordance with Argosy’s Risk Management Framework. A

risk assessment review has three phases: identification of

material risks arising from Argosy’s operation; assessment of

the probability and consequences of the risk and development

of controls to achieve a level of residual risk that is within

Argosy’s risk appetite.

Argosy generally operates within a medium (M), low (L) to

very low (VL) overall risk range. Argosy has a low-risk appetite

for risks associated with managing developments, Value Add

projects and compliance matters. Argosy’s key risks are set out

in the table below:

Business riskMitigationResidual

Risk Rating

Asset Management: Unanticipated

loss of value due to regulatory

changes, inherent defects or poorly

selected acquisitions.

Argosy regularly monitors the quality of its portfolio. This includes

monitoring of seismic performance, cladding and environmental

hazards. Argosy carries out detailed due diligence prior to acquiring

any property.

M

Property Development: Delay, cost

increases or supplier default materially

impacting forecast profitability of

development activities.

Argosy closely monitors project budgets, prepares standardised

reporting for developments, conducts project end review meetings for

efficiency improvement, maintains a dedicated development team, and

fosters strong relationships with key contractors to mitigate risk.

L

Economic downturn: Downturn in

economy leading to tenant distress

and reduced leasing demand.

Argosy carries out comprehensive due diligence on new tenants

and has a diverse base of tenants which provides resilience in an

economic downturn. Tenant arrears are reviewed fortnightly and non-

payment is prioritised and addressed with tenants promptly. Our

portfolio diversification across sectors and geographies, and exposure

to Government tenants, reduces the risk of distressed tenants. Argosy's

weighted average lease term of 5.1 years also limits exposure to reduced

demand during downturns in the business cycle.

M

Insurance: Failure to adequately

insure resulting in uninsured losses.

Argosy engages reputable insurance brokers and carries out regular

insurance valuations to ensure properties are adequately insured. We

seek to reduce risk by both maintaining strong relationships with

local insurers and by accessing offshore insurers in London. Argosy

has established an insurance captive to improve access to overseas

reinsurance markets thereby reducing risks in relation to securing

adequate insurance cover at reasonable cost, particularly in relation to

Wellington earthquake risk.

VL

Health and safety: Non-compliance

with health and safety legislation

by Argosy or its contractors leading

to preventable health and safety

incidents resulting in serious injury

or death.

Argosy has a health and safety framework to manage health and safety

risk. Health and safety is overseen at a management level by the Health

and Safety Committee, and health and safety is a standing agenda item

with routine reporting at Board meetings. Our health and safety systems

are independently reviewed on a three-yearly cycle. We collaborate with

contractors and tenants to promote high standards of health and safety

at Argosy sites.

VL

Disruption to business continuity:

Interruption to business as usual

operations at Argosy's corporate

premises due to natural disaster or

other events impacting Argosy's staff,

property or systems.

Argosy maintains a business continuity plan under which each

employee can work from home and Argosy's business as usual

operations can be carried out away from its corporate offices.

Information technology systems are cloud-based and backed up

locally and overseas ensuring the security and accessibility of

business records.

VL

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202575

Business riskMitigationResidual
Risk Rating

Cyber crime: Financial loss, loss of

business records, or unauthorised

disclosure of sensitive information

due to criminal activity involving

the use of a computer, network, or

networked device.

Argosy staff undertake regular cyber security training to prevent

unauthorised access to Argosy's computer network and systems.

Argosy systems incorporate security features such as disk encryption,

strong passwords, multi-factor authentication, anti-spam technologies,

monitoring tools to pre-emptively detect incidents, and analysis tools

to identify incidents as they happen or after they occur. There are

also strong controls to prevent fraud-induced payments. Argosy's

information technology systems are cloud-based, with multiple backups

locally and overseas by reputable providers to ensure the security

and accessibility of business records. Were Argosy's business records

to become inaccessible due to a cyber event, many key records

could be reconstructed from hard copy documentation and third party

information (such as lease documentation and bank records) and

monthly automatic lease payments would continue to be received

from tenants

L

Interest rates and liquidity:

Unexpected interest rates rises or

rapid and unexpected appreciation

of funding margins leading to

increased costs; or limited capacity

or rationed lending restricts access to

debt funding.

Argosy follows a hedging policy under which it operates within hedging

bands recommended by independent treasury advisors. Bank funding is

confirmed until at least October 2027, and there is added diversification

and tenor from Argosy's Green Bonds. The average duration of Argosy's

total funding is 2.7 years.

M

Breach of bank covenants:

Reduction in property values or

increase in interest costs causes

Argosy to breach bank covenants

Argosy operates under a capital management framework which ensures

regular monitoring of bank covenants. Argosy maintains significant

headroom in its facilities and fosters strong relationships with its

banking syndicate. Regular monitoring includes forecasts of key ratios

(and associated sensitivity analysis) and takes into account the impact

of material transactions.

L

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202576

Corporate Governance

20 LARGEST REGISTERED FINANCIAL PRODUCT HOLDERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025
RankNameUnits% Units

1Accident Compensation Corporation83,301,2969.73

2FNZ Custodians Limited66,770,3437.80

3HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited55,326,2626.46

4BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited50,457,2125.89

5New Zealand Depository Nominee Limited32,721,5883.82

6Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited32,605,5763.81

7Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited31,935,5443.73

8Tea Custodians Limited Client Property Trust Account29,718,7063.47

9Investment Custodial Services Limited25,219,3182.94

10HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street23,963,1842.80

11JPMorgan Chase Bank Na NZ Branch-Segregated Clients Acct23,641,5772.76

12Custodial Services Limited13,449,4231.57

13Adminis Custodial Nominees Limited13,337,0011.56

14Simplicity Nominees Limited10,870,4201.27

15JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited10,706,4761.25

16PT (Booster Investments) Nominees Limited9,548,2571.11

17Christine Anne Mansell & Harvan Trustees Limited7,547,5000.88

18Jarden Custodians Limited6,926,3190.81

19NZX WT Nominees Limited5,854,7210.68

20Peter John Whiting & Janet Graham Whiting & Peter Austin Gowing5,843,3400.68

SUBSTANTIAL PRODUCT HOLDERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Date notice filedNo of shares% of total shares

Accident Compensation Corporation30 October 202378,916,2139.32%

FirstCape Group Limited1 May 202469,597,7448.21%

Salt Funds Management2 March 202344,429,4935.25%

The total number of shares on issue in the Company as at 31 March 2025 was 856,546,809. The only class of shares on issue as at

31 March 2025 were ordinary shares. The number and percentage of shares shown are as advised in the substantial security holder

notice to the Company disclosed by 31 March 2025 and may not be that substantial holder's current relevant interest.

DISTRIBUTION OF SHAREHOLDERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Holding RangeHolder CountHolder Count %Holding Quantity

Holding

Quantity %

1 to 4,9991,19817.632,915,1040.34

5,000 to 9,9991,22317.998,845,5361.03

10,000 to 49,9993,23247.5571,591,6378.36

50,000 to 99,9996329.3042,081,4124.91

100,000 to 499,9994356.4079,915,9739.33

500,000 to 999,999350.5124,476,4182.86

≥1,000,000420.62626,720,72973.17

Total6,797100856,546,809100

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202577

Investor Statistics

20 LARGEST REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ARG010 BONDS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025
RankNameUnits% Units

1FNZ Custodians Limited18,244,00018.24

2Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited15,843,00015.84

3Custodial Services Limited14,047,00014.05

4HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited11,236,00011.24

5Investment Custodial Services Limited5,603,0005.60

6PT (Booster Investments) Nominees Limited - Retail5,339,0005.34

7FNZ Custodians Limited3,109,0003.11

8Commonwealth Bank of Australia2,761,0002.76

9Bank of New Zealand - Treasury Support2,358,0002.36

10ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited1,933,0001.93

11Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited1,418,0001.42

12NZX WT Nominees Limited1,174,0001.17

13Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited835,0000.84

14Tea Custodians Limited Client Property Trust Account822,0000.82

15Westpac Banking Corporate NZ Financial Markets Group605,0000.61

16Andrew Patrick Cunningham & Elizabeth Anne Cunningham500,0000.50

16Hugh McCracken Ensor500,0000.50

18Craig Paul Werner & Lea Lynn Werner380,0000.38

19Frimley Foundation350,0000.35

19JN & HB Williams Foundation350,0000.35

DISTRIBUTION OF ARG010 BONDHOLDERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Holding RangeHolder CountHolder Count %Holding QuantityHolding Quantity %

5,000 to 9,9995312.80294,0000.29

10,000 to 49,99926664.255,322,0005.32

50,000 to 99,9995613.533,048,0003.05

100,000 to 499,999286.764,939,0004.94

500,000 to 999,99930.721,835,0001.84

≥1,000,00081.9484,562,00084.56

Total414100100,000,000100

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202578

Investor Statistics

20 LARGEST REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ARG020 BONDS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025
RankNameUnits% Units

1Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited18,406,00018.41

2Custodial Services Limited12,862,00012.86

3FNZ Custodians Limited12,765,00012.77

4HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited12,250,00012.25

5Tea Custodians Limited Client Property Trust Account7,564,0007.56

6Investment Custodial Services Limited6,925,0006.93

7Westpac Banking Corporate NZ Financial Markets Group5,419,0005.42

8PT (Booster Investments) Nominees Limited - Retail5,416,0005.42

9ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited2,943,0002.94

10Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited2,266,0002.27

11ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited1,584,0001.58

12Commonwealth Bank of Australia867,0000.87

13Bank of New Zealand - Treasury Support715,0000.72

14Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited560,0000.56

15FNZ Custodians Limited545,0000.55

16Henry & William Williams Memorial Trust Incorporated534,0000.53

17Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited510,0000.51

18Craig Paul Werner & Lea Lynn Werner464,0000.46

19Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited377,0000.38

20Frimley Foundation300,0000.30

20JN & HB Williams Foundation300,0000.30

DISTRIBUTION OF ARG020 BONDHOLDERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Holding RangeHolder CountHolder Count %Holding QuantityHolding Quantity %

5,000 to 9,999159.6284,0000.08

10,000 to 49,9998453.851,778,0001.78

50,000 to 99,9992214.101,340,0001.34

100,000 to 499,9992616.674,567,0004.57

500,000 to 999,99931.921,639,0001.64

≥1,000,00063.8490,592,00090.59

Total156100100,000,000100

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202579

20 LARGEST REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ARG030 BONDS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025
RankNameUnits% Units

1Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited26,962,00021.57

2Custodial Services Limited19,185,00015.35

3FNZ Custodians Limited18,759,00015.01

4Tea Custodians Limited Client Property Trust Account10,337,0008.27

5HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited A/C State Street9,326,0007.46

6NZX WT Nominees Limited4,292,0003.43

7Pin Twenty Limited3,000,0002.40

8Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited2,797,0002.24

9JBWere (NZ) Nominees Limited2,701,0002.16

10Generate Kiwisaver Public Trust Nominees Limited2,525,0002.02

11Investment Custodial Services Limited2,022,0001.62

12NZPT Custodians (Grosvenor) Limited2,000,0001.60

13BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited1,800,0001.44

14PT (Booster Investments) Nominees Limited - Retail1,672,0001.34

15Public Trust Class 10 Nominees Limited1,599,0001.28

16FNZ Custodians Limited1,264,0001.01

17ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited912,0000.73

18Sandore Limited800,0000.64

19Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited643,0000.51

20ANZ Custodial Services New Zealand Limited576,0000.46

DISTRIBUTION OF ARG030 BONDHOLDERS AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Holding RangeHolder CountHolder Count %Holding QuantityHolding Quantity %

5,000 to 9,9992710.63148,0000.12

10,000 to 49,99915862.203,139,0002.51

50,000 to 99,999259.841,445,0001.16

100,000 to 499,9992811.024,928,0003.94

500,000 to 999,99962.363,551,0002.84

≥1,000,000103.95111,789,00089.43

Total254100125,000,000100

HOLDINGS OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AS AT 31 MARCH 2025

Director

No. of shares

(non beneficial)

No. of shares

(beneficial)

No. of bonds

(non beneficial)

Stuart McLauchlan103,504

Chris Gudgeon18,100

Martin Stearne200,000

Mike Pohio50,000

Rachel Winder14,000

Jeff Morrison1,617,551302,3322,200,000

Alex Cutler

Directors' Statement

The Board is responsible for preparing the Annual Report. This report is dated 20 May 2025 and is signed on behalf of the Board of

Argosy Property Limited by Jeff Morrison, Chairman and Stuart McLauchlan, Director.

Jeff Morrison

Chairman

Stuart McLauchlan

Director

Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202580

Investor Statistics

Directors
ARGOSY PROPERTY LIMITED

Chris Gudgeon, Auckland

Stuart McLauchlan, Dunedin

Jeff Morrison, Auckland

Mike Pohio, Christchurch

Rachel Winder, Auckland

Martin Stearne, Auckland

Alex Cutler, Auckland

MANAGEMENT

Peter Mence, Chief Executive Officer

Dave Fraser, Chief Financial Officer


Registered Office

39 Market Place

Auckland 1010

PO Box 90214

Victoria Street West 

Auckland 1142

Telephone: (09) 304 3400


Registrar

COMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES LIMITED

159 Hurstmere Road

Takapuna

Private Bag 92119

Auckland 1142

Telephone: (09) 488 8700

Facsimile: (09) 488 8787

Auditor

DELOITTE 

Deloitte Centre

1 Queen Street

Private Bag 115003

Shortland Street

Auckland 1010

Telephone: (09) 303 0700

Legal Advisors

HARMOS HORTON LUSK LIMITED

Vero Centre

48 Shortland Street

Auckland

Telephone: (09) 921 4300


RUSSELL MCVEAGH

Vero Centre

48 Shortland Street

Auckland

Telephone: (09) 367 8000

Bankers to the Company

ANZ BANK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED

ANZ House

23–29 Albert Street

Auckland

BANK OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED

80 Queen Street

Auckland

COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

ASB North Wharf

12 Jellicoe Street

Auckland

WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED

16 Takutai Square

Auckland

INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA (NEW

ZEALAND) LIMITED

188 Quay Street

Auckland


Bond supervisor

THE NEW ZEALAND GUARDIAN TRUST

COMPANY LIMITED

191 Queen Street

Auckland


Argosy Property LimitedAnnual Report 202581

Directory

39 Market Place
PO Box 90214

Victoria Street West

Auckland 1142

P / 09 304 3400

argosy.co.nz

---

FUTURES
SUSTAINABLE

Sustainability Report

2025

Introduction
Saatyesh Bhana

HEAD OF SUSTAINABILITY

“Argosy is transforming its diversified portfolio

valued at $2.1 billion across industrial, office and

large format retail properties, to meet its target that

50% of the portfolio will be Green Buildings by

31 March

2031.”

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202502

Sustainability Report

This is Argosy's Sustainability Report for the year
ended 31 March 2025. It outlines Argosy’s Sustainability

Framework and comments on its performance against

sustainability objectives.

Argosy's approach

Argosy owns and manages a diversified portfolio of industrial,

office and large format retail investment property. Maintaining

a sustainable business model is critical to Argosy’s long-term

performance, and Argosy’s impact on the natural environment

is increasingly important to stakeholders.

Argosy’s Sustainability Framework supports sustainable growth

and ensures that its business is resilient, adaptable and

responsive to change. The Framework is built around material

topics identified in Argosy's ESG materiality assessment,

carried out in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

guidelines, applying a double materiality approach.

Argosy's sustainability polices, practices and performance are

overseen by the Board's ESG Committee and managed under

Argosy's Sustainability Framework.

Performance

•including a sustainability focus in Argosy's governance

structure and policies

•maintaining a Sustainability Framework with

measurable objectives

•assessing performance against sustainability objectives

•reporting on the sustainability of Argosy’s business

A copy of Argosy’s Sustainability Policy can be found on its

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

ESG materiality assessment

Argosy carried out an independently facilitated materiality

assessment process in 2022. This involved engaging with

internal and external stakeholders which included employees,

investors, lenders, tenants, contractors, suppliers, industry

groups and the communities in which Argosy operates.

Material topics were then determined based on interviews

with stakeholders and a workshop with members of Argosy’s

Management Team. A review of Argosy’s peers, media

commentary, industry perspectives, as well as Argosy’s internal

documentation was also carried out. The overall results were

classified by importance with respect to stakeholders and

business impact.

The materiality assessment identified seven material ESG

topics as shown in the matrix below. The Board's ESG

Committee has reviewed the material topics reported below and

considers that there have been no changes in Argosy's activities

or impacts which would alter the material topics identified.

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202503

THE MATERIAL TOPICS
The material topics are defined and broken down into sub-topics in the table below, which are reflected in Argosy’s Sustainability

Framework and reported on below in this Sustainability Report:

PillarTopicSub-topicDefinition

EnvironmentGreen buildings•Embodied carbon

•Resource efficiency

–Energy

–Water

–Waste


Sustainable and efficient use of resources in the

build process. Minimising the negative impact of

Argosy's buildings and embracing new opportunities

to positively impact the environment.

Climate change•Decarbonisation

•Climate adaptation

Actively transitioning to a net zero carbon economy

and adapting to the physical impacts of climate

change to maintain a resilient portfolio.

SocialTenant experience,

engagement and wellbeing

•Tenant experience

•Support tenants

sustainability practices

•Tenant health, safety

and wellbeing

Creating flexible, healthy, high quality and

sustainable spaces for tenants. Actively engaging

with tenants to understand and meet their

changing needs.

Engaged, healthy, diverse

and capable workforce

•Employee health, safety

and wellbeing

•Employee engagement

and growth

•Diversity and inclusion

Cultivating a strong, healthy workplace culture that

attracts, engages and develops high performing

teams that embrace diversity of thought.

Community engagement•Community impact

•Community partnerships

Engaging and supporting local communities in

which Argosy operates.

GovernanceESG governance•ESG governance

•Communication

and transparency

•Investor engagement

•Compliance

and regulation

Building strong, responsible ESG leadership and

governance frameworks to enable delivery on

sustainability ambitions. Disclosing ESG progress

and initiatives to stakeholders.

ESG leadership•Provide leadership

in the sustainability

space within the

property industry

•Support suppliers and

contractors to implement

sustainable practices

Encouraging sustainable change throughout

Argosy's value chain and industry.

Argosy’s GRI index is set out on page 19 of this Sustainability Report.

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202504

Sustainability Report

8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner, Wellington.
Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202505

Environment
Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202506

Sustainability Report

Argosy's approach

Argosy recognises that an important part of its responsibility to

stakeholders, and central to ensuring a sustainable business,

is to focus on the reduction of environmental impacts from its

property portfolio arising from carbon emissions from energy

consumption and waste. This is reflected in the identification

of Green Buildings and climate change as material topics in

connection with the environment during the ESG materiality

assessment. Argosy's strategy, targets and progress in relation

to these topics is outlined below.

Green Buildings

The Green Building Council of Australia developed the

Green Star rating system for sustainable buildings and

the New Zealand Green Building Council (NZGBC) revises

and customises the framework to reflect the New Zealand

environment. Based on this framework, Argosy's Green

Buildings have Green Star ratings and/or NABERSNZ ratings.

The Green Star rating tool is New Zealand’s largest voluntary

and truly holistic sustainability rating system for buildings.

NABERSNZ is an energy efficiency rating that standardises each

buildings energy use to allow comparisons between buildings.

It also provides information about how much energy a building

uses, providing a benchmark against which energy reductions

can be targeted and measured.

In accordance with Argosy’s Green Bond Framework, “Green

Buildings” are existing and/or planned Office, Industrial and

Large Format Retail buildings, including upgrades, that are

either targeting or have been certified as obtaining either a

minimum 4 Star NZGBC Green Star Built rating or a minimum

4 Star NABERSNZ Energy Base Build Rating or Energy

Whole Building Rating. Argosy's Green Buildings are identified

in its Our Portfolio report, which is available on Argosy's

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

With a focus on ensuring the long-term sustainability of its

business, coupled with a target that 50% of the portfolio (by

market value) will be Green Buildings by 31 March 2031, Argosy

will continue to transform the portfolio into one which is better

for the environment and delivers better outcomes for tenants

and their staff.

All of Argosy’s current and planned developments are either
retrofits of existing buildings or redevelopments of brownfield

sites, and target at least a 5 Green Star rating. By focusing

on the retrofitting of existing buildings and redevelopment of

brownfield sites, Argosy minimises the environmental impact

associated with its development activities and contributes to

the revitalisation of urban environments. Argosy has no current

or planned developments on greenfield sites.

Argosy has developed particular expertise from its experience

retrofitting existing office buildings as Green Buildings.

Examples include the office redevelopment at 105 Carlton Gore

Road completed in 2024 achieving a 6 Green Star Office Built

Rating, and 8 Willis Street which is described further below.

In its 8 Willis Street redevelopment, Argosy reduced embodied

emissions by strengthening an existing five-level concrete and

steel building frame on the site with seismic dampers and

incorporating it into the design of an eleven-level building

for Government occupancy (6 Green Star Office Built rating).

Argosy also redevelops industrial sites, such as the recently

completed Building B at 224 Neilson Street, for which it has

achieved a 6 Star Design and As Built rating.

Argosy's recent development of the 6 Green Star rated Building

B on a brownfields site at 224 Neilson Street illustrates

its commitment to the development of Green Buildings.

This project incorporates building features which reduce

environmental impact, enhance resilience and contribute to a

better tenant experience:

•Low carbon concrete, with up to 20% cement substitutes,

significantly reduces carbon emissions

•Stormwater management is addressed through advanced

overland flowpaths designed to handle high rainfall events,

ensuring effective water management

•The buildings boast a high freeboard of double the building

code requirement, providing additional flood protection

•Rainwater harvesting systems are installed, with tanks

supplying water for building wash and non-potable bathroom

needs, reducing reliance on mains water

•Solar energy is harnessed through PV solar arrays, providing

1.0mW of power

•Lower GHG refrigerants are used in hybrid systems with heat

recovery to attenuate greenhouse gas emissions

•High-performance façades are designed to reduce solar

gain, enhancing energy efficiency

•Advanced electrical systems include smart LED lighting

to deliver increased comfort and minimise energy

consumption, sub-metering systems to track performance

and site infrastructure designed to accommodate EV

charging requirements


Development plans are informed by climate risk and

adaptation plans, with buildings designed to withstand 3.1

degrees of climate change, ensuring long-term resilience

With a focus on ensuring the long-term sustainability of its

business, coupled with a target that 50% of the portfolio (by

market value) will be certified Green Buildings by 2031, Argosy

will continue to transform its portfolio into one which provides

dividend growth to shareholders, builds resilience, is better for

the environment, and delivers better outcomes for tenants and

building occupants.

The Company is improving the environmental performance of

its properties and as at 31 March 2025, approximately 33% of

the portfolio by market value has achieved Green Star and/or

NABERSNZ ratings of 4 Stars or higher. In terms of net lettable

area, 63.6% of Argosy’s net lettable office space and 10.7%

of industrial space is comprised of Green Buildings. Based on

presently available information and projections, Green Buildings

included in Argosy's current 10-year plan would be sufficient to

meet its target for 50% of its portfolio (by market value) to be

Green Buildings by 31 March 2031. However, meeting the target

by 2031 will depend on the commercial environment, leasing

activity and construction timeframes.

Performance

Green Star

•6 Green Star Design & As-Built Rating at Building B, 224

Neilson St (certified November 2024)

•6 Green Star Office Built Rating at 105 Carlton Gore Road

(certified March 2024)

•targeting a minimum 4 Green Star Rating on new builds and

major refurbishments

•of Argosy's twelve Green Star rated buildings, 8 have ratings

of 5 Green Stars or better

NABERSNZ


Argosy is targeting NABERSNZ ratings on all of its office

buildings by 2026 so that energy performance can be

tracked and improved

•installing energy sub-metering at all office buildings to

allow for efficient data collection, monitoring, measuring

and reporting

•targeting a minimum 4 Star Rating on new builds and

major refurbishments

•currently averaging above 5 Stars across ten green-

rated buildings

33%

Completed Green Buildings in the portfolio (by market value)

8 Buildings

With a rating of 5 Green Stars or better

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202507

Climate change
Argosy is committed to transitioning to a low-emissions,

climate resilient economy. This commitment is reflected in

third party certifications for its Green Buildings. These are New

Zealand Green Building Council Green Star ratings (around

overall building quality, environmental benefits, recycling,

environmental products and waste diversion) and NABERSNZ

ratings (energy use) as outlined previously.

Beyond Green Building certification, Argosy is also focused

on reducing the environmental impact of each building in

its portfolio, including carbon emissions, energy consumed

and waste produced. Argosy is developing plans for each

building that take advantage of opportunities to reduce the

environmental impact of its portfolio, in a steady and considered

way, and to obtain third party verification where practicable to

validate building performance.

Performance

During the year Argosy maintained an emissions reduction

plan, Toitū Net Carbon Zero Certification and portfolio-wide

initiatives to reduce its emissions.The emissions reduction plan

targets a 17.5% reduction from a FY24 baseline by FY31. The

main initiatives to help Argosy achieve its emission reduction

plan and an update on progress are outlined in the table below.

TargetsActions

Green Star certifications for all new buildings, and reviewing

emissions from construction during Green Star evaluations.

Argosy is developing Green Buildings on sites at 224 Neilson

Street and the Mt Richmond Industrial development.

Install sub-metering to monitor energy usage, with a target for

sub-metering at all Argosy office buildings by December 2026.

Argosy has installed energy sub-metering at twelve of its

thirteen office buildings.

Eliminate fossil fuel emissions from Argosy's buildings

by FY30 (excluding emergency fire systems and tenant-

controlled emissions).

Argosy is investigating alternatives to gas powered building

services and planning decarbonisation projects at two office

buildings. This should contribute to reduced fossil fuel

emissions and improved NABERSNZ ratings.

Phase out R22 refrigerants and replace with lower GHG potential

refrigerants by FY31.

Argosy is also investigating options to phase out R22

refrigerants and replace them with lower GHG potential

alternatives. During the year Argosy surveyed air-conditioning

units across its portfolio. This confirmed the refrigerants used

and provides a basis for optimising the maintenance of air-

conditioning units, replacing equipment using R22 refrigerants

and minimising refrigerant emissions over time.

Generate renewable energy and associated renewable energy

certificates from solar projects.

Argosy has solar panels installed on five office buildings and

its is registered as a renewable energy certificate generator,

contributing to emissions reductions through renewable energy

certificates. During the year Argosy piloted a solar project on an

industrial building at 224B Neilson Street, with electricity to be

supplied to the tenant and the excess to the grid.

Reducing waste from the construction and operation of buildings.Argosy has waste diversion targets for all new developments

which help to reduce emissions during construction. It is also

introducing waste diversion targets for areas of buildings that

are under Argosy’s control (such as common areas) and it

requires waste management service providers it works with to

collect information on recycling. 

Further information about Argosy's emissions reduction plan

and Carbon Zero certification overseen by Toitū Envirocare is

set out below and in the Metrics and Targets section of its

Climate-Related Financial Disclosures which are available on

Argosy's website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Toitū Envirocare Net Carbon Zero

Argosy has engaged Toitū Envirocare (Toitū) to calculate its

carbon footprint and provide emissions management guidance

by implementation of an emissions reduction plan for Scopes

1 & 2 and some Scope 3 emissions and has maintained a Net

Carbon Zero Certification since 2020.

Toitū Certification ensures that Argosy is meeting international

best practice in terms of measuring, reporting and monitoring

its carbon emissions. As a requirement of the Net Carbon Zero

Certification, Argosy has implemented an emissions reduction

plan. More information about the emissions reduction plan and

Argosy's performance is provided in the Metrics and Targets

section of Argosy's Climate-Related Financial Disclosures which

are available on Argosy's website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202508

Sustainability Report

7 Waterloo Quay, Wellington.
Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202509

Social
Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202510

Sustainability Report

Argosy's approach

Argosy’s commitment to building a better future extends to

managing its impacts on stakeholders, including its tenants,

workforce and community. 

•Resilience involves maintaining strong and valued

relationships by actively engaging with stakeholders

•As one of New Zealand's premier commercial landlords,

Argosy has a unique opportunity to make a difference to its

tenants and contractors

•Argosy promotes social initiatives which contribute to the

wider community

Tenant experience, engagement and wellbeing

Argosy is focused on creating flexible, healthy, high-quality,

and sustainable spaces for its tenants. Argosy actively

engages with tenants to understand their changing needs and

proactively manages tenant relationships to ensure it meets

their expectations. This ensures that Argosy provides high

quality and safe environments where its tenants and their

workers can confidently work, prosper and flourish.

To promote health, safety and wellbeing, Argosy also offers

new tenants comprehensive health and safety inductions. The

induction process covers essential safety protocols, emergency

procedures, and specific building requirements to ensure

a common understanding of health and safety. Inductions

promote a collaborative approach and contribute to the safety

of people working at Argosy's sites.

Performance

Argosy carries out annual tenant surveys and targets

high satisfaction levels across various measures, including:

professionalism in its dealings with tenants; satisfaction with

property management services; how well Argosy is meeting

tenant needs; and whether tenants would recommend Argosy

as a property partner. The results of tenant surveys help

Argosy identify areas where it is performing well and areas

for improvement.

“We asked our tenants about their future property

requirements, 38% indicated their needs would

likely increase during the next five years. We’re now

well placed to have discussions on how we are able

to support their future business growth.”

Haley Jones

MANAGER PROPERTY SERVICES

Engaged, healthy, diverse and
capable workforce

Health and wellness are relevant to all aspects of working

life, from the quality and safety of the physical working

environment to how employees feel about their job, their

workplace (including resources and setup), their environment,

and company culture. Employee wellbeing improves an

organisation's ability to deliver on its objectives, goals

and strategy.

Argosy prioritises the cultivation of a strong, healthy

workplace culture that attracts, engages, and develops high-

performing teams and embraces a diversity of thought. It

provides employees with a high quality and safe physical

working environment and carries out an annual employee

survey to gauge how employees feel about their jobs,

the workplace (including resources and setup), the working

environment, professional development opportunities and the

Company culture.

Argosy is also focused on the health, safety and wellbeing

of workers employed by contractors and subcontractors who

work at its sites. It collects information from its contractors

on their health and safety policies, makes observations of

work practices, and follows up reported health and safety

incidents. Argosy believes that ensuring contractors maintain

high standards of health, safety and wellbeing for their workers

also leads to high quality work and better results from

contractors and subcontractors. This is addressed further in

relation to Worker Engagement at page 13.

Performance

•annual employee survey

•collection of contractor health and safety policies

•observation of contractor work practices

TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT

Argosy is committed to investing in its employees' skills and

experience to promote a skilled and professional workforce.

As the business evolves and adapts to an ever-changing

competitive environment, so must the resources available to

meet those demands. Personal development plans are part of

every Argosy employee's Employee Performance Plan (EPP).

The EPP is created with the employee's line manager and

reviewed as part of the annual review process.

During the year, Argosy employees continued to upskill in

areas relevant to its business, including topics such as the

development and operation of Green Buildings, and health and

safety. Argosy’s staff regularly participate in industry workshops

and events. During the year approximately 63% of Argosy

employees received training from external providers, with an

average of eighteen hours of training per employee. 

Argosy’s Study Assistance Policy supports permanent

employees with further education toward recognised

qualifications relevant to their future employment with the

Company. Argosy pays up to 100% of tuition fees and provides

paid study leave. During the year, Argosy supported a staff

member studying for a post-graduate qualification through

the Auckland University of Technology. In prior years, Argosy

has supported staff through undergraduate and post-graduate

degree courses and professional examinations.

Argosy maintains a stable workforce with a low rate of turnover,

which was 8.5% during the year. It recognises competition

for high performing employees in the property industry

and engages in succession planning. Argosy’s succession

planning, from the periodic recruitment of graduates through

to more senior appointments and promotions, identifies capable

employees and opportunities for promotion. This ensures that

there is a pool of staff ready to step-up when opportunities

present themselves.

Performance

•study assistance policy

•professional development

•succession planning

DIVERSITY

Argosy remains committed to building and sustaining a diverse,

inclusive and supportive work environment for its employees.

The Company values the diversity of its workforce, which

is supported by its Diversity Policy, available on its website

(www.argosy.co.nz), which outlines its management approach

and contains measurable benchmarks for achieving diversity

goals. Key principles within the Diversity Policy include: treating

people with respect, valuing the contribution of others and

maintaining a zero tolerance policy for discrimination. Argosy

continues to retain talented people to support the delivery of its

strategy and recruit new ones as required.

Performance

Argosy discloses gender, ethnic and age diversity across

its business. The table below summarises Argosy's ethnic

diversity. Gender and age diversity are disclosed at page 65 of

the Company's Annual Report (available at www.argosy.co.nz).

71%European

23%Asian

3%NZ Māori

3%Pacific People

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202511

Health, Safety and Wellbeing Framework
During the year, Argosy updated its Health, Safety and

Wellbeing Framework which sets out its vision of what

good health, safety and wellbeing look like. The Framework

focuses on nine strategic goals based around leadership,

worker engagement and risk management, as set out in the

table below:

THREE PILLARSSTRATEGIC GOALSDESCRIPTION

WHAT GOOD HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELLBEING LOOKS LIKE

Leadership

We lead by example to

foster a culture that promotes

and values health, safety and

well-being.

1. Maintain a safety-first culture

Embed HSW as core values in our organisational

culture, encouraging proactive risk management and

continuous improvement.

2. Monitor and continually

improve

Monitor and continually improve the performance of

Argosy’s HSW framework.

3. Comply with legislation and

regulations

Comply with relevant legislation and regulations (e.g.

Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, Building Act 2004

and associated regulations).

Worker engagement

The engagement of workers,

ensuring they feel valued, heard

and empowered, is crucial to

maintaining a healthy and safe

work environment.

4. Engage and educate

employees

Consult and actively engage with employees to ensure

they have the training, skills, knowledge and resources

to maintain a healthy and safe workplace.

5. Encourage contractor,

consultants and tenant

commitment

Actively encourage our contractors, consultants and

tenants to demonstrate the same commitment to

achieving excellence in health and safety performance

as Argosy does.

6. Support staff health and

wellbeing

Support the health and wellbeing of Argosy staff and

encourage the safe and early return to work of injured

or ill employees.

Risk management

We proactively identify hazards,

and assess and mitigate risks,

to ensure the safety of workers.

7. Identify hazards and manage

risks

Proactively identify hazards and risks and implement

improvements/controls to eliminate, isolate or

minimise the risk of harm.

8. Report and investigate

incidents

Accurately report our incidents and investigate root

causes of serious incidents in a timely manner.

9. Focus on critical risks

Focus on critical risk areas, including management of

contractors, tenant works, high-risk works and general

contractor approval.

Argosy’s health, safety and wellness practices during the year

are outlined below.

LEADERSHIP

Argosy’s Health, Safety and Wellbeing Framework is

implemented by Management’s Health and Safety Committee

and overseen by the Board, where Health and Safety is a

standing agenda item at each meeting. Argosy’s Directors

regularly attend site visits with Argosy’s Head of Health, Safety

and Compliance to familiarise themselves with health and safety

practices in the property industry.

Management’s Health and Safety Committee, which provides a

report to each Board meeting, includes a representative cross-

section of the Management Team providing the opportunity

for input on Health and Safety matters from across Argosy’s

business. The Head of Health, Safety and Compliance presents

the Committee’s report to the Board.

Argosy’s Head of Health, Safety and Compliance routinely visits

sites to observe contractor work practices. This occurs at pre-

start meetings prior to commencement of work and while work

is carried out. Concerns about contractor work practices and

reported incidents are routinely followed up with contractors.

The Head of Health, Safety and Compliance also meets

regularly with Argosy’s preferred contractors which provides

an opportunity to collaborate on concerns raised by Argosy or

contractors. During the year Argosy arranged a mental health

awareness event for contractors, inviting contractors it works

with to a presentation from a prominent mental health advocate.

Every three years, Argosy engages external health and safety

experts to review its health and safety system and provide

recommendations. A review was carried out in 2024 and

recommendations from the review have been implemented.

Performance

•Board site visits

•routine health and safety reporting

•regular Health and Safety Committee meetings

•pre-start meetings and observations for works at

Argosy sites

•external health and safety review carried out in 2024

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202512

Sustainability Report

WORKER ENGAGEMENT
Argosy is committed to training and development, ensuring that

Argosy employees have access to appropriate health and safety

training resources. This includes health and safety inductions

for new employees, regular training updates and support for the

safe and timely return to work of injured employees.

To facilitate employee engagement, Argosy maintains a

Workplace Health and Safety Committee (WHSC). The WHSC

focuses on health, safety and wellness for Argosy’s corporate

workplace and operations and offers a forum for Argosy

employees to raise any concerns they have about their

working environment.

Argosy promotes employee wellness by offering flexible

working arrangements, a paid parental leave top-up, subsidised

gym memberships and access to an independent employee

assistance programme. It also provides access to subsidised

health, life and disability insurance for all permanent employees.

New tenants are inducted by Argosy’s Head of Health, Safety

and Compliance which ensures an understanding of hazards

and promotes ongoing collaboration. Leases set out health

and safety requirements and the Head of Health, Safety

and Compliance meets with tenant representatives on a

regular basis.

Argosy also promotes the health, safety and wellness of

contractors and subcontractors, particularly in the construction

industry. Contractors engaged by Argosy undergo a pre-

qualification before they can work at its sites. It also includes

health and safety requirements in agreements with contractors,

and collects information about contractor health, safety and

wellness practices.

Performance

•employee engagement through the WHSC and annual

staff surveys

•non-pay benefits and subsidised health, life and

disability insurance

•tenant inductions and regular meetings with

tenant representatives

•contractor prequalification and observations

RISK MANAGEMENT

Argosy has identified the following areas of particular focus for

managing health and safety risks in the context of its property

investment and management business:

•processes for appointing and managing contractors

•processes for identifying and managing high-risk work

•tenant alterations and additions

Argosy uses technology to streamline hazard management, risk

identification and incident reporting. Its contractor management

system allows real time notification of hazards, emergency

procedures and building information to contractors visiting

Argosy sites, through smart phone technology. This also

provides transparency over contractor attendance at its sites.

Argosy's event management and incident reporting system

enables it to keep track of reported hazards and follow up

with contractors. 

Argosy is committed to actively encouraging tenants and

contractors to demonstrate the same commitment to achieving

excellence in health and safety performance as Argosy does.

Argosy requires pre-start meetings with contractors appointed

to carry out work for Argosy, and encourages collaborative

meetings with tenants carrying out alterations and additions.

Performance

•contractor approval and induction process for

new contractors

•annual reviews of contractor health and safety policies and

reported incidents

•monthly meetings with key contractors to discuss health and

safety issues

•pre-start meetings for high-risk work (for example, hot works

and working at height)

•following up reported health and safety breaches

with contractors

•working with contractors to organise workshops on issues

such as mental health, suicide prevention awareness and

stress management

•providing training and personal protective equipment to

Argosy employees

•collaboration with fire, roofing, evacuation and building wash

contractors to provide practical, hands-on workshops for

front line staff

•collaboration with tenants carrying out alterations to ensure

a clear allocation of health and safety responsibilities

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202513

Community engagement
Argosy actively engages with and supports the local

communities in which it operates. Its objectives in community

engagement include investing in community organisations and

activities that align with the vision of building a better future.

Evidence of Argosy's commitment includes its support for surf

life saving clubs, Spirit of Adventure Trust, Keystone Trust,

Variety – The Children’s Charity and staff volunteer days, where

employees have the opportunity to support an organisation of

their choice, participating in activities such as planting native

trees and supporting conservation efforts.

SURF LIFESAVING

Argosy is proud to support the Hot Water Beach,

Taylor's Mistake, St Clair, Lyall Bay and Red Beach Surf

Lifesaving Clubs. 

“Argosy's support plays a vital role in sustaining

our operations—ensuring our volunteers are well-

equipped, well-trained and ready to respond.”

Matthew Bradley

CHAIRMAN, ST CLAIR SURF LIFE SAVING CLUB

These five clubs and their members are part of a larger

family of 74 surf lifesaving clubs in New Zealand, with

over 4,500 volunteer surf lifeguards patrolling at over 90

locations each summer. Lifeguards donate thousands of hours

to patrol beaches, saving lives and ensuring the safety of

beachgoers in New Zealand communities. Each year, Argosy's

contributions help these clubs ensure that both locals and

visitors can enjoy the beaches safely. This partnership reflects

Argosy's commitment to supporting local communities. Argosy

is dedicated to fostering strong community relationships and

contributing to the overall safety and enjoyment of New

Zealand's coastal areas.

SPIRIT OF ADVENTURE TRUST

Argosy is proud to support the Spirit of Adventure Trust and

the incredible work they do with young people from all over New

Zealand.  For many years Argosy has been providing financial

support for scholarships to deserving young people who need a

helping hand to access a Spirit of Adventure youth development

voyage. This is a unique experience, positively impacting the

lives of those who take part for years to come and Argosy loves

being part of this adventure.

Photo supplied by St Clair Surf Lifesaving Club.

Photo supplied by the Spirit of Adventure Trust.

Photo supplied by the Spirit of Adventure Trust.

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202514

Sustainability Report

Nathan Herbert from Argosy (left) with Pius Mihigo, recipient of the 2025
Keystone Argosy Property Limited Scholarship.

Argosy staff volunteering at the Papakura Stream Restoration Project.

Members of the Argosy team volunteering at Selwyn Bush, March 2025.

KEYSTONE TRUST

Argosy is now in its second year as a Keystone Trust

Scholarship partner. It was with great pleasure that Argosy

presented the 2025 Keystone Argosy Property Limited

Scholarship to Pius Mihigo, a student at AUT, studying a

Bachelor of Construction in Quantity Surveying. Keystone Trust

is instrumental in breaking down barriers students face by

offering financial aid, mentorship, and industry connections.

This support assists students to obtain a tertiary education and

set themselves up for a successful property or construction

career. Argosy is proud to support promising students like

Pius, who demonstrate passion, commitment and potential

within the property and construction industry. The Scholarship

award ceremony was a wonderful celebration, bringing together

students, industry leaders and sponsors to celebrate the

promising future of the property and construction industry.

VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY

Argosy continues to support Variety – The Children’s Charity

and the Warm Hearts Appeal, a vital initiative aimed at providing

warm beds and bedding to children in need across New

Zealand. This programme was designed in response to the

increasing rate of respiratory-related hospitalisations amongst

New Zealand's children and young people. In 2024, the Warm

Hearts Winter Appeal benefited thousands of children by

supplying them with new beds and bedding packs. Argosy’s

support for this cause reflects its commitment to building

stronger, healthier communities.

ARGOSY STAFF VOLUNTEER DAYS

Argosy provides its staff the opportunity to take a volunteer

day off and support a charity of their choice. Volunteering is

a vital way for Argosy staff to engage with the communities it

operates in, contributing towards its vision of building a better

future. Many of Argosy's staff undertook volunteer work during

the year. A number of them chose to support Conservation

Volunteers New Zealand, participating in environmental

conservation events across Auckland communities such as

Rosebank, Papakura and Selwyn. Argosy staff collaborated

with others to combat invasive pest plants and weeds,

contributing to the restoration of Auckland’s native ecosystem

and protecting threatened species of plants and animals.

Performance

•One hundred and eighty-eight volunteer hours completed by

Argosy staff

•Sponsorship of $70,800 to community organisations

188

Volunteer hours completed by Argosy staff

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202515

Corporate Governance
Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202516

Sustainability Report

Argosy's approach

Argosy is committed to maintaining the highest standards

of corporate behaviour and accountability, acting in good

faith and in the best interests of shareholders. The ethical

and behavioural standards expected of Directors, Officers and

employees are set out in Argosy's Code of Conduct and

Ethics. Argosy’s website contains key governance policies

which support the delivery of the highest standards of corporate

behaviour. Policies include:

•Code of Conduct and Ethics

•Conflicts of Interests Policy

•Diversity Policy

•Sustainability Policy

•Insider Trading and Restricted Persons Policy

•Investor Communications Policy

The Board has established the following committees,

frameworks and policies to manage governance risks and

promote high performance.

•The Board’s Audit and Risk Committee overseas the

implementation of Argosy’s Risk Management Framework.

The Risk Management Framework and Strategic Risk

Register are reviewed twice-yearly. The Risk Management

Framework is implemented by a Risk Management

Committee comprised of a representative cross-section of

Management and controls are implemented to ensure risks

are within Argosy’s risk appetite.

•Health and Safety Framework: The Board overseas the

implementation of the Company’s Health and Safety

Framework. The Framework is implemented by a Health

and Safety Committee comprised of a representative cross-

section of the Management Team.

•The Board’s ESG Committee overseas the implementation

of Argosy’s Sustainability Framework, which is based on

material topics identified in an ESG materiality assessment

(see page 3).

•The Board’s Remuneration and Nomination Committee

overseas remuneration practices and succession planning.

This includes responsibility for making recommendations

on succession planning, Director appointments, senior

management remuneration, employee bonuses and

remuneration reporting.

•Continuous Disclosure and Investor Communication Policies

ensure compliance with continuous disclosure obligations.

Performance
•Key risks are disclosed in Argosy’s Annual Report and

current and anticipated climate-related risks are disclosed

in Argosy’s Climate Related Disclosures (each available

at www.argosy.co.nz)

•Health Safety and Wellbeing Framework, described on

page 12

•The Board reviewed and updated its skills matrix during

the year

•Alex Cutler was appointed as a new Director, bringing

particular sustainability expertise

•Argosy’s CEO remuneration reporting is based on the NZX

remuneration template

•Regular two-yearly reviews of key governance policies

•Reporting against the NZX Corporate Governance Code

(available at www.argosy.co.nz)

•There were no reported regulatory breaches during the year

Sustainability Governance

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - SUSTAINABILITY

Argosy’s Sustainability Governance practices are overseen

by the Board’s ESG Committee in accordance with the

Sustainability Framework. The Sustainability Framework is

based on an ESG materiality assessment carried out by an

external consultant in accordance with GRI guidelines. This

means that Argosy’s Sustainability objectives and targets are

based on feedback from stakeholders.

Argosy’s Board holds an annual ESG capacity-building session

with particular input from the ESG Committee. These sessions

contribute to the Board’s understanding of topical ESG issues.

Argosy has a target to maintain an ESG rating of at least an

"A" with MSCI, which has been achieved for the current year

(rating issued in October 2024). This validates the Company's

ongoing efforts to meet high standards of ESG performance

and transparency.

Argosy’s annual tenant survey includes questions about

the Company’s sustainability performance. Argosy has a

Sustainable Procurement Strategy under which it has

registered as an accredited Living Wage Employer, and

it collect information from suppliers about their policies

and commitments in relation to diversity and inclusion,

sustainability and employment (including modern slavery risks).

Performance

•Annual ESG capacity building session

•“A” MSCI ESG rating

•Annual tenant survey

ESG LEADERSHIP

Argosy is committed to encouraging sustainable change

throughout its value chain and in the property industry.

It supports suppliers and contractors in implementing

sustainable practices and encourages them to adopt

sustainability standards.

Argosy’s efforts to promote sustainable practices and drive

innovation have been recognised through various awards. In

2024, Argosy's 8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner project

in Wellington received the Property Industry Supreme Award at

the Property Council New Zealand Property Industry Awards.

This project also won category awards for Commercial Office

Property and Heritage & Adaptive Reuse, highlighting its

sustainability credentials.

The 8 Willis Street building is Wellington’s first 6-Green

Star built rated commercial building, and is New Zealand’s

first completed project to achieve the maximum ten available

innovation points. This recognition underscores Argosy's

commitment to creating energy efficient buildings that benefit

both the environment and the community. More information

about the 8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons Corner project and

the awards it has received are included on page 6 of Argosy’s

Annual Report (available at www.argosy.co.nz).

During the year Argosy's Head of Sustainability, Saatyesh

Bhana, was honoured with a People in Property Award for his

outstanding work in sustainability and Green Buildings. He is a

frequent speaker and leading advocate for sustainable building

practices. Saatyesh’s leadership and innovation have been

instrumental in advancing Argosy's sustainability initiatives.

He has led numerous Green Building developments and

redevelopments, including the 8 Willis Street/Stewart Dawsons

Corner project, which underpin Argosy’s commitment to

sustainability and target for 50% of its portfolio to be Green

Buildings (by market value) by 31 March 2031.

Performance

•Property Industry Supreme Award

•Saatyesh Bhana, People in Property Award

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202517

Annual Meeting
Argosy’s Annual Shareholders Meeting (ASM) will be held as

a hybrid meeting on 22 July 2025 at 2pm at the Royal New

Zealand Yacht Squadron in Auckland. Argosy continues to

utilise the hybrid functionality of the ASM. It allows shareholders

to attend in-person or virtually and participate in all elements

of the meeting including questions & answers and voting. All

shareholders are encouraged to attend the meeting where there

will be an opportunity to ask questions about the Company and

meet the Board of Directors.

Retail Roadshow

The 2025 Retail Roadshow schedule has been finalised. Chief

Executive Officer Peter Mence is planning a twelve city visit of

New Zealand in May and June. The Retail Roadshow remains

an important engagement tool for Argosy’s Management to

meet directly with shareholders and update them on the

company's performance, sustainability goals and strategic

plan. This initiative underscores Argosy's commitment to

maintaining strong relationships with its shareholders and

ensuring transparent communication about the company's

future direction.

KEY DATES

(Indicative only and are subject to change)

23 May – 16 June 2025

Annual Retail Roadshow

25 June 2025

Final quarter FY25 dividend payment

22 July 2025

Annual Shareholders Meeting

September 2025

FY26 1st Quarter Dividend Payment

November 2025

FY26 Interim results release

December 2025

FY26 2nd Quarter Dividend Payment

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202518

Sustainability Report

GRI index
General Disclosures

Disclosure titleGRILocation or reference

Organisational details2-1Argosy Property Limited is a publicly listed company head quartered in

Auckland with operations in New Zealand

Entities included in the organisation’s

sustainability reporting

2-2Annual Report, page 55 (note 24)

Reporting period, frequency and

contact point

2-3Sustainability Report, page 3; Annual Report pages 80-81

Restatements of information2-4Argosy's FY24 GHG emissions were restated (see 2025 Climate-related

Disclosures) following the implementation of a new reporting system

External assurance2-5Argosy’s sustainability reporting is not subject to external assurance

Activities, value chain and other

business relationships

2-6Annual Report, pages 17-19

Employees2-7Annual Report, page 65

Workers who are not employees2-8Argosy does not have any workers who are not employees and whose

work is controlled by the organisation

Governance structure and composition2-9Annual Report, pages 26-27, 63-64 and 73

Nomination and selection of the highest

governance body

2-10Annual Report page 62 and Statement on Reporting against the NZX

Code, page 1 (available at www.argosy.co.nz)

Chair of the highest governance body2-11The Chair is not a senior executive

Role of the highest governance body in

overseeing the management of impacts.

2-12Argosy Board Charter, pages 1-2 (www.argosy.co.nz)

Delegation of responsibility for

managing impacts

2-13Sustainability Report, page 17

Role of the highest governance body in

sustainability reporting

2-14Sustainability Report, page 16

Conflicts of interest2-15Annual Report, page 61

Communication of critical concerns2-16Argosy has not established formal processes for the communication of

critical concerns to the Board

Collective knowledge of the highest

governance body

2-17Sustainability Report, page 17; Annual Report page 62

Evaluation of the performance of the highest

governance body

2-18Sustainability Report, page 17; Annual Report page 62

Remuneration policies2-19Annual Report, pages 64-67

Process to determine remuneration2-20Annual Report, pages 64-67

Annual total compensation ratio2-21https://www.argosy.co.nz/assets/2.5.25-GRI-topic-specific-

dislosures-FY25-All-v2.pdf

Statement on sustainable

development strategy

2-22Annual Report, pages 14-15

Policy commitments2-23Argosy does not have formal policy commitments referring to

intergovernmental instruments or human rights

Embedding policy commitments2-24Argosy does not have formal policy commitments referring to

intergovernmental instruments or human rights

Processes to remediate negative impacts2-25Argosy has not established formal stakeholder grievance processes

Mechanisms for seeking advice and

raising concerns

2-26Argosy has a Protected Disclosures (Whistleblower) Policy which is

available on its website (www.argosy.co.nz)

Compliance with laws and regulations2-27Argosy did not incur any significant fines or other non-monetary

sanctions during the reporting period

Membership of associations2-28NZGBC and PCNZ

Approach to stakeholder engagement2-29Sustainability Report, page 3

Collective bargaining agreements2-30Argosy staff are not covered by collective agreements

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202519

Sustainability Report

Topic Specific Disclosures
Disclosure titleGRILocation or reference

Process to determine material topics3-1Sustainability Report, page 3

List of material topics3-2Sustainability Report, page 4

Green Buildings

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, pages 6-7

Disclosure on energy intensity302https://www.argosy.co.nz/assets/2.5.25-GRI-topic-

specific-dislosures-FY25-All-v2.pdf

Climate Change

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, pages 7-8 and Climate Related

Disclosures (www.argosy.co.nz)

Disclosure on emissions305https://www.argosy.co.nz/assets/2.5.25-GRI-topic-

specific-dislosures-FY25-All-v2.pdf

Tenant experience, engagement and wellbeing

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, page 10

Engaged, healthy, diverse and capable workforce

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, pages 11-13

Employment401https://www.argosy.co.nz/assets/2.5.25-GRI-topic-

specific-dislosures-FY25-All-v2.pdf

Diversity405Sustainability Report, page 11; Annual Report, page 65

Community engagement

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, pages 14-15

ESG governance

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, page 17

ESG leadership

Disclosure on management approach3-3Sustainability Report, page 17

Statement of useArgosy Property Limited has reported the information

cited in this GRI content index for the year ended

31 March 2025 with reference to the GRI Standards

Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202520

Sustainability Report

1-3 Unity Drive, Auckland.
Argosy Property LimitedSustainability Report 202521

39 Market Place
PO Box 90214

Victoria Street West

Auckland 1142

P / 09 304 3400

argosy.co.nz

---

2025 Climate-Related
Financial Disclosures

–related

CLIMATE

IMPACTS

Overview
Saatyesh Bhana

HEAD OF SUSTAINABILITY

“The impact of Argosy’s business on the


natural environment is an increasingly important

consideration for investors, occupiers and other

stakeholders. An important part of our responsibility

is to identify and assess the risks presented by climate

change. Argosy considers that the development

of certified energy efficient Green Buildings is an

important part of our response to climate change.”

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures02

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Argosy is responding to climate change principally through
its strategy to develop certified energy efficient and climate

resilient “Green Buildings”. These are buildings which have a

Green Star Rating or a NABERSNZ rating of 4 Stars or better.

Argosy has a target for 50% of its portfolio, measured by market

value, to be Green Buildings by 2031.

This is Argosy’s second year reporting under the XRB’s

mandatory Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standard 1: Climate-

related Disclosures (NZ CS 1). NZ CS 1 mandates scenario

analysis based on three different climate change scenarios,

each based on a set of plausible but challenging assumptions

about the future. Scenario analysis enables us to explore

how various uncertain future climate change risks could

affect Argosy.

Adding to last year’s Disclosures, Argosy’s Climate-related

Disclosures for the year ended 31 March 2025 include

descriptions of the current financial impacts and anticipated

financial impacts of climate change based on Argosy’s scenario

analysis, as well as Argosy’s plan for transitioning to a low-

emissions climate resilient economy.

Plausible challenging scenarios are not

predictions or projections

In accordance with the intention of NZ CS 1, the three scenarios

described in the strategy section of this report are plausible

but challenging futures based on industry scenarios. These

scenarios are intended to highlight certain risks presented

by climate change and are not intended as projections or

predictions of what climate change impacts may or will actually

affect Argosy in the future.

As they are not predictions or projections of what climate

change impacts may or will actually affect Argosy in the future,

neither the scenarios themselves nor the commentary, risk

assessments or estimates in this report with respect to the

scenarios should be interpreted or relied on as forward-looking

statements about what Argosy considers may or will happen in

the future.

It is also important to acknowledge that this is the second

year of mandatory reporting under NZ CS 1, and there is no

settled approach to the scenario analysis and risk assessment

requirements under this Standard. It is anticipated that a

continuous improvement mindset will be required as scenario

analysis and risk assessment practices mature over the initial

years of mandatory reporting.

Statement of compliance

The Climate-related Disclosures in this report have been

completed in relation to the Argosy Property Limited group

and comply with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards.

In preparing these disclosures, Argosy has relied on the

following adoption provisions from Aotearoa New Zealand

Climate Standard 2: Adoption of Aotearoa New Zealand Climate

Standards (NZ CS 2):

•Adoption provision 6: exemption from disclosure of

comparative metrics. This exemption permits Argosy to

disclose one year (rather than two years) of comparative

information in its second reporting period.

•Adoption provision 7: exemption from disclosure of analysis

of trends. This provision applies for the second reporting

period to exempt Argosy from the requirement to disclose

an analysis of the main trends evident from a comparison of

metrics from previous reporting periods.

For and on behalf of the Board

Stuart McLauchlan, Director

Jeff Morrison, Chairman

20 May 2025

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures03

Governance
DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVE:

To enable primary users to understand both the role

an entity’s governance body plays in overseeing climate-

related risks and climate-related opportunities, and the

role management plays in assessing and managing those

climate-related risks and opportunities.

GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURES:

To achieve the disclosure objective above, an entity

must disclose the following information

a) the identity of the governance body responsible for

oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities

b) a description of the governance body’s oversight of

climate-related risks and opportunities

c) a description of management’s role in assessing and

managing climate-related risks and opportunities

a) Identity of the governance body

The Argosy Board is responsible for establishing, reviewing

and monitoring processes to identify climate-related risks and

opportunities. The Board’s Audit and Risk and ESG Committees

also support the Board with governance in relation to climate-

related risks and opportunities as outlined below.

b) Governance body oversight

Argosy’s Board acquires skills and competencies necessary

to oversee climate-related risks and opportunities through its

Director nomination process and various training initiatives.

Training initiatives include an annual Board-led session on

sustainability risks, presentations from external speakers, and

presentations from the Management Team in relation to

sustainability risks and opportunities affecting Argosy.

While Argosy’s Board is ultimately responsible for managing

climate-related risks and opportunities, responsibility for

overseeing climate-related risks and opportunities is delegated

to the Board’s Audit and Risk Committee which makes

recommendations to the Board on how climate-related risks

and opportunities should be managed. The Board’s ESG

Committee, which is responsible for overseeing Argosy’s

Sustainability Framework and making recommendations on its

approach to sustainability, also has a responsibility to raise

climate-related risks and opportunities.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures04

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Climate-related risks and opportunities are integrated into
Argosy’s Risk Management Framework and Strategic Risk

Register which are reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee

semi-annually. The Audit and Risk Committee makes

recommendations to the Board in respect of the management

of climate-related risks and opportunities also semi-annually,

and this includes informing the Board of climate-related risks

and opportunities through the Strategic Risk Register.

Strategy, reporting and monitoring in relation to climate-related

risks and opportunities are addressed in Argosy’s Sustainability

Framework, which is overseen by the Board’s ESG Committee.

Climate-related risks and opportunities raised by the ESG

Committee are added to the Strategic Risk Register overseen

by the Audit and Risk Committee in accordance with Argosy's

Risk Management Framework.

The Sustainability Framework includes Green Buildings and

Climate Change among Argosy’s material sustainability factors.

Each material sustainability factor has its own objectives

and targets which are reported to the Board’s ESG

Committee quarterly. More information about Argosy's material

sustainability factors is provided in Argosy’s Sustainability

Report (available at www.argosy.co.nz).

Targets from the Sustainability Framework are reflected in

Argosy’s strategy, budget and operating plan. Under Argosy’s

remuneration policy, targets linked to climate-related risks and

opportunities are included in the short-term incentive for each

Argosy employee other than the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). In the case of the CEO and

CFO specific targets are agreed, which include achievement of

targets for managing climate-related risks and opportunities.

c) Management's role

Climate-related risks and opportunities are identified and

assessed by Argosy’s Risk Management Committee, which

meets semi-annually and reports to the Board’s Audit

and Risk Committee. The Risk Management Committee

comprises a representative cross-section of the Management

Team including the CEO and CFO. The Risk Management

Framework under which it operates includes a risk appetite and

criteria for identifying and assessing climate-related risks and

opportunities arising from scenario analysis. Climate-related

risks and opportunities are reviewed at least semi-annually in

accordance with Argosy’s Risk Management Framework along

with other risks.

Argosy’s Sustainability Committee also contributes to the

management of climate-related risks and opportunities,

through the implementation of Argosy’s Sustainability

Framework and reporting to the Board’s ESG Committee on

material sustainability factors. The Sustainability Committee

meets at least quarterly and comprises a representative cross-

section of the Management Team, including the CEO, CFO and

Head of Sustainability.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures05

Strategy
DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVE:

To enable primary users to understand how climate

change is currently impacting an entity and how it may

do so in the future. This includes the scenario analysis

an entity has undertaken, the climate-related risks and

opportunities an entity has identified, the anticipated

impacts and financial impacts of these, and how an

entity will position itself as the global and domestic

economy transitions towards a low-emissions, climate-

resilient future.

STRATEGY DISCLOSURES:

To achieve the disclosure objective, an entity

must disclose:

a) a description of its current climate-related impacts

b) a description of the scenario analysis it

has undertaken

c) a description of the climate-related risks and

opportunities it has identified over the short, medium,

and long term

d) a description of the anticipated impacts of climate-

related risks and opportunities

e) a description of how it will position itself as the

global and domestic economy transitions towards a low-

emissions, climate-resilient future state

a) Current climate-related impacts

A current climate-related impact is one identified as having

a material impact during the year ended 31 March 2025. A

climate impact is considered material if it had the potential

to influence business-as-usual operations, achievement of

business or strategic objectives, value, or media coverage.

CURRENT TRANSITION IMPACTS

Green Buildings

Argosy has identified tenant preferences for energy efficient

certified Green Buildings as its only material current transition

impact. Green Buildings are considered a material current

transition impact as they are an important part of Argosy’s

strategy and Argosy has a target for 50% of its portfolio to be

comprised of Green Buildings by 31 March 2031.

Green buildings may present an opportunity if occupiers and

investors are attracted to Green Buildings and a risk if Argosy

is required to incur additional capital expenditure to develop

Green Buildings (which is not adequately compensated by

increased returns). To put these opportunities and risks in

context, Argosy’s first Green Building was certified in March

2014 and to date each of its fifteen Green Buildings has

competed effectively with otherwise similar buildings built to

New Zealand's Building Code in terms of development cost

and feasibility.

Argosy incurred total expenditure of $49.4 million on

developing Green Buildings in the year to 31 March 2025. The

added costs of Green Buildings can depend on factors such as

design features for increased efficiency and resilience that are

not required by the Building Code, and the stage in the design

process that such features are incorporated into the design

(earlier incorporation of design features tends to reduce their

cost). Argosy has not disclosed the additional financial impact

of developing a Green Building compared to a building built to

the Building Code as this information is not presently available.

Compensating for their added cost, Green Buildings have the

potential for higher returns from increased rents, reduced

vacancy and lower capitalisation rates. While there is New

Zealand based research evidencing higher returns (see for

example JLL’s August 2024 report “Turning Green to Gold:

The impact of green certifications on rents, prices and

values” and CBRE's November 2024 report "Auckland CBD

Office Space and Occupier Market Sustainability Analysis"),

Argosy has not disclosed the financial impact of increased

returns from its Green Buildings as this information is not

presently available. Key information for each of Argosy’s

properties, including market value, vacancy and passing yield,

is published in Our Portfolio 2025 which is available on Argosy’s

website (www.argosy.co.nz).

Since Green Buildings are designed to be more energy efficient

than regular buildings, they can be expected to have lower

operating costs than buildings designed to satisfy Building

Code requirements. Lower operating costs directly benefit

tenants under net leases where tenants pay for energy

consumed by building services, and directly benefit Argosy

under gross leases where Argosy pays for energy consumed

by building services. Argosy has not disclosed the financial

impact of reduced operating costs as this information is not

presently available.

CURRENT PHYSICAL IMPACTS

Argosy has not identified any material current physical impacts

(or associated financial impacts) of climate change on its assets

or operations for the year ended

31 March 2025.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures06

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

b) Scenario analysis undertaken
Argosy has analysed three climate scenarios to help identify its

climate-related risks and opportunities and better understand

the resilience of its business model and strategy. These

scenarios are intended to be plausible and challenging

scenarios highlighting certain risks presented by climate

change and are not intended as projections or predictions

of what climate change impacts may or will actually affect

Argosy in the future. Neither the scenarios themselves, nor the

commentary, risk assessments or estimates in this report with

respect to the scenarios, should be interpreted or relied on as

forward-looking statements about what Argosy considers may

or will happen in the future.

The scenario analysis described in this report is based on the

Climate Scenarios for the Construction and Property Sector

Ngā Horopaki Āhuarangi mō te Rāngai Hanganga me ngā

Whare, developed by Beca Limited for the New Zealand Green

Building Council (issued in 2023). Argosy, along with industry

peers, contributed to the development of these scenarios.

The industry scenarios have each been adapted to better

reflect Argosy’s specific circumstances, while ensuring that they

remain plausible and yet challenging. Summaries of Argosy’s

three scenarios are set out on pages 8 to 10.

c) Climate-related risks and opportunities

SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG TERM

Argosy defines short, medium and long term as follows:

•Short term: 2025 – 2030

•Medium term: 2030 – 2050

•Long term: 2050 – 2100

These time-frames differ from Argosy's conventional

operational and strategic, budgeting and planning time

horizons. However, they are considered appropriate as

they reflect the long-lived nature of both climate-related

risks and opportunities and Argosy's property assets. The

identification of risks over longer time frames complements

strategic, budgeting and planning time horizons by providing

an opportunity to consider and address longer term

climate-related risks and opportunities during internal capital

deployment and funding decision making processes.

CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Argosy has identified climate-related risks and opportunities

over the short, medium and long term based on the

following criteria:

•Physical risks are risks arising from the physical impacts

of climate change (such as the risk of physical damage to

Argosy properties). Physical risks may be acute (such as

severe weather events) or chronic (such as sea level rise).

•Transition risks are risks arising from the transition to a low

emissions climate resilient economy (such as requirements

for buildings to be more energy efficient and resilient to

physical climate change impacts).

•Opportunities are potentially positive climate-related

outcomes (such as demand for Green Buildings). These

can include opportunities arising from climate mitigation

and adaptation measures (such as rainwater harvesting

opportunities from increased rainfall).

The table on pages 12 to 13 below describes and assesses

material climate-related risks and opportunities based on

analysis of the three climate scenarios above and includes

information about whether they are physical or transition risks

or opportunities and their impacts. An impact is considered

material if it is identified as having potential to influence

business-as-usual operations, achievement of business or

strategic objectives, value or media coverage. Risks are

assessed on a five-point scale: “very low,” “low”, “medium”,

“high” and “severe”. The table on pages 12 to 13 shows

Argosy’s assessment of the residual risk remaining after

consideration of available controls and mitigations.

The scenarios are not predictions or projections of what

climate change risks and opportunities may or will actually

affect Argosy in the future. Neither the scenarios themselves

nor commentary, risk assessments or estimates in this

report should be interpreted or relied on as forward-looking

statements about what Argosy considers may or will happen in

the future.

In assessing climate-related risks and opportunities it has

been assumed that: the efficiency and climate adaptation

requirements for Green Star rated buildings will meet

stakeholder expectations and regulatory requirements for

buildings to be energy efficient and resilient under each of the

three scenarios, and Councils will be able to maintain public

infrastructure in built-up areas over the long term.

Funding and capital deployment decisions in relation

to anticipated climate-related risks and opportunities are

addressed under Argosy’s Sustainability Framework, which

identifies Green Buildings and climate change as material

sustainability factors. Each material sustainability factor has

its own objectives and targets. Targets in the Sustainability

Framework are considered in the development of Argosy’s

strategy, budget and operating plan.

Argosy's three climate scenarios ("Orderly", "Disorderly" and

"Hot House World") are summarised on pages 8 to 10.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures07

Scenario One - Orderly
SCENARIO ONE - ORDERLY

•Global warming is limited to 1.5°C by 2100.

•New Zealand achieves net zero CO

2

emissions by 2050.

•From 2030, existing buildings must disclose energy and

carbon performance. New buildings must be much more

energy efficient than they are required to be under the

existing code.

•Entities that fail to set and meet ambitious emission reduction

targets face financial repercussions.

•The construction sector experiences significant growth fuelled

by the development of greener infrastructure and efficiency

projects, crowding out greenfield development activity.

•Employers encourage their employees to work from home

to reduce emissions and there is an ongoing trend for more

remote working and use of shared working spaces.

•The anticipated physical impacts of sea-level rise affect the

valuation of properties in low-lying coastal areas long before

the physical impacts themselves eventuate.

•Properties in low-lying coastal areas and floodplains or with

unstable ground conditions face insurance retreat by 2050.

New Zealand achieves net-zero CO

2

emissions by 2050,

contributing to global efforts which limit warming to 1.5°C by

2100. Decarbonisation is driven by uniform and immediate

regulatory changes that promote resource efficiency. These

include regulations requiring existing buildings to disclose

energy and carbon performance and making new buildings

much more energy efficient.

With these changes, buildings built to the existing building

code become unattractive to tenants concerned with their

environmental impact. The construction sector experiences

significant growth fuelled by the development of greener

infrastructure and energy efficiency projects. Construction

becomes more costly which reduces the margins for developers,

effectively crowding out a large portion of the construction and

redevelopment activity that may otherwise have been expected.

With broad public support for decarbonisation, there is a high

expectation for entities to set and achieve ambitious emission

reduction targets. Where entities fail to set targets or meet

expectations, financial repercussions can be expected from

lenders, investors, and the Government, with restricted access

to capital and funding.

Employers encourage employees to work from home to reduce

emissions. This leads to increased demand for residential

dwellings and local shared working spaces with suitable

amenities, affecting the demand for office buildings.

While the global response to climate change is successful

in limiting the physical impacts of climate change, New

Zealand along with the rest of the world faces an increase

in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events.

Greater frequency of high intensity rainfall affects properties

in floodplains, or with unstable ground conditions, which face

relatively higher insurance premiums and suffer insurance

retreat by 2050.

The long-term effects of baked in sea-level rise adversely affect

coastal properties in low-lying areas as associated risks are

priced into property valuations and the cost of insurance (to the

extent it remains available).

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures07

Strategy

DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVE:

To enable primary users to understand how climate

change is currently impacting an entity and how it may

do so in the future. This includes the scenario analysis

an entity has undertaken, the climate-related risks and

opportunities an entity has identified, the anticipated

impacts and financial impacts of these, and how an

entity will position itself as the global and domestic

economy transitions towards a low-emissions, climate-

resilient future.

STRATEGY DISCLOSURES:

To achieve the disclosure objective, an entity

must disclose:

a) a description of its current climate-related impacts;

b) a description of the scenario analysis it

has undertaken;

c) a description of the climate-related risks and

opportunities it has identified over the short, medium,

and long term;

d) a description of the anticipated impacts of climate-

related risks and opportunities; and

e) a description of how it will position itself as the

global and domestic economy transitions towards a low-

emissions, climate-resilient future state.

a) Current climate-related impacts

A current climate related impact is identified as having a

material impact during the year ended 31 March 2024. A climate

impact is considered material if it had the potential to influence

business-as-usual operations, achievement of business or

strategic objectives, value, or media coverage.

CURRENT TRANSITIONAL IMPACTS

Argosy has identified tenant preferences for certified Green

Buildings as a current transitional impact. Green Buildings are

considered a material current impact as they are an important

part of Argosy’s strategy and Argosy has a target for 50% of its

portfolio to be comprised of Green Buildings by 31 March 2031.

Argosy’s first Green Building was certified in March 2014 and to

date Green Buildings have competed with regular buildings in

terms of development cost and feasibility. Green buildings may

present an opportunity if occupiers and investors are attracted

to Green Buildings and a risk if Argosy is required to incur

additional capital expenditure to develop Green Buildings.

CURRENT PHYSICAL IMPACTS

Argosy has not identified any current physical impacts of

climate change on its assets or operations. Our portfolio

showed resilience during the Auckland Flood during January

2023. While floods had a severe impact on the Auckland

region, where 69% of Argosy’s properties are located, Argosy’s

properties did not suffer significant damage or disruption to

occupiers. However, this event has been taken as a learning

opportunity and Argosy’s Management Team has responded by

enhancing resilience with measures such as storing sandbags

at properties where the Auckland Flood highlighted potential for

water ingress.

CURRENT FINANCIAL IMPACTS

Argosy relies on adoption provision 1 in paragraph 10 of NZ

CS 2, which provides an exemption from disclosure of current

financial impacts in the first reporting period.

b) Scenario analysis undertaken

Argosy has analysed three climate scenarios to help identify its

climate related risks and opportunities and better understand

the resilience of its business model and strategy. The scenarios

are not intended as predictions of what climate change impacts

may or will actually affect Argosy in the future. Neither the

scenarios themselves, nor our commentary or risk assessments

in this report based on analysis of the scenarios, are intended as

forward-looking statements about what Argosy considers may

or will happen in the future.

Our scenario analysis is based on the Climate Scenarios for the

Construction and Property Sector Ngā Horopaki Āhuarangi mō

te Rāngai Hanganga me ngā Whare, developed by Beca Limited

for the New Zealand Green Building Council. Argosy along

with industry peers contributed to the development of these

scenarios. The industry scenarios have each been modified to

better reflect Argosy’s specific circumstances, while ensuring

that they remain plausible and yet challenging. Summaries of

Argosy’s three scenarios are set out below.

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures06

2024 Climate-related financial disclosures

Scenario One

at a glance

This scenario aligns

with external scenarios:

NGFS ‘Net Zero 2050’,

IPCC SSP 1-1.9,

IEA ‘Net Zero Emissions’,

CCC ‘Tailwinds’,

IPCC RCP 2.6

AMBITIONPOLICY

REACTION

TECHNOLOGY

CHANGE

BEHAVIOUR

CHANGE

SOCIO-POLITICAL

INSTABILITY

TRANSITION RISK

SEVERITY

PHYSICAL RISK

SEVERTIY

Immediate

and smooth

Fast changeLow – moderateLow – moderate

FastModerate

1.5°C

Ambition

1.5° C

Technology change

Fast

Policy Reaction

Immediate and

smooth

Physical Risk Severity

Moderate

Behaviour Change

Fast change

Socio- political instability

Low -moderate

Transition Risk Severity

Low -moderate

•Global warming is limited to 1.5°C by 2100.

•New Zealand achieves net zero CO

2

emissions by 2050. New

Zealand aligns its policy and markets with global trends,

enacting ambitious climate policies that steadily increase the

price of carbon to $250/tCO

2

e by 2050.

•From 2030, existing buildings must disclose energy and

carbon performance. New buildings must be much more

energy efficient than they are required to be under the

existing code.

•Entities that fail to set and meet ambitious emissions

reduction targets face financial repercussions.

•The construction sector experiences significant growth

fuelled by the development of greener infrastructure

and energy efficiency projects, crowding out greenfield

development activity.

•Employers encourage their employees to work from home

to reduce emissions and there is an ongoing trend for more

remote working and use of shared working spaces.

•The anticipated physical impacts of sea-level rise affect the

valuation of properties in low-lying coastal areas long before

the physical impacts themselves eventuate.

•Properties in low-lying coastal areas and floodplains or with

unstable ground conditions face insurance retreat by 2050.

New Zealand achieves net-zero CO

2

emissions by 2050,

contributing to global efforts which limit warming to 1.5°C by

2100. Decarbonisation is driven by uniform and immediate

regulatory changes that promote resource efficiency. These

include regulations requiring existing buildings to disclose

energy and carbon performance and making new buildings

much more energy efficient.

With these changes, buildings built to the existing building

code become unattractive to tenants concerned with their

environmental impact. The construction sector experiences

significant growth fuelled by the development of greener

infrastructure and energy efficiency projects. Construction

becomes more costly which reduces the margins for developers,

effectively crowding out a large portion of the construction and

redevelopment activity that may otherwise have been expected.

With broad public support for decarbonisation, there is a high

expectation for entities to set and achieve ambitious emissions

reduction targets. Where entities fail to set targets or meet

expectations, financial repercussions can be expected from

lenders, investors, and the Government, with restricted access

to capital and funding.

Employers encourage employees to work from home to reduce

emissions. This leads to increased demand for residential

dwellings and local shared working spaces with suitable

amenities, affecting the demand for office buildings.

While the global response to climate change is successful

in limiting the physical impacts of climate change, New

Zealand along with the rest of the world faces an increase

in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events.

Greater frequency of high intensity rainfall affects properties

in floodplains, or with unstable ground conditions, which face

relatively higher insurance premiums and suffer insurance

retreat by 2050.

The long-term effects of baked in sea-level rise adversely affect

coastal properties in low-lying areas as associated risks are

priced into property valuations and the cost of insurance (to the

extent it remains available).

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures08

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Scenario Two - Disorderly
SCENARIO TWO - DISORDERLY

•Atmospheric warming is limited to <2°C by 2100.

•New Zealand climate policy reaction is slow until 2030, but

abrupt and stringent decarbonisation policies and regulations

are enacted in the 2030s.

•Behavioural change is slow until 2030 and then fast, as

New Zealand rushes to transition. Working from home

trends increase as employers aim to reduce emissions

from commuting and office use. Retail property trends

are affected by increasing consumer concerns about

sustainable consumption.

•By 2050, New Zealand faces severe climate events, even

though the level of warming stabilises below 2°C. Properties in

low-lying coastal areas and floodplains face higher insurance

premiums and insurance retreat as a result.

•Older assets are at risk of being stranded after new

regulations are introduced in 2030, while early-movers can

utilise their future-proofed assets and supply chains to

pursue opportunities.

In this 'delayed transition' scenario, policy, technology, and

behavioural changes remain stagnant until 2030. As global

emissions rise, concerns about meeting Paris Agreement

targets trigger rapid policy shifts around 2030. This sudden

policy move towards stringent decarbonisation reigns in global

warming to below 2°C by 2100.

New Zealand aligns with this trend, leading to abrupt transitions

affecting the property and construction sectors post-2030.

During the 2020s, electricity demand slowly increases, surging

in the 2030s as New Zealand moves to electrify transport

networks. Unprepared power sectors fail to respond to this

sudden shift, causing supply constraints, frequent blackouts,

and fluctuating electricity prices.

The 2020s bring uneven regulation across local bodies,

generating uncertainty. By 2030, strict regulatory changes

begin, demanding a sudden shift in building energy and carbon

requirements. New technologies have not been developed

in time to meet the resulting spike in demand, leading to

disruptions in the building and materials market. Competition

for materials and products impacts new buildings and retrofit

development. This results in price escalations and construction

delays. Lack of investment in low-carbon buildings during

the 2020s causes disruption and stimulates competition

post-2030 for materials, technology, advice, and skilled

workers, increasing development costs.

Post-2030, centralised infrastructure struggles with

densification and physical climate risks. Inconsistent spatial

planning regarding decarbonisation, densification, and

resilience adds to this uncertainty. Initially, the construction

sector's decarbonisation is sluggish, but 'fast movers' who

adapt quickly gain an advantage over late adopters post-2030.

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures08

2024 Climate-related financial disclosures

Scenario Two

at a glance

This scenario aligns

with external scenarios:

NGFS ‘Delayed Transition’,

IPCC SSP 1-2.6, IEA

‘Sustainable Development’,

CCC ‘Headwinds’,

IPCC RCP 2.6

AMBITIONPOLICY

REACTION

TECHNOLOGY

CHANGE

BEHAVIOUR

CHANGE

SOCIO-POLITICAL

INSTABILITY

TRANSITION RISK

SEVERITY

PHYSICAL RISK

SEVERTIY

Delayed

Delayed

but fast

ModerateHigh

Delayed

but fast

Moderate

<2.0 °C

Ambition

1.5° C

Technology change

Fast

Policy Reaction

Immediate and

smooth

Physical Risk Severity

Moderate

Behaviour Change

Fast change

Socio- political instability

Low -moderate

Transition Risk Severity

Low -moderate

•Atmospheric warming is limited to <2°C by 2100.

•New Zealand climate policy reaction is slow until 2030, but

abrupt and stringent decarbonisation policies and regulations

are enacted in the 2030s. The carbon price rapidly increases

after 2030 and reaches $250/tCO

2

e by 2050.

•Behavioural change is slow until 2030 and then fast, as

New Zealand rushes to transition. Working from home

trends increase as employers aim to reduce emissions

from commuting and office use. Retail property trends

are affected by increasing consumer concerns about

sustainable consumption.

•By 2050, New Zealand faces severe climate events, even

though the level of warming stabilises below 2°C. Properties

in low-lying coastal areas and floodplains face higher

insurance premiums and insurance retreat as a result.

•Older assets are at risk of being stranded after new

regulations are introduced in 2030, while early-movers

can use their future-proofed assets and supply chains to

pursue opportunities.

There are minimal policy, technology and behavioural changes

until 2030. As global emissions rise, concerns about meeting

Paris Agreement targets trigger rapid policy shifts around 2030.

This sudden policy move towards stringent decarbonisation

reigns in global warming to below 2°C by 2100.

New Zealand aligns with this trend, leading to abrupt transitions

affecting the property and construction sectors post-2030.

During the 2020s, electricity demand slowly increases, surging

in the 2030s as New Zealand moves to electrify transport

networks. Unprepared power sectors fail to respond to this

sudden shift, causing supply constraints, frequent blackouts,

and fluctuating electricity prices.

The 2020s bring uneven regulation across local bodies,

generating uncertainty. By 2030, strict regulatory changes

begin, demanding a sudden shift in building energy and carbon

requirements. New technologies have not been developed

in time to meet the resulting spike in demand, leading to

disruptions in the building and materials market. Competition

for materials and products impacts new buildings and retrofit

development. This results in price escalations and construction

delays. Lack of investment in low-carbon buildings during

the 2020s causes disruption and stimulates competition

post-2030 for materials, technology, advice, and skilled

workers, increasing development costs.

Post-2030, centralised infrastructure struggles with

densification and physical climate risks. Inconsistent spatial

planning regarding decarbonisation, densification, and

resilience adds to this uncertainty. Initially, the construction

sector's decarbonisation is sluggish, but 'fast movers' who

adapt quickly gain an advantage over late adopters post-2030.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures09

Scenario Three - Hot House World
SCENARIO THREE - HOT HOUSE WORLD

•Atmospheric warming reaches >3°C by 2100.

•New Zealand climate change policy remains in keeping with

the rest of the world. Regulatory changes are slow, and the

carbon price does not increase past $35/tCO

2

e to 2050.

•Continued reliance on fossil fuels disincentivises carbon

reduction strategies (including energy efficient buildings and

shifting away from fossil fuels) unless they also improve

physical resilience.

•Disruption and political polarisation reduces the extent of large

centrally funded capital projects, which reduces construction

activity generally.

•The property and construction sector fails to meet its own

emissions reduction targets as it relies on adjacent sectors

also decarbonising, which does not happen.

•There is no transition incentive driving behavioural change

which is slow, however increasing physical impacts end

up driving behaviour change around office use and retail

property demand.

•The increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather

events drive demand for climate adaptation like retrofitting

buildings and infrastructure for heat and flood resilience.

Assets that can’t adapt become stranded.

•There is a spike in demand for housing due to climate-driven

immigration and climate refugees. Populations concentrate in

regions that are more climate resilient, leading to significant

demand for construction activity in resettlement areas.

In the 'Hot House World' scenario, global emissions continue

to climb, resulting in a temperature rise of >3°C above pre-

industrial levels by 2100. New Zealand's approach reflects

the global state, with no additional policies introduced to

curb emissions. The building and construction sector follows

the same pattern, with regulatory shifts focusing mainly on

mitigating climate-induced immigration.

With noticeable damage to infrastructure due to climate change,

mandates are introduced to conserve energy. New Zealand's

electricity grid sees gradual decarbonisation. Meanwhile, low

carbon materials are available due to lower demand, with

minimal innovations beyond current technologies and materials.

Investments are prioritised for climate resilience and adaptation.

As building codes become more stringent, some assets become

stranded. Physical effects of climate change stress centralised

infrastructures, resulting in failures and further stranding of

some assets. Consequently, local councils increase rates for

asset protection and restoration.

Despite these changes, no incentives are introduced to

encourage considerable behavioural changes. The scenario

depicts a significant breakdown of social cohesion, record heat

stress levels, mental health issues, and food insecurity. Demand

for housing spikes due to climate-driven immigration and an

increase in climate refugees.

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures09

SCENARIO TWO - DISORDERLY

•Atmospheric warming is limited to <2°C by 2100.

•New Zealand climate policy reaction is slow until 2030, but

abrupt and stringent decarbonisation policies and regulations

are enacted in the 2030s.

•Behavioural change is slow until 2030 and then fast, as

New Zealand rushes to transition. Working from home

trends increase as employers aim to reduce emissions

from commuting and office use. Retail property trends

are affected by increasing consumer concerns about

sustainable consumption.

•By 2050, New Zealand faces severe climate events, even

though the level of warming stabilises below 2°C. Properties in

low-lying coastal areas and floodplains face higher insurance

premiums and insurance retreat as a result.

•Older assets are at risk of being stranded after new

regulations are introduced in 2030, while early-movers can

utilise their future-proofed assets and supply chains to

pursue opportunities.

In this 'delayed transition' scenario, policy, technology, and

behavioural changes remain stagnant until 2030. As global

emissions rise, concerns about meeting Paris Agreement

targets trigger rapid policy shifts around 2030. This sudden

policy move towards stringent decarbonisation reigns in global

warming to below 2°C by 2100.

New Zealand aligns with this trend, leading to abrupt transitions

affecting the property and construction sectors post-2030.

During the 2020s, electricity demand slowly increases, surging

in the 2030s as New Zealand moves to electrify transport

networks. Unprepared power sectors fail to respond to this

sudden shift, causing supply constraints, frequent blackouts,

and fluctuating electricity prices.

The 2020s bring uneven regulation across local bodies,

generating uncertainty. By 2030, strict regulatory changes

begin, demanding a sudden shift in building energy and carbon

requirements. New technologies have not been developed

in time to meet the resulting spike in demand, leading to

disruptions in the building and materials market. Competition

for materials and products impacts new buildings and retrofit

development. This results in price escalations and construction

delays. Lack of investment in low-carbon buildings during

the 2020s causes disruption and stimulates competition

post-2030 for materials, technology, advice, and skilled

workers, increasing development costs.

Post-2030, centralised infrastructure struggles with

densification and physical climate risks. Inconsistent spatial

planning regarding decarbonisation, densification, and

resilience adds to this uncertainty. Initially, the construction

sector's decarbonisation is sluggish, but 'fast movers' who

adapt quickly gain an advantage over late adopters post-2030.

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures08

2024 Climate-related financial disclosures

Scenario Three

at a glance

This scenario aligns

with external scenarios:

NGFS ‘Current Policies’,

IPCC SSP 3-7.0, IEA

‘Stated Policies’,

CCC ‘Current Policies’,

IPCC RCP 8.5

AMBITIONPOLICY

REACTION

TECHNOLOGY

CHANGE

BEHAVIOUR

CHANGE

SOCIO-POLITICAL

INSTABILITY

TRANSITION RISK

SEVERITY

PHYSICAL RISK

SEVERTIY

None –

current policies

SlowHighLow

SlowExtreme

>3.0 °C

Ambition

1.5° C

Technology change

Fast

Policy Reaction

Immediate and

smooth

Physical Risk Severity

Moderate

Behaviour Change

Fast change

Socio- political instability

Low -moderate

Transition Risk Severity

Low -moderate

•Atmospheric warming reaches >3°C by 2100.

•New Zealand climate change policy remains in keeping with

the rest of the world. Regulatory changes are slow, and the

carbon price does not increase past $35/tCO

2

e to 2050.

•Continued reliance on fossil fuels disincentivises carbon

reduction strategies (including energy efficient buildings and

shifting away from fossil fuels) unless they also improve

physical resilience.

•Disruption and political polarisation reduces the extent

of large centrally funded capital projects, which reduces

construction activity generally.

•The property and construction sector fails to meet its own

emissions reduction targets as it relies on adjacent sectors

also decarbonising, which does not happen.

•There is no transition incentive driving behavioural change

which is slow, however increasing physical impacts end

up driving behaviour change around office use and retail

property demand.

•The increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather

events drive demand for climate adaptation like retrofitting

buildings and infrastructure for heat and flood resilience.

Assets that can’t adapt become stranded.

•There is a spike in demand for housing due to climate-driven

immigration and climate refugees. Populations concentrate in

regions that are more climate resilient, leading to significant

demand for construction activity in resettlement areas.

In the 'Hot House World' scenario, global emissions continue

to climb, resulting in a temperature rise of >3°C above pre-

industrial levels by 2100. New Zealand's approach reflects

the global state, with no additional policies introduced to

curb emissions. The building and construction sector follows

the same pattern, with regulatory shifts focusing mainly on

mitigating climate-induced immigration.

With noticeable damage to infrastructure due to climate change,

mandates are introduced to conserve energy. New Zealand's

electricity grid sees gradual decarbonisation. Meanwhile, low-

carbon materials are available due to lower demand, with

minimal innovations beyond current technologies and materials.

Investments are prioritised for climate resilience and adaptation.

As building codes become more stringent, some assets become

stranded. Physical effects of climate change stress centralised

infrastructure, resulting in failures and further stranding of some

assets. Consequently, local councils increase rates to fund asset

protection and restoration.

Despite these changes, insufficient incentives are introduced

to encourage behavioural changes. The scenario depicts a

significant breakdown of social cohesion, record heat stress

levels, mental health issues, and food insecurity. Demand

for housing spikes due to climate-driven immigration and an

increase in climate refugees.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures10

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

d) Anticipated climate-related impacts and financial impacts
The anticipated impacts of physical and transitional climate-

related risks and opportunities are described in the table on

pages 12 and 13.

ANTICIPATED FINANCIAL IMPACTS OF

PHYSICAL RISKS

Argosy has assessed financial impacts to its portfolio arising

from the physical risks of climate change based on outputs

from loss modelling carried out using KatRisk SpatialKat for

flood and cyclone risks and Moody's RMS Climate on Demand

for heat stress, sea level rise, water stress and wild fire risks.

This modelling produced average annual damage estimates

(AAD) for the portfolio, based on current insured values. AAD

represents an estimate of expected damage and disruption per

year, averaged over many years (it does not predict the actual

damage that may occur in any year). The modelling covers

flood, cyclone, wildfire, sea level rise, heat stress and water

stress (it did not suggest a material impact from wildfire or water

stress). The results are summarised in the three charts set out

below showing modelled AAD under RCP 2.6 corresponding to

Scenario 1, RCP 4.5 corresponding to Scenario 2 and RCP 8.5

corresponding to Scenario 3. The modelled AAD estimates vary

between scenarios and the highest modelled AAD estimate is

$925,000 per year (in respect of Scenario 3 in the year 2100).

AAD – Scenario 1 (RCP 2.6)

0

250

500

750

1000

2100205020302020

Floods

Cyclone wind

Sea level rise

Heat stress

Ye a r

$000’s

488

379

278

337

AAD – Scenario 2 (RCP 4.5)

$000’s

Floods

Cyclone wind

Sea level rise

Heat stress

Ye a r

0

250

500

750

1000

2100205020302020

598

421

278

337

AAD – Scenario 3 (RCP 8.5)

$000’s

Floods

Cyclone wind

Sea level rise

Heat stress

Ye a r

0

250

500

750

1000

2100205020302020

925

476

278

345

ANTICIPATED FINANCIAL IMPACTS OF

TRANSITION RISKS

Argosy’s portfolio is presently comprised of 33% completed

Green Buildings and has a target for 50% of its portfolio to be

Green Buildings by 2031. Argosy's strategic planning envisages

that the target for 50% of its portfolio to be Green Buildings

will be achieved through developing or acquiring new Green

Buildings (such as already announced developments at 224

Neilson Street and 8-14 Mt Richmond Drive) and the divestment

of existing non-Green Buildings.

Argosy's ten-year plan includes aggregate capital expenditure

of $284 million for the development of Green Buildings, of which

$277m is planned to be spent by 31 March 2031. Completion

of developments as contemplated by Argosy's ten-year plan

would result in Argosy achieving its target that 50% of its

portfolio will be Green Buildings by 31 March 2031. However,

meeting this 2031 timeframe will depend on factors outside

Argosy's control such as the commercial environment, leasing

activity and construction timeframes.

When Argosy achieves its target for 50% of its portfolio to

be Green Buildings, the balance of its portfolio will potentially

remain vulnerable to transition risks. These risks may include

costs to upgrade buildings to meet energy efficiency and/or

climate adaptation requirements over the medium-to-long

term. The strategy for these buildings is addressed in Argosy's

transition plan on page 15.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures11

c) Climate-related risks and opportunities
SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG TERM

Argosy defines short, medium and long term as follows:

•Short term: 2024 – 2030

•Merdium term: 2030 – 2050

•Long term: 2050 – 2100

These timeframes differ from Argosy's conventional operational

and strategic, budgeting and planning time horizons. However,

they are considered appropriate as they reflect the long-lived

nature of both climate-related risks and our property assets.

The identification of risks over longer time frames complements

our strategic, budgeting and planning time horizons by

providing an opportunity to consider and address longer term

climate-related risks and opportunities.

CLIMATE-RELATED RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES

We have identified climate-related risks and opportunities

based on the following criteria:

•physical risks are risks arising from the physical impacts of

climate change (such as risk of physical damage to Argosy

properties). Physical risks may be acute (such as severe

weather events) or chronic (such as sea level rise);

•transition risks are risks arising from the transition to a

resilient low carbon economy (such as requirements for

buildings to be more energy efficient and resilient to climate

impacts); and

•opportunities are potentially positive climate related

outcomes (such as demand for Green Buildings). These

can include opportunities arising from climate mitigation

and adaptation measures (such as rainwater harvesting

opportunities from increased rainfall).

The table [below] describes and assesses material climate-

related risks and opportunities based on analysis of the

three climate scenarios above and includes information about

whether they are physical or transition risks and their

impacts. An impact is considered material if it is identified

as having potential to influence business-as-usual operations,

achievement of business or strategic objectives, value, or

media coverage. Risks are assessed on a five-point scale:

“very low,” “low”, “medium”, “high” and “severe”. The table

shows Argosy’s assessment of the residual risk remaining after

consideration of available controls and mitigations.

The scenarios are not intended as predictions of what climate

change impacts may or will actually affect Argosy in the future.

Neither the scenarios themselves nor our commentary or risk

assessments in this report are forward-looking statements

about what Argosy considers may or will happen in the future.

Funding and capital deployment decisions in relation to climate-

related risks and opportunities are addressed under Argosy’s

Sustainability Framework, which identifies Green Buildings and

climate change as material sustainability factors. Each material

sustainability factor has its own objectives and targets. Targets

in the Sustainability Framework are included in the development

of Argosy’s strategy, budget and operating plan.

d) Anticipated climate-related impacts

Anticipated climate-related impacts based on analysis of the

three climate scenarios above are described in the table

[below]. In relation to anticipated financial impacts, Argosy

relies on adoption provision 2 in paragraph 12 of NZ CS 2, which

provides an exemption from disclosure of anticipated financial

impacts in the first reporting period.

e) Transition plan

Argosy is committed to managing and reducing the impact of

its operations on the environment, including climate change

impacts. Our strategy to develop Green Buildings reflects

our ambition to address sustainability issues by creating well

designed, vibrant and sustainable buildings for today and into

the future. We also believe that energy efficient Green Buildings

have the potential to provide several key benefits including:

•lower energy costs;

•higher occupancy;

•higher value;

•improved worker productivity and occupant health and

wellbeing; and

•lower transition risk.

Argosy’s Sustainability Framework is at the forefront of strategic

planning and applies to all areas of its business. Green Buildings

and climate change are identified as material sustainability

factors within this Framework. The most observable impact

of climate-related risks has been the drive for Argosy and its

stakeholders to obtain Green Building certifications in relation

to the refurbishment or construction (Green Star ratings) and

ongoing operation (NABERSNZ ratings) of its buildings.

These certifications provide evidence of reduced energy use

and emissions from Argosy’s buildings in accordance with

internationally recognised standards which help reduce the

carbon footprint of Argosy and its occupiers. Buildings with

Green Star ratings also benefit from climate adaptation planning

contributing to greater resilience. This drive toward green

certified Green Buildings is reflected in Argosy’s strategic

and financial planning as well as its plans for acquisitions,

developments and disposals.

Argosy is preparing its property portfolio for progressive

certification, which started with the 5 Green Star Office Built

rating obtained for the redevelopment of the historic Te Puni

Kōkiri House in March 2014. Since then, Argosy has obtained

Green Star ratings on a further nine buildings and has obtained

(4 star or better) NABERSNZ ratings on four of these buildings

and three other buildings. Our target is for 50% of the

portfolio (by market value) to be certified Green Buildings by

31 March 2031.

The development of certified Green Buildings has also provided

Argosy with an opportunity to diversify its funding through

Green Bonds. At the date of this report, Argosy has funding

of $325 million from Green Bonds supported by certified

Green Buildings (including developments targeting such a

certification) valued at [$722.5m].

Argosy relies on adoption provision 3 in paragraph 15 of NZ CS

2, which provides an exemption from disclosure of transition

plan aspects of its strategy, and the extent to which transition

plan aspects of its strategy are aligned with its internal

capital deployment and funding decision-making processes.

The discussion above addresses Argosy’s progress toward

developing the transition plan aspects of its strategy.

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures10

2024 Climate-related financial disclosures

Risk CategoryRisk DescriptionResidual riskCommentary on controls and mitigations

CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS

Scenario

SML

Climate Change

- Acute Physical

Risk

FLOODING, STORM,

CYCLONE, AND

WILDFIRE - Increase in

frequency and intensity

of extreme weather

events, including

flooding, cyclones

and wildfires, causing

significant damage

and/or destruction to

buildings and surrounding

infrastructure, delays to

project timelines. Some

properties may become

stranded or permanently

unprofitable due to the risk

of extreme weather events

and insurance retreat.

1

Extreme weather events are not expected to cause material

climate-related impacts for Argosy’s portfolio over the short,

medium or long term under any of the three scenarios. This

expectation is based on insurance modelling carried out in

October 2024 with AAD estimates showing Argosy’s risk

from flood, cyclone and wildfire over the long term under

each of the three scenarios (RCP 2.5, 4.5 and 8.5) will remain

very low. The modelling is summarised at page 11 above.

In assessing climate-related risks Management has made

an assumption that Councils will be able to maintain public

infrastructure in built-up areas over the long term. (Note that

there was no significant damage to Argosy’s portfolio from the

Auckland Floods or Cyclone Gabrielle.)

2

3

Climate Change

- Chronic

Physical Risk

RISING SEA LEVELS -

Rising sea levels impact

coastal locations, leading

to physical damage and

increased insurance

premiums for affected

properties. Some

properties may become

stranded or permanently

unprofitable due to the

risk of inundation and

insurance retreat.

1

Based on loss modelling carried out in October 2024, sea

level rise is assessed as presenting a very low residual risk

to Argosy’s portfolio in the short to medium term under

each Scenario and a “low” residual risk over the long term

under each Scenario. In assessing climate-related risks

Management has made an assumption that Councils will be

able to maintain public infrastructure in built up areas over the

long term.

2

3

Climate Change

- Chronic

Physical Risk

HEAT STRESS - Rising

temperature causes

heat stress creating

increased demand for

cooling. This increases

energy consumption

for buildings, with air-

conditioning increasing

operating costs.

Potentially buildings

without air-conditioning

may require capital

expenditure.

1

Under Scenarios 1 and 2, planned upgrades of existing air-

conditioning plant provide opportunities to address emergent

heat stress. However, there is potential for heat stress to

affect areas of buildings without existing air-conditioning

(such as many warehouse areas) under Scenario 3 in the

medium to long term . Heat stress could affect workers

or stock in such areas and may be harder to mitigate as

compared to areas with existing air-conditioning equipment.

However, consideration of the potential for future heat stress

when developing/redeveloping buildings should mitigate

the risk under Scenario 3 and the residual risk is rated as

“medium”.

2

3

Climate Change

- Chronic

Physical Risk

and Mitigation

Opportunity

INCREASED RAINFALL

- Increase in rainfall

causing changes in

ground conditions, slope

stability and shorter

earthworks season. Some

properties may become

stranded or permanently

unprofitable due to the

risk of unstable ground

conditions and insurance

retreat. Increased rainfall

also creates a mitigating

opportunity for increased

rainwater harvesting.

1

Increased rainfall will present a risk for vulnerable buildings

and an opportunity for resilient buildings. This risk should

be planned for in acquisitions and new developments/

redevelopments. Over the short term, some tenants may

be focused on resilience, particularly in relation to floods

under all three scenarios (to which Argosy’s portfolio proved

resilient in the Auckland Anniversary Weekend floods).

Tenant demand and a practical need for resilience will grow

as climate impacts increase in frequency and intensity,

particularly under Scenario 3. Our AAD estimate for flood

damage indicates that direct impacts to existing properties

from unstable ground conditions will be a “very low” risk over

the long term. However the potential for indirect impacts in

relation to earthworks and insurance mean that this is rated as

“low” for Scenarios 1 and 2 over the medium to long term and

“medium” under Scenario 3 over the medium to long term.

2

3

RISK ASSESSMENT LEGEND

Severe

S – short term M – medium term L – long term

HighMediumLowVery Low

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures12

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Risk Management
DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVE:

To enable primary users to understand how an entity’s

climate-related risks are identified, assessed, and

managed and how those processes are integrated into

existing risk management processes.

RISK MANAGEMENT DISCLOSURES:

To achieve the disclosure objective above, an entity

must disclose the following information for both

transition risks and physical risks:

a) a description of its processes for identifying, assessing

and managing climate-related risks; and

b) a description of how its processes for identifying,

assessing, and managing climate-related risks are

integrated into its overall risk management processes.

a) Processes for identifying, assessing and

managing climate-related risks

To facilitate consideration of climate-related risks, the

Risk Management Framework under which Argosy’s Risk

Management Committee operates has been updated to include

a risk appetite and criteria for identifying and assessing

climate-related risks arising from scenario analysis. The short,

medium and long term for assessing climate-related risks are

the same as the corresponding timeframe’s under Argosy’s

climate scenarios:

Short term:2024 – 2030

Medium term:2030 – 2050

Long term:2050 – 2100

In accordance with the updated Risk Management Framework,

the Risk Management Committee has analysed the climate

scenarios described above, identified climate-related risks and

opportunities and added them to Argosy’s Strategic Risk

Register. Controls and mitigations are developed where risks

are assessed as being outside Argosy’s risk appetite.

b) How processes for identifying, assessing, and

managing climate-related risks are integrated

into overall risk management processes

[Amendments to the Risk Management Framework and

additions to the Strategic Risk Register described above have

been reviewed by the Board’s Audit and Risk Committee

and approved by the Board]. In future, climate-related risks

and opportunities will be reviewed along with other risks in

accordance with Argosy’s Risk Management Framework.

Argosy Property Limited2024 Climate-related financial disclosures13

2024 Climate-related financial disclosures

Risk CategoryRisk DescriptionResidual riskCommentary on controls and mitigations

CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS

Scenario

SML

Climate Change

- Chronic

Transition Risk

and Opportunity

RESILIENT BUILDINGS -

Physical climate impacts,

tenant expectations

and insurance retreat

require increased captial

expenditrue to ensure that

buildings can withstand

direct physical impacts of

climate change and can

operate independently

of the power grid during

blackouts. This can be

a risk for vulnerable

buildings and an

opportunity for resilient

buildings.

1

Adaptation studies (required for Green Star rated buildings)

should anticipate climate adaptation/ resilience requirements

for Scenarios 1 and 2 and mitigations implemented over

the short to medium term should be effective in relation to

these scenarios. Under Scenario 3, the medium rating for the

long term relates to associated risks in relation to insurance

and infrastructure and the expectation of increased climate

change impacts from heat stress and increased rainfall.

2

3

Climate Change

- Transition Risk

EFFICIENT BUILDINGS

- Stricter building

regulations and tenant

preferences focused

on decarbonisation

impose minimum energy

efficiency and/or other

sustainability-based

standards on buildings

and related infrastructure,

requiring increased

capital expenditure to

make buildings comply

with energy efficiency

requirements and

standards.

1

Risks arising from energy efficiency requirements have

greater impacts in the short to medium term under Scenarios

1 and 2 and are particularly acute in Scenario 2 for the medium

term (2030-2050). However, Argosy’s strategy to develop/

redevelop green buildings and reduce GHG emissions over

the short to medium term should mitigate the heightened

medium term transitional risk in Scenario 2. There is little

emphasis on decarbonisation under Scenario 3 and this

scenario presents low risk (although severe physical impacts

of climate change create challenges for climate adaptation

and resilience). It is assumed that Green Buildings will satisfy

future stakeholder expectations and regulatory requirements

in relation to energy efficient buildings.

2

3

Climate Change

- Transition Risk

and Opportunity

GREEN BUILDINGS

- Demand from

tenants, investors and

stakeholders for certified

sustainable energy

efficient buildings with

a low carbon footprint

presents an opportunity

for owners of Green

Buildings and a risk for

owners of older less

efficient buildings.

1

Argosy’s strategy to develop Green Buildings (and target for

50% of its portfolio to be Green Buildings by 2031) should

leave it well-placed to take advantage of opportunities

presented by the transition to a low carbon economy. We have

assumed that Green Buildings will satisfy future stakeholder

expectations and regulatory requirements in relation to

energy efficient buildings.

2

3

Climate Change

- Transition Risk

REPUTATION AND

SOCIAL LICENCE -

Failure to meet investor,

regulatory or societal

expectations in relation

to management of

transitional climate

change impacts.

1

The inclusion of Green Buildings and climate change as

material sustainability factors in Argosy’s Sustainability

Framework will ensure that we remain focused on stakeholder

expectations and social licence concerns arising from the

transition to a climate-resiliant, low carbon economy.

2

3

RISK ASSESSMENT LEGEND

Severe

S – short term M – medium term L – long term

HighMediumLowVery Low

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures13

Building a
better future

G

r

e

e

n

R

e

s

i

l

i

e

n

t

D

i

v

e

r

s

i

f

i

e

d

Proactive delivery of

sustainable growth

A business culture that is

environmentally focused

Executing green Value Add

portfolio opportunities to drive

earnings and capital growth

A commitment to funding for green

assets

A business that is adaptable

and responsive to change

Maintaining strong and

valued relationships across

all stakeholders

A commitment to management

excellence delivering earnings

and dividend growth

Ensuring safe working

environments for Argosy

and its partners

A diversified portfolio by sector

and region

A diversified asset allocation across

sectors to reduce volatility and

widen growth opportunities

Targeting strategic growth

opportunities with green potential

and a focus on the Auckland

Industrial market

Maintaining a portfolio of

high quality, well located

Core assets with growth potential

e) Transition plan

BUSINESS MODEL AND STRATEGY

Argosy is a listed property investment vehicle with a $2.1 billion portfolio of commercial, industrial and large format retail property,

predominantly located in Auckland and Wellington. Argosy's strategy is based around its vision of building a better future:

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures14

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

TRANSITION PLAN ASPECTS OF STRATEGY
Argosy is transitioning its property portfolio to a low-emissions,

climate resilient economy through its strategy to develop Green

Buildings and the target for 50% of the portfolio to be Green

Buildings by 31 March 2031. This strategy reflects Argosy's

ambition to address climate change by creating well designed,

vibrant and energy efficient buildings which meet the needs of

tenants today and into the future. Argosy believes that energy

efficient Green Buildings have the potential to provide several

key benefits which will facilitate Argosy’s transition toward a

low-emissions, climate resilient economy:

•lower transition risk

•lower energy costs

•higher occupancy

•higher value

•improved worker productivity

•improved occupant health and wellbeing

Argosy’s Sustainability Framework is an important part

of its strategic planning and applies to all areas of its

business, including consideration of climate change risks

and opportunities. Green Buildings and climate change

are identified as material sustainability factors within this

Framework. The most observable impact of climate-related

risks and opportunities has been the drive for Argosy and its

stakeholders to obtain Green Building certifications in relation

to the refurbishment or construction (Green Star ratings) and

ongoing operation (NABERSNZ ratings) of its buildings.

These certifications provide evidence of reduced energy use

and emissions from Argosy’s buildings in accordance with

internationally recognised standards which help reduce the

carbon footprint of Argosy and its occupiers. Buildings with

Green Star ratings also benefit from climate adaptation planning

contributing to greater resilience. This drive toward certified

energy efficient Green Buildings is reflected in Argosy’s

strategic and financial planning as well as its plans for

acquisitions, developments and disposals.

Argosy is preparing its property portfolio for progressive

certification, which started with the 5 Green Star Office Built

rating obtained for the redevelopment of the historic Te Puni

Kōkiri House in March 2014. Since then, Argosy has obtained

Green Star ratings on a further eleven buildings and has

obtained (4 star or better) NABERSNZ ratings on six of these

buildings and three other buildings. The target for 50% of

the portfolio (by market value) to be certified energy efficient

Green Buildings by 31 March 2031 represents the main plank

of Argosy's transition plan. Beyond this target, the strategy for

each of Argosy’s existing properties considers whether they

have the potential to be upgraded or redeveloped as Green

Buildings. Where practicable, Argosy will plan to upgrade or

redevelop existing buildings so that existing building services

are replaced in-cycle toward the end of their useful lives. This

approach helps to mitigate transitional financial impacts from

the impairment of existing building services, and reduces the

cost of upgrading or redeveloping Green Buildings over time.

The development of Green Buildings has also provided Argosy

with an opportunity to diversify its funding through Green

Bonds. At the date of this report, Argosy has funding

of $325 million from Green Bonds supported by certified

energy efficient Green Buildings (including developments

targeting such a certification) valued at $785.2 million. Argosy

anticipates that in the future reducing GHG emissions, building

resilience and sustainable business practices will become

increasingly important factors in accessing other forms of

capital, including insurance.

Argosy is transitioning its corporate operations to a low-

emissions climate resilient economy by managing emissions

under its operational control (Scope 1 and 2 and some Scope

3 emissions). For example, its motor vehicle fleet is comprised

almost entirely of electric vehicles, it monitors airline travel, it

has an emissions reduction plan, and it has maintained a Toitu

Net Carbon Zero certification since 2020.

CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT AND FUNDING DECISION-

MAKING PROCESSES

Argosy’s internal capital deployment and funding decision

making processes are aligned with the target that 50% of its

property portfolio will be Green Buildings by 31 March 2031. This

is reflected in Argosy’s plans for developments, acquisitions

and divestments.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures15

Risk Management
DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVE:

To enable primary users to understand how an entity’s

climate-related risks are identified, assessed, and

managed and how those processes are integrated into

existing risk management processes.

RISK MANAGEMENT DISCLOSURES:

To achieve the disclosure objective above, an entity

must disclose the following information for both

transition risks and physical risks:

a) a description of its processes for identifying, assessing

and managing climate-related risks

b) a description of how its processes for identifying,

assessing, and managing climate-related risks are

integrated into its overall risk management processes

a) Processes for identifying, assessing and

managing climate-related risks

The Risk Management Framework under which Argosy’s Risk

Management Committee operates includes a risk appetite

and criteria for identifying and assessing climate-related risks

and opportunities arising from scenario analysis. The short,

medium and long term for assessing climate-related risks and

opportunities are the same as the corresponding time-frames

under Argosy’s climate scenarios:

Short term:2025 – 2030

Medium term:2030 – 2050

Long term:2050 – 2100

In accordance with Argosy's Risk Management Framework,

the Risk Management Committee has analysed the climate

scenarios described above, identified climate-related risks and

opportunities, and added them to Argosy’s Strategic Risk

Register. Controls and mitigations are developed where risks

are assessed as being outside Argosy’s risk appetite.

b) How processes for identifying, assessing, and

managing climate-related risks are integrated

into overall risk management processes

Amendments to the Risk Management Framework and

additions to the Strategic Risk Register described above

are reviewed by the Board’s Audit and Risk Committee and

approved by the Board. Climate-related risks and opportunities

are reviewed along with other risks in accordance with Argosy’s

Risk Management Framework.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures16

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Metrics and Targets
DISCLOSURE OBJECTIVE:

To enable primary users to understand how an entity measures and manages its climate-related risks and opportunities.

Metrics and targets also provide a basis upon which primary users can compare entities within a sector or industry.

METRICS AND TARGETS DISCLOSURES:

To achieve this disclosure objective, an entity must disclose:

a) the metrics that are relevant to all entities regardless of industry and business model

b) industry-based metrics relevant to its industry or business model used to measure and manage climate-related risks

and opportunities

c) any other key performance indicators used to measure and manage climate-related risks and opportunities

d) the targets used to manage climate-related risks and opportunities, and performance against those targets

Metrics relevant to all entities

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

Argosy's gross emissions in metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO

2

e) using the location-based method for the reporting

period to 31 March 2025 are set out in the table below:

ScopeGHG CategoryActivitytCO

2

e

FY25

tCO

2

e FY24

(restated*)

MethodologyUncertainty

1S1 Fugitive emissionsHVAC refrigerant top-ups180.5141.5Data supplied by service

provider from manual

entry records

Medium

S1 Mobile combustionCompany vehicles - fuel7.39.0Data taken from supplier

online data portal

Low

S1 Stationary combustionNatural gas - heating7.17.5Data supplied by utility

provider and taken

from invoices.

Low

Fire pump and

generator fuel

23.932.4Data supplied by service

provider from manual

entry records

Medium

Scope 1 total218.8190.4

2S2 Purchased electricityElectricity used by Argosy182.3181.0Data supplied by utility

provider and taken

from invoices

Low

Scope 2 total182.3181.0

3S3 1. Purchased goods

and services

Maintenance emissions -

spend based

1,116.01,052.4Data taken from internal

accounting system

High

Water supply

and wastewater

21.916.6Data supplied by utility

provider and taken

from invoices

Low

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures17

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

ScopeGHG CategoryActivitytCO
2

e

FY25

tCO

2

e FY24

(restated*)

MethodologyUncertainty

3S3 3. Fuel and energy-

related activities

Company vehicles - fuel

supply emissions

1.70.0Data taken from internal

accounting system

High

Electricity

distribution emissions

128.1160.9Data estimates applied,

using metered sites of

same industry type

High

Gas distribution emissions1.51.6Data supplied by utility

provider and taken

from invoices

Low

Fire pump and generator

fuel supply emissions

5.57.4Data supplied by service

provider from manual

entry records

Medium

S3 5. Waste generated

in operations

Landfilled waste127.056.9Data supplied by service

provider from manual

entry records

Medium

Recycling0.30.3Data supplied by service

provider from manual

entry records

Medium

S3 6. Business travelAir travel34.329.0Data taken from supplier

online data portal

Low

Private car travel for work93.4111.0Data taken from internal

accounting system

High

S3 7. Employee commutingEmployee commuting -

private vehicles and

public transport

17.029.6Internal survey of staff

using travel distance

High

S3 13. Downstream

leased assets

Electricity used by tenants4,321.13,890.3Data estimates applied,

using metered sites of

same industry type

High

Natural gas for heating used

by tenants

303.5325.6Data supplied by utility

provider and taken

from invoices

Low

Scope 3 total6,171.35,681.6

Grand total6,572.46,053.0

* Restated due to the implementation of a new and more accurate system for recording and reporting GHG emissions.

Methods, assumptions and uncertainties

The methods, assumptions and uncertainties in relation to the

calculation or estimation of Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions are

described below.

Scope 1, direct emissions: this scope captures emissions

directly generated by Argosy’s owned or controlled assets. Data

is collected from various sources: service contractors provide

information on refrigerant emissions and top-up volumes,

fuel card data helps track mobile combustion emissions from

company vehicles; and service providers offer data on top-

ups for stationary combustion sources like fire pumps and

backup generators.

Scope 2, indirect emissions from purchased energy within

Argosy's operational control: electricity use contributes to

indirect emissions. Argosy gathers data from electricity

suppliers, invoices, and on-site electrical sub-metering to

calculate both electricity emissions and electricity distribution

loss emissions. Scope 2 emissions are calculated using the

location-based method.

Scope 3, other indirect emissions: this scope encompasses

all other indirect emissions from Argosy's activities, and

emissions are calculated using emission factors as described

below (source of emissions factors). Purchased goods and

services emissions, including emissions from maintenance

across the portfolio, are estimated using a spend-based

methodology. Waste management data comes from service

provider weigh stations, allowing for calculations of emissions

from landfilled, recycled (including plastics, cardboard and

paper) and composted waste. Business travel emissions are

tracked – air travel data comes directly from the verified

provider, while taxi and rental car emissions are estimated

using spending data. Employee commuting emissions are

calculated based on road mapping, transport mode, and

commuting frequency. Finally, data for leased buildings is

calculated using tenant electricity consumption or estimated

using emissions factors derived from similar buildings within

Argosy's portfolio. This includes estimating emissions from

both tenant electricity consumption and electricity distribution

losses in those leased assets.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures18

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Standard under which emissions have been measured
Argosy’s emissions have been measured in accordance with

the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and

Reporting Standard.

Consolidation approach

Argosy has used an operational control approach for

consolidation of Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Although its

tenants are responsible for a large proportion of emissions,

an operational control approach is considered appropriate as

Argosy maintains close relationships with tenants enabling it to

influence and enact change.

Source of emissions factors

Argosy used the following sources of emissions factors:

•Market Economics Limited, 2023, Consumption Emissions

Modelling, report prepared for Auckland Council

•Calculated from Auckland Council Spend based diesel

and % of WTT to stationary combustion EFs (https://

www.climalife.co.uk/r454b)

•MfE Measuring Emissions Guidance, May 2024

•NZECS, Resources, Residual Supply, 2023/24 (https://

bravetrace.co.nz/residual-supply-mix/Source)

•UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company

Reporting, 2023

•UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company

Reporting, 2024

Specific exclusions from reported GHG emissions

Argosy has excluded the following specific source of GHG

emissions: refrigerant leakage from tenant-controlled air-

conditioning units in buildings occupied by a single tenant, as

it is outside Argosy's operational control.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures19

INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT


To the Stakeholders of Argosy Property Limited (“Argosy”)



Limited Assurance Conclusion

Based on the procedures performed and evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe the scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG

emissions (“Subject Matter Information”), including associated methods, assumptions, and estimation uncertainty, presented in Argosy’s FY25 Climate-

related Disclosures for the period of 1

st

April 2024 to 31

st

March 2025 (“the Report”), is not fairly presented and prepared, in all material respects, in

accordance with the Reporting Criteria, within the scope of our limited assurance engagement.


Scope of the Assurance Engagement

The scope of assurance was limited to the below Subject Matter Information, as presented on page 17 and 18 of the Report, applicable for the following

entities under Argosy’s operational control including Argosy Property Management Limited and Argosy Property No.1 Limited.


Our assurance engagement does not extend to any other information included in the Report or information from earlier periods. We have not performed

any procedures on the excluded information and, therefore, do not express any conclusion on it.


Subject Matter Information Assured Figure

Scope 1 GHG emissions 218.8 tCO2-eq.

Scope 2 GHG emissions (location based) 182.3 tCO2-eq.

Scope 3 (category 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 13) GHG emissions 6,171.3 tCO2-eq.

Total scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions 6,572.4 tCO2-eq.


Reporting Criteria

The Subject Matter Information was prepared in accordance with the Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards (NZ CSs) issued by the External Reporting

Board (XRB), and the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) (2015) issued by the World Resources Institute

(WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD).


Argosy’s Responsibilities

Management of Argosy was responsible for:

- Selecting and establishing suitable reporting criteria for preparing the Subject Matter Information subject to assurance.

- Preparing and presenting the Subject Matter Information in accordance with the Reporting Criteria.

- Designing, implementing, and maintaining internal controls relevant to the preparation of the Subject Matter Information that is free from material

misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

- Advising us of any known or suspected issues related to the Subject Matter Information.


Inherent Uncertainty in preparing GHG disclosures

As discussed on page 17 and 18 of the Report, the GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used

to determine emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases. Please also refer to page 18 for detailed information about

the assumptions applied for calculating scope 3 GHG emissions.


Our Responsibilities

Bureau Veritas was responsible for:

- Planning and performing the engagement to obtain the intended level of assurance about whether the Subject Matter Information is free from

material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

- Forming an independent conclusion based on the procedures performed and evidence obtained.

- Reporting our conclusion to the Directors of Argosy.


Bureau Veritas was not involved in the drafting of the report and our independence has not been compromised.



Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures20

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT






Summary of Work Performed

Our limited assurance engagement on the Subject Matter Information was conducted in accordance with NZ SAE 1 Assurance Engagements over

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosures issued by the External Reporting Board (XRB), ISAE NZ 3410 Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas

Statements issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), and informed by Bureau Veritas’ procedure for Sustainability

Assurance Engagements.


Our work was planned and executed in a manner designed to produce the intended level of assurance and to provide a sound basis for our conclusions.


The procedures we performed were based on our professional judgement and included enquiries, observation of processes performed, inspection of

documents, analytical procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling with

underlying records. In undertaking our assurance engagement, our procedures comprised:


- Review of the suitability and application of the Reporting Criteria used as the basis for preparing the Subject Matter Information.

- Enquiries of Argosy representatives to gain an understanding and evaluate implementation of processes, systems and internal controls to collect,

aggregate, calculate, analyse and report the Subject Matter Information.

- Enquiries of personnel responsible for the performance of the processes and preparation of the Subject Matter Information.

- Review of documentary evidence produced by Argosy representatives.

- Comprehensive performance data testing, involving source verification for emissions sources and emissions factors, as well as mathematical

accuracy of the calculations pertaining to the Subject Matter Information.

- Assessment of whether the Argosy’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and had been consistently applied.

- Review of the presentation and disclosure of the Subject Matter Information within the Report.

- Request of Management Representation Letter on key assertions.


The scope of a limited assurance engagement is significantly narrower than a reasonable assurance engagement. This includes fewer risk assessment

procedures, a more limited understanding of internal controls, and less extensive responsive testing. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a

limited engagement is substantially lower than a reasonable assurance. Even a reasonable assurance engagement, while providing a high level of

assurance, does not guarantee the detection of all material misstatements, should they exist.


Inherent Limitations and Exclusions

Excluded from the scope of our work is any assurance of information relating to:

- Activities outside the defined reporting period.

- Statements of commitment to, or intention to undertake future actions by Argosy.

- Statements of position, opinion, belief and/or aspiration by Argosy.

- Financial data audited by an external third party.

- Other sites and/or activities not included in the scope.


This independent assurance statement should not be relied upon to detect all errors, omissions or misstatements that may exist within the Report.


Statement of Independence, Impartiality, Competence

Bureau Veritas is a global leader in Testing, Inspection and Certification (“TIC”) services. Bureau Veritas’ mission is to support its clients complying with

regulations, managing risks and improving performance to meet the challenges of quality, health, safety, hygiene, environmental protection and social

responsibility. Leveraging its renowned expertise, as well as its impartiality, integrity and independence, Bureau Veritas has helped build trust between

companies, public authorities and consumers for nearly 200 years (https://group.bureauveritas.com/).


Bureau Veritas operates a quality management system across its activities and has implemented a robust Code of Ethics to maintain high ethical standards

among its personnel and business partners in their day-to-day business activities. We are particularly vigilant in the prevention of conflicts of interest.


No member of the assurance team has a business relationship with Argosy, its Directors or Managers beyond that required of this assignment. We have

conducted this assurance engagement independently and there has been no conflict of interest.


The assurance team was selected based on its extensive industry sector knowledge and experience in conducting independent verification, validation

and assurance of Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) information and associated systems and processes.


Bureau Veritas New Zealand Pty Ltd

28


April 2025


Jeremy Leu

General Manager, Perth, Australia

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures21

GHG EMISSIONS INTENSITY
Argosy's GHG emissions intensity by revenue is:

Scope 1 + Scope 2

=

401.1tCO

2

e

=3.02tCO

2

e/$1m

Revenue$132.7m

Argosy's GHG emissions intensity by net lettable area is:

Scope 1 + Scope 2

=

401.1tCO

2

e

=0.00073tCO

2

e/sqm

Net lettable area549,234.71sqm

ASSETS EXPOSED TO TRANSITION RISKS

All of Argosy’s property assets are potentially exposed to

transition risks arising under the climate scenarios described

in this report to some extent. For example, energy efficiency

requirements and the need for increased resilience. Further

information in relation to anticipated transition risks is set out

at page 13 above.

ASSETS EXPOSED TO PHYSICAL RISKS

All of Argosy’s properties are potentially exposed to physical

risks arising under the climate scenarios described in this

report, particularly under climate scenario 3, to some extent.

For example, climate impacts from acute weather events, sea

level rise and heat stress. Further information in relation to

anticipated physical risks is set out on page 12.

CLIMATE-RELATED OPPORTUNITIES

All of Argosy’s properties are potentially exposed to climate-

related opportunities under the climate scenarios described in

this report to some extent. For example, there is the potential

for properties to be upgraded such that they are more energy

efficient and resilient, making them more attractive to tenants.

CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT

Argosy has deployed capital expenditure toward climate-

related risks and opportunities during the year to 31 March 2025

as set out in the table below.

Capital deployed$000s

Development expenditure for Green Star rated buildings        49,353

Lighting upgrades             250

Sub-metering  (electricity and water)             551

Solar installation             116

HVAC renewal programme             613

Other              69

Total        50,952

INTERNAL EMISSIONS PRICE

For the year ended 31 March 2025, Argosy had an internal

emissions price of $21/tCO

2

e (2024: $21/tCO

2

e). This is the

average cost of offsetting Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions

for Argosy’s certification under Toitū Envirocare’s Net Carbon

Zero Programme.

REMUNERATION

Argosy’s short term incentive scheme includes components

linked to climate-related risks and opportunities. For the year

ended 31 March 2025, the percentages of STI linked to climate-

related risks and opportunities were: CEO 10%, CFO 10%, and

other staff 8%.

INDUSTRY BASED METRICS

Argosy has an emissions reduction programme as part of

its Toitū Envirocare Net Carbon Zero Programme, and other

targets used to manage climate-related risks and opportunities,

as outlined below.

Emissions reduction programme

Argosy targets a 17.5% reduction in emissions intensity for

Scope 1 , Scope 2 and selected Scope 3 emissions (for corporate

transport, energy distribution losses and waste/recycling) by

31 March 2031, under its Toitū Envirocare Net Carbon Zero

Programme. Argosy’s total emissions (Scopes 1, 2 and 3) have

increased 9% since the Base Year ending

31 March 2024. This

is made up of a 15% increase in Scope 1 direct emissions, a 1%

increase in Scope 2 electricity emissions, and a 9% increase in

the selected Scope 3 emissions. Brief commentary on Argosy's

performance in relation to each of the three Scopes is set out on

the following page.

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures22

2025 Climate-related Disclosures

Scope 1 emissions: refrigerant losses from building air-
conditioning systems within Argosy's operational control have

been the main cause of Argosy’s increase in Scope 1 emissions.

For the year ended 31 March 2025, R410a refrigerant losses

contributed 82% of Argosy's Scope 1 emissions. These

emissions are sporadic in nature, and Argosy has an ongoing

reductions project focused on leak detection and mitigation.

Excluding refrigerant emissions from the calculation, Scope 1

emissions would have reduced by 22%. This was contributed to

by the phasing out of fossil fuel powered company vehicles and

reduced natural gas and backup generator usage.

Scope 2 emissions: scope 2 electricity emissions have

remained steady with a small increase of 1%.

Scope 3 emissions: waste to landfill emissions in Scope 3

increased significantly due to the greater accuracy of data

received from contractors, which contributed to an overall

increase in selected Scope 3 emissions.

The emissions reduction target is an absolute target to reduce

Argosy’s emissions, and is a commitment under the Toitū

Envirocare Net Carbon Zero Programme. Achieving this target

will contribute to limiting global warming by reducing Argosy’s

emissions. However, it is not a science-based target linked

directly to Paris Agreement goals or the specific goal of limiting

global warming to 1.5°C.

Argosy’s Scope 1, 2 and selected Scope 3 emissions

reduction programme does not rely on carbon offsets.

However, Argosy’s certification under the Toitū Envirocare

Net Carbon Zero Programme relies on carbon offsets for

emissions remaining after reductions under Argosy’s emissions

reduction programme.

Other targets used to manage climate-related risks

and opportunities

Argosy has the following targets which are used to manage

climate-related risks and opportunities:

•Green Buildings: Argosy has a target that 50% of the

buildings in its portfolio (by market value) will be Green

Buildings by 31 March 2031. As at 31 March 2025, 33%

of completed buildings in Argosy’s portfolio (by market

value) were Green Buildings. Based on presently available

information and projections, planned Green Buildings would

be sufficient to meet Argosy’s target for 50% of its

buildings (by market value) to be Green Buildings by

31 March 2031. However, meeting the target by this date will

depend on the commercial environment, leasing activity and

construction time-frames.

•Green Star ratings for new buildings: Argosy has an annual

target that all new office buildings will achieve a 5 Green Star

rating and new industrial buildings will achieve a 4 Green

Star rating. Argosy developed one new building during the

year which met this target. This was the 6 Green Star Design

& As-Built Rating at Building B, 224 Neilson Street (certified

November 2024).


NABERSNZ ratings: Argosy has a target for all Core office

buildings to have a NABERSNZ rating by 31 March 2026.

There are eight Core and Value Add office buildings and

six of these have NABERSNZ ratings with one building

undergoing the renewal process for its rating and the

remaining building on track to receive its NABERSNZ rating

during the year to 31 March 2026.

•Diverting waste from landfill: Argosy has an annual target

for 80% landfill diversion on major projects (excluding tenant

fitout). Argosy had one major project, the development of

Building B at 224 Neilson Street, which met this target and

achieved 93% diversion from landfill.

•Fossil fuels: Argosy has a target for all existing buildings

to have no Argosy controlled fossil fuels combusted on site

(excluding emergency and fire services) by 31 March 2030.

Argosy is investigating alternatives to gas powered building

services and decarbonisation projects have been initiated at

two properties.

•R22 refrigerants: at its Core buildings, Argosy is

investigating options for phasing out R22 refrigerants in air-

conditoning units under its operational control by 31 March

2031. The intention is to replace R22 refrigerants with non-

ozone lower GHG potential refrigerants.

•Solar projects: Argosy had a target to pilot a solar project

for an industrial property during the year to 31 March 2025.

This target was met. During the year, a 224kW PV array was

installed as part of the development of Building B at 224

Neilson Street.

The targets above:

•are neither intensity nor absolute targets

•are not science based targets linked directly to Paris

Agreement goals or the specific goal of limiting global

warming to 1.5°C

•contribute to limiting global warming by helping to reduce

Argosy's overall emissions in current or future years

•do not rely on carbon offsets

Argosy Property Limited2025 Climate-related Disclosures23

39 Market Place
PO Box 90214

Victoria Street West

Auckland 1142

P / 09 304 3400

argosy.co.nz

---

quality
PORTFOLIO

OUR

Our Portfolio

2025

50
549,235

6.00%

2,109

96.5%

5.1yrs

NUMBER OF

BUILDINGS

NET LETTABLE

AREA (SQM)

PASSING

YIELD

MARKET VALUE

OF BUILDINGS

($M)

OCCUPANCY

BY RENT

PORTFOLIO

W A LT

8 Willis Street, Wellington

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202502

Industrial
Auckland

19 Nesdale Avenue, Wiri

VALUATION

$ 74,200

WALT

9.6

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

20,621

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.69%

240 Puhinui Road, Manukau

VALUATION

$ 46,700

WALT

9.6

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

13,273

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.48%

244 Puhinui Road, Manukau

VALUATION

$ 16,500

WALT

9.6

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

4,353

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.28%

Highgate Parkway, Silverdale

VALUATION

$ 38,000

WALT

2.8

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

10,581

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.03%

32 Bell Avenue, Mt Wellington

VALUATION

$ 18,700

WALT

2.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

8,139

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.42%

12-16 Bell Avenue, Mt Wellington

VALUATION

$ 37,450

WALT

7.7

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

14,809

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.13%

18-20 Bell Avenue, Mt Wellington

VALUATION

$ 22,600

WALT

7.8

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

5,639

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.98%

2 Allens Road, East Tamaki

VALUATION

$ 10,500

WALT

9.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

2,920

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.41%

12 Allens Road, East Tamaki

VALUATION

$ 9,500

WALT

8.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

2,307

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.42%

106 Springs Road, East Tamaki

VALUATION

$ 13,800

WALT

7.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

3,910

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.73%

5 Allens Road, East Tamaki

VALUATION

$ 8,150

WALT

3.6

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

2,572

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.38%

1 Rothwell Avenue, Albany

VALUATION

$ 36,700

WALT

5.3

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

12,683

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.13%

4 Henderson Place, Onehunga

VALUATION

$ 34,100

WALT

6.3

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

10,841

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.36%

211 Albany Highway, Albany

VALUATION

$ 37,900

WALT

2.8

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

14,589

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.74%

9 Ride Way, Albany

VALUATION

$ 31,900

WALT

7.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

9,178

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.62%

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202503

Our Portfolio

Industrial
90-104 Springs Road,

East Tamaki

VALUATION

$ 10,200

WALT

1.9

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

3,885

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.22%

1-3 Unity Drive, Albany

VALUATION

$ 18,450

WALT

6.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

6,116

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.84%

5 Unity Drive, Albany

VALUATION

$ 9,400

WALT

6.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

3,046

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.88%

Cnr William Pickering Drive &

Rothwell Avenue, Albany

VALUATION

$ 23,750

WALT

5.1

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

7,074

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.75%

17 Mayo Road, Wiri

VALUATION

$ 37,500

WALT

1.8

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

13,351

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.16%

320 Ti Rakau Drive, East Tamaki

VALUATION

$ 78,900

WALT

3.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

28,242

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.92%

80-120 Favona Road, Mangere

VALUATION

$ 155,250

WALT

3.0

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

59,386

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.48%

224 Neilson Street, Onehunga

VALUATION

$ 89,200

WALT

12.0

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

5,414

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


8-14 Mt Richmond Drive,

Mt Wellington

VALUATION

$ 103,000

WALT

3.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

23,016

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


15 Unity Drive, Albany

VALUATION

$ 8,120

WALT

3.1

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

7,002

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

3.82%

133 Roscommon Road, Wiri

VALUATION

$ 13,950

WALT

8.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

15,862

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

3.57%

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202504

Our Portfolio

Wellington
54-56 Jamaica Drive, Wellington

VALUATION

$ 11,400

WALT

10.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

1,825

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.12%

147 Gracefield Road, Seaview

VALUATION

$ 21,000

WALT

3.0

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

8,018

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.35%

19 Barnes Street, Seaview

VALUATION

$ 17,800

WALT

6.4

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

6,857

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

7.04%

39 Randwick Road, Seaview

VALUATION

$ 26,500

WALT

4.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

16,249

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.90%

68 Jamaica Drive, Grenada North

VALUATION

$ 21,500

WALT

3.3

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

9,417

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.05%

Other

100 Maui Street, Hamilton

VALUATION

$ 29,000

WALT

11.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

12,236

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

5.87%

8 Foundry Drive,

Woolston, Christchurch

VALUATION

$ 17,250

WALT

4.8

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

7,762

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

7.61%

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202505

Office
Auckland

99-107 Khyber Pass

Road, Grafton

VALUATION

$ 16,200

WALT

2.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

2,509

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.96%

8 Nugent Street, Grafton

VALUATION

$ 47,600

WALT

3.5

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

8,125

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

7.54%

39 Market Place, Viaduct Harbour

VALUATION

$ 6,100

WALT

3.1

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

10,365

VACANT SPACE (SQM)

8,220

PASSING YIELD

9.0%

82 Wyndham Street

VALUATION

$ 49,750

WALT

6.7

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

6,012

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.20%

101 Carlton Gore

Road, Newmarket

VALUATION

$ 29,000

WALT

3.3

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

4,206

VACANT SPACE (SQM)

987

PASSING YIELD

5.77%

105 Carlton Gore

Road, Newmarket

VALUATION

$ 49,500

WALT

6.9

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

5,196

VACANT SPACE (SQM)

570

PASSING YIELD

6.44%

107 Carlton Gore

Road, Newmarket

VALUATION

$ 43,750

WALT

6.9

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

6,093

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.44%

Citibank Centre, 23 Customs

Street East

VALUATION

$ 74,000

WALT

4.0

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

9,629

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

7.22%

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202506

Our Portfolio

Wellington
7-27 Waterloo Quay

VALUATION

$ 128,100

WALT

3.9

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

23,080

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.54%

15-21 Stout Street

VALUATION

$ 135,000

WALT

1.3

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

20,709

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.53%

143 Lambton Quay

VALUATION

$ 7,500

WALT

0.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

6,216

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

28.58%

147 Lambton Quay

VALUATION

$ 41,000

WALT

2.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

8,949

VACANT SPACE (SQM)

5,213

PASSING YIELD

4.48%

8-14 Willis Street/ 360

Lambton Quay

VALUATION

$ 148,000

WALT

9.9

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

16,767

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.37%

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202507

Large Format Retail

Auckland

Albany Mega Centre and 11

Coliseum Drive, Albany

VALUATION

$ 151,500

WALT

5.1

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

33,792

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

7.07%

50 & 54-62 Cavendish

Drive, Manukau

VALUATION

$ 31,100

WALT

6.2

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

9,939

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

6.49%

252 Dairy Flat Highway, Albany

VALUATION

$ 11,200

WALT

4.8

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

2,262

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

4.97%

Other

Cnr Taniwha & Paora Hapi

Streets, Taupo

VALUATION

$ 10,900

WALT

1.50

NET LETTABLE AREA (SQM)

4,212

VACANT SPACE (SQM)


PASSING YIELD

7.46%

In accordance with Argosy’s Green Bond Framework, “Green Buildings” are existing and/or planned Office, Industrial and

Large Format Retail buildings, including upgrades, that are either targeting or have been certified as obtaining either a

minimum 4 Star NZGBC Green Star Built rating or a minimum 4 Star NABERSNZ Energy Base Build Rating or Energy Whole

Building Rating.

Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202508

Our Portfolio

224b Neilson Street, Onehunga, Auckland
Argosy Property LimitedOur Portfolio 202509

Our Portfolio

39 Market Place
PO Box 90214

Victoria Street West

Auckland 1142

P / 09 304 3400

argosy.co.nz

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.