Scott Technology Limited logo

Scott Announces FY25 Results

Full Year Results20 October 2025SCTIndustrials

Scott Technology Reports Record FY25 Result

AUCKLAND NZ, [21 October 2025] - Scott Technology (NZX:SCT) today reported a record EBITDA result for the

2025 financial year, underpinned by a clear focus on higher margin contracts and the early success of its

Destination 2030 strategy. The strong second half performance more than offset a softer first half, reflecting the

benefits of strategic execution, improved order in-take, disciplined cost management and signaling long-term

growth trajectory.

Business Highlights

• Record EBITDA of $31.5m driven by strong second half performance and focus on higher margin contracts.

• Destination 2030 strategy, a plan for sustainable profitable growth centered on a customer-first mindset.

• Forward work grows to $169m, up 6% or $160m from FY24.

• New contract wins including $44m in the Appliance Domain across the Americas.

• On target for 30% lower emissions by 2030, with net Scope 1 and 2 GHGs down 9.1% from FY22 baseline .

• Final dividend declared of 5 cents per share (unimputed), taking the total full year dividend to 8 cents per share.


Financial Highlights

• Group revenue: $275m in-line with FY24.

• Second half revenue growth of 13% offsetting softer first half.

• Service revenue contribution: $80m, 29% of total revenue (up from 28% in FY24).

• Group net margin

1

improved to 29%, from 27% in FY24.

• Record EBITDA: $31.5m, up 19% from $26.4 million in FY24.

• N PAT : $ 14.2m up 84% from $7.7m in FY24.

• Operating cash flow improved to $22.3m, compared with $6.0m in FY24.

• Net debt reduced to $12.3m, reflecting improved cash flow and disciplined capital management.


Financial Performance

Group revenue for FY25 was $275m, compared to $276m in FY24. With revenue down 14% at the half-year, this

near full recovery highlights the momentum built in the second half. This was supported by multiple contract

wins across the Group and improved sales for our standard products and recurring revenue streams. Service

revenue grew to $80m, now contributing 29% of revenue up from 28% in FY24 , with a continued focus on

recurring revenue.

Group net margin improved to 29% from 27% in FY24, reflecting disciplined execution and a focus on higher-

value opportunities. EBITDA margin was also supported by a disciplined approach to costs while ensuring

sustainable future earnings.

While overall revenue remained steady at $275m, reported EBITDA reached a record $31.5m, up 19% from

$26.4m in FY24. This uplift was supported by higher-margin contracts, project execution, a reset cost base and

improved business mix. NPAT rose to $14.2m, up 84% from $7.7m in the prior year.

Operating cash flow improved significantly to $22.3m, compared with $6.0m in FY24. This was driven by securing

key new projects, effective working capital management and disciplined cost control, facilitating a 39% decrease


1

Group net margin represents total sales less the total direct and indirect costs of material and labour,

before overheads and other income or expenses.


in net debt to $12.3m. Investments were directed towards regional plant upgrades and strategic asset

developments.

Dividend: The directors have declared a final dividend of 5.0 cents per share (unimputed), taking the full year

dividend to 8.0 cents per share. The Dividend Reinvestment Plan will apply.

Strategy: Destination 2030

Scott Technology’s Destination 2030 strategy, introduced during FY25, provides a long-term blueprint for

sustainable profitable growth, targeting a revenue of $530m by 2030. This approach ensures that customer

needs are at the center of every business decision supported by Scott’s enablers; Customer First, One Scott,

Leading Edge Technology and High performing Teams.

CEO Mike Christman said, “The strategy emphasises continuous improvement, focused on Market

Understanding, Enabled Teams, Trusted Relationships and Innovation recogni sing that each cycle will drive

greater innovation and bring Scott closer to its customers. Early signs of strategy success were visible in FY25

through enhanced project governance, strengthened global position, higher margin contract wins and greater

penetration of service revenue.”

“Together these elements combine to reduce risk, improve scalability, and build resilience in earnings.”

On top of this we have set ambitious revenue and EBITDA margin targets through to 2030. Targeting $530 in

revenue and EBITDA margin of 14% by FY30. A detailed action plan has been established, including innovation

initiatives, lifecycle services, and investment in high performing teams to deliver on the company’s long-term

objectives.

Looking Forward

• Scott’s Destination 2030 strategy is already gaining traction across the business, driven by deeper

customer insight, an expanding R&D pipeline, unified global operations for scalable growth and a culture

of high performance ready to seize future opportunities.

• The record second half is an inflection point in the company’s earnings and represents an early sign of

success for the company’s new strategy .

• Forward work has improved to $169m, providing a strong platform leading into FY26. There is a strong

pipeline of future opportunities, with Destination 2030 providing a sharpened focus on converting these

into orders and growing forward work further.

• Over the coming year, we expect revenue growth and continued earnings leverage . However , we remain

cautious with the macro volatility that persists and any impact this may have on customers’ investment

plans over the next 12 months.

Additional specific domain detail is provided within the investor presentation.

ENDS


For investor enquiries please contact:


Mike Christman

Chief Executive Officer


E: mike.christman@scottautomation.com


For media enquiries please contact:


Eugene Afanasy

Communications Manager

T: +64 21 0852 4832

E: e.afanasy@scottautomation.com


About Scott


Scott delivers smart automation and robotic solutions that transform industries by making businesses safer,

more productive, and more efficient. Our diverse capability makes us the first choice for hundreds of the

world’s leading brands. With design and build operations across Australasia, China, Europe, and America and

over 100 years of engineering excellence, Scott is the global expert in automation.


Appendix

Domain Summary :


Domain Protein Mining

Materials

Handling

Appliances Other Total


FY25 ($m)

Revenue 69.4 50.9 123.1 31.4 0.4 275.3

Net Margin $ 20.4 18.8 32.0 7.9 (0.2) 79.0

Net Margin % 29% 37% 26% 25% (38%) 29%


FY24 ($m)

Revenue 59.9 48.8 127.3 36.0 4.1 276.1

Net Margin $ 16.8 17.4 28.3 10.6 0.0 73.2

Net Margin % 28% 36% 22% 30% 0% 27%


Protein:

• Overall: strong second half performance drives +16% revenue growth. A Lamb Primal sold to JBS

Cobram and trussing units sold to Maple Lodge underpinned H2.

• BladeStop: revenue up +12% on higher service and parts revenue due to increase service penetration

and a larger installed base.

• Lamb & Beef: strong close to the year following a slow start due to timing of orders. JBS Cobram lamb

primal progressing well and an installation of an existing Lamb Primal secured for Dawn Meats in UK.

• Poultry: sale to Maple Lodge in Canada and completion of Costco units during the period.

• Margin %: reflects execution on projects and increased mix of service and parts.


Mining:

• Overall: growth driven through Rocklabs standards supported by favourable commodity prices of gold

and copper.

• Rocklabs standard: strong unit sales for crushers and pulverisers. This strong period of capital

equipment growth supports service revenue in future periods.

• Modular: softer period after cycling the MRL project and timing of securing new orders. Strategic key

wins for Kinross (Alaska) and Rio Tinto (Australia).

• Energize: FY25 saw completion of the first phase of automated energy transfer systems (AETS) for

Caterpillar and kick-off of Phase Two which includes Early Learner sites.

• Margin %: improvement due to a mix of standard products. The target is for margins to trend back

towards 40%.


Materials Handling:

• Overall: strong service growth in EU is offset by the timing of large US projects. Strong margin uplift

delivers improved contribution.

• Europe & North America: strong period in Europe partnering with customers such as Ecofrost,

Clarebout, Cranswick and McCain for important projects. Following several periods of strong


equipment sales, service dr ove the incremental growth in EU. Project timing and commissioning phase

of JBS Brooks impacting North America.

• Transbotics: softer orders with customers delaying spending. Officially launched NexBot in March 2025

with promising opportunity pipeline

• Margin %: +4pts in margin with improved project and service mix

• Forward work: remains strong with a mix of orders across both Europe and North America.


Appliances

• Overall: despite the decline in revenue due to cycling a large project in prior year, it was a strong year

for Appliances delivering an important net margin contribution to the Group and securing significant

deals to set up FY26 .

• Appliances: FY25 was underpinned by Midea project in China which is in final stages of

commissioning. Prior year included large projects for Sub-Zero and GE Appliances.

• Forward work: recent wins include multiple projects worth $44m, with revenue to be recognised

across FY26 / FY27.

• Margin %: margin normalised and in-line with expectations following an elevated FY24 from a single

project.

---

SCOTT TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Annual

Report

Scott Technology Limited
Page 2

Dividend
Final dividend: 5.0 cents per share (unimputed)

Record date: 6 November 2025

Payment date: 19 November 2025

Annual Meeting

Tuesday 2 December 2025, 3:00pm

www.virtualmeeting.co.nz/sct25

Proxies close 3:00pm, Sunday 30 November 2025

02 Performance Snapshot

03 Global Presence

03 Five-year Trend

04 Letter from the Chairman

07 Chief Executive Officer’s Address:

From Heritage to Horizon

10 Destination 2030: Delivering Sustainable,

Profitable Growth

12 Our Domains

15 Carving Out New Markets

16 Where Innovation Meets Global Flow

19 Automated Future of Mining

20 Built to Last

22 Culture and Commitment

24 Health and Safety

25 Sustainable and Profitable Growth

27 Climate-related Disclosures

47 Financial Statements

95 Independent Auditor’s Report

98 Statement of Corporate Governance

105 Statutory Information

110 Remuneration

119 Directors' Responsibility Statement

120 Directory

Dividend reinvestment plan applies to this

payment for shareholders who have elected to

receive shares in lieu of a cash dividend.

CONTENTS

Stuart McLauchlan

Chairman and Independent Director

The Board of Directors (Board) of Scott Technology

Limited is pleased to present this Annual Report

for the year ended 31 August 2025. It provides a

review of our Group performance in FY25, as well

as individual segment performance updates and

an overview of Destination 2030, our refreshed

business strategic focus.

On behalf of the Board, 21 October 2025.

John Thorman

Director

Annual Report 2025

Page 1

PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT
Scott Technology reported a record EBITDA

1

result for the

2025 financial year, underpinned by a clear focus on higher

margin contracts and the early success of its Destination

2030 strategy. The strong second-half performance more

than offset a softer first half, reflecting the benefits of

strategic execution, improved order in-take, disciplined cost

management and signalling long-term growth trajectory.

While overall revenue remained steady at $275m, operating

EBITDA reached a record $31.5m, up 19% from $26.4m in FY24.

This uplift was supported by higher-margin contracts, project

execution, reset cost base and improved business mix.

NPAT

2

rose to $14.2m, up 84% from $7.7m in the prior year.

Group revenue for FY25 was $275m, compared to $276m in

FY24. With revenue down 14% at the half-year, this near full

recovery highlights the momentum built in the second half

of FY25. This was supported by multiple contract wins across

the Group, improved sales for our standard products and

recurring revenue streams. Service revenue grew to $80m,

now contributing 29% of revenue, up from 28%, highlighting

the benefits of a more resilient and recurring revenue base.

Group net margin

3

improved to 29% from 27% in FY24,

reflecting disciplined execution and a focus on higher-value

opportunities. Margin was also supported by a disciplined

approach to costs, while ensuring sustainable future earnings.

Operating cash flow improved significantly to $22.3m,

compared with $6.0m in FY24. This was driven by securing

key new projects, effective working capital management and

disciplined cost control, facilitating a 39% reduction in net debt

to $12.3m. Investments were directed towards regional plant

upgrades and strategic asset developments.

In recognition of the progress made by the company, the

directors declared a final dividend of 5.0 cents per share, payable

on 19 November 2025, to take the total full-year dividend to

8.0 cents. The dividend reinvestment plan will apply.


RECORD EBITDA

$31. 5m

GROUP NET MARGIN

3


PERFORMANCE


29%

STRONG FORWARD

ORDER BOOK OF

$169m

Supporting all Scott domains including,

securing additional service contracts.

9 .1%

DECREASE IN

EMISSIONS

Net Scope 1 and 2 GHG

4

emission

decrease on our FY22 Base Year levels.

Up 19% on FY24

Up 2 PTS on FY24

Scott ID25 – Investor Day outlining our long-term vision. Scott China team celebrates 10 years of operation.

1 Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation.

2 Net Profit After Tax

3 Group Net Margin represents total sales less the total direct and indirect costs of materials and labour, before overheads and other income or expenses

4 Greenhouse Gas

Scott Technology Limited

Page 2

20212022202320242025
FINANCIAL$‘000s$‘000s$‘000s$‘000s$‘000s

Revenue206,030221,757267,526 276,125 275,273

Reported EBITDA20,967 23,918 29,691 26,43031,539

Net surplus / (loss) after tax8,42212,65715,4367,71714,213

Operating cash flow13,426 6,30820,2175,97222,300

Net cash / (overdraft)12,242 3,93512,396(7,325)2,056

Bank loans10,920 11,97012,47512,73914,310

Total assets194,504 206,888253,054243,980269,568

Shareholders' equity98,195 100,406113,899111,721129,274

DIVIDENDS (CENTS PER SHARE)20212022202320242025

Interim

2.04.04.0 5.0 3.0

Final

4.04.04.0 3.0 5.0

6.08.08.08.08.0

EMPLOYEES (NUMBER)20212022202320242025

New Zealand188198231 225196

Australia869566 5240

China454043 4549

Americas736059 5848

Europe230240257 269278

Total622633656 649 611

FIVE-YEAR TREND

GLOBAL PRESENCE

1 Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation.

2 Net Profit After Tax

3 Group Net Margin represents total sales less the total direct and indirect costs of materials and labour, before overheads and other income or expenses

4 Greenhouse Gas

Annual Report 2025

Page 3

LETTER FROM
THE CHAIRMAN


"Destination 2030 is driving results faster

than expected and Scott’s evolution is

unmistakably under way”

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am pleased to present

Scott Technology’s 2025 Annual Report.

This year brought a sobering reminder of our responsibility,

the loss of a dear colleague, Michael Sherry, at our Dunedin

site in April 2025 has deeply affected the Scott community.

Safety remains our highest priority. The Board is united in its

commitment to ensuring every employee returns home safe

and well each day.

FY25 has been a defining year in Scott’s journey. Under the

leadership of our CEO, Mike Christman, we launched Destination

2030 – a bold five-year step within Scott’s longer-term journey –

setting our path towards becoming a customer-first organisation,

united by one global system, powered by leading-edge

technology and sustained by high-performing teams.

Rolled out at HY25 and launched externally at Scott ID25, our

inaugural investor day in Auckland, Destination 2030 has already

begun to transform the business. The second half of FY25

delivered record earnings, with EBITDA at all-time highs – clear

proof that, unlike many strategies that remain posters on the

wall, Destination 2030 is already delivering results.

Destination 2030 is driving results faster than expected, and

Scott’s evolution is unmistakably under way.

Destination 2030 Delivers Performance

and Progress


We reported record EBITDA of $31.5m, up 19% year on year and

NPAT of $14.2m, an 84% increase. Topline revenue held steady

at $275m, in line with guidance given at Scott ID25, reflecting the

timing of major project deliveries. These results highlight a leaner,

more assertive Scott that is positioned for sustainable profitable

growth through the new strategy.

Our four core domains are at the centre of this transformation.

Materials Handling & Logistics (MHL) advanced breakthrough

solutions for consumer goods companies, unveiling AccuTable

and NexBot in North America. Importantly, two large-scale

reference sites are going live in North America this calendar

year, a milestone that will anchor our reputation and accelerate

growth in this critical region. Alongside the Maestro+ software

platform, MHL is building complete automation ecosystems

that meet customer needs in a world of reshoring, supply chain

disruption and labour shortages and is increasingly becoming a

powerful bridge for cross-domain growth.

The Protein domain continues to expand its global footprint,

securing a contract to deliver the first LEAP Primal system

in the United Kingdom (UK) whilst building deeper traction

in North America. Accounting for roughly 45% of revenue,

services highlight not only the domain’s strong integration with

customer operations but also its role in building resilience and

recurring growth.

Mining continued to benefit from high demand in gold and

copper, with customers increasingly seeking automation at

scale. Notable wins included a major contract with Kinross Gold

in Alaska, alongside long-term service growth in Australia.

Our Rocklabs AMS technologies are reshaping laboratory

automation, while Robofuel continues to point to a broader role

in mine site automation.

Appliances celebrated its 10-year anniversary in China, where

our Centre of Excellence has become a steady anchor in Scott’s

global portfolio. The year also saw our largest appliance

automation contract in China, worth $20m (FY25), followed by

$44m project wins across the Americas for FY26.

This milestone not only strengthens our forward work pipeline

of $169m but also reflects the scale of opportunity Destination

2030 is unlocking, deepening customer intimacy, expanding

Scott’s role in global markets and proving our ability to deliver

complex, cross-regional projects.

Together, these domains showcase Scott’s ability to innovate

across industries, while deepening lifecycle partnerships with

customers.

Strategy in Motion

Destination 2030 provides clarity and ambition, to grow Scott

revenue to $530m by FY30, supported by an EBITDA margin

target of 14%. The four enablers Customer First, One Scott,

Leading-Edge Technology and High-Performing Teams have clear

milestones that span across years.

Already, we see evidence of progress. Customer First is

expanding our role from vendor to trusted partner across the

Stuart McLauchlan at the China 10-year celebration.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 4

full automation lifecycle. One Scott is unifying systems and
processes, creating a leaner operating model and enabling

Scott to better service its customers. Our R&D (research and

development) pipeline is being reshaped to move from project-

led sprints to sustained, long-term innovation. At the same time,

our commitment to High-Performing Teams is strengthening

leadership alignment and capability across geographies.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)

Good governance and responsible business practice remain

at the core of Scott’s success. The Board is committed to the

highest standards of transparency and accountability, with ESG

integration deepening into Destination 2030.

Our goal to reduce Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions by 30%

by 2030 – from our baseline year of 2022 – remains an ESG

priority. While revenue has grown by nearly 25% since FY22,

emissions have trended downwards by 9%, showing early signs

of decoupling growth from emissions. This is only the beginning,

with further initiatives in renewable energy, logistics optimisation

and lifecycle services that will accelerate progress.

Dividend

The Board is pleased to declare a dividend of 5 cents per share,

taking the full-year total to 8 cents for FY25. This balance between

rewarding shareholders and reinvesting in growth reflects our

confidence in Scott’s financial resilience and long-term trajectory.

Outlook

Looking ahead, the Board is confident in Scott’s ability to sustain

its growth trajectory. Our strong order book, expanding global

presence and customer-first mindset provide a powerful

platform. As markets evolve, demand for automation and

robotics will only accelerate and Scott is well positioned to lead.

With Destination 2030 in motion, Scott has both the ambition

and the roadmap to achieve it. By uniting our global teams,

deepening customer partnerships and investing in innovation,

we will continue to create value for our customers, our

shareholders and our people.

In closing, I would like to thank Mike Christman and the

Executive Team for delivering FY25 Results and Destination

2030, my fellow directors for their guidance and support and

to extend my gratitude to our team members worldwide.

Your dedication, talent and passion are the foundation of

Scott’s success.

Together, we will continue to build a stronger, more valuable

and more global Scott Technology.

Stuart McLauchlan

Chairman and Independent Director

Al Byers

Director

Stuart McLauchlan

Chairman and Independent

Director

Brent Eastwood


Director

John Berry

Director

Derek Charge


Independent Director


John Thorman

Independent Director

OUR BOARD

Full profiles are available on our website:

www.scottautomation.com/en/investor-centre/governance

Annual Report 2025

Page 5

Scott ID25 – CEO Mike Christman unveils Destination 2030 to a room full of investors.
Scott Technology Limited

Page 6

When I joined Scott a year ago, the move from London to
New Zealand felt natural to me. I had spent most of my

career in organisations defined by long-term vision and

leadership in automation, so Scott’s 110-year history of

resilience, engineering excellence and pioneering spirit

felt like the right next chapter.

From day one, the strengths within the organisation were

clear to me – a deeply committed team, pockets of world-

class technical expertise and a legacy of solving tough

problems. Those early months were about engaging with our

customers, listening to our people, learning about our history

and understanding what the business needed next.

In February, at our Half Year 2025 Results, I shared my early

observations with the market. It was clear to me that while

our people had passion, we needed greater alignment

and direction, our customers valued our engineering but

wanted deeper partnerships and our markets were moving

faster than our innovation pipeline. Behind the scenes, the

Executive Team and I shaped our response.

In April, we were deeply affected by the tragic loss of

Michael Sherry, a colleague at our Dunedin site, a solemn

reminder that the safety of our people is and must always

remain our highest priority.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S ADDRESS:

FROM HERITAGE TO HORIZON

We crafted a five-year strategy designed to evolve Scott from

an engineering mindset to a customer-first mindset. While

Scott must always retain its engineering DNA, our future

leadership will be defined by deep customer and market

understanding. We call this strategy Destination 2030.

Cycles of Success: Destination 2030

I set a dot on the horizon of $530m in revenue by 2030 – a

14% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) from what we

reported in FY25. Ambition alone, however, is not enough.

Destination 2030 is built around four key enablers that ensure

we not only grow but grow in the right way.

It begins with Customer First, deepening relationships through

lifecycle services, putting customers at the heart of everything

that we do and anticipating their needs rather than responding

to them.

To deliver on that promise, we need One Scott – unifying our

people, processes and systems so that we operate as a single,

highly efficient global company. This is about breaking down silos

”I set a dot on the horizon of $530m in

revenue by 2030 – a 14% CAGR from

what we reported in FY25."

Mike Christman, Chief Executive Officer (CEO).

Annual Report 2025

Page 7

and moving to enterprise thinking, strengthening collaboration
and building a shared sense of purpose across geographies.

Our growth also depends on Leading-Edge Technology –

reshaping and refocusing R&D to strengthen our innovation

pipeline and deliver automation solutions that set

benchmarks across industries, with the ambition to forge

the market rather than follow it, in other words, positively

disrupt.

None of this is possible without High-Performing Teams – a

commitment to maximising talent by refreshing our core values

and embedding a high-performance culture, so our people

have the clarity, skills and energy to deliver on our ambition.

Together, these four enablers form the foundation of

Destination 2030. Each has a clear roadmap and milestones

that span years and together they are already beginning to

shape the way Scott works and wins.

Defining the strategy was only the first step. From March, the

Executive Team and I worked with our Board of Directors,

visited teams across our global sites and engaged directly

with our people, our customers and our partners to share

the vision and gather input. The response was energising –

people saw themselves in the plan.

Early Impact, Strong Momentum

Six months after unveiling Destination 2030, the impact is

unmistakable. Scott has delivered record second half results

in FY25, with strong gains across financial and operational

measures, including record EBITDA of $31.5m (up 19% on

FY24) and NPAT of $14.2m (up 84% on FY24).

Through Customer First, we are strengthening our global

position. We have validated our key markets, expanded

our customer-facing teams to target strategic growth and

embedded ourselves more deeply in our customers’ success,

delivering a 29% service revenue contribution through

lifecycle partnerships.

These changes extend our footprint and reinforce Scott as a

trusted partner in automation in a region where customer

intimacy is becoming the decisive competitive advantage.

In Leading-Edge Technology, we launched our NexBot

solution in Chicago, the first-of-its-kind modular Automated

Guided Vehicle (AGV). In addition, we introduced the K800

BladeStop safety bandsaw in Frankfurt, setting a new global

benchmark with a five-millisecond stopping time. We also

saw growing adoption of both the Automated Modular

Solution at a mine site in Alaska and Automated Poultry

Trusser technology in Canada.

These innovations are more than product milestones,

they are forging new markets, reshaping expectations of

what automation can deliver and positioning Scott at the

forefront of industry disruption.

Through One Scott, we launched a unified platform

and digital roadmap to drive efficiency and alignment.

More than systems and processes, One Scott is already

establishing a single way of working, seamlessly connecting

our global teams and supporting the business to scale.

"Six months after unveiling Destination

2030, the impact is unmistakable. Scott

has delivered record second half results

in FY25"

High-Performing Teams, are now being put into practice,

beginning at the top with the Executive Team this year,

extending to management next year and staff the year

after. This staged rollout is already shaping outcomes,

strengthening alignment and has led directly to the leadership

changes we have made.

Custodians of Scott’s Unwritten Future

With more than a century behind us, being true custodians of

Scott’s unwritten future means shaping leadership structures

that serve today, while preparing for the generations and

challenges ahead.

Volatile markets, shifting supply chains and the pace of

technological change will continue to test us. Our role as

leaders is not to avoid these risks but to manage them with

discipline and confidence: diversifying our markets and supply

chains, investing in innovation and maintaining financial

resilience to geo-political uncertainty.

I have reorganised our executive team around four core

domains – Protein, Mining, Appliance and Materials Handling –

moving away from the regional business model. Alongside this,

I have created dedicated executive roles to expand lifecycle

services, strengthen R&D, maximise talent and drive business

transformation. Together, these changes provide clear

Scott US team in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 8

Full profiles are available on our website:
www. scottautomation.com/en/about-us/our-people

accountability, faster execution and the leadership focus

to deliver Destination 2030.

Custodianship is not only about structure, it is also about

outlook. Scott must achieve both breadth and depth; breadth

as a globally diversified company operating across industries

and geographies, and depth through a Customer First –

approach that spans the full lifecycle of automation. From

design and build, to operate, maintain, modify and, ultimately

dispose – adding value at every step.

This combination of breadth and depth gives Scott resilience

and growth potential that few others can match.

Towards the Horizon

As markets recover and the demand for automation

accelerates, Scott is positioned to lead, building on our

strengths across industries.

We are winning new customers while re-engaging with

long-standing partners in new ways, built on our Customer

First mindset, our Leading-Edge Technology, One Scott

systems and our culture of High-Performing Teams. These

are early results but they are already showing that

Destination 2030 is in motion.

Now our task is to accelerate, scale and deliver. The

journey ahead will not be without challenges but

progress implacably requires change. With the right

people, a clear strategy and a renewed sense of purpose

and vision, Scott is ready to capitalise on the opportunities

that lie ahead.

It is my privilege to lead this company at such an exciting

time. Together, we will bring greater value to our

customers, honour our heritage, embrace change and

create a future that solidifies Scott’s global presence.


Mike Christman

Chief Executive Officer

Aaron Vanwalleghem

President of

Materials Handling

Werner Conradie

President of Mining

Mark O'Malley

Chief Financial Officer

Hayley Hindmarsh

Group GM – People

Cathy Zhang

Regional Director - China

Mark Host

President of Protein

Andrew Arnold

Global Director of Innovation

Damian Lucas

GM – Australia, Director

of Lifecycle Services

Anthony Wesney

Director of Transformation

OUR EXECUTIVE TEAM

Mike Christman

Chief Executive Officer

"With more than a century behind

us, being true custodians of Scott’s

unwritten future means shaping

leadership structures that serve today,

while preparing for the generations

and challenges ahead.“

Annual Report 2025

Page 9

To be the trusted partner that puts our customers first fostering
lasting partnerships that drive innovation and success.

DESTINATION 2030:

DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE,

PROFITABLE GROWTH


P

o

w

e

r

i

n

g


o

u

r


c

u

s

t

o

m

e

r

s


a

n

d


i

n

d

u

s

t

r

y


w

i

t

h


t

r

a

n

s

f

o

r

m

a

ti


v

e


s

o

l

u

ti


o

n

s


a

n

d


s

e

r

v

i

c

e

s

I

N

N

O

V

A

T

I

O

N



























M

A

R

K

E

T


U

N

D

E

R

S

T

A

N

D

I

N

G

T

R

U

S

T

E

D


R

E

L

A

T

I

O

N

S

H

I

P

S















E

N

A

B

L

E

D


T

E

A

M

S

ONE SCOTT

CUSTOMER

FIRST

HIGH

PERFORMING

TEAMS

LEADING

EDGE

TECHNOLOGY

Scott Technology Limited

Page 10

Structured Innovation – Scott has a proud history of being
recognised as an innovative automation company. To build

on that strength, we are shifting from short-term, project-led

innovation towards structured, strategically aligned R&D.

With numerous inventions and patents already secured, we

have a strong platform but our focus now is on scaling ideas

deliberately across domains and geographies.

Investing with Discipline – Globally, leading industrial

automation companies generally invest 4-6% of revenue

into R&D. Over the past six months, we have reshaped our

approach by strengthening governance, securing funding

and embedding new structures to ensure innovation is

deliberate, scalable and disciplined. Scott’s advantage

lies not in outspending competitors but in speed, agility

and focus, creating innovations that make our customers’

businesses safer, smarter and more competitive.

Innovation that Matters – Our future focus is on areas

that create the greatest value for customers: accelerated

automation across domains, advanced service models,

sustainable automation and solutions that integrate

Industry 4.0 technology.

Defining High-Performance – High-Performing Teams are

defined by strong collaboration, clear communication and a

shared commitment to goals. They boost productivity and

efficiency, spark innovation by bringing diverse perspectives

together and foster a positive work culture that lifts

engagement, morale and retention. Their adaptability under

pressure makes them critical to achieving both short-term

objectives and long-term strategic goals.

Embedding Across Scott – Scott is embedding this

approach across the organisation through a staged

rollout. The Executive Team has adopted the methodology

first, setting the standard for clarity, accountability and

performance. Management will follow next year, with staff

engagement to come the year after, ensuring alignment

and consistency at every level.

Driving Results and Outcome – By embedding High-

Performing Teams across Scott, we are building a culture

that maximises talent, strengthens collaboration and

accelerates execution. This transformation is already

shaping outcomes and has led directly to changes in

leadership, equipping Scott with the resilience and focus

needed to deliver Destination 2030.

Destination 2030

Destination 2030

Unifying How We Work – Scott has grown significantly through

both organic and inorganic measures, gaining world-class talent,

expertise and access to new markets. With that growth came

complexity and multiple systems and processes that limited our

ability to scale efficiently and deliver a consistent experience.

One Scott is our enterprise-wide initiative to unify platforms,

harmonise processes and enable our 600+ global team to

operate as one integrated organisation.

Efficiencies that Scale – By consolidating core systems such as

ERP, HRIS, CRM and PLM into a single foundation, we are reducing

duplication, strengthening data integrity,and accelerating

collaboration. The benefits are already visible: smoother

onboarding, faster decision-making, greater cross-domain

visibility and more effective resource use, all of which support

profitable, scalable growth.

Built for the Future – One Scott is designed to be sustainable and

future-ready, with each phase shaped by feedback from across

the business. More than a digital roadmap, it is a cultural enabler

giving our people more time to focus on customers, unlocking

efficiency at scale and positioning Scott to compete and lead as

one high-performing global organisation.

A Mindset Shift – Customer First is more than a strategic

enabler; it is a mindset. It asks us to stop seeing ourselves

only as an engineering company and instead act as a

company that exists because of, and for, our customers.

Today’s customers are not just buying machines, they are

looking for partners who can solve their toughest problems

and create lasting value, now and into the future.

Value Across the Lifecycle – By truly partnering with

customers throughout the full automation lifecycle; Design,

Build, Operate, Maintain, Modify and Dispose (DBOMMD)

we shift from one-off projects to long-term partnerships.

This lifecycle model is central to Destination 2030, with

more than 35% of Group revenue expected to come from

lifecycle services by 2030, directly supporting our $530m

revenue and 14% EBITDA targets.

Intimacy as Advantage – At its heart, Customer First

is about moving from transactional to true key account

partnerships. Through market intelligence, customer insights

and our One Scott systems, we embed ourselves deeper

into customer operations, anticipate their needs and align

innovation directly with their outcomes. This intimacy

simplifies complexity, reduces risk and builds resilience,

ensuring that when our customers win, we win.

High-Performing Teams

One Scott

Leading-Edge Technology

Customer First

Annual Report 2025

Page 11

11%45%
OUR DOMAINS

Revenue

Net Margin

Net Margin %

Service %

$31m

$8m

25%

6%

$123m

$32m

26%

28%

Revenue

Net Margin

Net Margin %

Service %

APPLIANCEMATERIALS HANDLING

Revenue Contribution

Key Customer Partnerships

Scott Technology Limited

Page 12

19 %25%
$51m

$19m

37%

25%

$69m

$20m

29%

45%

Revenue

Net Margin

Net Margin %

Service %

Revenue

Net Margin

Net Margin %

Service %

MININGPROTEIN

Revenue Contribution

Key Customer Partnerships

Annual Report 2025

Page 13

Scott secured a contract to install an existing LEAP Primal for Dawn Meats in the UK – Protein Domain’s first UK install.
Scott Technology Limited

Page 14

CARVING OUT NEW MARKETS
By Mark Host, President of Protein

Building on a foundation of innovation and customer

trust, we have expanded our footprint, introduced

breakthroughs and entered new markets.

Revenue in FY25 grew 16% on FY24, with margin

performance reflecting both operating discipline and

stronger demand for automation across protein processing.

A major highlight was securing the first UK installation of a

LEAP Primal System with Dawn Meats. Following more than

20 successful installs across Australia and New Zealand –

including another Lamb Primal with JBS Australia in Cobram

earlier this year – Scott will now have primal systems

operating in the world’s leading lamb-producing regions at a

time when supply is shifting across key markets.

breaking K800 launch in Frankfurt, capable of stopping

a blade within just five milliseconds. Alongside this, our

automation reduces strain in high-risk tasks, enabling

processors to protect their people while improving yield.

Shaping the Future of Protein

Expansion into new lamb markets, wider adoption of the

automated poultry trusser, acceleration of BladeStop and

deeper service penetration across our installed base remain

powerful growth levers. With R&D set to introduce beef

automation, stronger collaboration with our Materials

Handling & Logistics domain and greater use of data-driven

insight, we are building systems designed not just for

today’s plants but for tomorrow’s connected, intelligent and

safety-led facilities.

Protein is central to Scott’s growth story and, with the right

partnerships, technology and focus, we are committed to

delivering safer, smarter and more sustainable processing

for customers worldwide.


"Expansion into new lamb markets, wider

adoption of the automated poultry trusser,

acceleration of BladeStop and deeper service

penetration across our installed base remain

powerful growth levers."

"Protein is central to Scott’s growth story and,

with the right partnerships, technology and

focus, we are committed to delivering safer,

smarter, and more sustainable processing..."

Australia is expanding exports, New Zealand is managing

tighter supply and the UK is balancing strong demand with

changing consumption trends. In this environment, Scott’s

lamb processing systems give processors the ability to

capture more yield and consistency from every carcass,

helping them adapt quickly to evolving market pressures.

Further to our UK expansion, we saw BladeStop gain

global traction with Cargill deploying units across its North

American network. Additionally, the Automated Poultry

Trussing technology entered the Canadian market with

Maple Lodge Farms, one of the country’s largest poultry

processors. This builds our momentum in North America,

where we see significant potential to scale.

Safety Matters More Than Ever

Our expansion in North America highlights both opportunity

and responsibility. As Scott systems scale across meat

processing, we are mindful of the safety challenges facing

today’s workforces.

Recent research from the University of California, San

Francisco found that most poultry and swine workers are

at elevated risk of musculoskeletal disorders, with many

reporting significant work-related pain. Risks that only

intensify as line speeds increase.

Scott’s safety-first approach is designed to meet these

realities. BladeStop safety bandsaws are engineered to

prevent life-changing injuries, proven again with the record-

Scott unveils BladeStop K800 at IFFA 2025 in Frankfurt .

Annual Report 2025

Page 15

WHERE INNOVATION MEETS
GLOBAL FLOW

By Aaron Vanwalleghem, President of Materials Handling

At its core, the story of MHL is simple, customers face growing

complexity and Scott delivers the solutions to meet it.

Right now, manufacturers across Europe and North America are

navigating fundamental shifts in how they operate. Reshoring

and supply chain disruption are reshaping production footprints.

Persistent labour shortages and high turnover in packaging roles

make it difficult to sustain reliable operations.

At the same time, consumer goods companies face rising

product complexity from evolving customer demand, Stock

Keeping Unit (SKU) volatility and regulatory and sustainability

mandates, all within increasingly constrained factory footprints.

These forces are accelerating demand for automation that is not

only efficient but also flexible, scalable and digitally connected.

Innovation at the Forefront

In 2025, Scott responded to these challenges with breakthrough

innovation. At PACK EXPO in Las Vegas, we introduced AccuTable

to the North American market. A world-first multi-line palletising

and accumulation solution already proven in Europe’s most

demanding consumer packaged goods environments.

AccuTable delivers high throughput in a compact footprint while

managing SKU volatility and labour shortages challenges that no

other solution in the market can address in quite the same way.

At PROMAT in Chicago, we introduced NexBot, our modular

Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) designed to provide intelligent,

flexible in-plant transport and seamless integration with Scott’s

palletising and logistics systems.

Alongside these hardware innovations, our Maestro+ software

platform continued to gain traction as a central intelligence

layer connecting data, control and analytics across the factory.

Together, these offerings show how Scott delivers complete

ecosystems designed to scale with our customers and deliver

measurable ROI (Return on Investment).

Performance and Global Outlook

While topline revenue for the year was modestly down 3%

year-on-year, reflecting the timing of major project deliveries,

the underlying business demonstrated strong momentum.

We secured significant new accounts while deepening

relationships with existing partners. Projects such as Coca-

Cola’s high-capacity palletising system in Belgium, DMK’s

multi-line installation in Germany and Ecofrost’s frozen

foods expansion, highlight just some of the strength of our

Customer First strategy.

Repeat business is now a decisive competitive advantage for

MHL, with loyalty from established customers combining with

new wins to create a cycle of success.

Looking ahead, we see four strategic levers that will drive MHL’s

next wave of growth.

"By aligning bold innovation with deep

customer partnerships, MHL is building

a stronger, more resilient growth engine

for Scott."

First, we will expand our footprint in Europe through new

partnerships and industry verticals, including our collaboration

with Savoye. Second, we will replicate our proven European

model in North America, building on the blue-chip reference sites

we have already established.

Third, we will scale our AGV offering globally through NexBot,

extending our role in in-plant logistics. Finally, we will accelerate

software and lifecycle services expansion, growing recurring

revenue streams and supporting long-term customer

relationships.

With Maestro+, the intelligence developed in our MHL centre of

excellence also extends beyond logistics, creating a cloud-based

platform for continuous improvement and Group-wide growth in

the era of Industry 4.0.

By aligning bold innovation with deep customer partnerships,

MHL is building a stronger, more resilient growth engine for Scott.

NexBot AGV launched in Chicago, US.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 16

At PACK EXPO Las Vegas, we unveiled AccuTable to the North American market the world’s first multi-line palletising
and accumulation solution, already proven in Europe’s toughest consumer packaged goods environments .

Annual Report 2025

Page 17

Mineral Resources is using Rocklabs' Automated Modular Solution to enhance safety
and efficiency in sample analysis at Ken’s Bore lab in Western Australia.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 18

The global mining industry is in a period of transition.
Record gold prices are driving investment across new and

existing operations, including deposits once considered

uneconomical. At the same time, the timeline for

electrification in mining has extended, delaying the

near-term ramp-up in some critical minerals.

Yet our conversations with customers make one thing clear:

automation is central to their 10-year strategies, particularly in

copper and critical minerals. New copper mines are opening,

older ones are being restarted and the industry is positioning

for the next wave of demand. This gives Scott confidence in a

strong, sustained market for our products and services.

Technology that Transforms

Being close to our customers means understanding their next

transition, towards robotics, automation and technological

integration. This is where Scott is investing and where we see

the most significant growth ahead.

Photon Assay, for example, is a game changer in gold

analysis, dramatically reducing turnaround times compared

to traditional methods. Rocklabs' AMS (Automated Modular

Solution) ecosystem, with modules like crush cell with lidding

and printing stations are designed to integrate seamlessly

with technologies like Photon Assay, creating powerful, end-

to-end systems for our customers.

Customers are responding positively: in FY25 we secured a

major contract with Kinross Gold Corporation to supply an

Automated Crush Module line in Fairbanks, Alaska, a project

that reflects both our technical capability and the strength of

our North American expansion strategy.

Building Regional Presence

North America and Australia remain two of the world’s most

important mining regions and our strategy is to be embedded

where our customers are.

In Australia, our direct presence has driven more than 300%

growth in service revenues over the past four years. Long-

term service-level agreements with Rio Tinto and other

major customers have created a stable foundation, while new

automation projects, such as the West Angeles laboratory

system, highlight the strength of these relationships.

North America’s scale in both gold and copper production

makes it a strategic priority, and we are building the technical

and business development teams to support it. These regional

blueprints, Australia first, now North America, will shape our

global expansion model.

Innovation and Integration

We are also advancing products such as Robofuel, which

we see as a platform for broader automation at mine sites.

Beyond refuelling, we are developing automated inspection

capabilities that allow haul trucks to be safely and efficiently

assessed during each stop, ensuring compliance while

improving productivity.

One Scott is central to this future. Increasingly, customers

are asking how Scott can integrate mining automation with

Materials Handling and Logistics. By bridging domains, we are

positioning ourselves to solve more complex problems and

deliver greater value.

AUTOMATED

FUTURE OF

MINING

By Werner Conradie, President of Mining

"Mining is entering a new era – defined by

automation, robotics and digital integration

– and Scott is ready to lead it..."

Our future lies in both breadth and depth – breadth by

expanding our standard equipment solutions into adjacent

industries such as agriculture, recycling and natural

resources; and depth by strengthening long-term customer

partnerships in mining. To support this, we are building the

next generation of leaders, upskilling our people for an AI-

enabled future and embedding a culture that can adapt as

technology reshapes our industry.

Mining is entering a new era – defined by automation,

robotics and digital integration – and Scott is ready to lead it,

standing alongside our customers as trusted partners in their

long-term journeys.

RoboFuel system for automated refuelling.

Annual Report 2025

Page 19

Scott’s appliance journey spans more than seven decades.
We began in the 1950s manufacturing white goods

before pivoting to automation, applying our deep

knowledge of production processes to build smarter,

faster and safer systems.

That heritage still defines us – we understand the appliance

world from the inside out. The appliance sector sits at the

intersection of everyday life and advanced manufacturing. It is

a space where design, reliability and precision come together at

unprecedented scale.

From laundry to refrigeration, global brands compete not just on

performance but also on efficiency, sustainability and speed to

market, making automation a critical enabler of their progress.

2025 marked the 10-year anniversary of Scott in China, our

Centre of Excellence for the Appliances Domain. Since launching

in Qingdao in 2015, supported by Christchurch design and

engineering teams, we have grown with China’s dynamic

manufacturing sector.

spans multiple systems for top and front-loader production

lines. It extends a partnership that began in 2000 and now

covers nine advanced production lines.

Beyond China, we continue to deliver for top tier global

Appliance customers such as Sub-Zero, GEA and Whirlpool,

each project reflecting our ability to meet the highest levels of

confidence, product quality and technical standards in appliance

automation.

Behind these achievements are our people. With more than 50

highly skilled employees in Qingdao, supported by our backbone

of experienced colleagues in New Zealand, Europe and the US,

Scott’s teams are the foundation of our performance. Their

commitment delivering rapid installations, or driving innovation,

continues to set us apart.

The Next Cycle: Global Spin

Looking ahead, three levers define our growth: a modular design

approach enabling flexible, scalable systems; a robust supply

chain ready to respond quickly to global opportunities; and a

targeted aftermarket and upgrade programme across our large

installed base.

Combined with Scott’s expertise in stainless steel forming and

precision automation, these levers make us the partner of choice

in premium appliance manufacturing.

The next chapter for Scott Appliance will be defined by

innovation and scale. As manufacturers seek smarter, safer and

more flexible automation, Scott is well positioned to respond.

BUILT TO LAST

By Cathy Zhang, Regional Director – China

"Over the decade, we’ve built enduring

relationships, expanded our capabilities and

embedded Scott into the fabric of the world’s

most competitive industrial landscapes."

Over the decade, we’ve built enduring relationships, expanded

our capabilities and embedded Scott into the fabric of the

world’s most competitive industrial landscapes.

Plugged into Performance

Today, Scott is recognised as a high-end automation provider

for leading brands such as GEA, Sub-Zero, Bosch, Midea

and Whirlpool. Appliances remain a core domain where our

expertise in automation, stainless steel forming and precision

engineering comes together.

In FY25, Appliances business maintained healthy margins and

continued to deliver on large-scale projects and servicing our

global partners.

Supported by our China-based Centre of Excellence, Appliances

remains a steady and dependable margin anchor for the Group

demonstrating resilience in a cyclical market and reinforcing

Scott’s reputation as a trusted long-term partner to the industry.

Big Loads, Bigger Wins

This year, Scott secured its largest-ever appliance automation

contract in China, valued at approximately NZ$20m (CN¥85m)

with a prominent global whiteware manufacturer. The project

Developing appliance line in Scott China .

Scott Technology Limited

Page 20

An appliance line is developed for a long-standing Scott Technology customer, a partnership
that has grown since 2000, during which Scott has delivered nine advanced production lines .

Annual Report 2025

Page 21

CULTURE AND COMMITMENT
By Hayley Hindmarsh – GM of People

Our people are the heart of our business. This principle

sits at the core of Destination 2030, with High-Performing

Teams and One Scott as two people-centric enablers of

our strategy. Their purpose is clear, to maximise talent,

strengthen performance, accelerate innovation and

deepen customer impact by harnessing the full energy

and talent of our teams to support the drive towards

sustainable, profitable growth.

Our global workforce of more than 600 people across 10

countries and four generations brings together experience,

fresh ideas and creativity. From graduates to long-tenured

specialists (with the current longest tenure being 46 years),

this diversity is what enables us to innovate, collaborate and

deliver as One Scott.

To get the best from our talent, we must understand their

experience, which is why listening, measuring and acting on

feedback is critical. This February, we launched a new global

culture platform to enable industry-wide benchmarking.

Eighty-five percent of our people took part in our first global

engagement survey, sharing nearly 2,000 comments.

The results showed real cultural strengths. Ninety-one

percent said they can take time out when needed, reflecting

strong trust and flexibility. Eighty-eight percent said they

understand how their work contributes to Scott’s broader

goals. Eighty-seven percent said they know what they need to

do to succeed in their role.

"Across Scott our people feel connected

to our purpose and supported in their

day-to-day work.“

These are not easy outcomes. They show that across Scott

our people feel connected to purpose and supported in their

day-to-day work.

Under Mike’s leadership we also saw progress in leadership

growth under our new domain-focused structure, with five

senior leaders promoted internally this year, a strong signal

that we are building talent from within.

Our culture survey also showed areas where we must

improve, and our people told us clearly where we can do

better. Acting on what we hear is how we will strengthen

engagement, improve retention and make Scott a place where

people want to stay, grow and contribute. We now have more

than 40 culture actions under way across the Group.

Our Destination 2030 – People Strategy sets ambitious

targets – from reduction of voluntary turnover below

global benchmark, to exceeding industry benchmarks on

engagement and employee net promoter score by 2030. Scott

is building the kind of culture that attracts the best, develops

leaders and delivers sustainable performance.

By investing in our people today, we are strengthening Scott’s

long-term resilience, innovation and growth.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 22

"This internship is an opportunity to build
confidence and skills in an environment

that values diversity and innovation. It

makes me feel that there’s a strong path

forward in engineering.”

-

India O’Neill, studying Engineering specialising

in Mechatronics.

"The scholarship and internship are

providing me with the valuable opportunity

to translate my engineering studies into

practical experience within the industry.

I’m looking forward to learning from

the experienced engineers at Scott

Technology and joining the team who are

shaping the future of automation.”

-

Heidi van der Peet, studying Mechanical Engineering.

"This reflects our commitment to act

where we can, to keep learning and

to provide opportunities that will grow

year by year. “

Building Pathways for Women in Engineering

We know that diverse teams deliver better solutions. That’s

why we’re taking practical steps to support more women

into engineering, especially in technical and leadership roles

where representation remains limited.

Now in its third year, our partnership with the University of

Canterbury gives women the chance to combine academic

study with real-world experience through the Scott Women

in Engineering Scholarship and Internship Programme.

The initiative provides financial support, mentoring and paid

work experience, these are small steps but meaningful ones

in broadening the pathways into engineering careers.

This year, the quality of applications was so strong that we

expanded the programme beyond its original scope. While

it traditionally offers one person a scholarship and one

internship, we awarded the scholarship and internship to

Heidi van der Peet who will join our Christchurch team and

offered an additional internship to India O’Neill, who will join

our Rocklabs team in Auckland.

We know this won’t change industry-wide gender diversity

overnight, but it reflects our commitment to act where we

can, to keep learning and to provide opportunities that will

grow year by year.

Foundations of High-Performing Teams

Together, these initiatives – from listening and acting on

feedback, to strengthening health and safety, to broadening

pathways for diverse talent – are about more than culture

alone. They are the foundations of High-Performing Teams

and High-Performing Teams are what will enable Scott to

deliver on Destination 2030. By investing in our people, we

strengthen the resilience, innovation and customer focus that

underpins sustainable, profitable growth.

Christchurch open day for Women in Engineering .

India O’Neil – our newest Rocklabs intern.

Annual Report 2025

Page 23

HEALTH AND SAFETY
Health and Safety remains our priority. In FY25

we strengthened our Health, Safety, Wellbeing and

Environment (HSWE) systems through new initiatives,

including enhanced safety leadership conversations,

expanded hazard reporting and refreshed global standards.

These actions reflect our commitment to honouring

our Dunedin colleague’s memory through continual

improvement and the protection of everyone who works

with and for Scott.

Investing in Leadership

Two global Bowtie workshops were held on potential energy

critical risks, engaging subject matter experts from five regions.

In FY25, our Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) was

2.89, and our Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate

(TRIFR) was 5.78. These highlight the importance of

continued investment in leadership capability, behavioural

safety, proactive reporting and critical risk management.

In FY26, we will bring the HSWE further with a modernised

One Scott platform, QR codes linking directly to risk guides

and real-time access for all employees across devices.

Behavioural safety will be at the centre of our engagement

approach, emphasising leader-led safety conversations,

peer checks and feedback, with recognition shifting from

compliance to genuine commitment.

We will also continue to refine how we measure health and

safety, focusing not only on injury statistics but also on the

quality of safety conversations, verification of critical controls,

timely close-out of actions, and learning from work.

What matters most is the continued effort to embed health

and safety into every decision, every process and every

workplace interaction.

Our commitment remains to learn from every incident,

strengthen our controls ensuring that health and safety

remains a top priority at Scott.


By Kasia Liu – Group Health and Safety Manager

Scott Technology Limited

Page 24

SUSTAINABLE AND
PROFITABLE GROWTH

If there is a central theme across this FY25 Annual Report, it

is that Scott is forming a long-term view of both our company

and the industries we serve. Within this context, ESG is best

considered as an important part of that future perspective.

In FY24, we introduced our Double Materiality Matrix, a dual-

perspective framework comprised of Impact and Financial

Materiality. Impact Materiality (Inside-Out) evaluates the social

and environmental effects of our operations and value chain,

assessing scale, scope and impacts that can't be reversed.

Financial Materiality (Outside-In) assesses external factors that

could affect Scott’s financial performance, from the magnitude

of risks to the likelihood of opportunities.

The FY24 assessment was informed by horizon scans, surveys

and interviews with customers, suppliers, employees, directors

and industry bodies, refining our focus on areas most critical to

both our business and our wider ecosystem. Now that we have

set out our Destination 2030 business strategy, the ESG focus

areas are no longer sitting on the parallel track but are woven

into the execution of Destination 2030, with integration still

deepening across certain streams.

30% Carbon Reduction by 2030

In FY22, which serves as the baseline year for our reduction

target, Scott reported 1,811 tonnes of CO₂e from Scope 1 and

2 emissions. This year, we’ve reported Net Scope 1 and 2 GHG

emissions of 1,645 tonnes CO₂e – a 8.9% decrease on FY24 and

a 9.1% decrease on our FY22 Base Year levels.

This demonstrates that while the business expanded, our

absolute emissions decreased against the baseline – an early

sign that decoupling growth from emissions is both possible and

achievable. Contributing to the reduction in FY25 was relocating

Sydney operations to a site with solar self-generation, HVAC

optimisation at the Sydney site, greening of the gird in most

Scott locations and fleet transition to electic vehicles.

By Mark O’Malley – Chief Financial Officer (CF0)

"...while the business expanded, our

absolute emissions decreased against

the baseline – an early sign that

decoupling growth from emissions is

both possible and achievable.“

Scott continues to commit capital towards decarbonisation initiatives including

the installation of vehicle charging facilities at our European sites.

Annual Report 2025

Page 25

Meeting this 30% reduction target will require continued
focus, with an annual average reduction of 3.75% each

year. Our focus is on energy efficiency across facilities,

adoption of renewable energy and optimisation of logistics.

Just as importantly, the progress we make will align with

customer expectations and investor confidence, reducing our

environmental footprint while strengthening Scott’s long-

term resilience.

Unified for Impact

ESG at Scott is not only about carbon. Our broader

commitments to People, Purpose and Place extend across

our workforce, customers and industries and are embedded

across our Destination 2030 strategy.

Our people are the foundation of performance and

ESG reinforces that by ensuring we invest in retention,

development and wellbeing. Focused training and career

pathways are equipping teams with the skills needed for a

digital, automated future, while our safety-first mindset and

inclusive culture foster workplaces where people feel secure,

valued and empowered.

The commitment underpins the One Scott approach - of

globally aligned and connected teams working across

geographies and domains with a shared sense of purpose.

High-Performing Teams extend this further by embedding

clarity, accountability and collaboration into daily execution.

Together, they enable us to innovate faster, adapt with

resilience and deliver consistently for customers.

Purpose Beyond Projects

ESG strengthens our promise of putting customers first. By

co-discovering opportunities, aligning on long-term capital

plans and embedding shared ESG priorities into those

relationships, we create enduring value that goes beyond

transactions.

"...as we grow toward $530m by 2030 we do

so in a way that protects people, empowers

customers and supports a more sustainable

industrial landscape.“

Our lifecycle framework, from design to dispose, supports

customers long after installation, reducing waste, extending

asset life and lowering environmental impact. By 2030,

more than 35% of Group revenue is expected to come

from lifecycle services, directly aligning ESG outcomes with

financial outcomes. When customers win, we win and their

success increasingly includes ESG performance.

Whether reducing system footprints, enabling cold-chain

logistics or lowering energy consumption, our solutions are

designed to help customers meet regulatory requirements,

sustainability goals and operational challenges. ESG doesn’t

constrain innovation at Scott; it directs it towards relevance

and resilience.

Delivering Sustainable Profitable Growth

By aligning our ESG priorities with our growth enablers from

a High-Performing Teams culture and One Scott systems to

Leading-Edge Technology and Customer First, we are building

a company that is financially resilient, socially responsible,

sustainable and positioned for long-term impact.

Destination 2030 is about more than hitting financial

milestones. It is about how we get there. Embedding ESG

into our strategy ensures that as we grow – toward $530m

revenue – we do so in a way that protects people, empowers

customers and supports a more sustainable industrial

landscape.

In this way, ESG is not an add-on. It is how Scott achieves

its purpose - powering our customers and industry with

transformative solutions and services.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 26

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
Scott Technology Ltd (Scott or, together with its subsidiaries, the Group) is a Climate

Reporting Entity (CRE) under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (the Act).

This is Scott’s second Climate-related Disclosures (CRD) under

the Act and covers the last 12 months of activity from 1 September 2024 – 31 August 2025.

These Climate-related Disclosures comply with Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standards

NZ CS 1-3 (the Standards) issued by the External Reporting Board.

The following provisions specified in the Standards have been adopted by the Group:

• Adoption provision 2: Anticipated financial impacts

• Adoption provision 4: Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions

• Adoption provision 5: Comparatives for Scope 3 GHG emissions

• Adoption Provision 8: Assurance of Scope 3 GHG emissions disclosures in the scope of its

assurance engagement.

These Climate-related Disclosures represent the group’s climate statement for FY25.

21 October 2025

Stuart McLauchlan

Chairman

John Thorman

Independent Director and

Chair Audit & Risk Committee

Note: We, and readers of this report should, recognise that climate change projections carry inherent uncertainty. This report

reflects our current understanding of climate-related risks and opportunities as of 31 August 2025. This report includes forward-

looking statements relating to climate-related scenarios that are inherently uncertain and subject to change in future reports.

This report includes metrics and targets that are based on estimates and assumptions that are uncertain and subject to

limitations. Challenges relating to data inputs may change over time and impact uncertainty of projections. Scott is committed to

progressing towards our targets as outlined in this report, however, due to uncertain technological changes, economic factors and

environmental changes (which in many cases are beyond Scott’s control), our targets and strategies to achieve these targets are

subject to change. Scott’s actual performance against its climate-related targets, and its climate-related risks and opportunities,

may not eventuate or may be materially different to what is currently anticipated. We caution reliance on aspects of this report,

which is necessarily subject to the caveats above. Nothing in this report constitutes the Group’s financial, legal, tax or strategic

growth guidance or advice.

CLIMATE-RELATED

DISCLOSURES

Annual Report 2025

Page 27

There are three priority areas that Scott has focused on
developing in relation to climate change. These are

as follows:

1. Financial quantification of the impacts from climate events

now and in future

2. The creation of a long-term Transition Plan that will be

integrated with business strategy

3. How Scott’s deployment of capital will proactively evolve

to support this evolution.

These three priority areas involve significant focus from

across the business and, as such, Scott has determined

that these areas will be a focus for both year two and year

three disclosures. The most progress made in year two is in

Transition Planning, with financial quantification also under

way and capital allocation to follow in year three, along with

the completion of the first two priorities.

This is the second year that Scott has provided Climate-

related Disclosures. The work to review, understand and

plan for the impacts of climate risks and opportunities is

a major priority for Scott and continues to be undertaken

widely across the business, with involvement ranging from

Board level to regional executive management level, with

all being closely involved in the building of the plans that

summarised in this statement.

The guidance provided by the XRB for year two of Climate-

related Disclosures has been considered carefully and been

enhanced by the internal review of Scott’s own learnings

from its first Climate-related Disclosures and more broadly

from learnings sought from across its industry and peer

group. Scott believes that the second year of disclosure builds

strongly upon year one, and this process will continue to be

an evolution, with some significant milestones planned to be

achieved in the third year of Climate-related Disclosures.

INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Mike and William inspect the development of Rocklabs’ automated systems.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 28

GOVERNANCE
Scott believes in the benefit of strong corporate governance

and the value it provides for our shareholders, customers,

employees and other stakeholders. Our Board is responsible

for ensuring that the company maintains high ethical standards

and corporate governance practices.

The governance associated with Scott’s approach to climate-

related risks and opportunities continues to be a priority,

with the Board maintaining overall responsibility but

formally delegating the oversight of the Climate-related

Disclosures process to the Audit and Risk Committee (ARC).

The ARC meets five times per year and reports to the Board

after each meeting.

The Board has formally set up a Sustainability Committee,

with its charter being published on our website. Under the

terms in the charter, management is empowered with the

responsibility for identifying and managing climate-related risks

and opportunities and these are formally reviewed at least

quarterly as required by the ARC. The Board is then informed

of the outcomes from this review. If substantive issues arise

at the Sustainability Committee that require more Board time

and focus, then specific Board sessions are arranged. The

below diagram outlines the relationship between the Board,

committees and working groups at Scott.

The committee structures outlined support governance

oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. The

committees are made up of a blend of Board-level and

management-level team members, which helps to bring a

diverse range of skills and knowledge relating to climate risk

to the fore.

Over the last 12 months, Scott has engaged Tadpole, an

independent advisor, to review its governance processes

for Climate-related Disclosures. This review gave the Board

confidence to proceed with its plans, confirming that key

aspects of the XRB guidance had been addressed, while also

highlighting areas for focus.

The Board has included ESG skills and competencies in a formal

skills matrix on page 99 of Scott’s 2025 Annual Report.

Climate-related risks and opportunities have been identified,

assessed and reviewed by the Board as part of the initial

climate work undertaken in 2024. The Board has considered

these risks and opportunities when reviewing and updating the

business strategy in FY25.

The Board also recognises the importance of integrating all

the relevant short-, medium- and long-term climate related

risks and opportunities identified into the broader long term

business strategy and has delegated this task to the team

undertaking Transition Planning.

Governance structure

Annual Report 2025

Page 29

Meets

at least

six times

annually

Meets

five times

annually

Meets

four times

annually

Meets

monthly

Meets

at least

bi-monthly

Board of Directors

The governance body responsible for oversight and implementation

of Scott’s ESG strategy and climate-related risks and opportunities

Regional working groups

Responsible for the execution of the ESG plan and report monthly to the Sustainability

Committee and the Executive Management Team. This includes climate-related

impacts and risks and opportunities.

Executive Management Team

As part of the monthly management meeting the Executive Management

Team reviews progress against the ESG plan and sets priorities as appropriate.

The team receives updates from the regional working groups on ESG matters,

including climate impacts and climate-related risks and opportunities.

Audit & Risk Committee

Responsible for reviewing and

recommending Scott’s Group

climate-related disclosure to the

Board for approval

Sustainability Committee

Provides oversight of the wider

ESG programme at Scott,

including progress against

targets in the ESG plan

A fleet of Rocklabs’ flagship crushers in development for dispatch to global customers.
In terms of target setting, the Board maintains full

responsibility for considering and setting the targets associated

with climate-related risk. Management has been tasked to

enact and execute these plans as part of the company’s wider

business strategy. The Executive Management Team has ESG

and climate-related performance KPIs included in its Short-

Term Incentive plans (STIs).

Management’s Role

Scott’s Executive Management Team is involved in identifying

and managing climate-related risks and opportunities.

While the CFO has been made accountable to the Board and

ARC for the specific climate-related disclosures work, all leaders

on the Executive Management Team have assigned responsibility

via the regional working groups, for different elements of the

broader ESG strategy. This approach will also apply to the future-

focused long-term transition plan. This responsibility extends

across all regions and provides a broad perspective as to how

Scott views these risks and opportunities.

Management’s relationship to other committees and working

groups at Scott is detailed in the aforementioned diagram.

STRATEGY

Integrating Scott’s ESG objectives into the business strategy

remains essential for the business to drive sustainable growth

and long-term success. In FY24, scenario analysis formed a

central part of our strategy disclosures. This process made it

possible to test a range of potential temperature outcomes

and to consider the corresponding climate-related risks and

opportunities. These outputs provided significant value in

undertaking transition planning in FY25 — a key strategy

component of Scott’s second Climate-related Disclosures.

Our scenario analysis in FY24 focused on three scenarios from

the Network for Greening of the Financial System (NGFS)

Framework, selected to illustrate different possible climate

pathways. These were: a Net Zero 2050 pathway, representing

an orderly transition with early and steady emissions reductions

to hold warming close to 1.5°C; a Delayed Transition pathway,

where action is deferred until after 2030, requiring a faster and

more disruptive adjustment to limit warming to below 2°C; and

a Current Policies pathway, reflecting minimal further mitigation

and leading to global warming beyond 2.5°C with pronounced

physical impacts.

Although undertaken in FY24, the scenario analysis continues

to feed into Scott’s broader strategy and risk processes.

In FY25, the climate scenarios served as a foundation

during Transition Planning workshops. The scenarios were

also reviewed and approved by the Board for our second

Climate-related Disclosures.

For the current reporting cycle, the underlying assumptions,

timeframes, temperature pathways and narratives relating

to scenario analysis remain consistent with Year One, with no

material changes. The only change has been a minor adjustment

to the Delayed Transition scenario, aligning the Representative

Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and Shared Socio-economic

Pathways (SSPs) more precisely with the scenario storyline and

climate modelling framework. This refinement does not alter

the Year One findings or their relevance to Year Two. A summary

of our Scenario Analysis process and outputs is provided in the

‘Scenario Analysis’ section of this report.

Over the past 12 months, we have also continued to monitor the

climate-related impacts experienced by the business. These are

provided in the following section.

Current Impacts and Financial Impacts

Climate-related events continue to impact the world, causing

disruption to communities, assets and supply chains. Scott is

aware of this increasing risk to the diverse geographies in which

we operate and has established robust review processes to

ensure that the financial impacts of these events are assessed

and quantified. These processes are now well established and

form part of the Scott way of working.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 30

Why these scenarios?
The decision to use the NGFS framework and the following three

scenarios was guided by XRB’s requirements and the importance

of considering the various industries Scott serves. As such, the

rationale for these decisions reflected the dual need to meet

regulatory standards and address industry-specific risks.

NGFS scenarios chosen:

1. Orderly Transition: Net Zero 2050 (<1.5°C global

temperature outcome)

2. Hot House World: Current Policies (>3.0°C global

temperature outcome)

3. Disorderly Transition: Delayed Transition (~2°C global

temperature outcome) (Scott’s third temperature choosing).

The NGFS scenarios remain consistent with frameworks selected

by other organisations and are particularly effective in rigorously

assessing transition risks.

The Net Zero 2050 scenario allowed us to assess our transition-

related risks under a rapid but planned decarbonisation

pathway. Delayed Transition scenario maximised and explored

transition risks by providing the most abrupt transition and

decarbonisation pathway. In contrast, the Current Policies

scenario enabled Scott to support considerations around the

physical impacts of climate change over time.

Scenario Characteristics

Each of the three scenarios Scott used is characterised by key

physical and socio-economic trends, influencing the direction of

change and the different pathways that could play out over time.

A description of these various emissions-reduction pathways

and key trends associated with each scenario is provided in the

following table. Key characteristic trends were guided by the

NGFS framework, various sector scenarios and input from the

Scott team.

CharacteristicsNet Zero 2050Delayed TransitionCurrent Policies

Global temperature outcomes

<1.5°C~2°C>3°C

Policy reaction

Immediate & smoothDisjointed & myopicChaotic, non-existent

Regional policy variation

AlignedConsumer & politically drivenSelfish

Speed of technology change

Fast change

Medium net change with

disjointed implementation

Slow change

Customer sentiment / behaviour

change

Universal, accelerated

& immediate

PolarisedAmbivalent

Physical risk severity

ModerateModerate – highSevere

Transition risk severityModerateHighLow

Supply chain impacts of physical

(& transition) risk

LowLow – mediumMedium

Physical impacts

In FY25, we experienced one event that was material to our

Australian business — Cyclone Alfred in February and March

2025 in Queensland. The impact of this event caused Scott’s

Brisbane site to be closed for 17 days due to access issues

caused by flooding and power outages.

Transition impacts

In FY25, while Scott did not experience any material transition

impacts, we note that climate-related legislation, particularly in

New Zealand and Europe, has continued to place an increased

cost of doing business on us to meet reporting requirements.

Other transitional impacts, such as changing consumer

preferences and insurance costs, continue to be monitored and

assessed year-on-year by Scott.

Scenario Analysis

As part of developing Scott’s Climate-related Disclosures, the

business conducted an indepth scenario analysis in FY24 to

identify the key climate-related risks and opportunities that may

arise in the future and their potential impacts on the business.

The scenario analysis detailed three climate scenarios:

1. A 1.5°C global warming scenario

2. A 3.0°C or greater global warming scenario

3. A third temperature scenario of Scott’s choosing.

For the structure of the three scenarios, as indicated earlier

in this report, Scott chose to use the Network for Greening

the Financial System (NGFS) framework, which provided

various temperature scenario ambitions and outcomes and

key trends underpinning them. The specific scenarios within

this framework, and their temperature policy ambitions, are

outlined in the next section of this report ‘Scenario Analysis

Methods and Assumptions’.

Scenario analysis methods and assumptions

Annual Report 2025

Page 31

Scenario Time Horizons
Scott used three time horizons (covering the short, medium and

long term) in the scenario analysis to help uncover the potential

outcomes of climate-related risks and opportunities. The three-

time horizons selected were:

• Short: 2024 – 2027

• Medium: 2028 – 2040

• Long: 2041 – 2050.

The endpoints of each time horizon were determined by a year

(2027, 2040, 2050) and chosen to align with Scott’s internal

commercial planning horizons and to improve applicability of

scenarios to the sectors Scott services.

The short term aligned with Scott’s strategic planning process,

the medium term reflected the significant activity taking place

in this period that could impact Scott and the long term aligned

to 2050 as the Net Zero target date many businesses continue

striving towards.

Scenario Data Sources

The use of data in a scenario analysis helps to paint a picture of

potential trends over time in the lead up to each temperature

outcome. The data sources that Scott used during the

construction of each scenario are provided in the Appendix.

No modelling outside of that which supported the primary data

was used in the construction of each scenario.

The Scenario Analysis Process

While the scenario analysis was conducted as a standalone

analysis, outputs from the process, particularly the climate-

related risks and opportunities, continue to serve as input into

Scott’s existing strategy and risk processes in FY25. Scott’s

scenario analysis process followed six key steps. These are

outlined below, at a high level.

1

Engage key

personnel &

stakeholders

4

Explore drivers:

map temperature

pathways &

outcomes

2

Set analysis

boundaries & ask

focal question

5

Scenario

narrative

development

3

Identify, assess

& prioritise

climate-related

drivers

6

Quantify

narratives &

begin to assess

resilience

The scenario planning process outlined above had the full

backing and participation of the Executive Management Team

in FY24. The Audit and Risk Committee also had oversight of

the process with regular updates in FY24, and in FY25 the

outputs of the scenario process were initially approved by the

ARC on the 21 August 2024 and subsequently reviewed at the

ARC meeting on 16 October 2025.

Scott engaged the external sustainability consulting firm,

Tadpole, to support and facilitate the creation of our first

and second Climate-related Disclosures, including the

development and delivery of the scenario analysis process in

FY24, in line with XRB guidelines.

Scenario Analysis Narratives

Based on the outputs from our scenario analysis, Scott

developed three narratives to illustrate how we consider key

climate-related trends may unfold over time and their potential

impacts on our business and wider industry. These narratives

(which were also used during Transition Planning in FY25) are

outlined below.

Orderly - Net Zero

The NGFS assumes the world shifts immediately and smoothly

towards a sustainable path in response to the impacts of

climate change. It assumes consumer behaviour increasingly

favours organisations focusing on climate action, and therefore

we anticipate an increasing demand (and pressure) for low-

emissions products, with a strong willingness from the market

to adopt and pay for these. Manufacturers are at the epicentre

of this shift. The robotics and automation sector undergoes

transformation and growth, with substantial investments in

research and development, which could lead to breakthroughs

in energy-efficient automation. These advancements

optimise energy use, reduce waste and enhance efficiency in

manufacturing and logistics, making it a solid investment for

organisations in these sectors.

Robotics and automation are also seen as a solution to manage

the impacts of an ageing population, while playing a crucial role

in creating resilient supply chains, capable of adapting to climate-

related disruptions. Increased data use and transparency enable

businesses to make more informed decisions, aligning product

categories with evolving consumer and business expectations.

Broadscale electrification also occurs within industries as they

race to decarbonise and this investment in capital temporarily

pushes commodity prices upwards as heavy emitters are forced

to rein emissions in.

We foresee that growth in critical mineral demand increases,

and the mining sector sees continued strong growth, increasing

the market size for Scott’s mining products. However, this

growth also means there are increased regulations on land and

resource use, traceability and modern slavery commitments.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 32

Heavy vehicle electrification and automation sees Scott leverage
its IP into new sectors.

Globally, consistent and strong political ambition across parties

signals the market to decarbonise immediately and rapidly,

supported by industry consultation and policy certainty. There

is a growing trend of climate litigation against organisations

that are not perceived to be contributing sufficiently to

sustainability efforts. Organisations that move quickly to

adapt and prepare for the impacts of climate change reap the

benefits of customer and employee loyalty, strong commercial

relationships and are well prepared to weather the period of

uncertainty in the 2020s and 30s.

Disorderly – Delayed Transition

The NGFS assumes that throughout the 2020s, economic

pressures dominate society’s focus, seeing climate action

deprioritised in favour of other issues. Climate change mitigation

is seen as a nice-to-have rather than a necessity. Some

forward-looking companies invest in decarbonisation but this

is typically at the fringes. Despite national emissions targets,

even well-intentioned companies struggle to transition, delaying

investments in circularity, low-emissions products and the

technology required to decarbonise their operations.

The response to climate change is characterised by ambitious

commitments but poor follow-through until panic begins to

spread among the general population and businesses in the late

2020s and early 2030s. In response, governments introduce a

series of policies aimed at rapidly transitioning the economy

to low emissions. Although well intentioned, these policies,

developed with minimal consultation and deployed haphazardly,

lead to unforeseen externalities. Farmers are hit particularly

hard as regulations target methane reduction and consumers

move away from high-emissions food. Only those who

demonstrate low-emissions production credentials win in the

marketplace and the sector sees fast consolidation. Operating

costs increase due to regulation-related rises in the price of

energy, fuel, transport and rent.

Organisations scramble to mobilise transition plans, requiring

fast decisions on asset divestment, product portfolio changes

and decarbonisation strategies. Scott’s customers increasingly

demand information on its emissions footprint and product-

level data, requiring Scott to rapidly develop this capability.

Internationally there is significant variation in domestic policy,

creating an environment of uncertainty and complexity. The

disjointed nature of the transition and associated policies

create friction when accessing raw materials, compounded by

exploitation, lumpy demand and chaotic planning – all of which

increase costs and complexity.

Access to finance and insurance hinges on comprehensive

transition planning and disclosure. Insurance for high-carbon

activities or at-risk locations becomes increasingly expensive or

unavailable as insurance companies withdraw from these

markets. Organisations that can demonstrate their progress

towards climate security can access discounted capital, and

the growth of green bonds and loans increases dramatically.

There are significant benefits available to organisations that

transition rapidly.

Hot House World – Current Policies

The NGFS assumes that from the present day to 2050,

no additional climate policies are implemented. Physical

impacts of climate change continue to affect all areas

of the economy. Acute climate events cause road and

bridge closures, while chronic impacts degrade coastal

infrastructure and working conditions within warehousing.

Legacy infrastructure becomes unreliable and traditional

routes become unusable for significant periods, impacting

Scott’s ability to efficiently source and move products.

Increased wind speeds, wave swell and storms hamper

New Zealand’s already remote ocean-based supply chains.

The workforce faces increasing pressure to maintain service

levels, leading to stress and workforce attrition. Costs

escalate and customers become unwilling or unable to pay,

making access to finance highly problematic.

New Zealand, Australia and the rest of the world

focus on prioritising food and energy security, leading

to uncontrolled emissions growth. Highly cyclical

governments with unclear decarbonisation objectives

dampen long-term planning and funding is directed

toward adapting to the changing climate rather than

developing mitigation strategies. The lack of effective

mitigation efforts and disagreements on climate action

exacerbate existing social tensions.

Climate mitigation technology development lacks direction,

with minimal emphasis on reducing emissions. Technology

adoption and automation are seen as critical enablers for

organisations to adapt to the changing climate and Scott’s

growth is rapid as it leverages its IP into new sectors and

automation is increasingly utilised.

Previous reliance on the consistent supply of raw materials

is called into question as manufacturers start to see

suppliers impacted by the effects of climate change in some

source locations. The historically reliable logistics network

starts to crack, impacting the long complex supply chains

for raw materials.

These impacts are exacerbated by geopolitical tensions

and protectionism, as countries begin to prioritise their

own resources. Some source locations become untenable,

and organisations must develop strategies to de-risk

themselves. Despite these challenges, some businesses find

opportunities in developing resilient systems and innovative

Annual Report 2025

Page 33

solutions to manage climate impacts. Companies that can
adapt to the harsh realities of a hot house world, by leveraging

advanced technologies and diversifying supply chains, may

still achieve success, albeit with higher operational costs and

increased risk management complexity. However, the overall

business environment remains challenging, with significant

uncertainties and heightened competition for resources and

market share.

Climate-related Risks and Opportunities

Our scenario analysis in FY24 helped us to identify a range of

potential physical and transition climate-related risks and

opportunities that could materialise over our three-time

horizons. The assessment included possible impacts on

the value chain and geographies, potential mitigation

measures and anticipated severity across short-, medium-,

and long-term horizons.

These risks and opportunities continue to be relevant in the

second reporting period, following further examination as part

of the 2025 Transition Planning process. The Board also reviewed

and approved Scott’s climate-related risks and opportunities

in FY25, following updates to some descriptions and severity

ratings. Additional detail on how climate-related risks and

opportunities inform Transition Planning is provided in the

‘Transition Plan’ section of this report.

The anticipated financial impacts of our climate-related risks

and opportunities, and the time horizons over which these may

occur, will be undertaken in our third reporting year, utilising

XRB’s NZ CS 2 Adoption Provision 2 and the extension provided

for the second year of reporting.

The complete list of our climate-related risks, opportunities and

potential impacts in FY25 is presented on the following pages.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 34

A European FMCG customer is using case alignment for layered palletisations - a key feature within the MHL ecosystem.

Description
of risk

Description of

anticipated impact

Net Zero

2050

Delayed

Transition

Hot House

World

Value chain

impacted

GeographyBusiness

response

Acute physical risks and severe weather

Significant

increase in

the quantum

and severity of

weather events

Severe weather events such

as floods, fires and storms

significantly impact transport

and logistics operations and

infrastructure. This can result

in challenges to delivery,

inability to unload, store and

distribute Scott products.

Freight,

Installation

AllRisks included

in Risk Register

discussion with

Board and inventory

levels optimised to

ensure supply is not

affected.

Transitional – customer

Changing

consumer

habits

With societal norms moving

away from industries that

are believed to be high

emitters of carbon, i.e. red

meat, one of Scott’s core

business pillars decreases.

End to endNZ

AU

US

Monitoring protein

sector while

exploring alternative

opportunities as they

arise.

Transition – political

Access to raw

materials

With an increasing demand

for raw materials and more

protectionist policies from

some countries, Scott is

forced to invest in inventory

levels to ensure security over

supply.

Component

manufacturing,

Servicing,

upgrades

AllRisks included

in Risk Register

discussion with

Board and inventory

levels optimised to

ensure supply is not

affected.

Increased

variance

in global

regulations

Globally, regulations are

increasing and are different

by each geography creating

complexity in navigating a

global business. Uncertainty

of incoming regulations and

lack of lead time to adjust to

incoming regulations.

Head Office

(Strategy)

AllMonitor key markets

for any divergence

and ensure strategy

allows for any

changes in demand.



Carbon

border taxes

/ adjustments

– traceability

(carbon

leakage)

Increased prevalence of

carbon border adjustments

and emissions reporting /

traceability.

Head Office

(Strategy),

Freight

AllMonitor key markets

for any divergence

and ensure strategy

allows for any

changes in demand.

Increase in

tariffs

Globally, tariffs are

increasing, impacting

geographies that Scott can

participate in. Increases

costs of goods, reduced

competitiveness

Head Office

(Strategy)

AllMonitor key markets

for any divergence

and ensure strategy

allows for any

changes in demand.

PHYSICAL AND

TRANSITION RISKS


Severity of impactTime horizon

Low

Moderate

High

Short term

Medium term

Long term

Annual Report 2025

Page 35

A European FMCG customer is using case alignment for layered palletisations - a key feature within the MHL ecosystem.

Description
of risk

Description of

anticipated impact

Net Zero

2050

Delayed

Transition

Hot House

World

Value chain

impacted

GeographyBusiness

response

Transition – economic

Access to

insurance

With more frequent weather

events causing an increase in

insurance payouts, both the

cost and access to insurance

becomes more prohibitive.

End to endAllInsurance included

on Risk Register and

levels of insurance

discussed with

directors.

Access to

finance

With a changing landscape

for consumers and investors

and a re-deployment of

capital towards more

‘green-based’ industries or

technologies, it is harder

to raise funding through

traditional methods.

End to endAllFinance included

on Risk Register and

levels of financing

needed discussed

with directors.

Mining industry

reduction in

stability due

to changing

demand

The mining industry,

traditionally very stable, will

see increasing change –

both upwards (increasing

demand for minerals

needed in decarbonisation

technology) and downwards

(significant reduction or

elimination of coal mining;

increased recycling of

products leading to reduced

demand for other freshly

mined minerals). This may

be difficult for Scott to

navigate.

Component

manufacturing,

Installation,

Servicing

NZ

AU

Monitoring mining

sector while

exploring alternative

opportunities as

they arise.

Transition – legal

Directors

and officers

responsibilities

Increased litigation against

directors and officers –

requirements for additional

education.

Head Office All (will

affect local

directors

as well)

Ensure directors

are educated and

insured.

Reporting and

compliance

Increased requirements for

reporting and compliance –

resourcing, cost.

Head OfficeAllEnsure reporting

process is robust and

educate key staff in

this area.

Transition – operational

Impacts on the

global freight

system

Changes in network

vulnerability of the freight

system can increase costs

and create scheduling

volatility

Freight,

Installation,

Servicing,

Upgrades

AllRisks included

in risk register

discussion with

board and inventory

levels optimised to

ensure supply is not

affected.

Severity of impactTime horizon

Low

Moderate

High

Short term

Medium term

Long term

Physical and transition risks continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 36

Time horizon
Short term

Medium term

Long term

Opportunity

Net Zero

2050

Delayed

Transition

Hot House

World

Value chain

impacted

GeographyBusiness

response

Growth in mining sector

As the transition to a low-emissions

economy requires significant amounts

of minerals and semi-precious metals,

growth in the mining sector is likely and

there is an opportunity to grow Scott’s

mining division.

Mining

division

Mining

customer

locations

Monitor key markets for

any opportunities and

ensure strategy allows for

any changes in demand.

Opportunity to change business model to reduce travel and freight

More distributed business model reduces

carbon footprint as well as saving the

cost of travel and freight. Opportunities

to engage with 3rd party providers –

e.g. distributed additive manufacturing

operations – to produce to our designs

and / or support customers on our behalf

(a more flexible business model).

Freight,

Installation,

Service,

Upgrades

AllReview strategy and

structure to ensure the

most efficient internal

supply chain possible.

Transition from red meat to alternative consumption

Opportunity to transition / grow in

different markets and / or sectors.

Head Office

(Strategy)

AllMonitor key markets for

any opportunities and

ensure strategy allows for

any changes in demand.

Drive for low-carbon mining

Opportunity to transition / grow in

different markets and / or sectors.

End to endNZ

AU

Monitor key markets for

any opportunities and

ensure strategy allows for

any changes in demand.

Leveraging Scott's IP and experience into sectors outside where we currently participate

Opportunity with ageing populations

globally and labour shortages. Scott can

leverage its experience into new sectors.

End to endAllMonitor key markets for

any opportunities and

ensure strategy allows for

any changes in demand.

Access to funding and government incentives

Government funding and R&D funding.Head Office

(Strategy)

NZ

AU

US

Monitor key markets for

any opportunities and

ensure strategy allows for

any changes in demand.

OPPORTUNITIES

Severity of impactTime horizon

Small

Moderate

Large

Short term

Medium term

Long term

Annual Report 2025

Page 37

The Role of Risks and Opportunities in
Transition Planning

Within Scott’s Transition Planning process, our identified climate-

related risks and opportunities were further reviewed and refined

to guide prioritisation and inform the development of potential

action plans.

Capital Deployment

We are currently determining how climate-related risks and

opportunities serve as an input to our internal capital deployment

and funding decision-making processes. However, Scott continues

to commit capital towards decarbonisation initiatives, including

the installation of vehicle charging facilities at our European sites.

TRANSITION PLAN

Scott Business Model and Strategy

Scott designs and delivers automation and robotics solutions

for global manufacturers, spanning food, mining and

industrial sectors. Revenue is generated through large-scale

project contracts, equipment sales and recurring service and

support offerings.

In FY25 we launched Destination 2030, Scott’s five-year roadmap

for sustainable, profitable growth.

With an ambitious dot set on the horizon to grow revenue to

$530m by 2030, with over 35% of this generated from deeply

embedded lifecycle services. The strategy is built on four

enablers that provide the foundation for a long-term cycle of

success: Customer First, One Scott, Leading-Edge Technology,

and High-Performing Teams. Together, these enablers evolve

Scott from an engineering mindset into a Customer First one

that anticipates customer needs, delivers innovation-led

growth through globally aligned unified teams and embeds

value across the full automation lifecycle.

Scott operates across four domains

– Protein, Mining,

Appliances, and Materials Handling – with a global footprint

spanning nine countries. This diversification strengthens our

resilience, mitigates market risk and allows us to leverage world-

class technical expertise across industries and geographies.

Our automation ecosystems are designed to improve

efficiency, enhance safety and productivity, reduce costs

and create sustainability benefits for customers. This value

proposition strengthens long-term partnerships with

key accounts and unlocks opportunities in new markets.

Consideration of climate-related risks and opportunities is now

embedded into our strategy and transition planning, ensuring

Scott’s growth is aligned with our ESG commitments and the

expectations of our stakeholders.

Scott’s operations as described above are also presented in the

company value chain, provided below.

Iron Ore

Oil

Chalcopyrite

Silicon

Other

Steel

Plastic

Copper

Electronic

Other

Robots

Steels

Controls

Motor/Gearbox

Other

FreightEnergy

DisassemblyFreight

Installation

Assembly

FreightServicingUpgrades

End of life

Freight

Component

Manufacture

Value Chain

Scott Technology Limited

Page 38

Background on Transition Planning
Transition Planning asks an organisation to evaluate how its

business model and strategy may need to adapt to stay resilient

to climate impacts while remaining competitive in a low-

emissions, climate-aligned economy. This process includes stress-

testing existing strategic assumptions against a range of plausible

climate futures and considering how significant climate-related

risks and opportunities may alter an organisation’s long-term

course. The objective is to determine whether the current

strategy is adequate or whether adjustments are necessary

to respond effectively to the challenges and opportunities

presented by different climate pathways.

The Transition Planning Process at Scott

Scott’s Transition Planning process provides a structured

means of aligning current and future sustainability initiatives

and climate risk mitigation or adaptation measures with a

longer-term perspective than is typically applied in strategic

planning. Over time, this process is intended to be fully

embedded into the company’s broader business strategy,

creating a single, integrated strategic framework.

Our process built on the scenario analysis conducted in FY24,

which examined three NGFS-aligned climate pathways to 2050

and identified 18 climate-related risks and opportunities.

These risks and opportunities represent factors that could

materially influence Scott’s operating environment as both

global and domestic climate responses progress. They

formed the foundation for Year Two’s Transition Planning,

which concentrated on exploring strategic implications and

evaluating organisational preparedness.

Transition Planning Inputs

As part of our Transition Planning, we concentrated on six

priority risks and opportunities – those considered as having

the most significant potential to influence the company’s long-

term resilience and strategic direction.

1. Significant increase in the quantum and severity of

weather events

2. Access to raw materials

3. Increased variance in global regulations

4. Access to insurance

5. Impacts on the global freight system

6. Leveraging Scott’s IP and experience into sectors outside

where the business currently participates.

We also evaluated a mix of internal and external drivers to

assess how they currently influence our strategic ambition

and how those influences could evolve under varying climate

scenarios. Taking this longer-term perspective out to 2050

identified areas where elements of the strategy may need to

adapt to remain both competitive and aligned with a climate-

constrained economy. The assessment pointed to six potential

strategic priorities that could shape Scott’s future direction:

1. Continued focus on decarbonising operations and the wider

value chain

2. Greater engagement in enabling and supporting the broader

economy-wide transition

3. Adjusting to shifting societal expectations and customer

preferences

4. Recalibrating the company’s risk appetite to reflect

heightened climate-related uncertainty

5. Continuing to seek out and develop flexibility of the

business model to further mitigate potential end-to-end

value chain susceptibility

6. To maintain a strong pace of technology adoption –

particularly in climate-related innovations – to enhance and

distinguish the customer proposition.

To further understand the potential shifts our business

model and strategy might experience, we also reviewed the

foundational assumptions underlying our current business

model and strategy. These are the assumptions that are typically

expected to remain stable over time and are not always explicitly

considered in strategic planning and decision-making.

It was important to test just how stable the assumptions

can be when challenged by our key climate-related risks and

opportunities identified above. By testing the foundational

assumptions against the priority climate-related risks and

opportunities, eight were considered to be at risk of material

change.

1. Democracy, enabling the rule of law that protects property

and rights

2. Free trade agreements underpinning a commercially reliable

and low-risk global trade system

3. A continuously growing economy

4. Freight infrastructure (air passage, ports, rail and roading)

remains operational

5. A reliable and low-risk global trade system in advanced

components and finished automation solutions

6. Sufficient water is available for cooling and other industrial

uses at manufacturing sites

7. Continued access to critical raw materials and components

8. Access to insurance

The potential erosion of any of these assumptions could

materially affect business resilience, underscoring the importance

of strategic flexibility.

Initial Focus Areas for FY26

In light of our key inputs (those being our prioritised climate-

related risks and opportunities, strategic ambition shifts

and the uncertainty around foundational assumptions, we

evaluated our Year One mitigations to assess if these were

Annual Report 2025

Page 39

sufficient to address these findings. From this process, we
intend to focus on three mitigation areas for development

in FY26. These are related to: responding to the significant

increase in the quantum and severity of weather events,

managing access to raw materials and remaining resilient

to the potential impacts climate change has on the global

freight system.

In addition to potential mitigations, we also evaluated our

current business initiatives to assess whether these measures

were sufficient to address our key inputs and the anticipated

changes that may arise.

Our current initiatives focus on decarbonising our business,

which is one of our six strategic priorities and is closely linked

to our prioritised climate-related risks and opportunities (for

example, the increased variance in global regulations and

access to insurance).

A summary of our initiatives are provided below:

• Transition of the fleet to hybrid and electric vehicles

• Servicing decentralisation in Australia to reduce travel

distances

• Electrification of the forklift fleet

• HVAC optimisation

• Optimisation of energy efficiency through modernisation

of machinery and equipment

• Inclusion of solar on our Sydney building

• Energy self-generation at other sites under investigation,

where sites allow for solar.

At this stage, we are focusing on progressing our current

decarbonisation initiatives and in FY26, we intend to centre

efforts on more broadly embedding insights from the Transition

Planning process into our business planning, updating strategic

assumptions and aligning capital deployment with a credible,

adaptive decarbonisation pathway.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Risk Management at Scott

Scott maintains a Risk Management Framework based on our

risk register. Our Executive Management Team reviews the

register before every Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) meeting

(held five times per year) to highlight any updates. The ARC

then reviews and any suggested additions or deletions, or

changes to risk profiles from the previous Risk Register, are

highlighted and flagged by management and discussed at the

ARC, with the CFO responsible for initiating the discussion.

The prioritisation of risks within the register is undertaken by

management utilising a grid that rates each risk according to

likelihood and impact to ascertain a risk score, which is then

colour coded (red/amber/green) using a pre-determined

risk score grid. Each risk is also assessed against a numeric

risk criterion, which is an estimate of quantified financial

impact to Scott, ranked from 1 (minor) to 5 (catastrophic).

At the management review, these risk scores and criteria are

documented and compared to the previous ratings.

Mitigations for these risks are also identified as part of this

process, as is the relevant link to strategic initiatives for each

risk. Owners from within the Executive Team are identified for

each risk.

The Board is responsible for overall oversight of the Risk

Management Framework. The full formal review happens at

least quarterly.

No material parts of the value chain are excluded from the risk

management processes. Time horizons within the Risk Register

align to those used during our scenario analysis process.

Integration of Climate Risks with Other

Business Risks

Climate-related risks and opportunities have been integrated

into the existing Scott Risk Management Framework in FY24

and FY25 and are reviewed in the same cycle as all business

risks. The Board has oversight of these processes. The

climate-related risks identified through scenario analysis are

also maintained separately and are assessed and reviewed

in the same cycle and forums as the overall integrated rRisk

Management Framework, at a minimum annually.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 40

METRICS AND TARGETS
Metric Categories

Scott understands the importance of providing detail

in relation to the sustainability metrics we focus on and

ensuring these metrics are appropriately measured and

disclosed. Our primary climate reporting metric is our GHG

emissions both in absolute and intensity terms. This metric

informs the progress of our decarbonisation activities.

Below is a summary of Scott’s Scope 1 and 2 Greenhouse Gas

(GHG) emissions. The business notes that an internal emissions

price is not employed over this reporting period. As such, for the

purposes of primary users this price may be interpreted as $0.

Absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions

Absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions for the Group in

FY25 totalled 1,638 tonnes CO

2

e. Scope 1 emissions come

from the combustion of transport fuel by the company’s car

and forklift fleet. Other Scope 1 emission sources include

stationary fuel used for heating and in back-up generators, lost

refrigerant gases and gases used in welding. Scope 2 emissions

come from the generation of purchased electricity, and are

location based (meaning we calculate them on the basis that

we consume electricity from national and state grids).

Tonnes CO

2

e

FY22* FY23*FY24*FY25

Scope 1

(ISO Category 1)


– Transport fuel

764 670807 735

– Stationary fuel for heating

216 193239 214

– Fugutive emissions

4411 3

Scope 2

(ISO Category 2)

787 737760 686

Total1,811 1,6011,807 1,638

FY25 Scope 1 emissions by source

* Unassured

Natural gas

for heating

21%

Forklift

fuel

2%

Diesel for

heating

2%

Company

cars

75%

Welding

gases

0.3%

FY25 Scope 1 emissions by sourceFY25 Scope 1 emissions by source

Annual Report 2025

Page 41

CO
2

e emissions by region and by scope, FY22 - FY25*

Group CO

2

e emissions by source, FY22 – FY25*

Intensity emissions*

Scope 1 Scope 2

In addition to measuring and tracking our absolute emissions,

we track intensity emissions to understand our ‘carbon

efficiency’ and how it is changing over time.

Tonnes CO

2

e

FY22FY23 FY24FY25

Total gross Scope

1 and Scope 2

emissions per

$m revenue8.175.99 6.545.95

Climate impact on assets and business activities

Our understanding from the work we have completed

through scenario analysis and identification of risks and

opportunities conducted in FY24 and reviewed in FY25

suggests that all areas of our business are susceptible to

the impacts of climate change. Whether these materialise

as risks or opportunities depends on our approach to

them, the magnitude and speed of the impact’s onset

and the preparation we have undertaken prior to the risk

materialising, if at all. Additionally, given that we are a global

business, it is clear that physical and transition risks will

impact different areas of our business in a variety of ways.

However, the degree of business activity or asset vulnerability

(or alignment) to our risks and opportunities has not yet

764

670

807

735

216

193

239

214

787

44

1

1

3

737

760

686

FY22FY23FY24FY25

Transport fuelStationary fuelFugitive emissionsElectricity

764

670

807

735

216

193

239

214

787

44

1

1

3

737

760

686

FY22FY23FY24FY25

Transport fuelStationary fuelFugitive emissionsElectricity

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY22FY23FY24FY25FY22FY23FY24FY25FY22FY23FY24FY25

EUANZCNUS

* this graph is not subject to assurance

* this graph is not subject to assurance

* intensity emissions are not subject to assurance

Scott Technology Limited

Page 42

been measured in detail. Scott considers that meaningful
quantification of exposure or alignment across assets and

activities is closely linked to our evaluation of anticipated

financial impacts – work that will be undertaken in FY26. As

such, we expect to quantify the proportion of assets and

activities expected to be impacted by risks and opportunities in

our third Climate-related Disclosures.

Ta r g e t s

We have set a short-term Scope 1 and 2 absolute emissions

reduction target of 30% by FY30. This is against a FY22 Base Year.

This is not a target that supports limiting global warming to 1.5 °C,

as defined by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi).

Implementation of our Scope 1 and 2 decarbonisation strategy,

outlined in the Transition Plan section of this report (pages 38

- 40), is currently under way. Our FY25 footprint indicates the

strategy is having a positive impact, with emissions down 9%

on last year and 10% on FY22. In terms of progress against our

target, we look to be tracking well.

In our endeavours to achieve our short-term target, offsets will

not be considered.

Notes about our GHG measurement

These inventories have been measured in compliance with

ISO 14064-1 (2018) using an operational control consolidation

approach. All emissions that Scott has direct control over are

covered. The organisational boundary of the inventory is that of

our financial statements, covering all subsidiaries listed on page

107. No facilities, assets or operations have been excluded.

Emissions factors used in the measurements are country

specific, sourced from the following agencies:

• New Zealand Ministry for the Environment (MfE)

• Australian Government’s Department of Industry, Science,

Energy and Resources

• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

• UK Government’s Department for Energy Security and

Net Zero (DESNZ)

• Carbonfootprint.com (for European country electricity

emissions factors).

For the FY25 measurement we used emissions factors with AR5

Global Warming Potentials (GWP) derived from the International

Panel of Climate Change Fifth Report (AR5). Emissions have

been calculated by applying the appropriate emissions factors to

Scope 1 and 2 activity data.

Few assumptions or estimations have been made in measuring

Scope 1 emissions. Uncertainty is low as calculations are activity

based using emissions factors with +/- 0.7% to 2.4% uncertainty

(MfE). In the calculation of transport fuel emissions for the

Australian division, fuel quantity has been estimated from spend

data in lieu of quantity data. In this instance, an assumed average

fuel price of 1.87 AUD per L has been applied (diesel). For Scope

2 electricity emissions, calculations use ICP meter data, which is

assumed accurate.

Emissions

source

Data

source

Methodology,

assumptions and

uncertainty

Scope 1 (ISO Category 1)

Transport

fuels

Supplier

invoices /

statements (L)

Activity based. Assumes data

in supplier invoices is free

from error. Uncertainty

impact low.

Transaction

records ($)

Where L data does not exist

(Australian operations), quantity

is assumed based on annual

average price of fuel ($ / L). Low

uncertainly impact.

Stationary

fuels

Supplier

invoices /

statements

(m3, kWh, kg

or L)

Activity based. Assumes data

in supplier invoices is free

from error. Uncertainty

impact low.

Fugitive

emissions

– welding

gases

Supplier

invoices /

statements

(kg)

Activity based. Assumes data

in supplier invoices is free

from error. Uncertainty impact

low.

Fugitive

emissions

– refrigerant

gases

Service

provider

invoices

or service

records (kg)

Activity based. Assumes

top-up quantity is equal to

quantity lost and data in

invoices / service records is

free from error. Uncertainty

impact low, noting no loss in

refrigerant gases in FY25.

Scope 2 (ISO Category 2)

Purchased

electricity

– sites

Supplier

invoices /

statements

(kWh)

Location based. Uncertainty low

as data is from meters and likely

to be free from error. Country-

specific emissions factors have

been used for New Zealand,

Europe and China. State

emissions factors have been

used for Australia and USA.

Selected Scope 1 and 2 emissions disclosed in these Climate-

related Disclosures have been subject to an independent

limited assurance engagement by Deloitte Limited in

accordance with NZ SAE 1: Assurance Engagements over

Greenhouse Gas Disclosures (‘NZ SAE 1’). Refer to the

assurance report on pages 44 to 46.

Previous assurance statements can be found on our website,

www.scottautomation.com/en/news-and-events/30-by-30.

Annual Report 2025

Page 43

Subject matter: Selected GHG DisclosuresReference
GHG emissions: gross emissions in metric tonnes of Carbon dioxide equivalent (‘CO2e’) classified as:

• Scope 1

• Scope 2 (calculated using the location-based method).

Pages 41

Additional requirements for the disclosure of gross GHG emissions per paragraph 24 (a) to (d) of Aotearoa New Zealand

Climate Standard 1: Climate-related Disclosures (‘NZ CS 1’), being:

• The statement describing that the GHG emissions have been measured in accordance with International Standard

ISO 14064-1 Greenhouse gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organisation level for quantification and

reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals (‘ISO 14064-1:2018’);

• The statement that the GHG emissions consolidation approach used is operational control;

• Sources of Scope 1 and 2 GHG emission factors and the global warming potential (‘GWP’) rates used or a reference

to the GWP source; and

• The summary of specific exclusions of Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions sources (if applicable), including facilities,

operations or assets with a justification for their exclusion.

Page 43

Disclosures relating to GHG emissions methods, assumptions and estimation uncertainty per paragraphs 52 to 54 of

Aotearoa New Zealand Climate Standard 3: General Requirements for Climate related Disclosures (‘NZ CS 3’):

• Description of the methods and assumptions used to calculate or estimate Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, and the

limitations of those methods.

• Description of uncertainties relevant to the Group’s quantification of its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions, including the

effects of these uncertainties on disclosures.

Page 43

Limited Assurance Conclusion

Based on the procedures we have performed and the

evidence we have obtained, nothing has come to our

attention that causes us to believe that the Scope 1 and

2 gross GHG emissions, additional required disclosures of

gross GHG emissions, and gross GHG emissions methods,

assumptions and estimation uncertainty, within the scope

of our limited assurance engagement (as outlined below),

included in the Group Climate Statements of Scott Technology

Limited (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’)

for the year ended 31 August 2025 (the ‘Selected GHG

Disclosures’), are not fairly presented and not prepared, in all

material respects, in accordance with Aotearoa New Zealand

Climate Standards (‘NZ CSs’) issued by the External Reporting

Board (‘XRB’), as explained on page 27 of the Group Climate

Statements.

Scope of Assurance Engagement

We have undertaken a limited assurance engagement over

the Selected GHG Disclosures within the Group Climate

Statements for the year ended 31 August 2025, as set out

below.

Our engagement has not covered Scope 3 GHG emissions as

the Group is taking advantage of the one-year extension to

the adoption provision so will not be reporting the Scope 3

GHG emissions for the year ended 31 August 2025.

Our report does not cover any forward-looking statements

made by the Group, any external references or hyperlinked

documents.

Our limited assurance engagement does not extend to any

other information included, or referred to, in the Annual

Report including the Group Climate Statements on pages 1 to

For the year ended 31 August 2025

INDEPENDENT LIMITED ASSURANCE REPORT ON SELECTED

GREENHOUSE GAS (‘GHG’) DISCLOSURES INCLUDED

WITHIN THE GROUP CLIMATE STATEMENTS (ALSO

REFERRED TO AS THE CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES)

FOR SCOPE 1 AND 2 GHG EMISSIONS

To the Shareholders of Scott Technology Limited

Scott Technology Limited

Page 44

40, 42 and 44 to 120. We have not performed any procedures
with respect to the excluded information and, therefore, no

conclusion is expressed on it.

Other Matter – Comparative Information

The comparative GHG disclosures (that is GHG disclosures

for the periods ended 31 August 2022, 31 August 2023

and 31 August 2024) have not been the subject of an

assurance engagement undertaken in accordance with New

Zealand Standard on Assurance Engagements 1: Assurance

Engagements over Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosures (‘NZ

SAE 1’). These disclosures are not covered by our assurance

conclusion.

Director’s Responsibilities for the Selected

GHG Disclosures

Directors are responsible for the preparation and fair

presentation of the Selected GHG Disclosures in accordance

with NZ CSs, which includes determining and disclosing the

appropriate standard or standards used to measure the

Group’s GHG emissions. This responsibility includes the design,

implementation and maintenance of internal controls relevant

to the preparation of GHG disclosures that are free from

material misstatement whether due to fraud or error.

Inherent Uncertainty in Preparing Selected GHG

Disclosures

Non-financial information, such as that included in the Group

Climate Statements, is subject to more inherent limitations

than financial information, given both its nature and the

methods used and assumptions applied in determining,

calculating and sampling or estimating such information. GHG

quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of

incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions

factors and the values needed to combine emissions of

different gases.

As the procedures performed for this engagement are not

performed continuously throughout the relevant period

and the procedures performed in respect of the Group’s

compliance with NZ CSs are undertaken on a test basis, our

limited assurance engagement cannot be relied on to detect

all instances where the Group may not have complied with

the NZ CSs. Because of these inherent limitations, it is possible

that fraud, error or non-compliance may occur and not be

detected.

In addition, we note that a limited assurance engagement

is not designed to detect all instances of non-compliance

with the NZ CSs, as it generally comprises making enquires,

primarily of the responsible party, and applying analytical and

other review procedures.

Our Responsibilities

Our responsibility is to express an independent limited

assurance conclusion on the Selected GHG Disclosures, based

on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we

have obtained.

We conducted our limited assurance engagement in

accordance with NZ SAE 1 and International Standard on

Assurance Engagements (New Zealand) 3410: Assurance

Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements (‘ISAE (NZ)

3410’), issued by the XRB. These standards require that

we plan and perform this engagement to obtain limited

assurance about whether the Selected GHG Disclosures are

free from material misstatement.

Our Independence and Quality Management

We have complied with the independence and other ethical

requirements of NZ SAE 1, which is founded on fundamental

principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence

and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour.

We have also complied with the following professional and

ethical standards:

• Professional and Ethical Standard 1: International Code of

Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International

Independence Standards) (New Zealand);

• Professional and Ethical Standard 3: Quality Management

for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial

Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services

Engagements which requires us to design, implement

and operate a system of quality management including

policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical

requirements, professional standards and applicable legal

and regulatory requirements; and

• Professional and Ethical Standard 4: Engagement Quality

Reviews.

Other than in our capacity as the statutory auditor of the

financial statements and as assurance practitioner, we have

no relationship with or interests in the Group.

As we are engaged to form an independent conclusion on

the Selected GHG Disclosures prepared by the Group, we are

not permitted to be involved in the preparation of the GHG

information as doing so may compromise our independence.

Annual Report 2025

Page 45

Summary of Work Performed
Our limited assurance engagement was performed in

accordance with NZ SAE 1 and ISAE (NZ) 3410. This involves

assessing the suitability in the circumstances of Group’s use

of NZ CSs as the basis for the preparation of the Selected

GHG Disclosures, assessing the risks of material misstatement

of the Selected GHG Disclosures whether due to fraud or

error, responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the

circumstances, and evaluating the overall presentation of the

Selected GHG Disclosures.

A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope

than a reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both

the risk assessment procedures, including an understanding

of internal control, and the procedures performed in response

to the assessed risks.

The procedures we performed were based on our

professional judgement and included enquiries, observation

of processes performed, inspection of documents, analytical

procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification

methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling

with underlying records. In undertaking our limited assurance

engagement on the Selected GHG Disclosures, we:

• Obtained, through inquiries, an understanding of the Group’s

control environment, processes and information systems

relevant to the preparation of the GHG disclosures. We did

not evaluate the design of particular control activities, or

obtain evidence about their implementation.

• Evaluated whether the Group’s methods for developing

estimates are appropriate and had been consistently applied.

Our procedures did not include testing the data on which

the estimates are based or separately developing our own

estimates against which to evaluate the Group’s estimates.

• Performed analytical procedures on particular emission

categories by comparing the expected GHGs emitted to actual

GHGs emitted and made inquiries of management to obtain

explanations for any significant differences we identified.

• Considered the presentation and disclosure of the Selected

GHG disclosures.

This limited assurance report relates to the Selected GHG Disclosures included within the Group Climate Statements for

the year ended 31 August 2025 included on the Group’s website. The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and

integrity of the Group’s website. We have not been engaged to report on the integrity of the Group’s website. We accept no

responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the Selected GHG Disclosures included within the Group Climate

Statements since they were initially presented on the website.

The limited assurance report refers only to the Selected GHG Disclosures included within the Group Climate Statements

named above. It does not provide an opinion on any other information which may have been hyperlinked to/from these

disclosures. If readers of this report are concerned with the inherent risks arising from electronic data communication, they

should refer to the published hard copy of the Group Climate Statements that include these Selected GHG Disclosures and

related limited assurance report dated 21 October 2025 to confirm the information presented on this website.

The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement

vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for,

a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level

of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement

is substantially lower than the assurance that would have

been obtained had we performed a reasonable assurance

engagement. Accordingly, we do not express a reasonable

assurance opinion about whether Selected GHG Disclosures

are fairly presented and prepared, in all material respects, in

accordance with NZ CSs.

Use of Our Report

Our limited assurance report (‘our Report’) is intended for

users who have a reasonable knowledge of GHG related

activities, and who have studied the GHG related information

in the Group Climate Statements with reasonable diligence

and understand that the GHG disclosures are prepared and

assured to appropriate levels of materiality.

Our Report is made solely to the Company’s shareholders,

as a body. Our limited assurance engagement has been

undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those

matters we are required to state to them in our Report and

for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law,

we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other

than the Company’s shareholders as a body, for our work, for

our Report, or for the conclusions we have formed.

Andrew Dick, Partner

for Deloitte Limited

Auckland, New Zealand

21 October 2025

Scott Technology Limited

Page 46

KEY
Accounting policy

Key judgements and

other judgements made

Index to the Financial Statements

C. Capital and funding

76

C1. Share capital76

C2. Earnings and net tangible assets per share76

C3. Borrowings77

C4. Trade creditors and accruals78

C5. Leases79

C6. Employee benefits81

C7. Provision for warranty81

C8. Performance-based compensation82

C9. Onerous contract provision82

D. Risk management83

D1. Financial instruments83

E. Group structure and subsidiaries89

E1. Subsidiaries89

E2.

Investments accounted for using

the equity method90

E3. Related party transactions91

E4. Non-recurring costs92

F. Other disclosures93

F1. Notes to the consolidated statement of

cash flows

93

F2. Contingent liabilities94

F3. Key management personnel compensation94

F4. Subsequent events94

Independent auditor’s report

95

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income48

Consolidated statement of changes in equity49

Consolidated balance sheet50

Consolidated statement of cash flows51

Notes to the consolidated financial statements52

Summary of accounting policies52

A. Financial performance55

A1.

Revenue from contracts with

customers and operating expenses

55

A2. Income taxes60

A3. Segment information63

B. Assets65

B1. Trade debtors65

B2. Inventories66

B3. Contract assets / liabilities67

B4. Property, plant and equipment68

B5. Goodwill69

B6. Intangible assets72

B7. Research and development costs74

B8. Development assets74

For the year ended 31 August 2025

FINANCIAL

REPORT

Annual Report 2025

Page 47

20252024
Notes$'000$'000

RevenueA1

275,273 276,125

Other operating incomeA1 1,715 2,541

Share of joint ventures’ net surplusE2 248 63

Raw materials, consumables used and operating expensesA1 (159,320) (163,799)

Employee benefits expense

(86,377) (84,705)

OPERATING EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST, TAX, DEPRECIATION AND

AMORTISATION, AND NON-RECURRING COSTS (OPERATING EBITDA)

31,539 30,225

Non-recurring costsE4

- (3,795)

OPERATING EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST, TAX, DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTISATION (EBITDA)

31,539 26,430

Interest revenue 365 373

Depreciation and amortisationB4, B6, B8, C5 (10,731) (11,280)

Finance costs (3,772) (4,557)

NET PROFIT BEFORE TAX 17,401 10,966

Taxation expenseA2 (3,188) (3,249)

NET PROFIT FOR THE YEAR AFTER TAX 14,213 7,717

Other Comprehensive Income

Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:

Translation of foreign operations 4,989 (2,803)

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR NET OF TAX 19,202 4,914

Net profit / loss for the year after tax is attributable to:

Members of the parent entity (used in the calculations of earnings per share) 14,371 7,853

Non-controlling interests (158) (136)

14,213 7,717

Total comprehensive income / loss is attributable to:

Members of the parent entity 19,360 5,050

Non-controlling interests (158) (136)

19,202 4,914

Notes Cents per shareCents per share

Earnings per share to shareholders from continuing operations

(weighted average shares on issue):

BasicC2 17.4 9.7

DilutedC2 17.4 9.7

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.

For the year ended 31 August 2025

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT

OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Scott Technology Limited

Page 48

For the year ended 31 August 2025
Fully paid

ordinary

shares

Retained

earnings

Foreign

currency

translation

reserve

Non-

controlling

interestsTotal

Notes$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

Balance at 31 August 2023 90,162 22,425 1,684 (372) 113,899

Net profit for the year after tax - 7,853 - (136) 7,717

Other comprehensive (loss) for the year net of tax - - (2,803) - (2,803)

Dividends paid (8.0 cents per share) - (7,446) - - (7,446)

Issue of shares under dividend reinvestment planC1 354 - - - 354

Balance at 31 August 2024 90,516 22,832 (1,119) (508) 111,721

Net profit for the year after tax - 14,371 - (158) 14,213

Other comprehensive income for the year net of tax - - 4,989 - 4,989

Dividends paid (6.0 cents per share) - (5,086) - - (5,086)

Issue of shares under dividend reinvestment planC1 3,437 - - - 3,437

Balance at 31 August 2025 93,953 32,117 3,870 (666) 129,274

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT

OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

Annual Report 2025

Page 49

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As at 31 August 2025

20252024

Notes$’000s$’000s

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents 12,152 11,674

Trade debtorsB1 59,607 40,201

Other financial assetsD1 503 560

Sundry debtors 5,938 5,663

InventoriesB2 38,842 36,869

Contract assetsB3 28,268 30,634

Taxation receivable 1,275 -

Assets held for sale 762 -

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

147,347 125,601

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipmentB4

21,097 23,560

Investment in joint venturesE2

1,115 867

Other financial assetsD1

9 5

Sundry debtors

1,966 3,237

GoodwillB5

53,902 50,832

Deferred taxA2

374 2,761

Intangible assetsB6

2,569 3,400

Development assetsB8

10,853 8,855

Right-of-use assetsC5

30,336 24,862

TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS

122,221 118,379

TOTAL ASSETS

269,568 243,980

Current liabilities

Bank overdraft

10,096 18,999

Trade creditors and accruals

C4 38,562 29,712

Lease liabilities

C5 5,622 4,660

Other financial liabilities

D1 511 245

Contract liabilities

B3 30,746 29,762

Employee entitlements

C6, C8 11,350 10,591

Provision for warranty

C7 1,118 1,541

Taxation payable

- 1,194

Borrowings

C3 2,045 1,200

Onerous contracts provision

C9 89 34

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

100,139 97,938

Non-current

liabilities

Other financial liabilities

D1 9 5

Employee entitlements

C6, C8 714 790

Lease liabilities

C5 27,167 21,987

Borrowings

C3 12,265 11,539

TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES

40,155 34,321

TOTAL LIABILITIES

140,294 132,259

Equity

Share capital

C1 93,953 90,516

Retained earnings

32,117 22,832

Foreign currency translation reserve

3,870 (1,119)

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

129,940 112,229

Non-controlling interests

(666) (508)

TOTAL EQUITY

129,274 111,721

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

269,568 243,980

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 50

20252024
Notes

$’000s$’000s

Cash flows from

operating activities

Cash was provided from / (applied to):

Receipts from operations 260,421 270,680

Interest received 364 374

Payments to suppliers and employees (235,604) (261,586)

Taxation paid (2,881) (3,496)

Net cash inflow from operating activitiesF1 22,300 5,972

Cash flows to

investing activities

Cash was provided from / (applied to):

Purchase of property, plant, equipment and intangible assets (2,621) (8,953)

Sale of property, plant and equipment 457 440

Purchase of development assetB8 (1,526) (1,384)

Net cash (outflow) from investing activities (3,690) (9,897)

Cash flows to

financing activities

Cash was provided from / (applied to):

Repayment of borrowings (3,625) (3,710)

Dividends paid (less amount reinvested the dividend

reinvestment scheme)

(1,649) (7,093)

Proceeds from borrowings 4,758 4,202

Lease payments (4,967) (4,556)

Interest paid (3,746) (4,639)

Net cash (outflow) from financing activities (9,229) (15,796)

Net (decrease) / increase in cash held 9,381 (19,721)

Add cash and cash equivalents at start of year (7,325) 12,396

Balance at end of year 2,056 (7,325)

Comprised of:

Cash and cash equivalents 12,152 11,674

Bank overdraft (10,096) (18,999)

2,056 (7,325)

The accompanying notes form part of and are to be read in conjunction with these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT

OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended 31 August 2025

Annual Report 2025

Page 51

The accounting policies set out below have been applied
in preparing the financial statements for the year ended 31

August 2025 and the comparative information presented in

these financial statements for the year ended 31 August 2024.

There have been no changes in accounting policy during the year.

The information is presented in thousands of New Zealand

dollars, which is the functional currency of the company and

the presentation currency of the Group.

Critical Judgements, Estimates and

Assumptions

In the application of NZ IFRS the directors are required

to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about

carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily

apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated

assumptions are based on historical experience and various

other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the

circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the

judgements. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on

an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are

recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if

the revision affects only that period or in the period of the

revision and future periods if the revision affects both current

and future periods.

Judgements made by the directors in the application of NZ IFRS

that have significant effects on the financial statements and

estimates with a significant risk of material adjustments in the

next year include:

• Estimating the percentage of completion for systems

contracts (note A1)

• Provisions for losses relating to contract assets (note B3)

• Goodwill impairment (note B5)

• Capitalisation and useful lives of development assets

(note B8).

Statement of Compliance

The consolidated financial statements presented are those

of Scott Technology Limited (‘Company’) and its subsidiaries

(‘Group’).

The company is a profit-oriented entity, registered in

New Zealand under the Companies Act 1993. The company

is an FMC reporting entity for the purposes of the Financial

Markets Conduct Act 2013 and its annual financial

statements comply with these Acts.

The Group’s principal activities are the design, manufacture,

sales and servicing of automated and robotic production

lines and processes for a wide variety of industries in New

Zealand and abroad.

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance

with New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting Practice

(‘NZ GAAP’) and, for the purposes of complying with GAAP,

it is a for-profit entity. They comply with New Zealand

equivalents to IFRS Accounting Standards (‘NZ IFRS’) and

other applicable financial reporting standards as appropriate

for profit-oriented entities. The financial statements also

comply with IFRS Accounting Standards (‘IFRS’).

The financial statements were authorised for issue by the

Board of Directors on 21 October 2025.

Basis of Preparation

The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of

historical cost except for the revaluation of certain financial

instruments.

Cost is based on the fair value of the consideration given in

exchange for assets.

Accounting policies are selected and applied in a manner that

ensures that the resulting financial information satisfies the

concepts of relevance and reliability, thereby ensuring that

the substance of the underlying transactions or other events

is reported.

NOTES TO AND FORMING PART

OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL

S TAT E M E N T S

SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

As at 31 August 2025

Scott Technology Limited

Page 52

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Material Accounting Policies

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation

of the financial report are set out within the particular note

to which they relate. These policies have been consistently

applied unless otherwise stated.

Consolidation of Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial

statements of the company and entities controlled by the

company and its subsidiaries. Control is achieved when the

company:

• Has power over the investee;

• Is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its

involvement with the investee; and

• Has the ability to use its power to affect its returns.

The Group financial statements are prepared by combining the

financial statements of all the entities that comprise the Group,

being the company and its subsidiaries as defined by NZ IFRS

10 Consolidated Financial Statements. Consistent accounting

policies are employed in the preparation and presentation of

the Group financial statements.

All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are

eliminated on consolidation.

On acquisition, the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities

of a subsidiary are measured at their fair values at the date of

acquisition. Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair

values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recognised as

goodwill. Any deficiency of the cost of acquisition below the

fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired (i.e. discount

on acquisition) is credited to profit and loss in the period of

acquisition.

The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of

during the year, are included in the consolidated statement of

comprehensive income from the effective date of acquisition,

or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate.

Standards and Interpretations Effective in the

Current Period

The Group has adopted all mandatory new and amended

standards and interpretations. None had a material impact

on these financial statements.

Standards and Interpretations

in Issue not yet Adopted

At the date of authorisation of the consolidated financial

statements certain new standards and interpretations to

existing standards have been published but are not yet effective,

and have not been adopted early by the Group.

Of these, the following are assessed as relevant to the Group:

NZ IFRS 18 (Presentation and Disclosure in Financial

Statements) — introduces new requirements, including a

change in the structure of the profit and loss, management

defined performance measures being included in a note to the

financial statements and enhanced aggregation/disaggregation

clarification. The new standard also amends the classification in

the statement of cash flows.

Annual improvements to NZ IFRS Accounting Standards 2024.

The amendments will have no material impact on the Group,

other than NZ IFRS 18, which has not yet been assessed but may

affect the face of the statements at a future date.

Goods and Services Tax and

Value-added Tax ('GST')

All items in the consolidated balance sheet are stated exclusive

of GST, with the exception of receivables and payables,

which include GST. All items in the consolidated statement of

comprehensive income are stated exclusive of GST.

Cash flows are included in the consolidated statement of cash

flows on a net basis. The GST component of cash flows arising

from investing and financing activities that is recoverable from,

or payable to, the taxation authority is classified as operating

cash flows.

Summary of accounting policies continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 53

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Foreign Currencies

The individual financial statements of each Group entity

are presented in the currency of the primary economic

environment in which the entity operates, which is its

functional currency. For the purpose of the consolidated

financial statements, the results and position of each Group

entity are expressed in New Zealand dollars, which is the

functional currency of the company and the presentation

currency for the consolidated financial statements.

In preparing the financial statements of each Group entity,

transactions in currencies other than the entity's functional

currency are recognised at the rates of exchange prevailing

at the dates of the transactions. At the end of each reporting

period, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are

retranslated at the rates prevailing at that date.

For the purposes of presenting these consolidated financial

statements, the assets and liabilities of the Group's foreign

operations are translated into New Zealand dollars using

exchange rates prevailing at the end of each reporting

period. Income and expense items are translated at the

average exchange rates for the period, unless exchange rates

fluctuate significantly during that period, in which case the

exchange rates at the dates of the transactions are used.

Exchange differences arising, if any, are recognised in other

comprehensive income and accumulated in equity and

attributed to non-controlling interests as appropriate.

Non-GAAP financial information

The Group uses earnings / (loss) before interest, tax,

depreciation and amortisation, and non-recurring costs

(Operating EBITDA), earnings / (loss) before interest, tax,

depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), and Net Tangible

Assets per ordinary shares, to describe financial performance

as it considers these line items provide a better measure of

underlying business performance.

These non-GAAP measures do not have a standard meaning

prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to

similarly titled amounts reported by other entities.

Summary of accounting policies continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 54

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Revenue on fixed-price contracts is recognised over

the term of the contract period using the input

method based on percentage of completion. At

balance date an assessment is made of the percentage

of completion based on the costs associated with the

work done to date relative to the total forecast cost to

complete. Included in revenue is the value attributed

to work completed, which includes direct costs,

overhead and profit, where this is allowable under the

contract. Scope variations that may potentially lead to

additional revenue are only recognised when certain.

The customer is obligated to pay a fixed amount

when a contractual milestone is met. At this time, a

receivable is recognised as the invoice is raised. If the

revenue recognised by the Group exceeds the amounts

invoiced, a contract asset is recognised. If the amounts

invoiced exceed the revenue recognised, a contract

liability is recognised. The transaction price is the fixed

price per the contract.

The incremental costs to obtain a contract where the

contract period is less than 12 months is expensed to the

profit and loss under the practical expedient provisions of

NZ IFRS 15.

The Group’s obligation to repair or replace faulty products

under the standard warranty terms is recognised as a

provision (see note C7).

SECTION A: FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

A1. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

AND OPERATING EXPENSES

(a) Accounting policies and significant judgements

The Group derives revenue from the following sources:

• Sales

• Services.

Revenue recognition – sales

The Group designs, manufactures and sells customised automation and robotic systems for use in a wide range of industries

under fixed-price contracts. The contracts are often for periods in excess of twelve months although shorter periods can also

apply. These contracts are specific to each customer and the Group is restricted by these contracts in its ability to redirect

the products to another customer. The Group, through these contracts, has an enforceable right to payment when agreed

milestones are met for performance completed up to that date.

Judgement

The estimation of percentage of completion relies

on the directors estimating costs to complete

systems contracts. If the costs incurred to complete

the systems contracts differ from the estimates

completed by management, the directors could be over

or under estimating the percentage of completion on

the project, and consequently revenue and profit to

date may also be over or under estimated.



The Group manufactures and sells a range of standalone automation and robotic equipment for use in a wide range of

industries, including:

• Rock crushers, pulverisers, ringmills and reference materials under the 'Rocklabs' brand for use by mining companies

and laboratories

• Bandsaw safety equipment under the 'BladeStop' brand, primarily for use by protein processors.


Annual Report 2025

Page 55

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Revenue is recognised when products are ready for

pickup, shipped to or received by the customer, or

installed at the customer’s premises, depending on

the terms of the contract.

A receivable is recognised when either a deposit is due

on receipt of a customer’s order or when the products

are shipped to the customer, as this is the point in

Policy

Revenue under service contracts is recognised at

a point in time when the service is delivered or

performed, depending on the terms of the contract.


time that the consideration is unconditional because

only the passage of time is required before the payment

is due.

The Group’s obligation to repair or replace faulty

products under the standard warranty terms is

recognised as a provision (see note C7).


Revenue recognition – services

The Group earns revenue from after sales service activities associated with the equipment manufactured and sold by the

Group, including spare parts, repairs, routine or scheduled maintenance, upgrades, remote monitoring and the operation of

a 24/7 helpline. Most of these activities are on an ad hoc, as required basis, while some of these activities are covered by an

agreement for services to be provided over a specified period of time.


The Group’s obligation to repair or replace faulty

products under the standard warranty terms is

recognised as a provision (see note C7).


Disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers

The Group derives revenue from the transfer of goods and services over time and at a point in time and reports these by

industry in the following major manufacturing segments and revenue streams. This is consistent with the revenue information

disclosed for each reportable segment under NZ IFRS 8 Operating Segments, (see note A3).

Section A: financial performance continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 56

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Section A: financial performance continued

Year Ended 31 August 2025

ProteinMinerals

Materials

Handling

Rest of

Business Total

$’000s$’000s $’000s $’000s

$’000s

New Zealand

manufacturing

Sales3,432 - - 99 3,531

Service4,645 - 891881 6,417

Revenue from external customers 8,077 - 891 980 9,948

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time3,187 - - 99 3,286

- At a point in time4,890 - 891881 6,662

8,077 - 891 980 9,948

Rocklabs

manufacturing

Sales - 35,415 - - 35,415

Service - 12,472 - - 12,472

Revenue from external customers - 47,887 - - 47,887

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time - 5,141 - - 5,141

- At a point in time - 42,746 - - 42,746

- 47,887 - - 47,887

Australia

manufacturing

Sales14,507 - - 296 14,803

Service11,101 - 821 - 11,922

Revenue from external customers 25,608 - 821 296 26,725

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time11,585 - - 296 11,881

- At a point in time14,023 - 821 - 14,844

25,608 - 821 296 26,725

Americas

manufacturing

Sales11,7992,91829,8807,873 52,470

Service11,8931438,239 - 20,275

Revenue from external customers 23,692 3,061 38,119 7,873 72,745

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time4,3562,91829,8807,873 45,027

- At a point in time19,3361438,239 - 27,718

23,6923,06138,1197,873 72,745

Europe

manufacturing

Sales8,482 - 58,8471,479 68,808

Service3,566 - 24,4531,047 29,066

Revenue from external customers 12,048 - 83,300 2,526 97,874

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time - - 58,8471,479 60,326

- At a point in time12,048 - 24,4531,047 37,548

12,048 - 83,3002,526 97,874

China

manufacturing

Sales - - - 20,094 20,094

Service - - - - -

Revenue from external customers - - - 20,094 20,094

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time - - - 20,094 20,094

- At a point in time - - - - -

- - - 20,094 20,094

Total

manufacturing

Sales38,22038,33388,72729,841195,121

Service31,20512,61534,4041,92880,152

Revenue from external customers 69,425 50,948 123,131 31,769 275,273

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time19,1288,05988,72729,841145,755

- At a point in time50,29742,88934,4041,928129,518

69,42550,948123,13131,769 275,273

Annual Report 2025

Page 57

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Year Ended 31 August 2024

ProteinMinerals

Materials

Handling

Rest of

Business Total

$’000s$’000s $’000s $’000s

$’000s

New Zealand

manufacturing

Sales5,712 - 2,473 1 8,186

Service6,4288 836 2,805 10,077

Revenue from external customers 12,140 8 3,309 2,806 18,263

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time 5,166 - 2,473 1 7,640

- At a point in time 6,974 8 836 2,805 10,623

12,140 8 3,309 2,806 18,263

Rocklabs

manufacturing

Sales - 30,833 - - 30,833

Service - 12,544 - - 12,544

Revenue from external customers - 43,377 - - 43,377

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time - 8,409 - - 8,409

- At a point in time - 34,968 - - 34,968

- 43,377 - - 43,377

Australia

manufacturing

Sales7,395 - - 1,652 9,047

Service9,493 - - 2,306 11,799

Revenue from external customers 16,888 - - 3,958 20,846

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time 2,872 - - 1,652 4,524

- At a point in time 14,016 - - 2,306 16,322

16,888 - - 3,958 20,846

Americas

manufacturing

Sales10,391 5,221 42,367 16,537 74,516

Service10,656 235 7,710 4 18,605

Revenue from external customers 21,047 5,456 50,077 16,541 93,121

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time4,482 5,221 42,367 16,537 68,607

- At a point in time16,565 235 7,710 4 24,514

21,047 5,456 50,077 16,541 93,121

Europe

manufacturing

Sales6,094 - 54,583 3,193 63,870

Service3,727 - 19,375 1,258 24,360

Revenue from external customers 9,821 - 73,958 4,451 88,230

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time - - 54,583 3,193 57,776

- At a point in time 9,821 - 19,375 1,258 30,454

9,821 - 73,958 4,451 88,230

China

manufacturing

Sales - - - 12,288 12,288

Service - - - - -

Revenue from external customers - - - 12,288 12,288

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time - - - 12,288 12,288

- At a point in time - - - - -

- - - 12,288 12,288

Total

manufacturing

Sales29,592 36,054 99,423 33,671 198,740

Service30,304 12,787 27,921 6,373 77,385

Revenue from external customers 59,896 48,841 127,344 40,044 276,125

Timing of revenue recognition

- Over time12,520 13,630 99,423 33,671 159,244

- At a point in time47,376 35,211 27,921 6,373 116,881

59,896 48,841 127,344 40,044 276,125

Section A: financial performance continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 58

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Revenue recognised in relation to contract liabilities

The following table shows how much of the revenue recognised in the current reporting period relates to carried forward

contract liabilities and how much relates to performance obligations that were satisfied in a prior year.

Revenue recognised included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Fixed-price contracts for long-term projects 17,260 25,098

There was no revenue recognised from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods on long-term projects.

Unsatisfied long-term fixed-price project contracts

The following table shows unsatisfied performance obligations resulting from fixed-price long-term project contracts.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to long-term fixed-price project

contracts that are partially or fully unsatisfied as at 31 August

85,487 79,365

Management expects that 93% of the transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied contracts as of 31 August 2025 will

be recognised as revenue during the next reporting period ($80 million) (2024: 90% of the transaction price allocated

to the unsatisfied contracts as of 31 August 2024 will be recognised as revenue during the next reporting period

($72 million)). The remaining 7% ($5 million) (2024: 10% ($7 million)) will be recognised in the following financial year.

(b) Other operating income

Government grants

Policy

Government grants are not recognised until there

is reasonable assurance that the Group will comply

with the conditions attaching to them and that the

grants will be received.

Government grants are recognised as other

income over the periods necessary to match

them with the costs for which they are intended

to compensate, on a systematic basis. Government

grants that are receivable as compensation for

expenses or losses already incurred, or for the

purpose of giving immediate financial support to the

Group with no future related costs, are recognised

in profit or loss in the period in which they become

receivable.

The Group receives grant revenue related to research and development through its Australian subsidiary Scott Automation and

Robotics Pty Ltd. Any tax credits claimed are offset against any tax expense.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Rental income

686 280

Government grants related to research and development

940 1,156

Other income

- 130

Other Government grants

70 851

Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

19 124


1,715 2,541

Section A: financial performance continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 59

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Audit services:

Deloitte Limited

Audit and review of the financial statements

649 604

Total remuneration for audit services

649 604

Other services:

Deloitte Limited

Other Assurance Services

- Limited assurance over Greenhouse Gas (GHG) information.

45 -

- Other local regulatory assurance services

- 3

Taxation services - Tax Filings

- 10

Total remuneration for other services 45 13

Total fees incurred for services provided by the audit firm 694 617

Other separately

disclosed expenses:

Directors’ fees 290 290

Superannuation scheme contributions 9,610 8,676

Raw materials and consumables used (cost of sales) 126,273 142,832

Foreign exchange loss 281 -

Unrealised fair value losses on foreign exchange derivatives 96 1,279

and after crediting:

Foreign exchange gains - 198

Unrealised fair value gains on foreign exchange derivatives 120 1,150

Unrealised fair value gains on interest rate swap contracts - -

Income tax recognised in net surplus

Policy

Current tax is calculated by reference to the amount

of income taxes payable or receivable in respect

of the taxable profit or tax loss for the period. It is

calculated using tax rates and tax laws that have been

enacted or substantively enacted by reporting date.

Current tax for current and prior periods is recognised

as a liability (or asset) to the extent it is unpaid (or

refundable).


20252024

$’000s$’000s

Net profit before tax

17,401 10,966

Income tax expense calculated at New Zealand rate of 28% (2024: 28%)

4,872 3,070

Foreign rates other than 28%

(391) (336)

Non-deductible expenses / non-assessable income

(595) 555

Under/(over) provision of income tax in previous year

(698) (40)

Taxation expense

3,188 3,249

Represented by:

Current tax

801 3,098

Deferred tax

2,387 151

3,188 3,249

The prima facie income tax expense on pre-tax accounting profit from operations reconciles to the income tax expense in

the financial statements as follows:

A2. INCOME TAXES

Section A: financial performance continued

(c) Included in raw materials, consumables and operating expenses

Scott Technology Limited

Page 60

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Deferred tax is accounted for using the

comprehensive balance sheet liability method

in respect of temporary differences arising from

differences between the carrying amount of assets

and liabilities in the financial statements and the

corresponding tax base of those items.

In principle, deferred tax liabilities are recognised for

all taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets

are recognised to the extent that it is probable that

sufficient taxable amounts will be available against which

deductible temporary differences or unused tax losses

and tax offsets can be utilised. However, deferred tax

assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary

differences giving rise to them arise from the initial

recognition of assets and liabilities (other than as a result

of a business combination) which affects neither taxable

income nor accounting profit.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the

tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when

the liability is settled or the asset is realised based on tax

rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at

reporting date. Deferred tax is charged or credited to profit

or loss, except when it relates to items charged or credited

to other comprehensive income or directly to equity, in

which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in other

comprehensive income or in equity.



Deferred tax balances

Section A: financial performance continued


2025

Opening

balance

Charged

to income

Closing

balance

$’000s $’000s $’000s

Gross deferred

tax assets:

Trade debtors

137 (106) 31

Other financial assets

5 583 588

Employee entitlements

1,384 (267) 1,117

Provisions

736 (525) 211

Tax losses 3,386 (2,077) 1,309

Leases

136 51 187

Inventories

- 420 420

5,784 (1,921) 3,863

Gross deferred

tax liabilities:

Other financial assets

(286) 286 -

Property, plant and equipment

(1,203) (303) (1,506)

Inventories (14) 14 -

Intangible assets

(1,520) (463) (1,983)

(3,023) (466) (3,489)

2,761 (2,387) 374

At the reporting date, the Group has unused gross tax losses of $5.2 million (2024: $10.4 million) available to offset against

future profits. A deferred tax asset has been recognised in respect of $1.3 million (2024: $3.4 million) of such losses.

It is considered probable that there will be future taxable profits available in the relevant jurisdictions to allow the Group to

utilise these losses.

Annual Report 2025

Page 61

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

2024

Opening

balance

Charged

to income

Closing

balance

$’000s $’000s $’000s

Gross deferred

tax assets:

Trade debtors

246 (109) 137

Other financial assets

5 - 5

Employee entitlements

1,320 64 1,384

Provisions

998 (262) 736

Tax losses 1,371 2,015 3,386

Leases

459 (323) 136

Inventories

671 (671) -

5,070 714 5,784

Gross deferred

tax liabilities:

Other financial assets

(313) 27 (286)

Property, plant and equipment

(263) (940) (1,203)

Inventories - (14) (14)

Intangible assets

(1,582) 62 (1,520)

(2,158) (865) (3,023)

2,912 (151) 2,761

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Imputation credits available to shareholders 52 246

The above amounts represent the balance of the imputation credit account at the end of the reporting period adjusted for:

• Imputation credits that will arise from the payment of the amount of the provision for income tax

• Imputation debits that will arise from the payment of dividends.

Availability of these credits is subject to continuity of ownership requirements.

Section A: financial performance continued

Imputation credit account balances

Scott Technology Limited

Page 62

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Segment revenues and results

The following is an analysis of the Group’s revenue and results by reportable segment. For the purposes of NZ IFRS 8, allocations are

based on the operating results by segment. The Group does not allocate certain resources (such as senior executive management

time) and central administration costs by segment for internal reporting purposes as these allocations would not result in a

meaningful and comparable measure of profitability by segment.

Manufacturing

New Zealand Rocklabs AustraliaAmericas Europe China Unallocated Elimination Total

2025

$’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s

Revenue from contracts with customers

Total revenue from

contracts with customers

9,948 47,887 26,725 72,745 97,874 20,094 - - 275,273

Inter-segment revenue 3,961 3,111 6,896 147 8,881 1,186 - (24,182) -

Segment Revenue 13,909 50,998 33,621 72,892 106,755 21,280 - (24,182) 275,273

Segment profit 9,291 13,975 2,702 2,882 14,720 2,973 - - 46,543

Depreciation and amortisation (853) (1,851) (2,480) (805) (3,704) (155) (883) - (10,731)

Share of net surplus in joint

ventures

248 - - - - - - - 248

Interest revenue 143 - 136 - 13 56 17 - 365

Central administration costs

- - - - - - (15,252) - (15,252)

Finance costs

(273) (937) (223) (513) (596) - (1,230) - (3,772)

Net profit/(loss) before

taxation

8,556 11,187 135 1,564 10,433 2,874 (17,348) - 17,401

Taxation (expense)/benefit

(140) (425) (917) 170 (1,489) (387) - - (3,188)

Net profit / (loss) after taxation

8,416 10,762 (782) 1,734 8,944 2,487 (17,348) - 14,213

Section A: financial performance continued

A3. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Policy

NZ IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires operating

segments to be identified on the basis of internal

reports about components of the Group that are

regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision-maker

(the Board) in order to allocate resources to the segments

and to assess its performance.

The Group’s Board allocates resources and assesses

performance of the Group by manufacturing base,

therefore under NZ IFRS 8 the Group’s reportable

segments are:

• New Zealand manufacturing

• Rocklabs manufacturing

• Australia manufacturing

New Zealand, (excluding Rocklabs), is reported as a single

segment due to the integrated nature of customers,

management, manufacturing and sales activities across

New Zealand.

Rocklabs is reported as a single segment due to

the integrated nature of customers, management,

manufacturing and sales activities associated with the

Rocklabs brand and operation in New Zealand and

Australia.

Australia, (excluding Rocklabs), is reported as a single

segment due to the integrated nature of customers,

management, manufacturing and sales activities across

Australia.

Americas is reported as a single segment due to

the integrated nature of customers, management,

manufacturing, sales and financing activities across North

and South America.

Europe is reported as a single segment due to the

integrated nature of customers, management,

manufacturing, sales and financing activities across Europe.

China is reported as a single segment due to the integrated

nature of customers, management, manufacturing, sales

and financing activities across China.

• Americas manufacturing

• Europe manufacturing

• China manufacturing.

Annual Report 2025

Page 63

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

The Group holds non-current assets in geographical areas outside of New Zealand, the country of domicile. These non-current

assets are held in the following locations

Section A: financial performance continued



Geographical information

The Group sells into eight principal geographical areas. The Group’s revenue from external customers by geographical location (of the

customer) is detailed below:


Revenue from contracts with customers

Total revenue from

contracts with customers

18,263 43,377 20,846 93,121 88,230 12,288 - - 276,125

Inter-segment revenue

12,229 2,480 7,273 783 12,552 2,372 - (37,689) -

Segment Revenue

30,492 45,857 28,119 93,904 100,782 14,660 - (37,689) 276,125

Segment profit

18,197 10,315 65 1,934 13,073 3,216 - - 46,800

Depreciation and amortisation

(840) (1,686) (3,791) (790) (3,814) (145) (214) - (11,280)

Share of net surplus in joint

ventures

63- - - - - - - 63

Interest revenue

- - 215 156 (91) 156 (63) - 373

Central administration costs

- - - - - - (20,433) - (20,433)

Finance costs

(926) (834) (165) (196) (516) - (1,920) - (4,557)

Net profit/(loss) before

taxation

16,494 7,795 (3,676) 1,104 8,652 3,227 (22,630) - 10,966

Taxation (expense)/benefit

(869) 76 535 (752) (1,949) (290) - - (3,249)

Net profit / (loss) after taxation

15,625 7,871 (3,141) 352 6,703 2,937 (22,630) - 7,717


2024

Revenue reported above represents revenue generated from external customers. Inter-segment sales, which are eliminated on

consolidation, were $24.2 million for the year ended 31 August 2025 (2024: $37.7 million).

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as the Group’s accounting policies. Segment profit represents the

profit earned by each segment without allocation of central administration costs and investment revenue.


20252024

$’000s$’000s

New Zealand (country of domicile) 23,630 23,390

Australia and Pacific Islands 41,571 31,576

North America, including Mexico 65,136 75,354

South America 4,364 2,550

Asia 39,378 24,233

Europe 98,203 117,758

Russia and former states - 147

Africa and Middle East 2,991 1,117

275,273 276,125


20252024

$’000s$’000s

Australia 23,395 22,350

US 15,641 10,873

Europe 33,732 29,474

China 998 1,029

73,766 63,726

Scott Technology Limited

Page 64

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025


Policy

Trade debtors are initially recognised at fair value and

are subsequently measured at amortised cost using

the effective interest rate method, less any provision

for expected credit losses. The Group applies the

simplified approach to measuring expected credit

losses, which uses a lifetime expected credit loss

allowance. The measurement of expected credit

losses is a function of the probability of default, loss

given default and the exposure of default.

The expected credit losses on trade receivables are

estimated using a provision matrix by reference to past

default experience of the debtor’s current financial

position, adjusted for factors that are specific to the

conditions of the industry in which the debtor operates

and an assessment of both the current, as well as the

forecast direction of conditions at the reporting date.

Provision for expected credit losses is recognised in

profit or loss.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Trade debtors

59,730 40,943

Allowance for expected credit losses

(123) (742)

59,607 40,201

Credit losses in profit and loss

The allowance for expected credit losses recognised in the profit and loss during the year was $0.6 million (2024: $0.4 million).

Credit period

The credit period on sales of goods ranges from 30 to 120 days depending on the terms negotiated by the customer for large

contracts. No interest is charged on trade debtors.

Impairment of financial assets

In relation to the impairment of financial assets, NZ IFRS 9 requires an expected credit loss model to be used. The expected credit loss

model requires the Group to account for expected credit losses and changes in those expected credit losses at each reporting date to

reflect changes in credit risk since initial recognition of the financial assets. Under NZ IFRS 9 it is not necessary for a credit event to have

occurred before credit losses are recognised.

The calculation of impairment losses impacts the way the Group calculates the bad debts provision, now termed the allowance for

expected credit loss. The Group applies the NZ IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses, which uses a lifetime

expected loss allowance for trade debtors.

To measure the expected credit losses, trade debtors, other financial assets, sundry debtors and contract assets have been grouped

based on their shared credit risk characteristics and the days past due. The contract assets relate to unbilled work in progress and have

substantially the same risk characteristics as the trade debtors for the same type of contracts.

SECTION B: ASSETS

B1. TRADE DEBTORS

Section A: financial performance continued

Information about major customers

In 2025 JBS accounted for 14% of total group sales (2024: there was no single customer accounting for more than 10% of total group

sales). These sales were across the New Zealand, Americas and Europe segments. Refer to note E3 for further information.


Annual Report 2025

Page 65

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

A provision matrix is determined based on historic credit loss rates for each group of customers, adjusted for any material

expected changes to the customers’ future credit risk. In addition, the company has increased the credit loss allowance for

anticipated losses from specific customers. On that basis, the credit loss allowance as at 31 August was determined as follows;

Provision matrix

New ZealandRocklabsAustraliaAmericasChinaEuropeGroup

20252024202520242025202420252024202520242025202420252024

$’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s

$’000s $’000s

Debtors

Current-30 days

5,664 5,351 9,532 6,212 3,141 4,164 15,931 6,174 341 2,023 15,929 7,970 50,538 31,894

31-60 days

190 17 427 1,336 192 376 874 393 - 42 829 1,025 2,512 3,189

61-90 days

12 58 593 425 362 109 290 974 221 152 244 221 1,722 1,939

Over 91 days*

92 73 837 453 - 187 655 505 2,309 1,490 1,065 1,213 4,958 3,921

Total debtors

5,958 5,499 11,389 8,426 3,695 4,836 17,750 8,046 2,871 3,707 18,067 10,429 59,730 40,943

Contract assets

2,123 2,258 336 2,104 493 28 2,881 3,963 9,971 10,032 12,464 12,249 28,268 30,634

Total assets

8,081 7,757 11,725 10,530 4,188 4,864 20,631 12,009 12,842 13,739 30,531 22,678 87,998 71,577

New ZealandRocklabsAustraliaAmericasChinaEuropeGroup

Allowance

based on

expected

credit loss - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Expected

credit loss on

individually

assessed

balances - - (78) (79) - (11) (42) (531) - - (3) (121) (123) (742)

Credit loss

allowance - - (78) (79) - (11) (42) (531) - - (3) (121) (123) (742)

* Includes retention payments in China which will be paid in the next 12 months.

Trade debtors and contract assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators

that there are no reasonable expectations of recovery include, amongst others, the failure of a debtor to engage in a

repayment plan with the Group.

Policy

Inventorie s are valued at the lower of cost and net

realisable value. Costs, including an appropriate

portion of fixed and variable overhead expenses,

are assigned to inventories by the method most

appropriate to the particular class of inventory,

with the majority being valued on a first-in first-out

basis. Net realisable value represents the estimated

selling price for inventories, less all estimated costs of

completion and costs necessary to make the sale.

Provision for slow moving and obsolete inventories is

assessed by the Group as part of the ongoing financial

reporting. Obsolescence is assessed based on the

time the inventory has been held and the likelihood of

future sales of the inventory.


B2. INVENTORIES

Section B: Assets continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 66

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025


20252024

$’000s$’000s

Raw materials 16,540 14,587

Work in progress 13,774 11,743

Finished goods 9,430 11,356

Provision for obsolete inventory (902) (817)

38,842 36,869

Write downs

The cost of inventories recognised as an expense during the year includes $0.1 million (2024: $0.2 million)

in respect of write downs of inventory to net realisable value and write offs of obsolete inventory.


Assets and liabilities related to contracts with customers

The Group becomes entitled to invoice customers for long-term projects when certain milestones are met. These milestones and

cash flows are agreed upfront with the customer when the contract is signed. When a particular milestone is reached, the customer

is sent an invoice and any revenue previously recognised as a contract asset is reclassified to trade receivables at this time. If the

invoice milestone payment exceeds the revenue recognised under the percentage of completion method, the Group will recognise a

contract liability for the difference.

The majority of fixed-price contracts are not considered to have a significant financing component under the percentage of

completion method as the period between the recognition of revenue and the milestone payments is usually less than one year.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Contract assets

28,268 30,634

Contract liabilities

(19,614) (19,925)

Deferred revenue

(11,132) (9,837)

(2,478) 872

Contract assets and contract liabilities include provisions where the likelihood of cost overruns are expected as a result of

factors such as the complexity of the projects and additional costs for commissioning and installation.

Policy

Contract assets are balances due from customers

under fixed-price project contracts that arise when the

Group receives payments from customers in line with

a series of performance-related milestones. The Group

will previously have recognised a contract asset for any

work performed. Any amount previously recognised

as a contract asset is reclassified to a trade debtor at

the point at which it is invoiced to the customer.

Contract liabilities relating to fixed-price project contracts

are balances due to customers under fixed-price project

contracts. These arise if a particular milestone payment

exceeds the revenue recognised to date.

Deferred revenue arises from short-term projects where

the Group receives payments from customers in advance

of delivering the asset to the customer.

Judgement

Determining the level of provisions to include against

contract assets and liabilities requires an estimation

of the costs to complete for the fixed-price contracts.

If the costs incurred to complete the contracts differ

from the estimates completed by management,

the directors could be over or under estimating

the contract assets or contract liabilities.


B3. CONTRACT ASSETS / LIABILITIES

Section B: Assets continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 67

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

All items of property, plant and equipment are stated at

cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Cost

includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the

acquisition of the item. In the event that settlement of

all, or part, of a purchase consideration is deferred, cost

is determined by discounting the amounts payable in the

future to their present value as at the date of acquisition.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis so as

to write off the net cost of the asset over its expected

useful life to its estimated residual value. The following

estimated useful lives are used in the calculation of

depreciation:

• Buildings 40 years

• Plant, equipment and vehicles 1-13 years

Freehold

land at cost

$’000s

Freehold

buildings

at cost

$’000s

Plant,

equipment and

vehicles at cost

$’000s

Total

$’000s

Gross carrying amount

As at 31 August 2023

2,437 13,726 28,117 44,280

Additions

- 1,933 6,452 8,385

Disposals

- - (3,352)(3,352)

Transfer

- - - -

Translation of amounts held in foreign currency

(5) (187) (404)(596)

As at 31 August 2024

2,432 15,472 30,813 48,717

Additions

- 292 2,329 2,621

Disposals

- (156) (3,204) (3,360)

Transfer

(296) (700) (1,404) (2,400)

Translation of amounts held in foreign currency

- 215 1,150 1,365

As at 31 August 2025

2,136 15,123 29,684 46,943

Accumulated depreciation & impairment

As at 31 August 2023

- 4,437 21,477 25,914

Disposals - - (3,071) (3,071)

Depreciation expense - 503 2,130 2,633

Transfer

- - - -

Translation of amounts held in foreign currency

- (35) (284) (319)

As at 31 August 2024

- 4,905 20,252 25,157

Disposals - (155) (2,882) (3,037)

Depreciation expense - 704 2,727 3,431

Transfer

- (234) (304) (538)

Translation of amounts held in foreign currency

- 94 739 833

As at 31 August 2025

- 5,314 20,532 25,846

Net book value

As at 31 August 2024

2,432 10,567 10,561 23,560

As at 31 August 2025

2,136 9,809 9,152 21,097

B4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Section B: Assets continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 68

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Gross Carrying Amount

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Balance at beginning of financial year

50,832 52,016

Translation of goodwill amounts held in foreign currency

3,070 (1,184)

Balance at end of financial year

53,902 50,832

Judgement

Determining whether goodwill is impaired requires an

estimation of the value in use of the cash-generating

units to which goodwill has been allocated. The value-

in-use calculation requires the directors to estimate

the future cash flows, particularly in relation to future

project wins and market conditions, expected to arise

from the cash-generating unit and a suitable discount

rate in order to calculate present value.

Impairment testing summary

For the purposes of preparing these financial statements, the Board has reviewed the intangible assets and impairment model and

determined that there is no impairment of any intangible assets in the current year or in prior periods based upon the inputs and

assumptions made for each cash generating unit (CGU).

Sensitivity analysis has been performed on the impairment model to determine how sensitive the model is to any changes to inputs,

specifically around the cash flow forecasts. The sensitivity analysis showed no reasonably possible scenarios resulting in impairment

for New Zealand, Rocklabs, Europe or China manufacturing.

A heightened degree of focus has been given to the Australian CGU as it enters a rebuilding phase after recent restructures. The

impairment model includes the FY26 budget, resulting in an expectation that the Australian CGU will improve its Earnings Before

Interest and Tax (EBIT) by NZ$1.6 million in 2026 and then adjusting for annualised growth after that date. The Board considers this a

reasonable estimate of forecast growth, given the changes made to the Australian business in the prior year. Sensitivity analysis has

showed that if the improvement in the net result from 2026 onwards is NZ$0.7 million rather than the NZ$1.6 million assumed and

no subsequent recovery in earnings is made, the model would result in nil headroom. The Board is satisfied that the assumptions

included in the model are reasonable.

A heightened degree of focus has been given to the Americas CGU as it recovers from a period of adverse market conditions. The

impairment model includes the FY26 budget, resulting in an expectation that the Americas CGU will improve its Earnings Before

Policy

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase

consideration over the fair value of the identifiable

tangible and identifiable intangible assets, liabilities and

contingent liabilities of the subsidiary recognised at the

time of acquisition of a business or subsidiary. Goodwill is

initially recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently

measured at cost, less any accumulated impairment losses.

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is

allocated to each of the Group’s cash-generating

units expected to benefit from the synergies of the

combination. Cash-generating units to which goodwill

has been allocated are tested for impairment annually

or more frequently when there is an indication that the

unit may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the

cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of

the unit, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce

the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit

and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the

basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. An

impairment loss recognised for goodwill is not reversed

in a subsequent period.

On disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of

goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or

loss on disposal.

B5. GOODWILL

Section B: Assets continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 69

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Interest and Tax (EBIT) by NZ$0.2 million in 2026 and then adjusting for annualised growth after that date. The model also includes

assumptions around future sales over and above the annualised growth of a specific product from FY27. The Board considers this

a reasonable estimate of forecast growth, given the changes made to the Americas business in the prior year. Sensitivity analysis

has showed that if the improvement in the net result from 2026 onwards and the estimate on future product sales is lower than

assumed, the model would result in nil headroom. The Board is satisfied that the assumptions included in the model are reasonable.

Allocation of goodwill to cash-generating units

The Group’s cash-generating units are:

• New Zealand manufacturing

• Rocklabs manufacturing

New Zealand is reported as a single cash-generating unit due to the integrated nature of customers, management, manufacturing,

sales and financing activities across New Zealand.

Rocklabs is reported as a single cash-generating unit due to the integrated nature of customers, management, manufacturing, sales

and financing activities associated with the Rocklabs brand and operation across New Zealand and Australia.

Australia is reported as a single cash-generating unit due to the integrated nature of customers, management, manufacturing, sales

and financing activities across Australia.

Americas is reported as a single cash-generating unit due to the integrated nature of customers, management, manufacturing, sales

and financing activities across North and South America.

Europe is reported as a single cash-generating unit due to the integrated nature of customers, management, manufacturing, sales

and financing activities across Europe.

China is reported as a single cash-generating unit due to the integrated nature of customers, management, manufacturing, sales and

financing activities across China.

Goodwill has been allocated for impairment testing purposes

to the cash-generating units:

20252024

$’000s$’000s

New Zealand manufacturing

6,630 6,630

Rocklabs manufacturing

12,777 12,564

Australia manufacturing

5,216 5,055

Americas manufacturing

8,411 7,904

Europe manufacturing

20,509 18,316

China manufacturing

359 363

53,90250,832

Impairment model inputs

The recoverable amount of each cash-generating unit is determined based on a value-in-use calculation, which uses cash flow

projections based on financial budgets and forecasts covering a five-year period. The inputs for each of the CGUs have been listed

below. Goodwill has been allocated for impairment testing purposes to the cash-generating units:

New Zealand

20252024

Annual growth rate

2.5%2.5%

Terminal growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Pre-tax discount rate

18.5%18.2%

New Zealand cashflow projections during the budget and forecast period are based on historical gross margins during the

budget and forecast period. The rate of revenue and materials price inflation during 2025 of 2.5% (2024: 2.5%) reflects the

effect of market expectations on global sales over the five-year period. Cash flows beyond that five-year period have been

extrapolated using a 2.0% p.a. growth rate (2024: 2.0%). The pre-tax discount rate calculated in 2025 is 18.5% (2024: 18.2%).

• Australia manufacturing

• Americas manufacturing

• Europe manufacturing

• China manufacturing.

Section B: Assets continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 70

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

• Europe manufacturing

• China manufacturing.

The New Zealand CGU has sufficient historical data to support the cash flow assumptions included in the impairment model and

management believes that any reasonably possible change in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount is based would

not cause the aggregate carrying amount to exceed the aggregate recoverable amount of the New Zealand cash-generating unit.

Rocklabs

20252024

Annual growth rate

2.8%2.8%

Terminal growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Pre-tax discount rate

16.9%16.9%

Rocklabs‘ cashflow projections during the budget and forecast period are based on historical gross margins during the budget and

forecast period. The rate of revenue and materials price inflation during 2025 of 2.8% (2024: 2.8%) reflects the effect of market

expectations on global sales over the five-year period. Cash flows beyond that five-year period have been extrapolated using a

2.0% p.a. growth rate (2024: 2.0%). The pre-tax discount rate calculated in 2025 is 16.9% (2024: 16.9%).

The Rocklabs CGU has sufficient historical data to support the cash flow assumptions included in the impairment model and

management believes that any reasonably possible change in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount is based would

not cause the aggregate carrying amount to exceed the aggregate recoverable amount of the Rocklabs cash-generating unit.


Australia

20252024

Annual growth rate

3.0%3.0%

Terminal growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Pre-tax discount rate

14.6%14.5%

Australia cashflow projections during the budget and forecast period are based on historical gross margins during the budget

and forecast period. The rate of revenue and materials price inflation during 2025 of 3.0% (2024: 3.0%) reflects the effect of

market expectations on global sales over the five-year period. Cash flows beyond that five-year period have been extrapolated

using a 2.0% p.a. growth rate (2024: 2.0%). The pre-tax discount rate calculated in 2025 is 14.6% (2024: 14.5%).

As noted above, the Australian CGU has received a heightened degree of focus for the impairment testing. The key

assumptions in the impairment test relate to achieving forecast EBIT.

Americas

20252024

Annual growth rate

2.5%2.5%

Terminal growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Pre-tax discount rate

15.3%15.4%

Americas’ cashflow projections during the budget and forecast period are based on historical gross margins, during the budget and

forecast period. The rate of revenue and materials price inflation during 2025 of 2.5% (2024: 2.5%) reflects the effect of market

expectations on global sales over the five-year period. Cash flows beyond that five-year period have been extrapolated using a

2.0% p.a. growth rate (2024: 2.0%). The pre-tax discount rate calculated in 2025 is 15.3% (2024: 15.4%).

As noted above, the Americas CGU has received a heightened degree of focus for the impairment testing. The key assumptions in the

impairment test relate to achieving forecast EBIT.

Europe

20252024

Annual growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Terminal growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Pre-tax discount rate

14.0%13.9%

Europe cashflow projections during the budget and forecast period are based on historical gross margins during the budget

and forecast period. The rate of revenue and materials price inflation during 2025 of 2.0% (2024: 2.0%) reflects the effect of

market expectations on global sales over the five-year period. Cash flows beyond that five-year period have been extrapolated

using a 2.0% p.a. growth rate (2024: 2.0%). The pre-tax discount rate calculated in 2025 is 14.0% (2024: 13.9%).

Section B: Assets continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 71

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

The European CGU has sufficient historical data to support the cash flow assumptions included in the impairment model

and management believes that any reasonably possible change in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount is

based would not cause the aggregate carrying amount to exceed the aggregate recoverable amount of the European cash-

generating unit.

China

20252024

Annual growth rate

2.5%2.5%

Terminal growth rate

2.0%2.0%

Pre-tax discount rate

13.2%13.2%

China cashflow projections during the budget and forecast period are based on historical gross margins during the budget and

forecast period. The rate of revenue and materials price inflation during 2025 of 2.5% (2024: 2.5%) reflects the effect of market

expectations on global sales over the five-year period. Cash flows beyond that five-year period have been extrapolated using a

2.0% p.a. growth rate (2024: 2.0%). The pre-tax discount rate calculated in 2025 is 13.2% (2024: 13.2%).

The Chinese CGU has sufficient historical data to support the assumptions included in the impairment model and management

believes that any reasonably possible change in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount is based would not

cause the aggregate carrying amount to exceed the aggregate recoverable amount of the Chinese cash-generating unit.






Policy

Intangible assets with finite useful lives that

are acquired separately are carried at cost, less

accumulated amortisation and accumulated

impairment losses. Amortisation is recognised on a

straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives that

are acquired separately are carried at cost, less

accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets that are acquired in a business

combination and recognised separately from

goodwill are initially recognised at fair value at the

acquisition date, which is regarded as their cost.

Subsequent to initial recognition, intangible assets

acquired in a business combination are recognised

on the same basis as intangible assets that are

acquired separately.

At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews

the carrying amounts of its non-financial tangible

and intangible assets to determine whether there

is any indication that those assets have suffered

an impairment loss. If any such indication exists,

the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in

order to determine the extent of the impairment loss,

if any. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually.

Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are

independent from other assets, the Group estimates

the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to

which the asset belongs.

The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value, less

costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use,

the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their

present value using a discount rate that reflects current

market assessments of the time value of money and

the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of

future cash flows have not been adjusted.

If the recoverable amount of a cash-generating unit

(CGU), is estimated to be less than its carrying amount,

the carrying amount of the CGU is reduced to its

recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised in

profit or loss immediately, unless the asset is carried at

fair value, in which case the impairment loss is treated as

a revaluation decrease.

B6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Section B: assets continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 72

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

As at 31 August 2023

3,835 9,413 164 825 112 14,349

Amortisation expense

691 1,356 26 150 24 2,247

Disposals

- - - - - -

Foreign Translation Difference

(194) (44) - (42) (2) (282)

As at 31 August 2024

4,332 10,725 190 933 134 16,314

Amortisation expense

712 113 26 156 23 1,030

Disposals

(2,097) - - - - (2,097)

Foreign Translation Difference

637 266 - 157 8 1,068

As at 31 August 2025

3,584 11,104 216 1,246 165 16,315

Net book value

As at 31 August 2024

2,240 113 150 809 88 3,400

As at 31 August 2025

1,757 - 124 622 66 2,569

Conveyor

& palletiser

technology

at cost

BladeStop

technology

at cost

Centrifuge

technology

at cost

Automated

grading

technology

at cost

Patents

& otherTotal

$000’s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

Gross carrying amount

As at 31 August 2023

6,711 10,886 340 1,791 207 19,935

Additions

65 - - 61 18 144

Disposals

- - - (35) - (35)

Foreign Translation Difference

(204) (48) - (75) (3) (330)

As at 31 August 2024

6,572 10,838 340 1,742 222 19,714

Additions

- - - - - -

Disposals

(2,097) - - (115) - (2,212)

Foreign Translation Difference

866 266 - 241 9 1,382

As at 31 August 2025

5,341 11,104 340 1,868 231 18,884

Assets

Intangible assets comprise:

• Conveyor and palletiser technology used in the materials handling industry, purchased through the acquisition of the Alvey

business in April 2018, is being amortised on a straight-line basis over an estimated remaining useful life at the time of

purchase of 10 years

• BladeStop bandsaw safety technology purchased in October 2017, which is being amortised on a straight-line basis over an

estimated remaining useful life at the time of purchase of eight years

• Centrifuge technology used in the honey and fish oil industry purchased through the acquisition of the other joint venture

partners’ interests in Scott Separation Technology Limited in May 2017, is being amortised on a straight-line basis over an

estimated remaining useful life at the time of purchase of 13 years

• Automated grading technology used in the meat industry purchased through the acquisition of Normaclass in May 2019, is

being amortised on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life at the time of purchase of 10 years.


Section B: assets continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 73

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

B7. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Policy

Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an

expense in the period in which it is incurred.

An asset arising from development (or from the

development phase of an internal project) is recognised if,

and only if, all of the following are demonstrated:

• the technical feasibility of completing the asset so

that it will be available for use or sale;

• the intention to complete the asset and use or sell it;

• the ability to use or sell the asset;

• how the asset will generate probable future

economic benefits;

• the availability of adequate technical, financial and

other resources to complete the development to

use or sell the asset; and

• the ability to measure reliably the

expenditure attributable to the asset during the

development.

Policy

Development assets exist where the Group is working

on developments with the intention to meet an end

customer's needs, but no contract exists with that end

customer. Revenue is not recognised on these projects

until a contract with a customer is formed and all

the costs incurred will sit on the balance sheet until a

conclusion is reached. These projects have a large portion

of R&D and are undertaken with the view that the Group

will be able to realise future sales on these products.

At the end of each reporting period, an assessment

is made of these development assets for indicators

of impairment using the mix of external and internal

indicators included in NZ IAS 36 and the criteria for

capitalisation under NZ IAS 38 outlined in B7. Where

there are indicators of impairment the asset's recoverable

amount is calculated and an impairment recognised. If the

criteria for capitalisation are no longer met, the assets are

expensed.

Amortisation of the development assets is recorded

using the units of production method. Where units are

in production at the reporting date, a percentage of

completion is estimated.

Judgement

Determining when costs incurred on a project are

research, when costs are development, what costs

can be capitalised as a development asset, the

recoverability of development assets through future

sales and the number of future sales to amortise

the assets over relies on the directors' judgement.

B8. DEVELOPMENT ASSETS

Section B: assets continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 74

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

• The Protein Development Assets relate to work being completed on producing systems to automated processing solutions

for chickens. Work has also been completed on updating design drawings for a lamb processing system. Additionally this

year development work has been undertaken on a beef processing system. All meat development assets relate to the New

Zealand and Australian segments.

• Mineral Development Assets relate to work completed on large projects to develop products that will be able to be sold as

future products. All mining development assets relate to the Rocklabs segment.

• MHL Development Assets relate to work completed on producing material handling systems that will be able to be sold as

future products. All MHL development assets relate to the Americas segment.

Development assets

Protein Mining MHL Total

$’000s $’000s $’000s $’000s

Gross carrying

amount

As at 31 August 2023

1,413 6,747 - 8,160

Additions

- 535 849 1,384

Transfer

- - - -

Disposals

- - - -

Foreign translation difference

- 29 (21) 8

As at 31 August 2024

1,413 7,311 828 9,552

Additions

99 96 1,331 1,526

Transfer

1,404 - - 1,404

Disposals

(50) - - (50)

Foreign translation difference

1 - 106 107

As at 31 August 2025

2,867 7,407 2,265 12,539

Accumulated

amortisation and

impairment

As at 31 August 2023

353 - - 353

Amortisation expense

227 117 - 344

Transfer

- - - -

Foreign translation difference - - - -

As at 31 August 2024 580 117 - 697

Amortisation expense

372 313 - 685

Transfer

304 - - 304

Foreign translation difference - - - -

As at 31 August 2025

1,256 430 - 1,686

Net book valueAs at 31 August 2024 833 7,194 828 8,855

As at 31 August 2025 1,611 6,977 2,265 10,853

Section B: assets continued

Section B: assets continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 75

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Equity instruments issued by the Group are recorded as the proceeds are received, net of issue costs.


2025202420252024

NumberNumber$’000s$’000s

Fully paid ordinary shares at beginning of financial year 81,346,603 81,198,794 90,516 90,162

Issue of shares under dividend reinvestment plan 1,830,402 147,809 3,437 354

Balance at end of financial year 83,177,005 81,346,603 93,953 90,516

All shares have equal voting rights and participate equally in any dividend distribution or any surplus on the winding up of the Group.



Earnings per share from continuing operations

20252024

Cents per shareCents per share

Basic

17.4 9.7

Diluted

17.4 9.7

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Net profit for the year used in the calculation of basic and diluted

earnings per share from continuing operations

14,371 7,853

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculation of basic

and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

82,36281,214

Non-GAAP information

20252024

Net tangible assets per ordinary share

Cents per shareCents per share

Basic

74.056.4

Diluted

74.056.4

20252024

Notes

$’000s$’000s

Ordinary shares at year end used in the calculation of net tangible assets

per ordinary share

C1

83,17781,347

Net tangible assets (net assets excluding goodwill, intangible assets, development assets

and deferred tax)

61,57645,873

SECTION C: CAPITAL AND FUNDING

C1. SHARE CAPITAL

C2. EARNINGS AND NET TANGIBLE ASSETS PER SHARE

Scott Technology Limited

Page 76

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Borrowings are recorded initially at fair value, net of

transaction costs.

Subsequent to initial recognition, borrowings are

measured at amortised cost with any difference

between the initial recognised amount and the

redemption value being recognised in the profit or

loss over the period of the borrowings using the

effective interest rate method.

20252024

NZD$’000sNZD$’000s

Current 2,045 1,200

Non-current 12,265 11,539

Total term loans 14,310 12,739

Maturity profile of non-current portion

One to two years 11,881 180

Two to three years 141 10,981

Three to five years 243 378

12,265 11,539

Interest rates applicable to 31 August 2025 on the bank term loans ranged from 1.0% to 5.6% p.a. (2024: 1.0% to 8.4% p.a.)


The carrying amounts of the Group's borrowings are

denominated in the following currencies:

2025202520242024

FacilityUtilisedFacilityUtilised

NZD$’000sNZD$’000sNZD$’000sNZD$’000s

New Zealand dollar 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000

United States dollar 3,008 3,008 3,692 2,826

European euros 13,145 2,630 10,625 1,191

Czech koruna 954 672 1,030 722

25,107 14,310 23,347 12,739

The Group also has access to the following working

capital facilities:

FacilityUtilisedFacilityUtilised

NZD$’000sNZD$’000sNZD$’000sNZD$’000s

New Zealand dollar35,00010,096 35,000 18,999

United States dollar1,698 - 1,595 -

European euros990 - 883 -

Czech koruna - - - -

37,688 10,096 37,478 18,999

C3. BORROWINGS

Section C: capital and funding continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 77

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Borrowing facilities

Borrowings shown above include bank debt and vehicle financing.

Borrowing facilities include bank overdraft, term loans and credit card facilities, which are included in trade creditors and accruals.

The main source of financing for the Group is through ANZ Bank in New Zealand. The total of the ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited

current facility agreement for borrowings and working capital is NZ$46 million (2024: NZ$46.7 million), of which NZ$24.9 million was

unutilised at 31 August 2025 (2024: $16.9 million)

The bank facilities of ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited are secured by general security agreements over all the present and after

acquired property of Scott Technology Limited and certain subsidiaries, and therefore associated property, plant and equipment

assets are pledged as security for these facilities. The bank facilities from ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited are also secured by

mortgages over the properties at 630 Kaikorai Valley Road Dunedin, 10 Maces Road Christchurch and 1B Quadrant Drive

Lower Hutt.

The Group also has borrowing facilities through KBC Bank in Belgium with a total facility for borrowings and working capital of EUR

6.6m (2024: EUR 6.0 million) of which EUR 5.3 million was unutilised at 31 August 2025 (2024: EUR 5.3 million). Additionally, there is

borrowing through CSOB Leasing of EUR 0.5 million (2024: EUR 0.5 million) of which EUR 0.1m was unutilised at 31 August 2025

(2024: EUR 0.5 million).

The bank facilities from KBC Bank are secured by a registered pledge on the business assets of Scott Automation NV for a total of

EUR 8.1 million(2024: EUR 8.1 million).

Other borrowing facilities include a USD$1.0 million, (2024: USD$1.0 million), line of credit from BB&T Bank not utilised at

31 August 2025 or 31 August 2024. A nominal amount of EUR 0.5 million (2024: EUR 0.5 million) also is available as a line of credit

and remains unutilised.

The Group has fully complied with, and operated within, the debt facility financial covenants under arrangements with its bankers.


Policy

Trade creditors are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using

the effective interest rate method.


20252024

$’000s$’000s

Trade creditors

20,857 14,748

Accruals

17,705 14,964

38,562 29,712

Terms

All trade creditors are current and paid within the terms agreed with individual suppliers.

C4. TRADE CREDITORS AND ACCRUALS

Section C: capital and funding continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 78

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

The Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains

a lease, at the inception of the contract. The Group

recognises a right-of-use asset and a corresponding

lease liability with respect to all lease arrangements

in which it is the lessee, except for short-term leases,

defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months

or less, and leases of low-value assets. For these

leases, the Group recognises the lease payments as

an operating expense on a straight-line basis over

the term of the lease unless another systematic

basis is more representative of the time pattern in

which economic benefits from the leased assets are

consumed.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present

value of the lease payments that are not paid at the

commencement date, discounted by using the rate

implicit in the lease. If the rate cannot be readily

determined, the Group uses its incremental borrowing

rate (IBR). The lease liability is subsequently measured

by increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on

the liability, using the effective interest method, and

by reducing the carrying amount to reflect the lease

payments made.

The right-of-use assets comprise the initial measurement

of the corresponding lease liability, lease payments made

at, or before, the commencement day and any initial

direct costs. They are subsequently measured at cost less

accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Right-

of-use assets are depreciated over the shorter period

of lease term or useful life of the underlying asset. The

Group applies NZ IAS 36 to determine whether a right-

of-use asset is impaired and accounts for any identified

impairment loss as described in the intangible assets

policy in note B6.

Judgement

The estimation of the IBR relies on the directors

considering the credit risk of the Group. If the

credit risk faced by the Group differs from what is

estimated, the IBR may differ, and consequently the

future net present value of the lease cash flows may

be over or under stated.

The Group leases several assets including buildings, cars and machinery. The average lease term is 4.1 years (2024: 4.6 years).

The Group has options to purchase certain equipment at the conclusion of their current lease terms.

As management is undecided on the outcome of these transactions, the purchase price has not been included in the

lease liability calculations.

The determination of lease term relies on the

directors' view of the likelihood of any lease renewal

options being renewed. If the lease renewal options

are included and then not taken up, or are not

included and are taken up, the net present value of the

lease cash flows may be over or under stated.

C5. LEASES

Section C: capital and funding continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 79

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Lease liabilities

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Current liability 5,622 4,660

Non-current liability 27,167 21,987

Total 32,789 26,647

Maturity analysis

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Not later than 1 year 5,622 4,660

Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years 17,014 11,346

Later than 5 years 10,153 10,641

Total 32,789 26,647

BuildingsPlantVehiclesGroup

$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

Cost

Balance 31 August 2023 18,151 347 3,445 21,943

Additions 17,673 59 2,292 20,024

Disposals (4,951) (113) (783) (5,847)

Translation of leases held in foreign currency (761) (4) (114) (879)

Balance 31 August 2024 30,112 289 4,840 35,241

Additions 7,466 - 2,711 10,177

Disposals (1,914) - (496) (2,410)

Translation of leases held in foreign currency 1,429 5 309 1,743

As at 31 August 2025 37,093 294 7,364 44,751

Acccumulated

Depreciation and

Impairment



Balance 31 August 2023 8,080 181 1,209 9,470

Depreciation expense 4,889 38 1,129 6,056

Disposals (3,978) (89) (720) (4,787)

Translation of leases held in foreign currency (309) (3) (48) (360)

Balance 31 August 2024 8,682 127 1,570 10,379

Depreciation expense 4,436 32 1,117 5,585

Disposals (1,914) - (496) (2,410)

Translation of leases held in foreign currency 698 2 161 861

As at 31 August 2025As at 31 August 2025 11,902 11,902 161 161 2,352 2,352 14,415 14,415

As at 31 August 2024

21,430 162 3,270 24,862

As at 31 August 2025 25,191 133 5,012 30,336

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Total cash outflow for leases 4,967 4,556

Interest expense on lease liabilities 1,497 1,438

Expense relating to short-term liabilities 1,205 1,022

As at 31 August 2025, the Group is committed to $0.8 million (2024: $0.6 million) for short-term leases.

Right-of-use assets

Amounts recognised in profit and loss and cash flows statement

Section C: capital and funding continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 80

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Provision is made for benefits accruing to employees

in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave, long

service leave and sick leave, share-based payment

arrangements, and short-term incentives when it is

probable that settlement will be required and they are

capable of being measured reliably.

Provisions made in respect of employee benefits

expected to be settled within twelve months

are measured at their nominal values using the

remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of

settlement.

Provisions made in respect of employee benefits that

are not expected to be settled within twelve months are

measured at the present value of the estimated future

cash outflows to be made by the Group in respect of

services provided by employees up to reporting date.



Policy

The provision for warranty claims represents the present

value of the directors’ best estimate of the future

outflow of economic benefits that will be required under

the Group’s twelve-month warranty programme for

certain equipment. The estimate has been made on

the basis of historical warranty trends and may vary

as a result of new materials, altered manufacturing

processes or other events affecting product quality.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Balance at 1 September

1,541 1,374

Additional provisions (derecognised) / recognised

(423) 167

Balance at 31 August

1,118 1,541

Obligation

The provision for warranty reflects an obligation for after sales service work in relation to completed contracts and products sold

to customers. The provision is expected to be utilised within twelve months of balance date, however, this timing is uncertain and

dependent upon the actual level of after sales service work required.


C6. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

C7. PROVISION FOR WARRANTY

Section C: capital and funding continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 81

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

For cash-settled performance-based compensation,

a liability is recognised for the amount payable based

on on-target performance against set performance

measures. For long-term incentives (which include

the payment of a monetary amount after a period

of approximately three years of continuous full-time

employment), the payment amount is determined by

the differential between the company's share price

at the beginning of the scheme and at the end of the

reporting period, after adjusting for any events that

affect the share price, such as capital reconstruction,

bonus issues or dividends. Accordingly, at the end of

each reporting period, until the liability is settled, and

at the date of settlement, the fair value of the liability is

remeasured, with any changes in fair value recognised

in profit or loss for the year.



Details of arrangement

The Group has short-term and long-term incentives in place for certain executives and senior employees of the Group. Short-term

incentives (STIs) are annual performance-based compensation linked directly to individual and company performance, while long-

term incentives (LTIs) are payable to executives and senior employees who are members of the LTI and remain in employment with

the Group at the vesting dates (after three years). On the vesting date, those members of the LTI will be granted a cash incentive

based on the movement in Scott Technology Limited’s share price from the beginning of the scheme to the vesting date.

At balance date there is a liability of $0.2 million (2024: $0.1 million) included in employee entitlements in the balance sheet. The

impact of the movement in the liability on profit for the year was a $0.1 million increase (2024: $0.1 million increase) and is included

in the employee benefits expenses. Refer to note F3.

No shares, or share options, in Scott Technology Limited are issued under either incentive scheme.



Policy

Present obligations arising under onerous contracts are

recognised and measured as provisions. An onerous

contract is considered to exist where the Group has

a contract under which the unavoidable costs of

meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the

economic benefits expected to be received under it.








20252024

$’000s$’000s

Balance at 1 September

34 1,061

Additional provisions expensed to the profit and loss during the year

89 34

Utilisation of provisions

(34) (1,061)

Balance at 31 August

89 34

The onerous contract provision relates to the expected

losses on certain long-term projects in progress as at 31

August. The onerous contract provisions are based on

management's best estimate to complete the projects

in progress. The completion of work required is typically

expected in the next 12 months.



C8. PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION

C9. ONEROUS CONTRACT PROVISION

Section C: capital and funding continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 82

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the

date the derivative contract is entered into and are

subsequently remeasured to their fair value at each

reporting date. The resulting gain or loss is recognised

in profit or loss unless the derivative is designated and

effective as a hedging instrument, in which event, the

timing of the recognition depends on the nature of the

hedge relationship.

The Group designates certain derivatives as hedges of

the fair value of firm commitments (fair value hedge)

or as hedges of forecast future sales (cash flow

hedge). Open firm commitments reflect contractual

agreements to provide goods to customers at an

agreed price denominated in a foreign currency on

specified future dates.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated

and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in profit

or loss, together with any changes in the fair value of

the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the

hedged risk. The gain or loss relating to the effective

portion of interest rate swaps hedging fixed rate

borrowings, is recognised in profit or loss within finance

costs, together with changes in the fair value of the

hedged fixed rate borrowings attributable to interest rate

risk. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is

recognised in profit or loss within other gains / (losses).

If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge

accounting, the adjustment to the carrying amount of

a hedged item for which the effective interest method

is used, is amortised to profit or loss over the period to

maturity using a recalculated effective interest rate.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of

derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow

hedges are recognised in other comprehensive income

and accumulated as a separate component of equity

in the hedging reserve. The gain or loss relating to the

ineffective portion is recognised immediately in profit or

loss and is included in the other expenses line.

Amounts recognised in the hedging reserve are

reclassified from equity to profit or loss (as a

reclassification adjustment) in the periods when the

hedged item is recognised in profit or loss, in the same

line as the recognised hedged item.

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging

instrument expires, or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or

no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any cumulative

gain or loss recognised in the hedging reserve at that time

remains in equity and is recognised when the forecast

transaction is ultimately recognised in profit or loss. When

a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the

cumulative gain or loss that was recognised in the hedging

reserve is recognised immediately in profit or loss.

Financial risk management objectives

The Group’s finance function provides services to the business, coordinates access to domestic and international financial

markets and monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the Group through internal risk reports,

which analyse exposures by degree and magnitude of risks. These risks include market risks (including currency risks and fair

value interest rate risks), credit risks, liquidity risks and cash flow interest rate risks.

The Group seeks to minimise the effects of these risks by using derivative financial instruments to hedge these risk exposures. The

use of financial derivatives is governed by the Group’s policies approved by the Board of Directors, which provide written principles

on foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, the use of financial derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments and the

investment of excess liquidity. Compliance with policies and exposure limits are reviewed on a continuous basis. The Group does not

enter into, or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for speculative purposes.

Capital risk management

The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising

the return to stakeholders through the optimisation of the debt and equity balance. The Group’s overall strategy remains

unchanged from 2024.

SECTION D: RISK MANAGEMENT

D1. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Annual Report 2025

Page 83

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025


The capital structure of the Group consists of equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued capital and

retained earnings.

The Group has sufficient liquid assets to fund the operations of the business. To the extent that additional working capital

funding is required the Group has bank facilities available as disclosed in note C3. Where the Group requires funding for a

significant capital acquisition, separate funding facilities are established, provided the directors consider that the Group has

adequate equity to support these facilities.

Market risk

The Group's activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Group enters

into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to foreign currency risk, including forward foreign

exchange contracts to hedge the exchange rate risk arising on the export of manufactured products.

There has been no change to the Group's exposure to market risks or the manner in which it manages and measures the risks.

Foreign currency risk management

The Group undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies, hence exposures to exchange rate fluctuations

arise. Exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters utilising forward foreign exchange contracts.

There were no open cash flow hedges at balance date. The carrying amounts in New Zealand dollars of the Group’s foreign

currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the reporting date are as follows:

AssetsLiabilities

2025202420252024

$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

United States dollar 31,064 27,329 28,882 30,976

Euros 32,636 21,628 25,256 13,836

Australian dollar 10,752 13,171 15,149 3,527

Great Britain pound 290 253 458 40

Chinese yuan 6,439 5,046 1,635 932

Canadian dollar 6 - 34 -

Czech koruna 473 468 353 514

Polish zloty 2 2 - -

Swedish krona - - 108 -

Singaporean dollar - - 409 321

81,662 67,897 72,284 50,146

Forward foreign exchange contracts

It is the policy of the Group to enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to cover specific foreign currency payments and

receipts. The Group also enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to manage the risk associated with anticipated sales and

purchase transactions. These are presented in other financial assets or other financial liabilities in the balance sheet.

For hedges of firm commitments, as the critical terms (i.e. the notional amount, life and underlying) of the foreign exchange forward

contracts and their corresponding hedged items are the same, the Group performs a qualitative assessment of effectiveness and it

is expected that the value of the forward contracts and the value of the corresponding hedged items will systematically change in

opposite direction in response to movements in the underlying exchange rates.

The main source of hedge ineffectiveness in these hedging relationships is the effect of the counterparty and the Group’s own credit risk

on the fair value of the forward contracts, which is not reflected in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to changes in foreign

exchange rates. No other sources of ineffectiveness emerged from these hedging relationships.

From time to time the Group will enter into collar options to cover forecast sales and purchases. These are not hedge accounted.

Section D: risk management continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 84

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Assets

20252024

$’000s$’000s

At fair value:

Fair value hedge of open firm commitments 178 6

Foreign currency forward contracts held as effective fair value hedges 192 244

Foreign exchange derivatives

142 315

512 565

Represented by:

Current financial assets 503 560

Non-current financial assets 9 5

512 565

Liabilities

At fair value:

Fair value hedge of open firm commitments 192 244

Foreign currency forward contracts held as effective fair value hedges 178 6

Foreign exchange derivatives 150 -

Interest rate swap contracts

- -

520 250

Represented by:

Current financial liabilities 511 245

Non-current financial liabilities 9 5

520 250

The fair value of foreign exchange contracts outstanding is recognised as other financial assets / liabilities.


Outstanding forward foreign currency contracts

Average Fx RateNominal valueFair value

202520242025202420252024

$’000s$’000s$’000s

Sell US dollars

0.58750.6100 22,156 22,505 164 541

Sell Australian dollars

0.91520.9125 12,920 1,867 (158) 12

35,076 24,372 6 553


Outstanding forward foreign currency contracts maturity profile

Nominal valueFair value

2025202420252024

$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

0-3 months 12,531 6,764 (132) 155

3-6 months 10,173 9,040 40 197

6-9 months 6,638 6,791 50 141

9-12 months 4,668 1,656 50 55

Greater than 12 months 1,066 121 (2) 5

35,076 24,372 6 553

Section D: risk management continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 85

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Foreign currency sensitivity analysis

The Group is mainly exposed to the United States dollar, the euro, the Australian dollar and the Chinese yuan.

The following table details the Group’s sensitivity to a 10% increase and decrease in the New Zealand dollar against the

relevant foreign currencies. Ten percent represents management’s assessment of the reasonably possible change in foreign

exchange rates. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency-denominated monetary items and

adjusts their translation at the period end for a 10% change in foreign currency rates. A positive number below indicates an

increase in profit and equity where the New Zealand dollar weakens 10% against the relevant currency.


10% increase in

New Zealand dollar

10% decrease in

New Zealand dollar

2025202420252024

$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

United States dollar

75 588 (92) (719)

Euro

(432) (600) 528 733

Australian dollar

400 (877) (489) 1,072

Great Britain pound

15 (19) (19) 24

Chinese yuan

(437) (374) 534 457

Canadian dollar

3 - (3) -

Czech koruna

50 70 (61) (85)

Singaporean dollar

37 29 (45) (36)

Swedish krona

10 - (12) -

These movements are mainly attributable to the exposure to outstanding foreign currency bank accounts, receivables, payables

and derivatives at year end in the Group.

In management’s opinion, the sensitivity analysis is unrepresentative of the inherent foreign exchange risk as the year end

exposure does not reflect the exposure during the year.

Credit risk management

In the normal course of business, the Group incurs credit risk from trade receivables and transactions with financial

institutions. The Group has a credit policy, which is used to manage this exposure to credit risk, including requiring payment

prior to shipping to high credit-risk countries and customers, and customer credit checks. The Group, as a result of the

industries in which it operates, can be exposed to significant concentrations of credit risk from trade receivables and

counterparty risk with the bank in relation to the outstanding forward exchange contracts. They do not require any collateral

or security to support financial instruments as these represent deposits with, or loans to, banks and other financial institutions

with high credit ratings.

At year end the amount receivable from the five largest trade debtors is $21.1 million (2024: $10.1 million).

The maximum credit risk of on-balance sheet financial instruments is their carrying amount.

The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the financial statements, which is net of impairment losses, represents the

Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk without taking account of the value of any collateral obtained.

Section D: risk management continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 86

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Liquidity and interest rate risk management

Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of Directors, which has built an appropriate liquidity

risk management framework for the management of the Group’s short-, medium- and long-term funding and liquidity

management requirements. The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, banking facilities and reserve

borrowing facilities, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial

assets and liabilities. Included in note C3 are details of additional undrawn facilities that the Group has at its disposal to further

reduce liquidity risk.

There is no reasonably possible movement in interest rates that could have a material impact on the financial statements.

Interest rate swap contracts

Under interest rate swap contracts, the Group agrees to exchange the difference between fixed and floating rate interest

amounts calculated on agreed notional principal amounts. Such contracts enable the Group to mitigate the risk of changing

interest rates on the fair value of issued fixed rate debt and the cash flow exposures on the issued floating rate debt. The

fair value of interest rate swaps at the reporting date is determined by discounting the future cash flows using the curves at

reporting date and the credit risk inherent in the contract.

Undiscounted cash flows of non-derivative financial liabilities

The following table details the Group’s remaining undiscounted contractual maturity for its non derivative financial liabilities.

The tables below have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on

which the Group can be required to pay.

The tables include both interest and principal cash flows.


Weighted average

effective

interest r ate

On

demand

Less

than 1

year

1-2

years

2-3

years

3-5

years

5+

yearsTotal

%$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

2025

Financial liabilities

Lease liabilities4.03% - 7,207 6,435 5,602 8,975 11,066 39,285

Borrowings5.30% - 2,153 12,511 148 205 52 15,069

Trade creditors and accruals 38,562 - - - - - 38,562

38,562 9,360 18,9465,750 9,180 11,118 92,916

2024

Financial liabilities

Lease liabilities4.63% - 6,038 4,878 3,987 6,155 12,020 33,078

Borrowings7.51% - 1,290 193 11,806 240 166 13,695

Trade creditors and accruals 29,712 - - - - - 29,712

29,712 7,328 5,071 15,793 6,395 12,186 76,485

The Group has access to financing facilities, of which the total unused amount is NZD $38.4 million at the balance sheet date

(2024: NZD $29.1 million). The Group expects to meet its other obligations from operating cash flows and proceeds of maturing

financial assets.

Section D: risk management continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 87

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Fair value measurements recognised in the balance sheet

The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair

value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 on the degree to which fair value is observable.

The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities are determined as follows:

• Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and

liabilities

• Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs, other than quoted prices, included within Level 1 that are

observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices)

• Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that

are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

The fair value of forward exchange contracts and options is based on their quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market

price is not available, then fair value is estimated by discounting the difference between the contractual forward price and the

current forward price for the residual maturity and options of the contract using a market rate of interest.


Level 1Level 2Level 3Total

$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

2025

Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss

Fair value hedge of open firm commitments

- 178 - 178

Foreign currency forward contracts held as effective fair value hedges

- 192 - 192

Foreign exchange derivatives

- 142 - 142

Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

Fair value hedge of open firm commitments

- (192) - (192)

Foreign currency forward contracts held as effective fair value hedges

- (178) - (178)

Foreign exchange derivatives

- (150) - (150)

- (8) - (8)

2024

Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss

Fair value hedge of open firm commitments

- 6 - 6

Foreign currency forward contracts held as effective fair value hedges

- 244 - 244

Foreign exchange derivatives

- 315 - 315

Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

Fair value hedge of open firm commitments

- (244) - (244)

Foreign currency forward contracts held as effective fair value hedges

- (6) - (6)

Foreign exchange derivatives

- - - -

- 315 - 315

Fair value

The fair value of financial instruments not already measured at fair value approximates their carrying value.

Section D: risk management continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 88

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

20252024

%%

Parent entity

Scott Technology Limited31 AugustNew Zealandn/an/a

New Zealand trading subsidiaries

Scott Technology NZ Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand100100

Scott Automation Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand100100

Scott Technology USA Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand100100

QMT General Partner Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand9393

QMT New Zealand Limited Partnership31 AugustNew Zealand9292

Scott Technology Americas Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand100100

Scott Technology Europe Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand100100

New Zealand non-trading subsidiaries

Scott LED Limited31 AugustNew Zealand100100

Rocklabs Limited 31 AugustNew Zealand100100

Overseas subsidiaries

Scott Technology Australia Pty Ltd 31 AugustAustralia100100

Scott Automation & Robotics Pty Ltd 31 AugustAustralia100100

Scott Systems International Incorporated 31 AugustUSA100100

Scott Systems (Qingdao) Co Limited 31 December (*)China9595

Scott Technology GmbH 31 AugustGermany100100

Scott Technology Belgium bvba 31 AugustBelgium100100

Scott Automation NV 31 AugustBelgium100100

Scott Automation a.s. 31 AugustCzech Republic100100

Scott Automation SAS 31 AugustFrance100100

Scott Automation Limited 31 AugustUnited Kingdom100100

Normaclass 31 AugustFrance100100

Rivercan S.A. 31 December (*)Uruguay100100

* Determined by local regulatory requirements.

SECTION E: GROUP STRUCTURE AND SUBSIDIARIES

E1. SUBSIDIARIES

Annual Report 2025

Page 89

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Interests in joint ventures

Policy

A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby

the parties that have joint control of the

arrangement have rights to the net assets

of the joint arrangement. Joint control is the

contractually agreed sharing of control of an

arrangement, which exists only when decisions

about the relevant activities require unanimous

consent of the parties sharing control.

The results, assets and liabilities of joint

ventures are incorporated in these consolidated

financial statements using the equity method

of accounting. Under the equity method a

joint venture is initially recognised in the

consolidated statement of financial position at

cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the

Group’s share of the profit or loss and other

comprehensive income of the joint venture. In

assessing the Group’s share of the profit or loss,

or other comprehensive income of the joint

venture, the Group’s share of any unrealised

profits or losses on transactions between Group

companies and the joint venture is eliminated.

Dividends or distributions received from a joint venture

reduce the carrying amount of the investment in that

joint venture in the Group financial statements. When

the Group’s share of losses of a joint venture exceeds

the Group’s interest in that joint venture, the Group

discontinues its share of further losses. Additional

losses are recognised only to the extent that the Group

has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made

payments on behalf of the joint venture.

An investment in a joint venture is accounted for using

the equity method from the date on which the investee

becomes a joint venture until the date it ceases to be a

joint venture. On acquisition of the investment in a joint

venture, any excess of the cost of the investment over

the Group’s share of the net fair value of the identifiable

assets and liabilities of the investee is recognised as

goodwill, which is included within the carrying value of

the investment. Any excess of the Group’s share of the

net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities

over the cost of the investment, after reassessment, is

recognised immediately in profit or loss in the period in

which the investment is acquired.


Joint ventures

Country of

incorporation

Ownership interestCarrying value

2025202420252024

%%$’000s$’000s

Robotic Technologies Limited*New Zealand

5050

1,115 867

Balance at 31 August

1,115 867

* Scott Technology Limited’s joint venture with Silver Fern Farms Limited, Robotic Technologies Limited (RTL), was formed in

October 2003 and has a balance date of 31 August. RTL’s principal activity is the marketing and development of (primarily)

lamb meat processing equipment and the management of the intellectual property associated with these developments.

Scott Technology Limited’s share of RTL’s net profit was $248,000. (2024: share of net profit $63,000).




E2. INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR USING THE EQUITY METHOD

Carrying value of equity accounted investments:

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Balance at 1 September 867 804

Share of net surplus 248 63

Balance at 31 August 1,115 867

Section E: group structure and subsidiaries continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 90

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Summarised statement of comprehensive income of joint ventures

from continuing operations:

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Income 1,552 826

Expenses (1,056) (700)

Net surplus and total comprehensive income 496 126

Group share of net surplus24863

Summarised balance sheets of joint ventures:

Current assets 2,217 1,513

Non-current assets 860 570

Current liabilities (848) (350)

Non-current liabilities - -

Net assets 2,229 1,733

Group share of net assets 1,115 867

RTL does not have any contingent assets, contingent liabilities or commitments for capital expenditure. The Group is not jointly

and severally liable for any of the joint venture's liabilities.

20252024

Joint ventures

$’000s$’000s

Project work undertaken by the Group for RTL

769671

Administration, sales and marketing fees charged by the Group to RTL

288 239

Sales revenue received by RTL from the Group

1,459 798


Advances

Advances to / from joint ventures are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand.

Substantial shareholders

JBS Australia Pty Ltd owns a 53.44% shareholding in Scott Technology Limited (2024: 52.95%). The Group has recognised sales

to JBS companies of $36 million (2024: $24.0 million) and has made purchases from JBS Companies of $0.9 million (2024: $Nil).

As at balance date the Group had $12.7 million receivable from JBS Companies (2024: $2.2 million).

Dividends paid to JBS amounted to $2.6 million (2024: $3.9 million). In 2025, $2.6 million of these dividends were reinvested

under the dividend reinvestment plan.

Terms and conditions

Transactions relating to dividends, calls on shares and subscriptions for new shares are on the same terms and conditions that

applied to other shareholders.

Goods sold to related parties during the year are based on price lists in force and terms that would be available to third parties.

Outstanding balances are unsecured and repayable in cash.

Refer to note F3 for key management personnel disclosure.

E3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Section E: group structure and subsidiaries continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 91

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

E4. NON-RECURRING COSTS

Strategic Ownership Review

On 15 June 2023 Scott advised the share market that after discussions with the majority shareholder JBS, it intended

to undertake a strategic review of its ownership structure, with the view to exploring options to maximise value for all

shareholders. Scott engaged Macquarie Capital as financial advisor to assist with the strategic review. As Scott advised the

market on the 13th of November 2023, the strategic review would not continue further at this time. The costs associated

with the strategic review have been included on a separate line as they are one off in nature and do not represent the trading

position of the Group. In 2024, these costs were $2.5 million.

Review of appliance market

During July 2024, a consultation was undertaken on the future of Scott supplying the North American appliance market. The

outcome of this consultation was commenced in July, with Scott withdrawing from this market. This resulted in job losses in the

Christchurch facility.

This process resulted in redundancy costs of $1.0 million in 2024. The process was concluded in August 2024 and all of the

costs associated with this process were included in 2024.

Review of industrial automation market

During July 2024, a consultation was undertaken on the future of Scott supplying the industrial automation market in Australia.

The outcome of this consultation was completed in July, with Scott withdrawing from this market. This resulted in job losses in

the Australian business.

This process resulted in redundancy costs of $0.3 million in 2024. The process was concluded in August 2024 and all of the

costs associated with this process were included in 2024.

Section E: group structure and subsidiaries continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 92

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Policy

The statement of cash flows is prepared exclusive

of GST, which is consistent with the method used

in the statement of comprehensive income.

Definition of terms used in the statement of cash flows:

• Cash includes cash on hand, demand deposits,

and other short-term highly liquid investments

that are readily convertible to a known amount

of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of

change in value, net of bank overdrafts

• Operating activities include all transactions and

other events that are not investing or financing

activities

• Investing activities are those activities relating to the

acquisition and disposal of current and non-current

investments and any other non-current assets

• Financing activities are those activities relating to

changes in the equity and debt capital structure of

the Group and those activities relating to the cost

of servicing the Group’s equity.



SECTION F: OTHER DISCLOSURES

F1. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Net profit after tax for the year

14,213 7,717

Adjustments for non-cash / non-operating items:

Depreciation and amortisation

10,731 11,280

Net gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

(19) (124)

Deferred tax

2,387 151

Share of net loss / (surplus) of joint ventures and associates

(248) (63)

Interest expense

3,746 4,638

16,597 15,882

Add / (less) movement in working capital:

Trade debtors

(19,406) 3,438

Other financial assets – derivatives

53 854

Sundry debtors

996 4,777

Receivable from JV

- 431

Inventories

(1,973) 1,382

Contract assets

2,366 3,607

Contract liabilities

984 (15,692)

Onerous contract provision

55 (1,027)

Taxation payable

(2,469) (452)

Trade creditors and accruals

8,850 (9,588)

Other financial liabilities – derivatives

270 (1,574)

Employee entitlements

683 (2,229)

Provision for warranty

(423) 167

(10,014) (15,906)

Movements in working capital disclosed in investing / financing activities:

Movement in foreign exchange translation reserve relating to working capital 1,504 (1,721)

Net cash inflow from operating activities 22,300 5,972

Annual Report 2025

Page 93

Notes to and forming part of the consolidated financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 August 2025

Payment guarantees are provided to customers in respect of advance payments received by the Group for contract work in progress,

while performance bonds are provided to some customers for a period of up to one year from final acceptance of the equipment.

Scott Technology Limited has a payment bond to the value of $75,000 (2024: $75,000) in place with ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited in

favour of the New Zealand Stock Exchange.

The Group is currently involved in a dispute with a supplier. The matter is being addressed through the appropriate legal process. The

claim is considered to have no merit and accordingly no contingent liability has been recognised.

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Payment guarantees and performance bonds

12,906 15,165

Stock Exchange bond 75 75

Maximum contract penalty clause exposure 6,961 3,942

F2. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Key management personnel include the directors of the company, the Chief Executive (Executive Director) and his direct

reports. The compensation of the executives, is set out below:

20252024

$’000s$’000s

Short-term benefits – employees 3,391 3,138

Short-term benefits – CEO 1,127 1,813

Long-term benefits – employees 16 77

Long-term benefits – CEO 120 25

4,654 5,053

Directors' remuneration

290290

Detailed remuneration disclosures are provided in the remuneration statement on pages 110 to 118.

F3. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION

F4. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On 21 October 2025 the Board of Directors approved a final dividend of five cents per share to be paid for the 2025 year.

(2024: three cents per share).

Section F: other disclosures continued

Reconciliation of movement in debt facilities

Balance at 1

SeptemberAdditionsDisposalsDrawingsRepayment

Translation

of foreign

exchange

Balance at 31

August

$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s$’000s

2025

Borrowings 12,739 - - 4,758 (3,625) 438 14,310

Lease liabilities 26,647 10,164 - - (4,967) 945 32,789

39,386 10,164 - 4,758 (8,592) 1,383 47,099

2024

Borrowings 12,475 - - 4,202 (3,710) (228) 12,739

Lease liabilities 13,375 19,341 (1,157) - (4,556) (356) 26,647

25,850 19,341 (1,157) 4,202 (8,266) (584) 39,386

Scott Technology Limited

Page 94

Opinion
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Scott

Technology Limited and its

subsidiaries (the ‘Group’), which comprise the consolidated

balance sheet as at 31 August 2025, and the consolidated

statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in

equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended,

and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including

material accounting policy information.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial

statements, on pages 48 to 94, present fairly, in all material

respects, the consolidated financial position of the Group as

at 31 August 2025, and its consolidated financial performance

and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with New

Zealand Equivalents to IFRS Accounting Standards (‘NZ IFRS’)

as issued by the External Reporting Board and IFRS Accounting

Standards (‘IFRS’) as issued by the International Accounting

Standards Board.

Basis for Opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International

Standards on Auditing (‘ISAs’) and International Standards

on Auditing (New Zealand) (‘ISAs (NZ)’). Our responsibilities

under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s

Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial

Statements section of our report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is

sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

We are independent of the Group in accordance with

Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code of

Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International

Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by the

New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and

the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’

International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants

(including International Independence Standards), and we

have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance

with these requirements.

Other than in our capacity as auditor and the provision of a

limited assurance engagement on the Selected Greenhouse

Gas (GHG) Disclosures, we have no relationship with or

interests in the Group. These services have not impaired our

independence as auditor of the Group.

Audit Materiality

We consider materiality primarily in terms of the magnitude

of misstatement in the financial statements of the Group that

in our judgement would make it probable that the economic

decisions of a reasonably knowledgeable person would be

changed or influenced (the ‘quantitative’ materiality). In

addition, we also assess whether other matters that come to

our attention during the audit would in our judgement change

or influence the decisions of such a person (the ‘qualitative’

materiality). We use materiality both in planning the scope of

our audit work and in evaluating the results of our work.

We determined materiality for the Group financial statements

as a whole to be $1,500,000 (2024:$1,500,000).

Key Audit Matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional

judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the

consolidated financial statements of the current period. These

matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the

consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming

our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate

opinion on these matters.

For the year ended 31 August 2025

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Shareholders of Scott Technology Limited

Annual Report 2025

Page 95

Independent Auditor’s Report continued
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Recognition of Revenue and Profit on

Fixed-Price Contracts

The Group’s most significant revenue stream relates to

contracts for designing and manufacturing customised

automation and robotic systems for customers in various

industries (“fixed-price contracts”) amounting to $145.8

million (2024: $159.2 million) for the year ended 31 August

2025, as disclosed in note A1. Revenue on fixed-price

contracts is recognised over the term of the contract period

using the input method based on estimate of the percentage

of completion of the individual contracts. An estimate of the

percentage of completion is based on costs associated with

the work done to date relative to the total forecast costs to

complete.

There is a significant level of judgement involved in the

recognition of revenue and profit on fixed-price contracts

driven by factors which arise throughout the life of the

project requiring estimation, and contract conditions differing

between projects. For these reasons, we have identified this

area as a key audit matter.

We assessed the Group’s processes and design and implementation of

controls around preparation / calculation of the percentage of completion.

For a sample of projects in place at the end of the prior year, we

compared the current year actual results to prior year forecasts to assess

the reliability of estimates relating to the cost of completion.

For a sample of contracts, we performed the following procedures:

• Assessed whether the key estimates reflect the terms and conditions

of the contract;

• Evaluated cost to complete forecasts by challenging the key

assumptions and comparing revenue recognition calculations to

project cost forecasts prepared by project managers;

• Obtained evidence of scope variations and claims and confirmed

that these have not been included in the determination of revenue

recognition until agreed with the customer; and

• Tested a sample of costs incurred on fixed-price contracts during

the year to assess whether the costs have been applied to contracts

appropriately when determining percentage of completion.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment –

Australian & Americas cash generating unit

As at 31 August 2025, there is $53.9 million (2024: $50.8

million) of goodwill included on the balance sheet of the

Group as detailed in note B5. The balance is held across six

(2024: six) cash generating units (CGUs). $5.2 million (2024:

$5.1 million) of the goodwill balance is allocated to the

Australian CGU and $8.4 million (2024:

$7.9 million) of the goodwill balance is allocated to the

Americas CGU.

NZ IAS 36 Impairment of Assets requires the Group to

complete an impairment test related to goodwill annually.

The Group tests for impairment by determining the

recoverable amount of the cash generating units to which

the goodwill is allocated and comparing the recoverable

amounts of the CGUs to their carrying values.

The recoverable amount of each CGU is based on value

in use which is determined using a discounted cash flow

calculation. This calculation is subjective, and requires the

use of judgement, primarily in respect of:

• Annualised forecast cash flows for the 5 year forecast

period (using the budget for the first year of the forecast

period).

• Discount rates.

• Annual growth rates.

• Terminal growth rates.

We have included the impairment assessment of goodwill

relating to the Australian CGU and the Americas CGU as key

audit matters due to the significance of the balance to the

financial statements, the lower level of headroom relative to

the other cash generating units and the level of judgements

and estimates required in preparing the value in use model.

We considered whether the Group’s methodology for assessing impairment

of the Australian and Americas cash generating units are compliant with NZ

IAS 36. We focused on testing and challenging the suitability of the model

and reasonableness of the assumptions used by the Group in conducting

their impairment review.

Our procedures included, among others:

• Agreeing first year forecast cashflows to Board approved budgets;

• Challenging the reliability of the Group’s revenue and expense growth

rates to historical forecasts and actual results;

• Assessing reasonabless of key assumptions and changes from the

previous years; and

• Assessing whether the Group’s determination of cash generating units is

consistent with our understanding of the Group’s business and operating

environment.

We used our internal valuation experts to assist with evaluating the model

and challenging the Group’s key assumptions. The procedures of the

specialist included:

• Evaluating the appropriateness of the model;

• Testing the mathematical integrity of the model; and,

• Comparing the Group’s annualised and terminal growth rates to market

data.

We evaluated the Group’s sensitivity analysis to consider the extent to

which a change in one or more of the key assumptions could give rise to

impairment in the goodwill. We note that this analysis resulted in additional

disclosure in the financial statements relating to the Australian CGU and the

Americas CGU.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 96

Independent Auditor’s Report continued
Other Information

The directors are responsible on behalf of the Group for the other

information. The other information comprises the information in

the Annual Report that accompanies the consolidated financial

statements and the audit report.

Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not

cover the other information and we do not express any form of

assurance conclusion thereon.

Our responsibility is to read the other information and

consider whether it is materially inconsistent with the

consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained

in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

If so, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to

report in this regard.

Directors’ Responsibilities for the Consolidated

Financial Statements

The directors are responsible on behalf of the Group for the

preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial

statements in accordance with NZ IFRS and IFRS, and for such

internal control as the directors determine is necessary to

enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements

that are free from material misstatement, whether due to

fraud or error.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the

directors are responsible on behalf of the Group for assessing

the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing,

as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the

going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either

intend to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or have

no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the

Consolidated Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about

whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole

are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud

or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our

opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance,

but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance

with ISAs and ISAs (NZ) will always detect a material

misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from

fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in

the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence

the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these

consolidated financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit

of the consolidated financial statements is located on the

External Reporting Board’s website at:

www.xrb.govt.nz/standards/assurance-standards/auditors-

responsibilities/audit-report-1-1

This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Restriction on Use

This report is made solely to the Company’s shareholders, as a

body. Our audit has been undertaken so that we might state to

the Company’s shareholders those matters we are required to

state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To

the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume

responsibility to anyone other than the Company’s shareholders

as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions

we have formed.

Andrew Dick,

Partner for Deloitte Limited

Auckland, New Zealand

21 October 2025

Annual Report 2025

Page 97

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE

employees who are more likely to be exposed to material

information relating to Scott. A Director or senior manager

is obliged to advise the NZX promptly if they trade in the

company’s shares.

The directors’ shareholdings and all trading of shares during the

year by the directors are disclosed under Directors’ Interests on

page 105 to 106 of this Annual Report.

PRINCIPLE 2:

BOARD COMPOSITION

AND PERFORMANCE

The Board of Directors operates under a written charter,

which outlines the roles and responsibilities of the Board.

The charter complies with the relevant recommendations in

the NZX Corporate Governance Code and is available on the

company website.

The primary responsibilities of the Board include:

• Ensuring the company’s goals are clearly established and that

strategies are in place for achieving them

• Establishing policies for strengthening the performance of

the company and ensuring that management is proactively

seeking to build the business

• Monitoring the performance of management

• Appointing the CEO and setting the terms of the CEO’s

employment agreement

• Ensuring the company’s financial statements are true and fair

and conform with the law

• Ensuring the company adheres to high standards of ethics

and corporate behaviour

• Ensuring the company has appropriate risk management /

regulatory compliance policies in place.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Scott Technology Limited (Scott) believes in the benefit of

strong corporate governance and the value it provides for our

shareholders, customers, employees and other stakeholders.

The Board is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the

company maintains high ethical standards and corporate

governance practices. The company is striving to ensure its

corporate governance practices are in line with best practice

and the NZX Corporate Governance Code (NZX Code). Any

exceptions to this are identified where appropriate under

Principles 1 to 8 below.

The key corporate governance documents referred to in this

report are available on Scott’s website:

www.scottautomation.com/en/investor-centre/governance

PRINCIPLE 1:

CODE OF ETHICAL

B EH AV IOU R

The Board is committed to maintaining the highest standards

of behaviour and accountability. Scott’s Code of Conduct is

the framework of standards by which the directors, senior

management and employees are expected to conduct their

professional lives. It is intended to support decision-making

that is consistent with Scott's values, business goals and legal

and policy obligations, rather than to prescribe an exhaustive

list of acceptable and non-acceptable behaviour.

As part of the induction process, new employees receive

a copy of the Code of Conduct, which is accessible to all

employees on the Scott intranet and the company website.

The Code of Conduct was most recently reviewed in 2025.

The company also has an Ethics Line Policy, which provides a

confidential online reporting system that allows employees to

report suspected breaches of law or company policies, as well

as other serious concerns they may have. The purpose of the

Policy is to protect an employee who wishes to raise concerns

from reprisals or victimisation for reporting their concerns.

Scott supports the integrity of New Zealand’s financial

markets and has a Financial Product Trading Policy to

mitigate the risk of insider trading by employees and

Directors. In addition to this Policy and Guidelines, more

specific and stringent rules also apply to trading in Scott

Technology Limited’s securities by directors and certain

AS AT 31 AUGUST 2025

Scott Technology Limited

Page 98

Board Composition
As at 31 August 2025

The Board composition reflects the majority shareholding of

the company, with 53% held by JBS Australia Pty Limited. As

at 31 August 2025, the Board comprised three Independent

Directors, and three Directors representing JBS Australia Pty

Limited. The Chair of the Board is an Independent Director.

Stuart McLauchlan

Independent Chair

Derek Charge

Independent Director

John Thorman

Independent Director

Brent Eastwood

Non-executive Director representing

JBS Australia Pty Limited

John Berry

Non-executive Director representing

JBS Australia Pty Limited

Alan Byers

Non-executive Director representing

JBS Australia Pty Limited

For a Director to be deemed Independent, the Board has

determined that he / she must not be an executive of Scott

Technology nor an executive or Director of JBS Australia

Pty Limited and must have no disqualifying relationships.

Independence will be determined by reference to the NZX

Listing Rules and the NZX Corporate Governance Code.

Further details on each Director, including their interests,

qualifications and shareholdings, is provided in this Annual

Report and on the company’s website.

Director Appointment

Membership, rotation and retirement of directors is

determined in accordance with the company Constitution and

NZX Listing Rules.

Directors will retire and may stand for re-election by

shareholders every three years. A Director appointed since the

previous annual meeting holds office only until the next annual

meeting but is eligible for re-election at that meeting. The Board

asks for Director nominations each year prior to the Annual

Shareholders Meeting, in accordance with the Constitution of

the company and the NZX Listing Rules.

The Governance, Remuneration and Nominations Committee

undertakes the process for nominating and appointing directors

on behalf of the Board and makes appropriate recommendations

to the Board, in line with the Committee’s Terms of Reference.

New Board members enter into written agreements with the

company, setting out the terms of their appointment.

The Board has a skills matrix and directors are selected on

individual skills, qualifications, experience and contribution

to the company. The Board believes that all current directors

offer valuable and complementary skillsets.

Skills Matrix and Director strength

Statement of corporate governance continued

Governance

Finance and accounting

Risk management

Capital markets and M&A

Health and safety

Regulatory knowledge and experience

Human Resources

Growth execution

Strategy

Operations and supply chain excellence

Industry experience

Customer / brand / marketing

International experience

Govt / regulatory relationships

Investor relationships

Sustainability

The Board is satisfied that each Director has the necessary

time available to devote to the position, broadens the Board’s

expertise and has a personality that is compatible with the

other directors.

The company encourages all directors to undertake appropriate

training and education to ensure they remain up to date on how

to best perform their duties as directors.

Day-to-day management of Scott is delegated to the CEO

and the senior management team, in line with the company’s

Delegated Authority Framework.

Management is responsible for providing information of

sufficient content, quality and timeliness as the Board considers

necessary to allow the Board to effectively discharge its duties.

In addition, all directors have access to management to discuss

issues or obtain information on specific areas in relation to

matters to be discussed at Board meetings or other areas as they

consider appropriate. With the prior approval of the Chair, each

Director also has the right to seek independent legal and other

professional advice at the company’s expense about any aspect

of the company’s operations or undertakings to assist in fulfilling

their duties and responsibilities as a Director.

Number of directors with strength in this area

Annual Report 2025

Page 99

The Board regularly evaluates its own collective and individual
performance, processes and procedures, including those of

sub-committees. Through this process, the Board identifies any

training opportunities for the individual directors to ensure they

have relevant and up-to-date skills for performing their role.

Diversity

The Board has a Diversity Policy, which outlines Scott’s

commitment to providing an inclusive and diverse working

environment.

Diversity initiatives are applicable, but not limited to,

our practices and policies on recruitment and selection;

compensation and benefits; professional development

and training; promotions; transfers; social and recreational

programmes; restructures; and terminations.

The Board believes the principles of the Diversity Policy were

upheld in FY25 and is working towards setting measurable

objectives to support its focus on diversity and inclusion. The

following initiatives are in place to support Scott’s diversity plan:

• Anti-bullying & Harassment Policy

• Ethics hotline where employees can anonymously report

anything they believe to be unethical or discriminatory

• Employee surveys.

As at 31 August 2025, Scott had 611 employees of which 16%

were female and 84% were male (31 August 2024: 649 Scott

employees, 16% female, 84% male).

PRINCIPLE 3:

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board has delegated a number of responsibilities to

committees to assist in the execution of the Board’s duties.

However, any recommendations made by committees are

recommendations to the Board and the Board retains ultimate

responsibility for the functions of its committees. Each

Committee operates under specific terms of reference, which

are reviewed regularly and approved by the Board.

The Board has four standing committees. A separate

Independent Directors’ Committee meets if needed.

Responsibilities of each Committee are detailed in Committee

charters, which are available on the company website.

Management attends Committee meetings only at the invitation

of the Committee.

Audit and Financial Risk

Committee

John Thorman (Chair)

Stuart McLauchlan

John Berry

Health and Safety

Committee

Stuart McLauchlan (Chair)

Full Board

Governance, Remuneration

and Nominations

Committee

Stuart McLauchlan (Chair)

Derek Charge

John Thorman

Treasury CommitteeStuart McLauchlan (Chair)

John Berry

Audit and Financial Risk Committee (AFRC)

The objective of the Audit and Financial Risk Committee (AFRC) is

to assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities for financial

reporting and risk and financial / secretarial compliance.

The AFRC must consist of at least three directors and a majority

of independent directors. The chair of the AFRC is John Thorman,

who is an Independent Director and is not the Board Chair.

Stuart McLauchlan is a Fellow and John Thorman a Member of

Chartered Accountants Australia & New Zealand.

The Committee generally invites the CEO, CFO and the external

auditor to attend AFRC meetings as appropriate. The Committee

also meets and receives regular reports from the external

auditor without management present, concerning any

matters that arise in connection with the performance of its

role.

* Officers include all members of the Executive Team who

report to the CEO.

20252024

As at 31 AugustFemaleMale FemaleMale

Directors0 6 0 7

Officers* 2 7 2 5


Statement of corporate governance continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 100

Health and Safety Committee
The Board recognises the critical role health and safety forms

as part of Scott’s day-to-day operations and its focus is on

ensuring a safety-first culture across all business operations.

Health and safety is deemed an ‘all of board’ responsibility

and all directors are members of the Health and Safety

Committee. The Committee assists the Board in discharging its

responsibilities in overseeing and reviewing health and safety

matters arising out of Scott’s activities and the impact of these

activities on employees, contractors and visitors to Scott.

Governance, Remuneration and Nominations

Committee

The Governance, Remuneration and Nominations Committee

assists the Board in establishing remuneration policies and

practices for the company and also assists in discharging the

Board’s responsibilities relative to remuneration setting and

review of the company’s CEO and directors. The Committee also

undertakes the process for nominating and appointing directors

on behalf of the board and makes appropriate recommendations

to the Board.

Due to a conflict of interest in being the majority shareholder,

JBS Australia Pty Ltd and its board representatives abstain from

voting on the appointment of independent directors.

Treasury Committee

The role of the Treasury Committee is to oversee the treasury

management processes to ensure the integrity, transparency

and adequacy of the Group’s investments, borrowings,

hedging, balance sheet management and treasury risk

management in accordance with Group Treasury policies.

Independent Directors’ Committee

The Independent Directors’ Committee is convened as

needed and consists of independent directors who address

significant conflicts of interest and any other matters referred

by the Board. Scott has protocols that set out the procedures

to be followed if there is a takeover offer. These procedures

are set out in the Takeover Response Protocols that have

been adopted by the Board.

Statement of corporate governance continued

Board Meetings and Attendance

Director attendance at Board and Committee meetings

during FY25 was as follows:

BoardAudit and Financial


Risk CommitteeHealth and Safety


CommitteeGovernance,


Remuneration and Nominations Committee

Total number

of meetings

6562

Stuart McLauchlan5 5 5 2

Brent Eastwood5 - 5 -

Alan Byers 6 - 6 -

John Berry 6 1 6 -

John Thorman6 5 6 2

Derek Charge 6 - 6 2

PRINCIPLE 4: REPORTING

AND DISCLOSURE

The Board is committed to providing accurate, adequate and

timely information both to existing shareholders and to the

market generally. This enables all investors to make informed

decisions about the company.

Scott, as a company listed on the NZX Main Board, has an

obligation to comply with the disclosure requirements under

the NZX Main Board Listing Rules. Scott recognises that these

requirements aim to provide equal access for all investors

or potential investors to material price-sensitive information

concerning issuers or their financial products. This, in turn,

promotes confidence in the market.

Scott’s Continuous Disclosure Policy outlines the obligations

of Scott and relevant Scott personnel in satisfying the

disclosure requirements. It also covers other related matters,

including external communications by Scott.

Scott publishes its key governance and other relevant

documents in the investor centre of the company’s website at:

www.scottautomation.com/en/investor-centre/governance

All significant announcements made to the NZX and reports

issued are also posted on the company’s website.

Annual Report 2025

Page 101

Financial Reporting
Scott’s management team is responsible for implementing

and maintaining appropriate accounting and financial

reporting principles, policies and internal controls. These are

designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards,

applicable laws and regulations.

The Audit and Financial Risk Committee oversees the quality

and integrity of external financial reporting, including

the accuracy, completeness, balance and timeliness of

financial statements. It reviews the full and half-year

financial statements and makes recommendations to the

Board concerning accounting policies, areas of judgement,

compliance with accounting standards, stock exchange and

legal requirements and the results of the external audit.

All matters required to be addressed, and for which the

Committee has responsibility, were addressed during the

reporting period.

For FY25, the directors believe that proper accounting

records have been kept that enable, with reasonable

accuracy, the determination of the financial position of the

company and facilitate compliance of the financial statements

with the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

The CEO and CFO have confirmed in writing to the Board that

the company’s external financial reports present a true and

fair view in all material aspects.

Scott’s full and half-year financial statements are available on

the company’s website.

Non-Financial Reporting

In FY25, Scott introduced a new five-year strategy, which

builds on four key enablers. Scott believes these enablers

will enhance the long-term sustainability of the company

and support the company’s licence to operate. The company

discusses its strategy and progress against objectives in

this Annual Report and other investor presentations and

communications.

The company has policies that support environmental,

social and governance concerns and is in the process of

formulating a formal ESG framework. Material matters that

may impact or influence the long-term sustainability of the

company are considered and managed as part of the risk

management process.

PRINCIPLE 5:

REMUNERATION

Scott’s remuneration philosophy promotes the company’s

shared performance culture with the aim of achieving

sustained growth within the business, both in terms of

corporate size and the quality of equipment and services

provided to our customers. The philosophy also emphasises

the fundamental value of all our employees and their roles

in attaining sustained growth through fair and balanced

remuneration practice.

The Governance, Remuneration and Nominations Committee

makes recommendations to the Board on remuneration

matters, particularly remuneration of directors and Senior

Executives, including the CEO.

Director Remuneration

Details of individual Director remuneration for the year are

on page 117 of this Annual Report.

The total Director remuneration pool of $400,000 was last

approved by shareholders at the 2021 annual meeting. The

Board is responsible for the setting of individual Director's

fees in accordance with the permitted pool. Any proposed

increases in Non-executive Director fees and remuneration

are put to shareholders for approval.

In FY25, the approved remuneration for each role was

as follows:

Fees per annum

(NZ$)

Board Chair$140,000

Independent Director $65,000

Audit and Risk Committee Chair$10,000

Governance, Remuneration and

Nominations Committee Chair

$10,000

No fees were paid to directors representing JBS Australia Pty Ltd.

Executive Remuneration

The remuneration of the CEO and the Executive Team is

determined by the significance of their roles and industry

benchmarking. The total remuneration is made up of fixed

remuneration and short-term cash-based incentives, plus

long-term incentives.

The short-term incentives are at-risk payments that reward

performance. They are designed to motivate and incentivise

senior employees in the delivery of performance. The amount

payable is determined annually. The payment of the

short-term incentive depends on achieving certain results and

Statement of corporate governance continued

Scott Technology Limited

Page 102

outcomes. Performance over the financial year is measured
against ‘stretch’ performance targets. The performance

metrics differ with each role. The levels and appropriateness

of these incentives and weighting are reviewed each year.

The senior management phantom share scheme is a

long-term incentive linked to the company’s share price,

which aligns the long-term interests of both senior

management and shareholders, as well as acting as a

retention incentive to senior management.

Further details of the CEO and executive remuneration can be

viewed on page 112 to 116 of this Annual Report.

PRINCIPLE 6:

RISK MANAGEMENT

The Board is responsible for overseeing the company’s

system of internal controls to manage key risks and have

overall responsibility for managing risk.

The company maintains a Group Risk Register to identify

and manage risk. Specific health and safety risk registers for

each site are separately maintained given the significance

of this area to the business. The Senior Executive Team is

responsible for maintaining the risk registers.

Through the Audit and Financial Risk Committee, the Board

considers the recommendations and advice of external

auditors in relation to financial risk and ensures that those

recommendations are investigated and, where considered

necessary, appropriate action is taken. Financial statements

are prepared monthly and are reviewed by the Board

progressively during the year to monitor management’s

performance against budget goals and objectives.

A structured framework is in place for capital expenditure,

including appropriate authorisation and approval levels, which

place a high emphasis on commercial logic for the investment.

The Board has set limits to management’s ability to incur

expenditure, enter contracts and acquire or dispose of assets.

The Board requires managers to identify and respond to risk

exposures, and key business risks are formally reviewed by

the Board.

Crisis plans are in place, along with agreed protocols on

actions to be taken in crisis scenarios.

Health and Safety

The Board recognises that effective management of health and

safety is essential for the operation of a successful business. Its

intent is to prevent harm and promote wellbeing for employees,

contractors, customers and suppliers. The Health and Safety

Committee Charter outlines the Board’s responsibilities and

approach in regards to health and safety matters.

Specific protocols include:

• Well established Health and Safety management systems

and processes in the workplace, fully supported by the

Executive Team and Board

• Processes and documents are reviewed and audited on

a regular basis as part of our continuous improvement

programme through the HS Strategic programme

• Dedicated health and safety coordinators on each site,

fully supported and well informed with the legislation and

law changes

• In-house competency-based training programme that

utilises both in-house expertise and external certified

trainers to ensure our employees are safe to operate in

our workshop and on customer sites

• Health and safety measures that are monitored and

regularly reviewed.

Performance in FY25 reflects both progress and hard lessons.

We were deeply saddened by the loss of a team member at

our Dunedin site in April 2025, which has further sharpened

our focus on prevention and care for our people. Safety

conversations and Site Safety Walks are up 59%, first-aid

and near-miss reporting up ~29% and 815 hazards reported

across our operations, supported by ongoing SafeMate peer

recognition.

In FY25, our LTIFR was 2.89, compared with 0.89* in FY24.

While this increase is above the prior year and higher than

typical rates reported across advanced manufacturing

sectors, it highlights the importance of our ongoing

investment in critical risk management, behavioural safety,

and system improvements.

* An incident resulting in a Lost Time Injury (LTI) occurred in FY24

was not escalated at the time and was reported after year-end.

Statement of corporate governance continued

Annual Report 2025

Page 103

PRINCIPLE 8: SHAREHOLDER
RIGHTS AND RELATIONS

The company seeks to ensure that investors understand

its activities by communicating effectively with them and

providing access to clear and balanced information.

The company website www.scottautomation.com provides an

overview of the business and information about Scott. This

information includes details of operational sites, latest news,

investor information, key corporate governance information

and copies of significant NZX announcements. The website

also provides profiles of the directors and the senior

management team.

All shareholders are given the opportunity to elect to receive

electronic communications from the company. Copies of

previous annual reports, financial statements and results

presentations are available on the website.

Shareholders are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting

and may raise matters for discussion at this event, and vote on

major decisions, which affect the company. The company aims

to publish notices of annual meetings on its website at least 20

business days before the meeting each year. Voting is by poll.

In addition to shareholders, Scott has a wide range of

stakeholders and maintains open communication channels

for all audiences, including brokers, the investing community

and the New Zealand Shareholders’ Association, as well as

its employees, suppliers and customers. In particular, Scott’s

CEO and CFO develop strong relationships with the investor

community and ensure shareholders are kept informed. Scott

has a number of policies that uphold stakeholder interests.

Statement of corporate governance continued

Cyber Security

The Board recognises the critical role of cyber security and

the importance of having appropriate systems and processes

in place to protect the company’s data, including financial,

employee, engineering, supplier and customer data.

PRINCIPLE 7: AUDITOR

The Audit and Financial Risk Committee makes

recommendations to the Board on the appointment of the

external auditor as set out in the Charter. The Committee also

monitors the independence and effectiveness of the external

auditor and reviews and approves any non-audit services

performed by the external auditor.

The Committee regularly meets with the external auditor to

approve the terms of engagement, audit partner rotation (at

least every five years), the audit fee and to review and provide

feedback on the annual audit plan. Every year, a comprehensive

review and formal assessment of the independence and

effectiveness of the external auditor is undertaken. The

assessment uses an external auditor's assessment tool, which

is internationally recognised and endorsed by the Independent

Directors Council. The Committee routinely has time with Scott’s

external auditor, Deloitte, without management present.

For the financial year ended 31 August 2025, Deloitte was the

external auditor for Scott Technology Limited. Deloitte was

re-appointed under the Companies Act 1993 at the 2024

Annual Meeting.

All audit work is separated from other services to ensure

that appropriate independence is maintained. Other services

provided by Deloitte were non-audit related. These were

deemed to have no effect on the independence or objectivity of

the auditor in relation to audit work. The amount of fees paid

to Deloitte for audit services and other services in FY25 are

detailed on page 60 of this Annual Report.

The last audit partner rotation was in 2021. Deloitte attends

the company’s Annual Meeting.

Scott has a number of internal controls, including controls

for computerised information systems, security, business

continuity management, insurance, health and safety,

conflicts of interest and prevention and identification of

fraud. Scott does not have an internal audit function.

Scott Technology Limited

Page 104

As at 31 August 2025
STATUTORY INFORMATION

Annual Report 2025

Page 105

Stuart McLauchlan

ChairmanNew Zealand Sports Hall of Fame

Chairman

Analog Digital Instruments Ltd (Group

Instruments)

ChairmanOtago Community Hospice

ChairmanWoodworks Southern Limited

ChairmanSkyline Healthcare Group Limited

ChairmanNZ Formulary Limited

Partner / DirectorGS McLauchlan & Co Limited

DirectorArgosy Property Limited

DirectorCargill Hotel 2002 Limited

DirectorDunedin Casinos Limited

DirectorEBOS Group Limited

DirectorScenic Hotel Group

DirectorOrari Street Properties Limited

DirectorRosebery Holdings Limited

DirectorB Pac NZ

DirectorSouth Link Education Trust

DirectorHillcrest Properties Limited

John Thorman

DirectorEnergizer NZ Limited

Director

Corporate Services New Zealand

Limited

DirectorTNX Limited

DirectorStarnow GP LLC

DirectorPro-Invest NZ Property 3 GP Limited

Director

Pro-Invest NZ Hotel Operating 3

Limited

DirectorFRV NZ1 Limited

DirectorFRV Services New Zealand Limited

DirectorKitaki Nominees Limited

DirectorDBGIS Limited

DirectorGOT Technologies NZ Limited

DirectorRVJK Kiwi GP Limited

DirectorE & P Foundation Trustee Limited

DirectorBig Wednesday New Zealand Limited

DirectorGAP II NZ GP Limited

DirectorFairfield TIR New Zealand Limited

DirectorInternational Paper (New Zealand)

Limited

DirectorBaby Bunting NZ Limited

DirectorCSNZ Trustees (Blue) Limited

DirectorCSNZ Trustees Limited

DirectorThe Last Chance Trustee Limited

DirectorNextdc New Zealand Holdings Limited

DirectorNextdc New Zealand Limited

DirectorLauriston Solar Holdco Limited

DirectorLauriston Solar Projectco Limited

Director32660381 Holdco Limited

Brent Eastwood

Chief Executive /

Director

JBS Australia Pty Limited and Associated

Companies

DirectorAndrews Meat Industries Pty Limited

DirectorEnunga Enterprises Pty Limited

DirectorPremier Beehive NZ

MemberBusiness Council of Australia

Alan Byers

Nothing to declare

John Berry

Director

JBS Australia Pty Limited & Associated

Companies

DirectorAndrews Meat Industries Pty Limited

DirectorPremier Beehive NZ Director

Alternate DirectorSalmon Tasmania

Derek Charge

DirectorCharge Advisory Pty Limited

DirectorLarooma Farm Holdings Pty Limited

DirectorWhisky Tasmania Limited

DirectorHellyers Road Distillery Pty Limited

DirectorAC DC Bond Store Pty Limited

DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS

The company maintains an Interests Register in accordance with the Companies Act 1993 and the Financial Markets Conduct

Act 2013. No interest disclosures for the purposes of section 140(1) were given during the year ended 31 August 2025. The

following are general disclosures of interest given by directors of the company under section 140(2) of the Companies Act 1993.

Statutory Information continued
Scott Technology Limited

Page 106

Director2025 2024

S McLauchlanIndirect / beneficial interest438,379428,307

J ThormanIndirect / beneficial interest5,3965,272

D ChargeIndirect / beneficial interest5,4885,336

H EastwoodNon-beneficial interest*44,451,31743,076,698

J BerryNon-beneficial interest*44,451,31743,076,698

A ByersNon-beneficial interest*44,451,31743,076,698

* The non-beneficially held shares of H Eastwood and J Berry are in their capacity as directors of JBS Australia Pty Ltd,

the majority shareholder of the Group.

SHARE DEALINGS OF DIRECTORS

The details of disclosures by directors of acquisitions or disposals by directors of relevant interests in ordinary shares of the

company during the financial year ended 31 August 2025, in accordance with section 148(2) of the Companies Act 1993, are

shown below.

DirectorNature of relevant interest

Number of

shares

acquired /

(disposed)Date

Consideration

paid /

received

($)

S McLauchlan

Issue of ordinary shares pursuant to the company’s dividend reinvestment

plan to Rosebery Holdings Limited, being a person over whom the Director

has power and control.

5,053 20-Nov-24 10,283

5,019 21-May-25 8,711

J Thorman

Power to exercise, or control the exercise of, a right to vote attached to

ordinary shares issued pursuant to the company's dividend reinvestment

plan to the registered holder with whom the Director has a personal

relationship.

62 20-Nov-24126

62 21-May-25108

D Charge

Power to exercise, or control the exercise of, a right to vote attached to

ordinary shares issued pursuant to the company's dividend reinvestment

plan to the registered holder with whom the Director has a personal

relationship.

73 20-Nov-24149

79 21-May-25137

H Eastwood

Issue of ordinary shares pursuant to the company's dividend reinvestment

plan to JBS Australia Pty Ltd, being a person that acts in accordance with

the directions and instructions of the Director in relation to the company's

ordinary shares (jointly with other directors of JBS Australia Pty Ltd).

656,484 20-Nov-24 1,336,011

718,135 21-May-25 1,246,395

J Berry

Issue of ordinary shares pursuant to the company's dividend reinvestment

plan to JBS Australia Pty Ltd, being a person that acts in accordance with

the directions and instructions of the Director in relation to the company's

ordinary shares (jointly with other directors of JBS Australia Pty Ltd).

656,484 20-Nov-24 1,336,011

718,135 21-May-25 1,246,395

A Byers

Issue of ordinary shares pursuant to the company's dividend reinvestment

plan to JBS Australia Pty Ltd, being a person that acts in accordance with

the directions and instructions of the Director in relation to the company's

ordinary shares (jointly with other directors of JBS Australia Pty Ltd).

656,484 20-Nov-24 1,336,011

718,135 21-May-25 1,246,395

USE OF COMPANY INFORMATION

The company received no notices from directors wishing to use company information received in their capacity as directors,

which would not have ordinarily been available.

DIRECTORS’ RELEVANT INTERESTS IN SHARES AS AT 31 August 2025

In accordance with the NZX Listing Rules, as at 31 August 2025, ordinary shares in the company in which each Director

has a relevant interest are specified in the table below.

Statutory Information continued
Annual Report 2025

Page 107

DIRECTORS' AND OFFICERS' INSURANCE

In accordance with the Companies Act 1993 and the Constitution of the company, Scott Technology Limited indemnifies and

insures its directors and officers, including directors and officers of subsidiary companies within the Group, in respect of liability

incurred for any act or omission in their capacity as a Director or Officer of the company. This insurance includes defence costs.

If an act or omission was to occur that was covered by this insurance, the company would pay the liability of the act or omission

and be reimbursed by the insurer.

SUBSIDIARY COMPANY DIRECTORS

Section 211(2) of the Companies Act 1993 requires the company to disclose, in relation to its subsidiaries, the total

remuneration and value of other benefits received by directors and former directors and particulars of entries in the interests

registers made during the year ended 31 August 2025.

No subsidiary has directors who are not directors of Scott Technology Limited or employees of the Group.

The remuneration and other benefits of such directors are included in the directors' remuneration section of this Annual Report

and the remuneration and other benefits of employees totalling NZ$100,000 or more during the year ended 31 August 2025 are

included in the relevant bandings for remuneration on page 118.

No remuneration is paid to any Director of a subsidiary company for their position as Director of that subsidiary company.

The persons who held office as directors of subsidiary companies at 31 August 2025 were as follows:

Subsidiary companyDirectors

Scott Technology NZ Limited Stuart McLauchlan, Michael Crombie

Scott Automation Limited Michael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

Scott Technology US Limited Michael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

QMT General Partner LimitedMichael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

QMT New Zealand Limited Partnership QMT General Partner Limited

Scott Technology Americas LimitedMichael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

Scott Technology Europe LimitedMichael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

Scott LED Limited Michael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

Rocklabs LimitedMichael Crombie, Laurence O’Malley

Scott Technology Australia Pty Ltd Damian Lucas, Michael Crombie, Keilesh Gounder*

Scott Automation and Robotics Pty LtdDamian Lucas, Michael Crombie, Keilesh Gounder*

Scott Systems International Incorporated Jerry McDonough, Laurence O’Malley

Scott Systems (Qingdao) Co Limited Laurence O’Malley, Cathy Zhang, Michael Crombie

Scott Automation GmbHAaron Vanwalleghem BV

Scott Technology Belgium BV Aaron Vanwalleghem BV, Jonas Vromant, Michael Crombie, Cameron Mathewson*

Scott Automation NVAaron Vanwalleghem BV, Jonas Vromant, Michael Crombie, Cameron Mathewson*

Scott Automation a.s. Aaron Vanwalleghem B V, Michael Crombie, Pavel Cevela, Vladimir Stoklas

Scott Automation SAS Aaron Vanwalleghem BV, Jonas Vromant

Scott Automation Limited Aaron Vanwalleghem BV, Michael Crombie

Normaclass s.a.s.Aaron Vanwalleghem BV

Rivercan S.A.Eric Luis Zeballos Pérez

* Ceased to hold office during the period.

Other than as set out in the Directors' Interest table above, no interest disclosures for the purposes of section 140(1) were given

by any Director of a subsidiary during the year ended 31 August 2025.

Statutory Information continued
Scott Technology Limited

Page 108

SPREAD OF SHAREHOLDERS AS AT 31 AUGUST 2025

As at 31 August 2025, there were 83,177,005 ordinary shares in the company on issue, which were held as follows:

RangeNumber of ordinary security holders% of issued capital

1-1,0007510.39

1,001-5,0001,0503.26

5,001-10,0003853.38

10,001-50,0003819.01

50,001-100,000302.52

Greater than 100,0002981.44

Total shareholders2,626100%

TWENTY LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS AS AT 31 AUGUST 2025

Rank Registered shareholder

Number of

shares

% of total shares

in the company

1 JBS Australia Pty Limited 44,451,317 53.44

2 Oakwood Securities Limited 5,755,008 6.92

3 Accident Compensation Corporation 4,159,232 5.00

4 Leveraged Equities Finance Limited 2,439,390 2.93

5 Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited 1,380,195 1.66

6 JBWERE (NZ) Nominees Limited 1,267,421 1.52

7 Custodial Services Limited 919,440 1.11

8 New Zealand Depository Nominee 804,426 0.97

9 Citibank Nominees (NZ) Ltd 771,636 0.93

10 Jack William Allan 655,000 0.79

11 Wairahi Investments Limited 600,000 0.72

12 Jarden Custodians Limited 479,982 0.58

13 Rosebery Holdings Limited 438,379 0.53

14 Gmh 38 Investments Limited 400,000 0.48

15 Forsyth Barr Custodians Limited 390,183 0.47

16 Turha Limited 350,000 0.42

17 Robert Wong & Cristein Joe Wong 283,764 0.34

18 Everist A/C & Andrew Paul Lissaman Everist 274,068 0.33

19 Private Nominees Limited 188,810 0.23

20 FNZ Custodians Limited 176,393 0.21

Statutory Information continued
Annual Report 2025

Page 109

SUBSTANTIAL PRODUCT HOLDERS

The following substantial product holder information is given pursuant to section 293 of the Financial Markets Conduct

Act 2013. These substantial product holders are shareholders who have a relevant interest of 5% or more of a class

of quoted voting products of the company according to the company’s records. As at 31 August 2025, details of the

substantial product holders of the company and their relevant interests in the company’s ordinary shares were as

follows below. As at the balance date (31 August 2025) there were 83,177,005 ordinary shares in the company on issue.

Name of substantial

product holder

Number of ordinary voting

securities as at 31 August 2025% of issued capital

JBS Australia Pty Limited44,451,31753.44

Oakwood Securities Limited5,755,0086.92

Accident Compensation Corporation 4,159,232 5.00

DONATIONS

The Group made no donations during the year (2024: $0).

CREDIT RATING

The company currently does not have a credit rating.

WAIVERS FROM NZX LISTING RULES

No waivers were granted by NZX or relied on by the company during the 12-month period ended 31 August 2025.

REMUNERATION
As at 31 August 2025

Scott Technology Limited

Page 110

Dear Shareholders

On behalf of Scott's Board of Directors, I am pleased to

present Scott's remuneration overview for the company and

its controlled entities (the Group) for the year ended

31 August 2025.

As the Chair of the Board and its Remuneration Committee,

I work closely with my fellow directors to ensure that

Scott's remuneration policies and frameworks continue to

motivate, reward and retain our talented team. As a Board,

we are committed to ensuring there is an appropriate level

of transparency around Scott's approach to remuneration

to encourage confidence in Scott's Executive and Director

remuneration processes and reinforce key stakeholder

(including shareholder) and executive pay-for-performance

alignment.

FY25 Performance and Remuneration

Outcomes

Scott has demonstrated resilient business performance

amid a challenging global economy, achieving continued

growth driven by its diversified product portfolio and focus

on customer partnerships, innovation and operational

excellence. We reported record EBITDA of $31.5m, up 19%

year on year, and Net Profit After Tax of $14.2m, a 84%

increase. Topline revenue held steady at $275m, reflecting

the timing of major project deliveries. These results

highlight a leaner, more assertive Scott that is positioned for

sustainable profitable growth through the new strategy.

The strong FY25 performance has direct implications

for short-term incentive (STI) outcomes, as revenue and

EBITDA growth demonstrates successful execution of key

Stuart McLauchlan

Chair of the Board and Remuneration Committee

financial and operational objectives. The focus on strategic

investments and navigating macroeconomic uncertainty

positions Scott for sustained success into FY26 and beyond.

Executive Remuneration Framework

To drive sustainable business performance and to execute

its strategic plan, Scott must attract and retain people of a

high calibre. Accordingly, executive remuneration is set with

regard to this and other key business objectives, including

encouraging a long-term commitment to Scott.

Scott aligns components of executive remuneration with the

performance of Scott (pay-for-performance alignment). As

such, executive remuneration comprises fixed and 'at-risk'

(or performance-based) elements that are both short and

longterm in nature. The purpose of this structure is to ensure

that the interests of the executives, Scott and its shareholders

are aligned during the period over which the business results

are realised (stakeholder alignment).

The Board believes that our focus on profitability via the

Short-Term Incentive Plan remains appropriate for an

organisation of Scott's maturity and complexity, while our

Long-Term Incentive Plan continues to promote sustainable

business growth. The Remuneration Committee is committed

to reviewing our incentive plans annually to ensure that they

remain fit for purpose in our evolving business.

Thank you to all Scott shareholders for your support this year.

Remuneration continued
Annual Report 2025

Page 111

STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT

This remuneration overview is structured as follows:

1. Remuneration Philosophy and Principles

2. Remuneration Governance

3. Executive Remuneration Framework

4. CEO Remuneration

5. Non-executive Director Remuneration

6. Employee Payment Bands

SECTION 1: REMUNERATION

PHILOSOPHY AND

PRINCIPLES

Scott has a Remuneration Policy that relates to the remuneration

of the directors and Senior Executives of Scott.

A copy of the policy is available on Scott's website:

www.scottautomation.com/en/investor-centre/governance

The philosophy of the policy is to emphasise the fundamental

value of all our employees and their role in attaining sustained

growth through fair and balanced remuneration practice.

Scott adopts an objective, robust and market-competitive system

to determine the remuneration levels of roles at Scott based

on the job requirements, skills and experience and knowledge

required of a fully competent job incumbent without bias. This

approach is also flexible enough to ensure that Scott is able to

recruit, develop and retain a highly qualified workforce. The

Remuneration Policy is reinforced by Scott's Values that recognises

the Group's overarching commitments to People, Excellence,

Results and Integrity. Attracting, developing and retaining

people of a high caliber is critical to support sustainable business

performance and execution of strategy, and the remuneration of

directors and executives is set having regard to this.

Executive remuneration is benchmarked against comparably

sized companies on the NZX. The benchmarking notes the

evolving complexity in the business with Scott operating across

a number of geographies and sectors, the requirements of

the individual position and relevant internal and external pay

relativities.

The Remuneration Framework is structured to promote the

long-term sustainable growth of the Group with the LTI portion

of performance-based executive remuneration awarded as

cash settled equity to reinforce alignment with the interests of

Scott and its shareholders over this period. In this way, Executive

pay-for-performance is aligned with stakeholder (including

shareholder) experience over the longer term.

SECTION 2: REMUNERATION

GOVERNANCE

As set out in the terms of reference for the Governance,

Remuneration and Nominations Committee (GRNC),

the objective of the GRNC is to assist the Board in the

establishment of remuneration policies and practices for

the company and to also assist in discharging the Board’s

responsibilities relative to remuneration-setting and review

of the company’s CEO, directors (both Non-executive and

Executive). The GRNC will also advise and assist the CEO in

remuneration-setting for other Senior Executives. The terms of

reference for the GRNC are available Scott's on website:

www.scottautomation.com/en/investor-centre/governance

The GRNC is responsible for:

• Approving the remuneration of executives

• Recommending Non-executive Director remuneration to

the Board (within a fee pool approved by shareholders).

The Board is responsible for:

• Approving Non-executive Director remuneration (within

a fee pool approved by shareholders)

• Approval of remuneration policies.

The members of the Remuneration Committee during the

year were Independent Directors Stuart McLauchlan (Chair),

John Thorman and Derek Charge. The CEO attends each

meeting by a standing invitation. From time to time the

Chair of the Committee shall be entitled to request that the

Committee meet without the CEO. Other employees are

involved in these meetings on an as needed basis and only

by invitation.

Remuneration continued
Scott Technology Limited

Page 112

Fixed Variable

Total Fixed Remuneration

(TFR)

Short-Term Incentive

(STI)

Long-Term Incentive

(LTI)

How is it delivered? CashCashCash

How does it work?Fixed remuneration consists of

base salary and may include

a component of compulsory

superannuation contributions

for Australian- based executives

and KiwiSaver contributions for

New Zealand-based executives.

Executives' fixed remuneration

is set based on:

• The person's position

accountabilities,

qualifications, and

experience;

• Performance and record of

achievement at Scott; and

• Relevant market data

for similar positions at

comparable companies,

generally on the NZX.

The STI is an annual

performance-dependent cash

payment based on business

performance.

Business performance is

measured:

• For all executives, by Group

EBITDA

• For those executives

with business unit

responsibilities, business

unit EBITDA.

Further details are set out in

section (b) below.

The LTI comprises a grant of

Performance Rights.

The LTI aligns Group

performance to Executive

reward through a direct link

to the Group share price and

Group financial performance.

It is tested against:

• Three-year Earnings per

Share Compound Annual

Growth Rate (EPS CAGR);

and

• Continued employment

with the Group.

Further details are set out in

section (c) below.

What is its purpose? To attract and retain executives

with competitive remuneration

in our markets.

Aligns individual performance

and behaviours with the Board-

approved strategic and financial

objectives of the Group for a

financial year.

Aligns an individual with the

medium to long-term financial

performance of the Group,

thereby closely aligning with

shareholders and long-term

executive retention.

What is the time

horizon? (See also

table below)

Salary and superannuation paid

throughout a financial year.

One financial year.

The Board will only approve

an STI at the same time as

the financial results for that

financial year are finalised and

the audit is completed.

Three financial years.

The Board will approve an

LTI paying out once both

conditions of the LTI have been

satisfied.

Executive Remuneration Framework Summary

SECTION 3: EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION FRAMEWORK

A. Summary

The Group's Executive Remuneration Framework is a transparent structure comprising three elements.

• Short-Term Incentive (STI) Plan

• Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Plan

• Executive Remuneration Mix

Annual Report 2025
Page 113

Approach

Purpose

Aligns individual performance and behaviours with the Board-approved strategic and financial

objectives of Scott for a financial year.

Provides individuals with a competitive market position for total cash reward (i.e. variable and

fixed pay components).

Instrument

Cash

Performance criteria

The performance measures for the STI are set by reference to the executive's responsibilities

and particular projects relevant to that executive and the business or function for which they

are responsible.

The STI is made up of two portions. These can be paid individually of each other depending on

the financial results of Scott for the relevant period. These portions are:

• 40% is related to the Group EBITDA or the relevant business unit EBITDA for those with

business unit responsibilities

• 60% related to individual key performance indicators (KPIs) related to their position.

The Board determines what the targets are for a financial year and if these targets have

been achieved. Targets are set using the Board-approved budget for the relevant year, with

the overarching objective being that targets are achievable but sufficiently challenging. This

ensures targets also reflect (as and when appropriate) significant transformative acquisitions

that are projected to impact upcoming year performance.

In line with the Board's expectation that management is accountable for a range of activities,

including implementation of sustainability and health and safety initiatives, the Board also

has the flexibility to consider non-financial STI performance measures and award Short-term

Incentive payments for special, strategically important and / or transformative projects. The

Board separately oversees key activities and initiatives of management (including in relation

to sustainability and health and safety). The Board believes that financial metrics remain

appropriate for an organisation of Scott's complexity and maturity.

Management has discretion if an STI will operate for a financial year and who participates in

the STI.

The payment of an STI to a participant is conditional upon the participant's overall performance

and behaviours being satisfactory.

FY25 STI plan

B. Short-Term Incentive (STI) Plan

Remuneration continued

Scott Technology Limited
Page 114

Approach

Purpose Align a portion of executives' total remuneration with the medium to long-term performance of the Group's

financial performance and share price. Provide individuals with a competitive market position for total reward (i.e.

variable and fixed pay components).

Instrument

Cash-settled shadow equity programme.

Performance

period

Three years from 1 September 2023 to 31 August 2026 or pro-rated from date of entry into the scheme.

Performance

criteria

The performance criteria for executives are:

• The participant remaining in full-time employment as an Executive Team member with the Group for the

duration of the term

• The company share price meeting or exceeding the average growth of the NZX Portfolio Index over the term.

The performance criteria are assessed at the end of the three-year performance period (with no re-testing in

future periods).

The Board also has the flexibility to consider broader performance criteria, including capital efficiency and / or

non-financial objectives and award long-term incentive payments for special, strategically important and / or

transformative projects (to drive significant outperformance and retain key executives over the relevant period).

The Board believes that share price growth remains an appropriate measure to assess the

medium-to-long -term performance of Scott and its Executive Team.

Settlement At the end of the performance period, if the Board determines that performance criteria has been met, a cash

payment based on the following formula is payable to the participants:

• Initial shadow equity entitlement x final share price; minus

• Initial shadow equity entitlement x initial share price; minus

• The amount the Group is required by law to deduct from the payment on account of income tax. KiwiSaver

or other superannuation obligations will be subtracted from the payment calculation.

If the payment calculated in accordance with the formula above is zero or a negative figure, then no payment

will be made to the participant.

The Group will pay to the participant any payment within 10 business days of the calculation date.

Dividends &

voting rights

Dividends paid during the performance period will be included in the calculation above.

As this is a cash-settled equity scheme, there are no voting rights attached to this programme.

Board

discretion

and clawback

The Board has discretion if an LTI will operate for a period and who participates in the LTI.

The Board has discretion to adjust downwards (including to zero) LTI awards where, in the opinion of the Board, the

participant:

• Acts, or has acted, fraudulently or dishonestly or made a material misstatement on behalf the Group;

• Is in breach of any of their duties or obligations to the Group (including a breach of their obligations under their

employment contract);

• Has engaged in negligence or gross misconduct;

• Has done an act that could reasonably be regarded to have contributed to material reputation damage to the

Group; or

• Is convicted of an offence or has a judgment entered against them in connection with the affairs of the Group.

Cessation of

employment

If at any time during the performance period the participant shall cease to be employed by the Group for any reason

whatsoever, then the participant shall cease to be a participant in the programme.

If at any time during the performance period the participant shall no longer be a member of the Executive Team

however, remains employed by the Group, the participant shall cease to be a participant in the programme.

The directors do have the discretion to determine that a participant may continue to be a party to this programme

upon ceasing executive responsibilities, provided the participant maintains their employment with the Group or on

such other terms as the directors consider fit.

C. Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Plan

FY25 LTI plan

Remuneration continued

Annual Report 2025
Page 115

SECTION 4: CEO REMUNERATION

A. FY25 Total Realised Remuneration

The table below summarises the realised remuneration outcomes for Mike Christman in FY25 and John Kippenberger for FY24.

Summary of total realised remuneration

FixedVariable

Salary

Superannuation

contribution*SubtotalSTILTI

Additional

payments**

Total

remuneration

Mike Christman FY25631

40671296-1601,127

John Kippenberger FY24845

105950163-7001,813

* All superannuation contributions and holiday pay have been calculated in accordance with the New Zealand Holidays Act 2003.

** Additional payments relate to a sign-on bonus paid to Mike Christman in FY25 and retention payments made to John Kippenberger

throughout FY24.

Each component of Mike Christman's remuneration in FY25 is described more fully below.


* STI was pro-rated for the 10 months Mike Christman has been employed at Scott.

Remuneration componentDescriptionTarget value

Fixed RemunerationAnnual base salary725

KiwiSaver annualised36

Short-Term Incentive (STI)Target value of STI363

Long-Term Incentive (LTI)Target value of LTIVariable based on share price

Annual Total PackageAnnual total package at target1,127

DescriptionPerformance measures

Percentage

achieved

Resulting

weighted

average

STI payout

%

Set at 50% of base salary

for on-target performance.

Combination of financial and

non-financial performance

measures.

Financial Measures:

40% weighting

The financial measures are based on achieving the

Group EBITDA budget100%40%40%

Individual Measures:

60% weighting.

Individual goals relating to delivery of strategic

priorities, building core business drivers and

building capabilities.97%60%58%

Total STI payout98%

DescriptionPerformance measures

LTI payout

%

Cash-based scheme based

on criteria set out on page 114.

Settlement is determined at the end of the three-year period

as per the table on page 114.

0.0%

Short-Term Incentive (STI)

Long Term Incentive (LTI)

Remuneration continued

Scott Technology Limited
Page 116

B. Key terms of CEO employment contract

The table below sets out the key terms of Mike Christman employment contract.

CEO contract

Contract durationNotice period

Termination provision

(where notice provided)

Post-employment

restraint

Ongoing until terminated by either party6 months 4 weeks 6 months

C. CEO Remuneration Outcomes for FY25

Fixed Remuneration

In FY25, Mike Christman received Fixed Remuneration of $671,000. This included compulsory superannuation contributions

calculated in accordance with the New Zealand Holidays Act 2003.

STI outcomes

FY24 outcomes

As at August 2024, John Kippenberger achieved an STI payout of 17.5% based on his target KPIs. As such, John Kippenberger was paid

$136,000 for this period. This cash was physically paid in FY25.

FY25 outcomes

As at August 2025, Mike Christman achieved an STI payout of 98% based on his target KPIs. As such, Mike Christman was paid

$296,000 for this period. This amount has been pro-rated for the 10 months Mike Christman has been employed by Scott. This cash

was physically paid in FY26.

LTl outcomes

FY25 LTl

As the vesting date of the current LTI is 31 August 2026, no LTI payments have been made to Mike Christman in regards to the LTI

for FY25.

Remuneration continued

Annual Report 2025
Page 117

SECTION 5: NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REMUNERATION

To support the attraction and retention of directors of the highest calibre and requisite expertise from New Zealand, Australia

and internationally, the Group aims to set remuneration of non-executive directors reflecting:

• The time commitment and responsibilities of the non-executive directors (including any commitment as a member of a

standing or ad hoc Board committee and special exertion for significant project work outside of the normal workload for the

Board and committees)

• Market rates for Non-executive Director remuneration for comparable companies (by size, industry classification and

complexity). The Board reflects this in its succession planning and the attraction and retention of directors from, or with

experience in, key geographic markets in which the Group operates, including Australia and Southeast Asia.

Non-executive Director remuneration is in the form of fees. Non-executive directors do not receive performance-based or

equity-based remuneration.

Total remuneration for non-executive directors is subject to an aggregate fee pool limit of $400,000 in any financial year. The fee

pool was approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting held on 26 November 2021. The table below sets out the current fee

allocations for Director fees by position.

Non-executive Director fees by position

PositionFee ( NZ$)

Chair$140,000

Independent Director$65,000

Chair of Audit & Risk Committee $10,000

Chair of Remuneration Committee $10,000

Directors' remuneration and other benefits required to be disclosed pursuant to section 211(1) of the Companies Act 1993 for

the year ended 31 August 2025 were as follows:

Non-executive Director fees paid during FY25

Director

Base fee

NZ$

Audit and Risk

Committee NZ$

Remuneration

Committee NZ$

Cash settlement

of rights

S McLauchlan (Chair)$140,000-$10,000$150,000

J Thorman$65,000$10,000-$75,000

D Charge$65,000--$65,000


Remuneration continued

Scott Technology Limited
Page 118

Salary rangeNumber of employees

$100,000-$110,00042

$110,001-$120,00043

$120,001-$130,00031

$130,001-$140,00016

$140,001-$150,00024

$150,001-$160,00017

$160,001-$170,00026

$170,001-$180,00017

$180,001-$190,00015

$190,001-$200,00016

$200,001-$210,00015

$210,001-$220,000

12

$220,001-$230,00013

$230,001-$240,00014

$240,001-$250,0006

$250,001-$260,000

3

$260,001-$270,000

4

$270,001-$280,000

4

Salary rangeNumber of employees

$280,001-$290,000

2

$290,001-$300,000

6

$300,001-$310,000

3

$310,001-$320,000

1

$320,001-$330,000

1

$330,001-$340,0003

$340,001-$350,000

1

$350,001-$360,000

1

$360,001-$370,000

1

$370,001-$380,000

1

$390,001-$400,0001

$440,001-$450,0001

$450,001-$460,0001

$470,001-$480,0002

$490,001-$500,0001

$600,001-$610,0001

$720,001-$730,0001

$830,001-$840,000

1

Total

347

Employee Payment Bands

Grouped below, in accordance with section 211 of the Companies Act 1993, are the number of employees or

former employees of the company and its subsidiaries, including those based outside of New Zealand, who received

remuneration and other benefits in their capacity as employees totalling NZ$100,000 or more during the year.

Employee payment bands*

Remuneration continued

Annual Report 2025
Page 119

The directors are responsible for the preparation, in accordance with New Zealand law and generally accepted

accounting practice, of financial statements, which present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated

financial position of Scott Technology Limited and its subsidiaries ('the Group') as at 31 August 2025 and the

results of their operations and cash flows for the year ended 31 August 2025.

The directors consider that the financial statements of the Group have been prepared using accounting

policies appropriate to the Group’s circumstances, consistently applied and are supported by reasonable and

prudent judgements and estimates and that all applicable New Zealand equivalents to International Financial

Reporting Standards have been followed.

The directors have responsibility for ensuring that proper accounting records have been kept, which enable

them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1993 and the Financial Markets

Conduct Act 2013.

The directors have responsibility for the maintenance of a system of internal control designed to provide

reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting. The directors consider that

adequate steps have been taken to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and

other irregularities.

The directors present the financial statements of Scott Technology Limited for the year ended 31 August 2025.

These financial statements are dated 21 October 2025 and are signed in accordance with a resolution of the

directors made pursuant to section 461(1)(b) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

For and on behalf of the directors

Stuart McLauchlan


Chairman and Independent Director

As at 31 August 2025

DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY

S TAT E M E N T

John Thorman

Director

Parent company
Registered office

Scott Technology Limited

630 Kaikorai Valley Road

Dunedin 9011

New Zealand

+64 3 478 8110

Mailing address

Scott Technology Limited

Private Bag 1960

Dunedin 9054

New Zealand

Website

www.scottautomation.com

Chairman and Independent Director

Stuart McLauchlan

Independent directors

John Thorman

Derek Charge

Directors representing JBS Australia Pty Ltd

(Non-independent directors)

Brent Eastwood

John Berry

Alan Byers

Chief Executive Officer

Mike Christman

Regional contacts

New Zealand

Andrew Arnold

+64 21 670 975

a.arnold@scottautomation.com

Australia

Damian Lucas

+61 407 551 642

d.lucas@scottautomation.com

China

Cathy Zhang (Smart)

+86 186 6168 1911

c.smart@scottautomation.com

Europe

Aaron Vanwalleghem

+32 473 477 590

a.vanwalleghem@scottautomation.be

Americas

Jerry McDonough

+1 980 475 9860

j.mcdonough@scottautomation.com

Professional services

Share registry

MUFG Corporate Markets

Level 30, PwC Tower

15 Customs Street West

Auckland 1110

+64 9 375 5998

+64 3 375 5990 (fax)

enquiries@linkmarketservices.co.nz

Bankers

ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd

Solicitors

Gallaway Cook Allan

Auditor

Deloitte Limited

Scott Technology Limited

Page 120

DIRECTORY

---

SCOTT TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Investor Presentation

21 October 2025

FY25

R ES U LT S

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 2
Key messages

Record EBITDA:driven by a clear focus on margin-accretive projects and modular approach

Destination 2030 strategy: sets a plan for sustainable profitable growth focused on our customers

Customer first: culture change to lead a new era of Scott Technology

Positive signs of acceleration: strong second half growth andearly signs of strategy success

Forward work uplift: recent contracts showing positive signs with $169m of forward work

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 3
FY25

Business Performance

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 4
Destination 2030 strategy release – Scott’s

plan for sustainable profitable growth centered

around a customer-first mindset.

Record EBITDA $31.5m – strong second-half

performance across the business and strategic

focus on higher margin contracts.

Forward work remains positive with $169m

comprising a spread across all domains and at a

higher margin mix than the prior year.

Decoupled emissions from growth – Reported

a 8.9% decrease in net Scope 1 and 2 GHG

emission on our FY24, and a 9.1% decrease on

FY22 Base Year levels

Strong growth runway fueled by innovative

products and scalable solutions, with the launch of

NexBot, BladeStop K800, AccuTables and progressed

key developments in Beef and Lamb modules.

The Directors have recommended a final dividend

of 5.0 cents per share (unimputed) taking total

full-year dividends to 8.0 cents. The dividend

reinvestment plan will apply.

FY25 Business Highlights

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 5
FY25 Performance Snapshot

$275m

29%

* FY24 and FY23 operating EBITDA (excl. non-recurring costs) was $30.2m and $30.4m respectively. FY25 was $31.5m, same as reported EBITDA.

** Forward Work represents contracted activity. It is not an indicator of revenue over a set period of time.

*** Underlying Earnings Per Share excludes non-recurring costs

$169m

29%

FY24 $276m +3%

FY24 27% +0 PTS | FY23 27% + 3 PTS

FY24 28% +1 PT | FY23 27% +1 PT

FY24 $160m -18% | FY23 $195m +2%

Service Revenue Contribution

Forward Work**

Group Margin Performance

FY25 Revenue

$31.5m

FY24* $26.4m -11% | FY23* $29.7m +24%

Reported EBITDA*

-0%

| FY23 $268m +21%

+ 19%

+6%

+1 PT

+2 PTS

8.0 cents

Dividends Per Share (Cents)

FY24 8.0

FY23 8.0

Underlying Earnings Per Share (Cents)

***

17.4 cents

FY24 14.3

FY23 20.3

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 6
Strategy Refresh

Destination 2030

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 7
Top line Highlights

Our vision is to be the trusted partner that puts our customers first by delivering safe, sustainable,

leading-edge solutions that create value, fostering lasting partnerships that drive innovation and success.

•Destination 2030 strategy: sets a plan for sustainable profitable growth focused on our customers

•Cycle of success: will drive continuous improvement through everything we do

•Long-term targets: we know where we want to be and have set ambitious targets

•Action roadmap: we have a detailed plan in place, it is time to take action

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 8
Destination 2030

Destination 2030: Customer led purpose

High Performing Team

When working with Customers, Team

Members and other stakeholders, I take

action that supports their long-term goals.

Leading Edge Technology

Drives innovation through deep market

understanding and expertise by delivering

transformative, scalable, and modular solutions.

Customer First

We provide our customers exceptional value

by understanding and removing pain points to

improve performance.

One Scott

Our globally aligned vision built upon a

foundation of ambition, unified ways for

working, using rich data and technology.

Powering our customers and

industry with transformative

solutions and services.

Continuous improvement will

need to become core to

everything we do.

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 9
35% +

FY30 Dot on the Horizon

The revised focus areas will

drive growth, objectives

include:

•'$530 by 30' – sustainable

profitable growth

•Higher proportion of

revenue from Lifecycle

Services

•Partner with Key Accounts

to understand their capital

requirements to build out a

long-term pipeline

•Targeting EBITDA of 14% of

revenue by FY30

22%26%27%28%

Service %

Revenue by domain ($m)

Note: All currencies are in NZD unless otherwise specified.

CAGR +14%

FY25 – FY30

68

70

94

127

123

530

47

57

76

60

69

29

40

41

49

51

20

29

40

36

31

42

26

16

4

206

222

268

276

275

530

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26FY27FY28FY29FY30

MHLProteinMineralsAppliancesOther

29%

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 10
Action Roadmap

GROUP ENABLERS

One Integrated Customer Platform

One ERP - AU & US

One ERP - Rocklabs, NZ & CN

Key Customer Account Plans

HPT Program

- Team Members

HPT Program

- Leaders

Employee Profit Share Scheme

One People Platform

– Learning & Development

One People Platform

– Recruitment & Onboarding

One Project Methodology

One Global Supply Solution /

Procurement; One Planning Process

Product Lifecycle Management

Domain Product Roadmaps

Product Go To Market Framework

Year One

ACTIVITIES & PRIORITIES

Lifecycle Services

Framework

(including Key

Account

Management)

Core Values

Refresh

Product Innovation

- R&D Structure, Funding and Process

One

Scott

Key account

Training

Sales, Marketing,

Engineering

Domain Market Analysis

Customer First

Customer Feedback

Customer Communications

Customers Key Innovation Partner

>>

Year Two

Year Three Onwards

High

Performing

Te a m

Leading Edge Technology

Market

Understanding

Enabled

Te a m

Trusted

Relationships

Innovation

Resource Planning

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 11
FY25

Financial Performance

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 12
Group Performance Metrics

Group revenue over time ($m)

Sales and service revenue split over time ($m)

Service %

26%

27%22%28%29%

Group net margin % over time

24%

24%

27%

27%

29%

20%

22%

24%

26%

28%

30%

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Focus driven towards proven

technologies at higher margins and

lower risk

Increased focus on lifecycle services is driving

higher levels of recurring revenue

Continued net margin expansion via modular

approach, improved project governance, scale

/ operational efficiencies and increased

service penetration

160

165

195

199

195

46

57

72

77

80

206

222

268

276

275

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Service

Sales

68

70

94

127

123

47

57

76

60

69

29

40

41

49

51

20

29

40

36

31

42

26

16

4

206

222

268

276275

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

MHLProteinMineralsAppliancesOther

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 13
Group revenue: rebound of Protein and a strong second-half performance

Group revenue over time ($m)

•Strong second-half of top-line revenue ($153m in H2)

•Led by +16% growth in Protein with improving

conditions following a tough period for the industry

- Lamb Primal project for JBS Cobram progressing well

and first UK install secured. Both systems due to be

commissioned in FY26

•Mining had +4% growth with Rocklabs Standard

Equipment growing +23% YoY supported by gold prices

•MHL down -3% largely due to cycling higher

proportion of JBS Brooks contract in North America -

Europe up +8% with strong growth coming through

service

•Appliances down -14% cycling project for Sub-Zero but

a positive result with Midea project in China at solid

margins

•Service contributed 29% of total revenue, up from 28%

and expected to continue to grow in FY26 with

strategic focus on Lifecycle Services

Service %

28%29%

27%

26%

22%

68

70

94

127

123

47

57

76

60

69

29

40

41

49

51

20

29

40

36

31

42

26

16

4

206

222

268

276275

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

MHLProteinMineralsAppliancesOther

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 14
Group net margin: continued improvement in margin aligned to strategy

Group net margin % over time

•Net margin expansion driven by:

•Modular approach and selling solutions at

improved margins where we have a

differentiated offering

•Improved business mix with a higher proportion

of service and contributions from Protein and

Mining

•Project execution and governance with greater

control on project costings and completion

•Reset cost base following restructures at the end

of FY24

•Looking forward we expect to see continued margin

expansion as we increase scale and gain operational

efficiency, and have a higher proportion of service

revenue at relatively attractive margins

24%

24%

27%

27%

29%

20%

22%

24%

26%

28%

30%

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Net Margin is calculated as revenue less direct and indirect cost of goods sold

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 15
Record half performance in H2 provides momentum into FY26

Group revenue by H1 and H2 ($m)

Reported EBITDA by H1 and H2 ($m)*

* FY24 and FY23 operating EBITDA (excl. non-recurring costs) was $30.2m and $30.4m respectively.

FY25 was $31.5m, same as reported EBITDA.

Following a soft period of order in take in FY24, the second half of FY25 rebounded off the back of key contract wins, improved

standard product sales, and growth in recurring revenue streams, whilst delivering increased operational efficiency.

99

114

127

141

122

107

108

141

135

153

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

H1H2

9.8

11.8

14.6

14.1

12.2

11.2

12.1

15.1

12.3

19.3

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

H1H2

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 16
EBITDA performance over time

•Record EBITDA off the back of a strong second-half

performance following improved order in take

•FY25 highlighted with net margin expansion to 29%

reflecting good execution on higher margin contracts, a

reset operational cost base and improved business mix

•Disciplined approach taken to costs while targeted

investments occurred including a new ERP in Europe and

Destination 2030 strategic initiatives

•Going forward, we expect profits to improve as revenue

grows, with improved operating leverage

Note: FY23 and FY24 Operating EBITDA was $30.4m and $30.2m respectively after excluding non-recurring

costs. FY25 was $31.5m, same as reported EBITDA.

Reported EBITDA and EBITDA % ($m)

21.0

23.9

29.7

26.4

31.5

10.2%

10.8%

11.1%

9.6%

11.5%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Reported EBITDAEBITDA %

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 17
Significant uplift in NPAT through EBITDA contribution and reduced debt

•Net profit uplift +84% Yo Y

•Change in one-off costs of $3.8m associated with the

strategic review and restructuring costs in FY24

•Reduced amortisation with several assets now fully

amortised

•Reduced effective tax rate due to utilisation of prior

period losses

•Savings on interest with improved cash position and

lower interest rates

7.7

3.8

1.3

0.6

-0.1

0.9

0.114.2

FY24 NPAT

Change in

One-off

Operating

EBITDA

Depr. &

Amortisation

Lease

interest

Bank

interest

TaxFY25 NPAT

Net profit after tax ($m)

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 18
Significant cashflow improvement and strong net debt position to support growth

Improved operating cash position

•Significantly improved and normalised operating cash

after cycling large cash receipts and timing of builds in

prior periods

•Capital management needs to take a long-term view due

to the volatility that can occur with project timings

•A focus on controlling working capital and project cash

flows

•Recent wins also supportive of further improvement

Improved total net debt position

•FY24 saw elevated investment in plant, equipment and

facilities to position for growth, with FY25 returning to

historical levels

•Reduced bank interest with improved cash position

Operating Cashflow ($m)

Total Net Cash (Debt) ($m)

1.3

(8.0)

(0.1)

(20.1)

(12.3)

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

13.4

6.3

20.2

6.0

22.3

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 19
Balance sheet

•Net cash / (debt): solid period of earnings translated to cash

allowing for a reduction in overdraft facility. Reduced

investment in plant and equipment in FY25 following larger

investments made in FY24. The DRP applied to dividends

paid in FY25, resulting in reduced cash paid in period

•Trade debtors: elevated as at August 2025 due to timing of

recent orders and multiple substantial milestone payments

for on-going projects. Debtors normalised in September

2025 following receipt of due amounts

•Development assets: investments targeted towards beef

development and NexBot

Balance sheet

FY25FY24% chg

Cash*12.211.74%

Inventories38.836.95%

Trade debtors59.640.248%

Development assets10.88.921%

Property, plant and equipment21.123.6-11%

Goodwill53.950.86%

Total assets269.6244.010%

Bank overdraft*10.119.0-47%

Trade creditors & accruals38.629.730%

Borrowings*14.312.713%

Total liabilities140.3132.36%

Total liabilities and equity269.6244.010%

Net cash / (debt)*(12.3)(20.1)-39%

Note: numbers in breakdown do not necessarily add to total balance sheet class. Select accounts are shown only

* Net cash / (debt) = Cash – Bank overdraft - Borrowings

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 20
Dividend overview

•The Directors declared a final dividend of 5 cents per share,

bringing the total full year dividend to 8 cents per share

•Following two consecutive half yearly periods of 3 cents per

share, this reflects a positive step to increase the final

dividend in FY25 and bring full year dividends in line with

prior years

•Scott aims to provide sustainable, consistent and growing

dividends, while maintaining financial flexibility

•Target payout ratio of 50–80% of adjusted net profit after

tax. Subject to cash flow, capital requirements and balance

sheet strength

2

44

5

3

4

44

3

5

6

8888

56%

50%

42%

64%

46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

InterimFinalPayout Ratio

Dividends declared over time (cents per share)

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 21
Domain

Highlights

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 22
$51m$69m

FY25 Revenue

FY25 Domain Summary

Appliances

Materials Handling

ProteinMining

FY25 Revenue

+16%

$123m

FY25 Revenue

$31m

FY25 Revenue

37%

Net Margin

29%

Net margin

26%

Net margin

25%

Net Margin

25%

45%

Service % of

Revenue

28%

6%

Service % of

Revenue

Service % of

Revenue

Service % of

Revenue

+1 PTS

-6 PTS

-1 PTS

+1 PTS

+4%

-13%

-5 PTS

-5 PTS

-3%

+4 PTS

+6 PTS

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 23
13.4

18.2

25.4

16.8

20.4

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

42.8

37.3

41.7

24.2

17.3

22.6

8.9

5.3

5.1

47.0

57.1

76.0

59.9

69.4

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Poultry

Lamb & Beef

Bladestop

Protein: Improved trading following a tough period for the industry

•Overall: strong second half performance drives +16% revenue

growth. A Lamb Primal sold to JBS Cobram and trussing units sold

to Maple Lodge underpinned H2

•BladeStop: revenue up +12% on higher service and parts revenue

due to increased service penetration and a larger installed base

•Lamb and Beef: strong close to the year following a slow start

due to timing of orders. JBS Cobram Lamb Primal progressing well

and an installation of an existing Lamb Primal secured for Dawn

Meats in UK

•Poultry: sale to Maple Lodge in Canada and completion of Costco

units during the period

•Margin %: reflects execution on projects and increased mix of

service and parts

Revenue (NZ$m)

Margin (NZ$m)

Margin (%)

33%

28%

29%

32%

29%

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 24
36.7

35.2

42.9

3.3

8.4

5.1

1.2

5.2

2.9

29.2

39.6

41.2

48.8

50.9

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Energize

Modular

Rocklabs Std

Mining: Strong growth in standard products partly offset by softer Modular & Energize

•Overall: growth driven through Rocklabs standard equipment

supported by favourable commodity prices of gold and copper

•Rocklabs standard: strong unit sales for crushers and pulverisers.

This strong period of capital equipment growth supports service

revenue in future periods

•Modular: softer period after cycling the MRL project and timing

of securing new orders. Strategic key wins for Kinross (Alaska)

and Rio Tinto (Australia)

•Energize: FY25 saw completion of the first phase of automated

energy transfer systems (AETS) for Caterpillar and the kick-off of

Phase Two, which includes Early Learner sites

•Margin %: improvement due to a mix of standard products. The

target is for margins to trend back towards 40%

Revenue (NZ$m)

Margin (NZ$m)

Margin (%)

40%36%

37%

40%

43%

12.6

15.9 16.6 17.4 18.8

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 25
Materials Handling: Growth in European service offset by timing of N. American projects

•Overall: strong service growth in EU offset by the timing of large

US projects. Strong margin uplift delivers improved contribution

•Europe and North America: strong period in Europe partnering

with customers such as Ecofrost, Clarebout, Cranswick and McCain

for important projects. Following several periods of strong

equipment sales, service drove the incremental growth in EU.

Project timing and commissioning phase of JBS Brooks impacting

North America

•Transbotics: softer orders with customers delaying spending.

Officially launched NexBot in March 2025 with promising

opportunity pipeline

•Margin %: +4pts in margin with improved project and service mix

•Forward work: remains strong with a mix of orders across both

Europe and North America

Revenue (NZ$m)

Margin (NZ$m)

Margin (%)

23%

22%

26%

20%26%

67.8

77.3

85.0

8.4

33.0

23.1

18.2

17.1

15.0

67.8

70.0

94.3

127.3

123.1

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Transbotics

US Palletisation

EU Palletisation

17.7

13.9

21.6

28.3

32.0

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 26
Appliances: strong margin contribution and key wins set-up FY26

•Overall: despite a revenue decline caused by cycling a large

project from the prior year, it was a solid year for Appliances

delivering a meaningful net margin contribution to the Group

and securing significant deals to set up a strong start to FY26

•Appliances: FY25 was underpinned by the Midea project in

China, which is in final stages of commissioning.Prior years

included large projects for Sub-Zero and GE Appliances

•Forward work: recent wins include multiple projects worth

$44m, with revenue to be recognised across FY26 / FY27

•Margin %: margin normalised and in line with expectations

following an elevated FY24 from a single project

Revenue (NZ$m)

Margin (NZ$m)

Margin (%)

30%

14%

25%

11%

31%

19.8

29.4

39.8

36.0

31.4

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

6.1

3.3

5.6

10.6

7.9

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 27
Environmental, Social and

Governance

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 28
Environmental, Social and Governance

ESG Focus Areas

Employee

Retention &

Engagement

Employee

Safety &

Wellbeing

Diversity

& Inclusion

Governance

Customer

Experience

GHG EmissionsClimate Change

Sustainable

Procurement

Product

Innovation

People - Building an engaged,

diverse, and talented workforce.

Sustainability Report and

Climate-Related

Disclosures now fully

integrated into the Annual

Report, aligning with

global best practice

Achieved a 9.1% emissions

reduction compared to

FY22 Base, keeping us

firmly on track to deliver

on our 30% reduction

target by 2030

Scott Women in

Engineering Scholarship

now in its third year, with

two internships offered

in 2025

Unified global systems

under One Scott,

enhancing transparency,

efficiency, and connectivity

across regions to support

sustainable growth

Global engagement survey

achieved an 85% participation

rate – leading to 40 culture

improvement actions across

the group

Purpose - Growing profitable business

focused on long-term growth.

Place - Committed to promoting sustainable

practices for a better environment.

*ESG Focus areas are based on the 2024 Double Materiality assessment that identifying what matters to internal stakeholders, customers and wider ecosystem.

FY26 Transitional Plan priorities

addressing severe weather risks,

securing raw materials, and

strengthening freight resilience

embedding climate insights into

strategy and capital deployment

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 29
Health and Safety

•450 proactive engagements, marking a 59%

increase in safety conversations and Site

Safety Walks

•815 hazards were reported and fixed across

Scott’s global operations, with 96%

successfully resolved

•There were 125 First Aid EP&D and Near

Miss reports, representing a 29% increase

from FY24

•62 SafeMate nominations were submitted

globally, with many employees recognised for

exemplifying Scott’s six safety expectations

In FY25, we advanced the integration of health, safety, and wellbeing

into everyday work:

•Refreshed group Health, Safety, Well-being,

and Environment (HSWE) standards with

clearly defined responsibility and

accountability in each process

•Existing Scott domains (MHL, Rocklabs,

Appliances) achieved ISO 45001

recertification. Protein sites are now

completing gap assessments in preparation

for certification

•Bowtie risk assessment workshops covering

potential energy across five regions

In FY26, we will bring the HSWE further with a modernised OneScott platform, QR codes linking

directly to risk guides, and real-time access for all employees across devices. Behavioural safety

will be at the centre of our engagement approach, emphasising leader-led safety conversations,

peer checks, feedback, and recognition shifting from compliance to genuine commitment.

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 30
Looking Forward

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 31
Improved order in take and forward work position

•Positive trend of order in take in last three

quarters of FY25 following a soft FY24

•Key recent wins for Appliances, MHL and Protein

•Increased order in take in FY25 provides greater

momentum starting the new financial year

compared to prior year

•Current forward work comprises a mix of higher

margin work

Note: forward work represents secured work that has not been recognized as revenue.

Orders can span over multiple reporting periods

111

119

122

172

165

179

135

136

139

146

4

9

10

19

19

16

26 24

26

23

115

128

132

191

184

195

161

160

165

169

HY21FY21HY22FY22HY23FY23HY24FY24HY25FY25

SalesSalesOrder intake

Snapshot of forward work over-time ($m)

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 32
Contract wins and market outlook

Recent contract wins and opportunities

•Since Investor Day 2025, we have announced securing $44m across two appliance contracts in the USA and Brazil,

in addition to the multiple MHL projects in Europe totaling +$19m and a contract to install an existing LEAP Primal

System for Dawn Meats UK – Scott Protein’s first UK install

•We are progressing well toward securing several other opportunities that we expect to realise in the first half of

the year

Market outlook

•We enter FY26 with improved order momentum and a solid pipeline of secured work and future opportunities

across domains, supported by ongoing demand for automation and productivity solutions

•Over the coming year, we expect revenue growth, continued earnings leverage and incremental wins in projects

and lifecycle services

•However, we remain cautious with the macro volatility that persists and any impact this may have on customers’

investment plans over the next 12 months

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 33
Closing comments

Record EBITDA:driven by a clear focus on margin-accretive projects and modular approach

Destination 2030 strategy: sets a plan for sustainable profitable growth focused on our customers

Customer first: culture change to lead a new era of Scott Technology

Positive signs of acceleration: strong second half growth andearly signs of strategy success

Forward work uplift: recent contracts showing positive signs with $169m of forward work

Market outlook: positive momentum heading into FY26 with a clear path forward

Scott Technology Limited: FY25 Results | 34
Thank You

---

Results announcement
(for Equity Security issuer/Equity and Debt Security issuer)

Updated as at June 2023



Please do not amend or delete individual rows. As this template relates to prescribed content, changes to content

should only be made where it is clearly indicated that this is permitted, otherwise, if an Issuer considers a particular

element does not apply, mark the row as N/A, Any other changes to this prescribed form must first be approved by

NZX as required under NZX Listing Rule 3.26.1.


Results for announcement to the market

Name of issuer Scott Technology Ltd

Reporting Period 12 months to 31 August 2025

Previous Reporting Period 12 months to 31 August 2024

Currency NZD

Amount (000s) Percentage change

Revenue from continuing

operations

$275,273 (0.3)%

Total Revenue $277,236 (0.5)%

Net profit/(loss) from

continuing operations

$14,213 84%

Total net profit/(loss) $14,213 84%

Interim/Final Dividend

Amount per Quoted Equity

Security

$0.05000000

Imputed amount per Quoted

Equity Security

$0.00000000

Record Date 6 November 2025

Dividend Payment Date 19 November 2025

Current period Prior comparable period

Net tangible assets per

Quoted Equity Security

$0.740 $0.564

A brief explanation of any of

the figures above necessary

to enable the figures to be

understood

For commentary on the results please refer to the commentary

in the related NZX release. Further information is also set out in

the audited financial statements of the Company for the 12

months to 31 August 2025 which accompanies this information.

Authority for this announcement

Name of person


authorised

to make this announcement

Mark O’Malley, Chief Financial Officer

Contact person for this

announcement

Mark O’Malley

Contact phone number 03 478 8110

Contact email address m.omalley@scottautomation.com

Date of release through MAP


21 October 2025


Audited financial statements accompany this announcement.

---

Distribution Notice






Please note: all cash amounts in this form should be provided to 8 decimal places


Section 1: Issuer information

Name of issuer Scott Technology Limited

Financial product name/description Ordinary shares

NZX ticker code SCT

ISIN (If unknown, check on NZX

website)

NZSCTE0001S3

Type of distribution

(Please mark with an X in the

relevant box/es)

Full Year X Quarterly


Half Year Special

DRP applies X

Record date 6 November 2025

Ex-Date (one business day before the

Record Date)

5 November 2025

Payment date (and allotment date for

DRP)

19 November 2025

Total monies associated with the

distribution

1


$4,158,850

Source of distribution (for example,

retained earnings)

Retained earnings

Currency NZD

Section 2: Distribution amounts per financial product

Gross distribution

2

$0.05000000

Gross taxable amount

3

$0.05000000

Total cash distribution

4

$0.05000000

Excluded amount (applicable to listed

PIEs)

N/A

Supplementary distribution amount $0.00000000

Section 3: Imputation credits and Resident Withholding Tax

5


Is the distribution imputed Fully imputed

Partial imputation

No imputation


1

Continuous issuers should indicate that this is based on the number of units on issue at the date of the form

2

“Gross distribution” is the total cash distribution plus the amount of imputation credits, per financial product, before the deduction of

Resident Withholding Tax (RWT).

3

“Gross taxable amount” is the gross distribution minus any excluded income.

4

“Total cash distribution” is the cash distribution excluding imputation credits, per financial product, before the deduction of RWT.

This should include any excluded amounts, where applicable to listed PIEs.

5

The imputation credits plus the RWT amount is 33% of the gross taxable amount for the purposes of this form. If the distribution is

fully imputed the imputation credits will be 28% of the gross taxable amount with remaining 5% being RWT. This does not constitute

advice as to whether or not RWT needs to be withheld.



If fully or partially imputed, please

state imputation rate as % applied

6


0%

Imputation tax credits per financial

product

$0.00000000

Resident Withholding Tax per

financial product

$0.33000000

Section 4: Distribution re-investment plan (if applicable)

DRP % discount (if any)

1.0%

Start date and end date for

determining market price for DRP

07/11/2025 11/11/2025

Date strike price to be announced (if

not available at this time)

17/11/2025

Specify source of financial products to

be issued under DRP programme

(new issue or to be bought on market)

New issue

DRP strike price per financial product

Not available at this time

Last date to submit a participation

notice for this distribution in

accordance with DRP participation

terms

7/11/2025

Section 5: Authority for this announcement

Name of person


authorised to make

this announcement

Mark O’Malley, Chief Financial Officer

Contact person for this

announcement

Mark O’Malley, Chief Financial Officer

Contact phone number 03 478 8110

Contact email address m.omalley@scottautomation.com

Date of release through MAP


21 October 2025






6

Calculated as (imputation credits/gross taxable amount) x 100. Fully imputed dividends will be 28% as a % rate applied.

Data sourced from publicly available filings. Our datasets may not be complete. Automated analysis can produce errors. If you believe any data on this page is incorrect, please contact us at hello@nzxplorer.co.nz. For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.